User talk:Soaper1234

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Soaper1234}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Hello! Welcome to the talk page of Soaper1234!

Archives

2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021

Orphaned non-free image File:Nancy Osborne.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nancy Osborne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| June 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Josh Hudson

Hello! Your submission of Josh Hudson at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:17, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Love your work on Jade Lovall! Nice to see my favourite Casualty character recognised.

– Meena • 15:49, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I enjoyed creating that one and was glad to get it finished! Soaper1234 - talk 20:39, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ash

Source dumping :p

[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]Rain the 1 19:48, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Raintheone: Thank you so much!! Soaper1234 - talk 20:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Casualty (Marcus Fidel)

Hi Soaper1234, hope your well.

Just to clarify that Marcus' last appearance was just under a month ago, and he is not credited to appear in any more episodes since then, and considering that the new characters are joining, and that the storylines are moving on, as well as a six-week timejump in the next episode, I think it's safe to say that Marcus isn't returning any time soon, obviously, therefore he has made his final appearance for now, he can remain in the departed recurring characters until he returns, just like other recurring characters such as Natalia Malinovsky and Luca Malinovsky who make sporadic appearances, but are billed as recurring characters.

Kind Regards, MediDude4345 MediDude4345 (talk) 21:15, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MediDude4345: Do we know for certain that Marcus has left though? If he has then that's fine. Also, characters like Natalia and Luka should be included in recurring characters as they are making "sporadic appearances", aka being recurring characters. Soaper1234 - talk 20:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In my eyes, a recurring character is a character who appears continuously. Natalia last appeared in June 2022, leaving six months between her last appearance, Luka last appeared over a year ago before last week. And it's not exactly certain, but highly likely, given that it's now been five episodes without the character, which would constitute their final appearance (for now). Personally, a recurring character to me is someone who appears in at least two of the four episodes a month, with some gaps, but none longer than a month. MediDude4345 (talk) 20:41, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MediDude4345: As characters who have been proven to appear here and there, I think it would be best to keep them as recurring characters. Plus, with Faith's new story, it is possible that we could see more of them. A recurring character is a character who "frequently appears from time to time during the series' run"; this seems like an accurate description for Faith's children. Soaper1234 - talk 20:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Faith's episode was a flashback episode, and the two don't make any other appearances within this month, if you read the cast list. I think they may well come back in the future, and I'm happy for them to be listed as recurring. But Marcus Fidel should remain in Last Appearance as his last appearance aired a month ago. MediDude4345 (talk) 20:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus' last appearance was a month ago? You can continue to include characters in lists for more than one calendar year if there is no source to support an actors permanent departure. There is no source confirming a permanent departure, is there? I had to comment after reading your edit summary stating it "will remain as my edit for now until a conclusion is reached." Says who? You or the consensus of countless Wikipedia editors?Rain the 1 23:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MediDude4345: If Marcus' exit is sourced then he can be moved, but I don't think it has been reported in the media. As Raintheone has said, without a source, he can remain there, per the general consensus. Soaper1234 - talk 15:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, this comment wasn't left to cause offence or anything like that, it simply wasn't meant too. What I meant by that was until we had discussed it. Being fairly new to Wikipedia, mistakes can happen, so I apologise for that. If you all agree, then it can be changed back, apologies for any inconvenience caused. MediDude4345 (talk) 16:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MediDude4345: Don't worry. I know it wasn't intended to cause offence and it is understandable to make mistakes. All sorted now though. Soaper1234 - talk 13:52, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jacob Masters.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jacob Masters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jodie Whyte

Hello Soaper, I hope you're well! I just wanted to let you know that I plan on making a article for Jodie due to the sheer amount of dramatic content she's already had within 4 months, I've never seen anything like it. Depending on the content I can get in, it may be published soon or it may be a gradual work in progress like my drafts for Anna Knight and Nina Bulsara. Just thought I'd let you know in case you were planning on it (or let me know if you already are and I'll abandon plans) - my first Casualty character article! – Meena • 19:39, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Meena: I'm sorry. I thought I had replied to this! Great plan for an article. Looking forward to reading the finished product. Soaper1234 - talk 19:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank you for creating Chantelle Atkins! An Actor for her was needed and is very important to UK television and your hard work is really appreciated. Well done! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 23:57, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Soaper1234 - talk 19:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Soaps improvement drive

Hello, I pinged you on the WP:SOAPS talk page about this so sorry to double on the message but I want to get as many on-board for this as it's ambitious, even for me. Due to the recent surge in scrutiny on soap articles, we all need to come together and improve soap articles, so I've created an improvement drive with dates and articles for the soap WikiProject to focus on improving articles each week. Right now, it's focused on Hollyoaks, but the plan is to keep it going until we get to each soap. I did not include a section to sign up as I didn't want editors to feel that they are signing their life away and are expected to edit the articles mercilessly. I hope for some level of dedication but it's not a drive with huge pressure. Are you interested in joining in? – Meena • 11:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Meena: Yes, it is a shame that this is happening to WP:SOAPS. I'll respond on the talk page, but I would like to say how some articles have been included on the clean up that are not in need of a clean up. I'll try to help where possible, but I'm not online lots. Soaper1234 - talk 19:04, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chantelle Atkins

On 29 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chantelle Atkins, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that EastEnders producers decided to kill off Chantelle Atkins at the conclusion of a domestic-abuse plot after learning of the high statistic of women killed by a partner? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chantelle Atkins. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chantelle Atkins), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A question about your recent edit.

I can see why you reverted some of my edits, but why did you remove the redirects of Chris Clenshaw? You remove the redirects for Chris Clenshaw for both when it was the first time his name was mentioned in a segment, and when his name was mentioned in the references. So, what was the reason you remove the redirects?

Happy New Year's Eve tomorrow in the meantime. 174.44.191.134 (talk) 23:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@174.44.191.134: Oops, my mistake! I've fixed it now. Thank you for pointing it out. Happy New Year to you too. Soaper1234 - talk 00:35, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Alina Pop

Hello, Soaper1234,

Thank you for creating Alina Pop.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi Soaper1234. This article would benefit from inclusion in additional appropriate categories. Please also explain in he lede sentence what show this character is from.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bastun: Hello. I have not created this article - it was Geb2355. I created the initial redirect to a list entry. However, the page has now been reverted back to a redirect as not enough work had been done to create it. Soaper1234 - talk 19:21, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, my bad! Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 19:25, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Episode 1093" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Episode 1093 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 12 § Episode 1093 until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 05:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warren Finn

Hello there, I will perhaps make a third attempt of writing a section on the EastEnders character Warren Finn when he has appeared a few times and when potentially there is more to be said about his character by cast members and critics. EmmerdaleFan2001 (talk) 09:37, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@EmmerdaleFan2001: Hello. I think that is the best idea. As it stands, there isn't enough information about the actual character. If more information appears then by all means, please create a section. Soaper1234 - talk 20:13, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did create a section and I believe you made some changes to it. However I must ask, how come the info boxes of certain characters aren't allowed to be shown. Is there a reason for this? - out of curiosity. EmmerdaleFan2001 (talk) 14:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Halfway (EastEnders).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Halfway (EastEnders).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]