User talk:Soaper1234/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Soaper1234. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archives

2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020

List of Casualty characters - impending changes

Hi - I added Kathleen "Dixie" Dixon to the impending changes because I have been told by the Casualty publicist that she will be departing on the 30th January this year so I don't understand why you removed it as the link given says that she is departing. You will see that next Saturday Dixie leaves the show and that I was correct - I won't just add any characters to the impending changes unless I get confirmation first from the BBC, you did the same with Tess Bateman when I added her to impending changes and I was right then as well - your not the only editor on that page so others are allowed to make changes. Dannysage96 (talk) 21:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

@Dannysage96: I actually didn't remove Dixie at all. I simply moved Dixie from the bottom of the table to the second row, as it is arranged it order of the impending cast changes date. Also, I have left your link there and not changed it. I do not doubt your website is a poor one and believe you have achieved a good standard of success. Also, I cannot recall removing Tess from the table, nor you ever having added a link to her departure from your website. I am aware I am not the only editor only the page and have never said or implied I was. Soaper1234 (talk) 21:26, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

I didn't realise that you had moved Dixie from the bottom of the table as on my phone it wasn't showing her at all on that table for impending changes - sorry for accusing you if removing her & Tess but it was someone else who kept removing Tess. Sorry again.Dannysage96 (talk) 08:09, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

It's all good. We all make mistakes from time to time. :) Soaper1234 (talk) 09:41, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

February 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Kate Oates, from its old location at User:Soaper1234/Kate Oates. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 14:31, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kate Oates has been accepted

Kate Oates, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

RadioFan (talk) 01:51, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

"Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request" - this is why I think it's silly that userspace drafts are being moved into draftspace by users other than the user whose userspace the draft is in! I am sure Soaper1234 would have moved the draft from userspace to mainspace him/herself if someone else hadn't moved it to draftspace first. Anemone Projectors 12:53, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi @AnemoneProjectors:, I have previously noticed requests for a pages to be moved by yourself on your talk page. I was wondering whether in future, I could ask for yourself to do that myself. Thanks Soaper1234 (talk) 17:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Well I noticed you did ask but then removed the request - I assumed you had done so because you realised you could move the page yourself because it didn't yet exist in the mainspace, but then it got moved to the draftspace instead! So if you have a page in your userspace that is ready to go to mainspace, always check if you can move it yourself first, if not then you're welcome to ask me - Raintheone and JuneGloom07 always do! There is a more official way but those guys know me... Anemone Projectors 22:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

@AnemoneProjectors: Thanks for that, I'll know to do that in the future. Soaper1234 (talk) 16:10, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Dylan in Casualty

Are you sure? I'm pretty sure I remember him being referred to as a consultant and his name badge saying that from his first appearance. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

@Necrothesp: Hi, I'm sure he was, also if you notice in Casualty (series 25), it states Dylan was a Trust Grade Doctor, but was promoted throughout the series to Consultant. Soaper1234 (talk) 15:58, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm not. I also have no memory of him being promoted. We can't use one Wikipedia article to source another. In fact, I'm not very sure about a number of the grades of characters listed in these articles. It seems to me in many cases that editors have added what they think the grades should be instead of what the programme says they are. For a start, I don't recall any doctor in Casualty ever being referred to as a "trust grade doctor". Registrar, yes. Consultant, yes. SHO (when they existed), yes. Most other grades? No. I think a lot of it is editors' knowledge of the NHS being imposed on the series when it's not actually stated. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

@Necrothesp: If you feel so strongly about the role of the characters, please feel free to change them. I was under the impression that Dylan was formerly a Trust Doctor, but if you are adamant he is not, adjust accordingly. Soaper1234 (talk) 19:01, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Cast lists

Hi, can I ask why you've removed the numbers of appearances for the cast in the lists of EastEnders episodes we were working on? Were they incorrect? Anemone Projectors 21:56, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

@AnemoneProjectors: Hi AP, the user who posted the count was not happy we stole their work and did not reference it so I offered to remove it in favour of the alphabetised list. Soaper1234 (talk) 22:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

How did they know? I don't think a cast count can be "stolen", can it? It's technically not a reliable source anyway, so couldn't be referenced, so it's probably for the best. Anemone Projectors 07:05, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

@AnemoneProjectors: Kelvin posted a message in the forum and they saw everything. I went on to say how I would personally remove their work. I suppose it wasn't really fair to steal their work and I have apologised to them. Soaper1234 (talk) 08:52, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

User:ElectrodeandtheAnode/sandbox

Hi Soaper1234, I was wondering if you could have a look at a newly updated Casualty (TV series) article I sandboxed. I did this because I felt that Casualty's Main Page needed updating massively. Any chance you could tell me what you think of it? ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 16:47, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi @ElectrodeandtheAnode: It is a good article that you have clearly worked on and it is worth uploading. My only feedback is maybe talk about some events/episodes that have happened in the past (the early days, if you will). You should also possibly avoid adding statements like 'the most recent thing of this to happen was' and stick to adding some examples of these things across the 30 series. Other than that, a great article! Soaper1234 (talk) 20:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much Soaper1234, and may I also take this opportunity to thank you for your recent, very constructive edits on Casualty (series 30). Do you have any suggestions with regards to past events and episodes? If you want to feel free to add the information into my sandboxed article. Thank you again, and thank you very much for replying! ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 22:27, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi @ElectrodeandtheAnode: It is no problem, I've been reading your article in more depth and as I go through it, I've been adding bits. I do hope that is ok and if it isn't, please let me know. Thanks for asking me about the project in the first place. Soaper1234 (talk) 14:12, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

That is not problem at all, Soaper1234, your edits have been constructive and only enhanced the article further. Please continue to upgrade the article if you feel it still needs tweaking here and there. I mainly began the project because I thought, considering the show is reaching its thirtieth milestone this September, the main article itself deserved an upgrade with more information and citations. Thank you for helping me out with the project, and hopefully the project will be ready soon and we can update the current main article! ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 14:32, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello again, do you think the Casualty article is ready to be updated? We can re-add any lost images once the article has been updated. Hope you're keeping well. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 10:12, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Steven Beale (2016).jpg

Hi, I'm afraid you can't display this image on your user page because it is fair-use, and you have stated "The file will only be used on the stated page" which is Steven Beale, not your user page. Non-free images are only allowed in the mainspace. Thanks :-) anemone projectors 09:15, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

My apologies @AnemoneProjectors:, I had totally forgotten, it has been removed now. Soaper1234 (talk) 10:07, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I was sure you must have known, sometimes easy to forget things :-) anemone projectors 10:18, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Mary-Claire Carter

Hello there. I just wondered if you were going to do anymore work on Mary-Claire Carter? I did want to restore the redirect but noticed you had done some work on it. There is too much development information in the lead section and it needs expanding atleast 5x - but as you previously worked on it perhaps it is something you are interested in doing? She was a great character and deserves a great article, as I'm sure you agree.Rain the 1 23:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Raintheone: I had been working on creating a page for Mary-Claire last year and that was as far as I had got to. I immediately uplodaded the work when I saw the page then, but never returned to it. All I did was improve what was there effectively. Now, I wouldn't have any plans for expanding it further and you may as well as redirect it. Soaper1234 (talk) 06:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Okay, no worries. I think I will wait a little longer in case someone else adds information.Rain the 1 10:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bridge Street Market.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bridge Street Market.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 23 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Kate Oates page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Hollyoaks

Hello there. Where did you find the surname of Diego's sister, Maria?Rain the 1 22:48, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Raintheone: I couldn't find one in any of the spoilers she was mentioned in, but when I checked Diego Salvador Martinez Hernandez De La Cruz, it said Maria De La Cruz so I presumed she had been referenced on-screen as so. If not, it can always be changed. Soaper1234 (talk) 08:42, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Okay no problem - he has referred to her about twice but only as Maria. She probably has a similar long name but we should only use Maria until we know for sure.Rain the 1 11:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Casualty (series 30)

Hello again, apologies I've come to your talk page again, however I came here because I know you contribute frequently to the Casualty (series 30) article. I was just wondering, do you think the notes at the end of some of the summaries in episodes where characters arrive or depart are necessary? I ask this because there is a whole character section dedicated to the cast of Casualty and in addition to this there is also, in brackets, the episode dates when characters arrive and depart. As the characters section of the article is so well developed, do you think those notes are truly a necessity?

As well as this, is there a possibility we're overlinking parts of the article? I mean, I've seen a few characters which have been linked a multiple number of times. Or is there no problem with linking suitable links more than once?

I would have asked this on the series' talk page - however I've seen that previous users have left messages which have been unanswered on the talk page, so I thought if I came here then I'd have a greater chance of having a response. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 22:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

@ElectrodeandtheAnode: Hi again, no problem coming here, I'm sorry I didn't reply to your other message. I'm still trying to add extra information to the article, but hopefully soon. I do believe the note section is unneccesary for character movement, but helpful for a reason to why an episode may be aired on a Sunday etc. I am terrible when it comes to overlinking. However, on that topic I was thinking about this the other day. I believe that if for example has been linked in the characters section, they shouldn't be linked again in that section. But, if the character was referenced again in the Production section, include a link to them. So basically, 1 link to the page per section. The talk page for the page isn't used well, but thanks for asking me about it. Soaper1234 (talk) 10:07, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

That's fine, I've been searching around for extra information too. I mean considering the wealth of the character section, I believe that the notes are not definitely unnecessary – I'd say delete them, personally. I agree with the latter of your comment and would agree in saying the notes are appropriate and helpful for reasoning behind episodes airing a day later. With regards to the overlinking once again I agree with the idea of one hyperlink per section. I'll scan through the article in a bit and remove any overlinks of characters/information in a section, although if we do remove repetitive links in one section, does that mean removing character links found in the developed paragraphs beneath the character lists? Thank you for your cooperation. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 15:19, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Hiya, just came back to this old post as my question here regards Series 30. I've seen on various articles that episode references aren't necessary once an episode has aired, does that mean we should get rid of the references for the individual episodes, or are they fine remaining referenced? ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 21:16, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

@ElectrodeandtheAnode: Hi again, sorry for the delayed response. I would leave the references to each episode as they are quite helpful. Soaper1234 (talk) 16:26, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

I'm back! Come to this section again because I don't want to keep making new sections for your talk page. I've looked through the Casualty (series 30) article, and was thinking: we should make the article a GA-class article. I was thinking of seeing if it could be reviewed against GA standards to see what we need to do to improve the article. I came here because I wondered what you thought of the article? It's already a B-class, I think it could easily become a GA-class, definitely soon. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 22:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

@ElectrodeandtheAnode: Hi again, no worries - may as well discuss the series 30 article in the series 30 section haha. I think it would be worth trying for a GA standard, maybe if you created a topic within Talk:Casualty (series 30) and pinged myself, June and Rain to see some more opinions? Soaper1234 (talk) 18:40, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

User:ElectrodeandtheAnode/Casualty (series 31)

Hello there! Just thought I'd let you know that today I felt we had enough information to create the new thirty-first series article. I've requested for its creation but that could be a little while before it's accepted, so I thought I'd just let you know that there is now an article draft for Casualty (series 31). All the best. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 15:34, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

@ElectrodeandtheAnode: That's a fantastic article Electrode! You have proven yourself to be a valuable Wikipedia editor and you are a fantastic asset to the Casualty project. Note on series 31 article, the article stating that Hanssen/Jac/Fletch would appear in the 30th anniversary also stated that we would see "well-loved faces from the past return" and Duffy and Josh have so far been confirmed to return (for Josh, see List of Casualty characters). I would also advise that you create a user page to show off your created articles, what topics you are following etc. Kind regards, Soaper1234 (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your kind words, Soaper1234! I didn't realise Josh would be returning too, I'll add him to the Cast section in a bit, is there a source for his return do you know? I'm going to make a user page tonight I think, I've never gotten round to doing it, I keep forgetting! ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 19:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

@ElectrodeandtheAnode: It's not a problem Electrode (I do hope you don't mind me calling you that). It's located in the article, it is on the actor's Spotlight page. I look forward to seeing some more of your work and also, I enjoyed your work on the series 29 finale episode. Soaper1234 (talk) 19:10, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Not at all, Soaper1234. Thank you, I'll hunt down that source now and add Josh. And thank you again! I remember seeing a collection of articles on the series 29 finale and I thought the episode was pretty big in itself, and there was certainly a bit to talk about! I was thinking of perhaps making an article for the 1000th episode, but the only thing is I don't want to overdo it on the article for episode creations, and I can almost certainly see an article being made dedicated to "Too Old for This Shift" considering it's a feature-length episode and the thirtieth anniversary! Also, I found an article in the Daily Mail newspaper for Casualty the other day, so I've been expanding the main sandboxed article for Casualty that little bit more. Still a few more facts to add, but I think the article is looking wonderful! I cannot thank you enough for helping me with the article, you've been wonderful! Keep up the excellent work yourself. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 20:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

@ElectrodeandtheAnode: Hi, I've noticed somebody has created a page for series 31, however it is very poor and not a scratch. I'm going to ask someone I know if they can move your page into the official space as the official series 31 page. I hope you don't mind, I should infact speed the process along. Soaper1234 (talk) 16:19, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

I said to myself last night as soon as I sent the article to be reviewed that I should have just made the page official immediately. Not sure why I didn't do that in the first place. Thank you very much, that's very kind of you! P.S. - I couldn't find the article regarding Josh's return for the thirtieth anniversary, I was wondering if you could possibly add his character with a source for me, if you wouldn't mind? ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 16:24, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Josh's return was the actor's spotlight page (http://www.spotlight.com/interactive/cv/1/M1597.html). Looking further into it, it suggests no official confirmation that he returns for 30th anniversary, same with Tess Bateman (http://www.spotlight.com/interactive/cv/0211-6756-5535). Both don't official confirm returns for 31, but it seems very likely and so, we can only speculate. Soaper1234 (talk) 16:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so, so much for getting the Series 31 article moved over to the mainspace, I honestly cannot thank you enough! And thank you, keep up your excellent work, Soaper1234. Keep well! ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 16:58, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Not a problem @ElectrodeandtheAnode: It was pleasure, your work is fantastic! I've left something on your talk page for all your hardwork - you really deserve it! Soaper1234 (talk) 20:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

You're too kind, Soaper1234, thank you very much! Your kind words have really made my day, I look forward to hopefully collaborating with you more in the future! All the best, and keep well! (Not to put a downer on anything too soon... but it appears we have a slight problem on the Series 31 page already... a lot of edits from unregistered users already! I think it may be worth keeping a close eye on the edit history for a while...) ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 20:29, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Not a problem and thank you. I look forward to working with you in the future - hopefully finshing off this Casualty article! :P I've added to my watchlist to keep an eye out for vandalism... Soaper1234 (talk) 20:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Yes, hopefully it'll be finished soon and we can update the main page – it really does need an update, I looked at the current main page last night and there's so much content which we have in the sandbox which isn't there in the article at the moment, who knew investing just that little extra time researching would help the article come such a way along? Ah brilliant! I've added it to my watchlist as well, hopefully the unsourced and sometimes disruptive edits will die down soon. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 16:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Too Old for This Shift and note

Me again! Just wanted to let you know I won't be very (if at all) active on Wikipedia from 6 August 2016 until 22 August 2016. If I am active, I'll only be able to edit via my phone (but...I'm not a fan of mobile edits!) so I may be inactive for the next two weeks. In case you haven't seen it yet, I created an article for "Too Old for This Shift" and was wondering if you could keep a close eye on the article for me just in case, by any chance, it is vandalised. I have recently issued a disruptive editing warning to a user because of their continuous unsourced editing, so hopefully it will stop now. Anyway, all the best. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 20:45, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi @ElectrodeandtheAnode: I have seen it, don't worry - I'll add it to my watchlist. It looks like a promising article. Soaper1234 (talk) 20:56, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm thinking, along with a reception and plot section (potentially images? If there are any we can use) that the article could become a GA class article. I decided to create it now because of the wealth of information there is on the production of the episode already. Hopefully we can make it a GA, maybe an FA? I did look at several Featured Article episode articles today as I was working on the article so I could make it as encyclopedic as possible right off the bat and to try and avoid deletion of the article. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 21:05, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

@ElectrodeandtheAnode: A plot and reception will be a fantastic addition, if you notice articles such as I'll Walk You Home include a promotion section and a good example of a good article featuring a show's episode is EastEnders Live. I'm aware that although not everything can be added yet, so that is slightly tricky. Adding a cast section could also be vital and splitting the production into various aspects such as Cast, Background, Filming and Broadcast. The reception section could also include the pre-broadcast hype, ratings, award nominations and the critic's response. I think with the correct level of dedication (which I'm reassured you will provide) the article will quickly recieve a good article position. Soaper1234 (talk) 21:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Brilliant idea! Just read through the EastEnders Live article and it really is exceptional. Definitely determined to make the article as good as possible. It is a little difficult at the moment you're right, but I have no doubt this hype is going to pay off, and that many more articles are yet to be created surrounding this episode. I'm wondering if the trailer should be added to the Production section now as it has been aired already and is a regular advertisement on the BBC One channel already. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 21:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

@ElectrodeandtheAnode: The trailer would make a great start to the promotion section, but don't worry about that now - enjoy your holiday and it can be sorted upon your return! I'm actually wondering now whether you may have been better leaving the article in draft space until plots, development was added/expanded... Soaper1234 (talk) 21:53, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, I will! That might have been a better idea actually, I did consider it but then decided just to go ahead with the article, didn't really think it through properly at the time unfortunately. Please, if you can, keep the article as up-to-date as possible! I think the stunt which going to air will have quite a few articles dedicated to it too (particularly from Digital Spy and Radio Times) so that will help expand the article that little bit more too. I've been looking for as many primary and secondary sources as possible to use as well as it was so easy just to reference information from Digital Spy and the BBC. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 21:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Just thought I'd let you know the 'Who's Who' has been released in the Inside Soap magazine. If I gave you all the information needed to fill in the cite journal tag do you think you could switch the refs to the Who's Who for me? I would do it but it is SO hard to edit on a mobile phone. Anyway, here's the information for the tag: date: 6—12 August 2016, title: Who's Who?, journal: Inside Soap, issue: 31, page: 83. Don't worry if you don't get round to doing it, I'll do it when I get back. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 15:05, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

@ElectrodeandtheAnode: Hi! Hope you're enjoying your holiday! The 'Who's Who' section of Inside Soap magazine can't actually be considered to source the cast of series 31 until we reach the week 27 August — 2 September because that is when the episode airs. I found it quite strange because normally when the programme isn't airing due to a break (like Casualty are doing), they don't include it in the magazine. When the 27 Aug-2 Sept magazine is released on 23rd, we can add it in, but until then we can not. Soaper1234 (talk) 20:52, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

I just looked back through the Who's Who? and realised Rita is still credited, so yeah I see what you mean now. I'm having a great time thank you, it's so lovely to get away from reality for a few weeks. Good job on your swift reverting of vandalism edits again by the way, you're doing a fantastic job. I'll probably make a few random edits over the next week if I get a chance, but I'm liking the Series 31 article. I feel like we should do Cast Overview sections for Series 30, 29 and 28 as well, but I can do them if you don't want to. Keep up the great work. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 23:36, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

@ElectrodeandtheAnode: Thanks for that and don't worry about editing - enjoy your holiday! The Cast Overview section is just a fancier way of setting out the cast paragraph which is featured at the bottom of series 30 article, but I'll try and set it out as an overview section for series 30, 29 and 28. Soaper1234 (talk) 10:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

To All in this Section, I am here to tell you that Too Old for This Shift is a SINGLE episode. It is a special episode to celebrate the 30th Anniversary of Casualty and it is the FIRST episode of Series 31. It is NOT episode with episode 2. Episode 2 is called 'The Heaven's Lieutenant'. Please do not keep putting Too Old for This Shift as a double episode as it is NOT double episode.

Thank you for taking the time to read, Pug05 (talk) 13:10, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Finished the article! I wrote the reception section of the Casualty (series 31) article and I thought I'd copy it over to the episode article. Do you think there are any images we could possibly add? If we get the article copyedited and then have one final read through, I reckon the article could be put up either for a GA nomination or even FA nomination. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 17:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Super! Go for it! I think adding an image of one or two actors who reappeared in the episode would be good. Soaper1234 (talk) 18:10, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Updating the Casualty (TV Series) article

Hope you're having a nice holiday, Soaper1234! I came here to ask you if you thought the sandbox version of the updated Casualty (TV Series) article was anywhere closer to being ready to be put on the main, published article. I've updated the sandbox again recently, adding the air ambulance crash controversy and cleaning-up the article a bit (definitely needs a final clean-up before we do finally move the article). What do you think of the article? Would you say it's getting close to being ready to update? Have a nice rest of your holiday, by the way! ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 18:10, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi @ElectrodeandtheAnode:, I am thank you - a nice little break! I was looking over the article the other day and have added it to my mainpage to-do list. I think it could be good to see June and Rain's opinions on the article too. I think the article has a great chance of survival as an article. Soaper1234 (talk) 22:50, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Excellent, I'm glad to hear it! Ah that's kind of you, thank you. I've left a message on JuneGloom07's talk page, and she's replied, saying she'll have a closer look at the sandbox article soon. I'll leave a message on Raintheone's talk page as well. Thanks again! ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 18:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

@ElectrodeandtheAnode: I imagine June and Rain will be able to contribute a lot to the article revamp too. Soaper1234 (talk) 22:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I'd imagine so too. On the same note of sandbox articles, I began earlier this year looking at a potentially new style for the List of Casualty characters, if you have seen it, what do you think of it so far? I probably won't do anything more with sandbox version (at the moment) to be honest, as it was more of a play-around with the article primarily to see what a new table style would look like, but I feel like separating the references and notes would make it look neater and hopefully easier to read. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 10:57, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

@ElectrodeandtheAnode: I had noticed when looking at the Casualty article sandbox - a side note to that is that you can create pages under your username, for example a page I am creating for Alicia Munroe is located in one of my named sandboxes: User:Soaper1234/Alicia. I think alongside making the Casualty article a GA, making the List of Casualty characters page a FL. Soaper1234 (talk) 20:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I saw that – I'm just unsure as to how you actually create pages under your username, could you tell me how you do it please? (Hope you had a nice holiday!) ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 21:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

@ElectrodeandtheAnode: Simply type in the search box: User:ElectrodeandtheAnode/(article name, for example List of Casualty characters) where it should say "You may create the page "User:ElectrodeandtheAnode/(article name)", but consider checking the search result below to see whether the topic is already covered." Click the red link and begin the creation of the page. And thank you I did enjoy it! Soaper1234 (talk) 22:35, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Also, do you think (if you find the time) you would be able to take a look at the Alicia sandbox? I'm awaiting some Inside Soap magazine sources from Raintheone, but I was wondering if you could look at what is there to see if it is ok? Thanks, Soaper1234 (talk) 22:35, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for that – I'll turn them into pages under my name ASAP. Of course I can! I'll have a look now for you. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 16:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

@ElectrodeandtheAnode: Thanks, I really appreciate you looking over what is there. Soaper1234 (talk) 17:01, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

The article is looking good Soaper1234! I've made a few spelling corrections but other than that I think it's doing well. Keep up the good work! ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 17:15, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

@ElectrodeandtheAnode: Thanks so much for that Electrode! Soaper1234 (talk) 18:35, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

List of Holby City characters

Hi,

I have just made a few edits on this page & adding sources - then you are going right behind me & putting "unreliable source?" why are you putting that for as it's still a website that gives out news etc on this programme and have been correct with everything they have put so far, how about read the articles before you put that the source is unreliable.

I don't see you putting it down as unreliable when a source from holby.tv is used, they are a fan site. Dannysage96 (talk) 14:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

	Merry Christmas!
	Wishing you a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! x JuneGloom07 Talk 21:23, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks JuneGloom07! All my best for the Christmas period and beyond! Soaper1234 (talk) 21:31, 24 December 2016 (UTC)