User talk:Soaper1234/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Happy New Year, Soaper1234!

Happy New Year!

Soaper1234,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 00:35, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Thank you Davey2010. A Happy New Year to yourself too. Soaper1234 - talk 15:16, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Lofty Chiltern

Hello and apologies for my revert of your edit on the above. I'm afraid I got you mixed-up with the IP:86.833.92, who has been constantly altering BBC series and BBC News articles without any sources - and has been blocked multiple times. Regards and apologies, David, David J Johnson (talk) 12:22, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

@David J Johnson: Oh, no worries. I did wonder whether it had been a mistake since you had thanked my edit before reverting it! All the best, Soaper1234 - talk 12:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Holby

Hello again, Thanks for the reversion. The only reason I deleted was that it was made without reference or source by a IP who has been blocked multiple times for that reason. Regards, David J Johnson (talk) 21:58, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

No worries about it! The IP address is obviously vandalising pages and you have done an excellent job at tackling their edits. I suppose it just happened to be that this once, they were fine to do so! :P All the best, Soaper1234 - talk 22:10, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

DYK for John Gaskell

On 19 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Gaskell, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that fans noticed Doctor Who references in a promotional trailer for Paul McGann's first episode in Holby City as John Gaskell? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Gaskell. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John Gaskell), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 15:06, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your work on Jack Callahan

Hey Soaper1234, thanks so much for your cleanup on Jack Callahan! I will paraphrase those quotes ASAP so thanks for pointing that out. I am more running it for GA as it will point out the faults on the article so I can take it to its full potential as I want my first "proper article" on Wikipedia to be the best as it can be! This way I can go on to making more articles minus the mistakes. I only stated editing last year on Wikipedia so just bear with as I go through my teething stages! — Hatio93 ^Talk 07:15, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi Hatio93, no worries. I noticed how it had potential to be a great article but it just needed tidying up a bit. Like I stated, the article needs paraphrasing a lot as there were too many direct quotes, but we've all been there. Good luck for the future Soaper1234 - talk 19:53, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jack Callahan (Neighbours), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Star (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK for EastEnders in Paris

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Babe Smith

Hello I noticed you changed Babe's car back to a Robin, its not a Robin, its a Rialto. The shape is obvious enough as to the model and even Annette Badland herself refers to it as a Rialto. Have a look at http://www.reliant.website/rialto_hist.shtml — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.96.178.118 (talk) 22:55, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

I reverted the section on Babe's car because it is all unsourced. I think that a section on Babe's car is a great idea - it would just need sourcing and development. Also, do you have a source that states that Badland refers to the car as a Rialto? Soaper1234 - talk 07:31, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Hey

Hey there. With the new selection of Holby infobox pics could we perhaps use more of the promotional image? I believe they look better as they show the character's work uniform. Not an entire image, just a portion like used in Oliver, Sahira, Eddi, Guy etc.Rain the 1 17:39, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

@Raintheone: Yeah, I would be happy to do that. I don't really know why I only did the face if I'm honest as I've always preffered the slightly longer shots. Nice to see you back online by the way :) Soaper1234 - talk 19:38, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Updated! Hope they look ok :) Soaper1234 - talk 19:58, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

You sorted that quick and they look good now. By the way, it must be said that you did good work on John Gaskell. Thumbs up!Rain the 1 21:38, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Just a quick job! Thank you very much. I spotted an opportunity with all the sources and took it! Soaper1234 - talk 21:42, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Essie Harrison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Daily Star

List of Holby City characters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Daily Star

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Holby City (series 18), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Crossover and Bedside manner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Samathuvapuram

Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 23:05, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Soaper1234. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 18:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

And also

Hi Soaper1234, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 18:12, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Beeblebrox! Soaper1234 - talk 18:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Group Animal

Thank you for providing that promo image! - JuneGloom07 Talk 19:30, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

@JuneGloom07: Not a problem! It's a great article too - you should consider putting it up for GAN :) Soaper1234 - talk 06:34, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

You're the second person to say that! I'll take it to DYK first, then we'll see. - JuneGloom07 Talk 16:01, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

@JuneGloom07: It must be a sign! Soaper1234 - talk 17:18, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

I reckon so! Just wanted to let you know that an IP added a category to your Jez draft earlier, and that I added a colon to it, so the page wouldn't be categorised per WP:USERNOCAT. - JuneGloom07 Talk 17:05, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

@JuneGloom07: No worries - thank you for letting me know. Soaper1234 - talk 20:15, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Episode 1068

On 25 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Episode 1068, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that actor Jamie Davis asked his former co-star Sunetra Sarker to reprise her role for his departure in Episode 1068 of Casualty? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Episode 1068. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Episode 1068), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Louise Mitchell

Hello! Your submission of Louise Mitchell at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 12:51, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of List of Casualty specials

Hello! Your submission of List of Casualty specials at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! dawnleelynn^(talk) 03:52, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK for List of Casualty specials

On 9 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of Casualty specials, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Casualty's list of special episodes includes the first webisode for a BBC continuing drama? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of Casualty specials. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, List of Casualty specials), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

User talk:Raintheone

I think it might be wise to remove or strike the part of your comment that encourages the IP of a known sockpuppet to possibly try and circumvent their block. I probably shouldn't have left my reply tbh, but I'm putting that down to not thinking straight while ill. - JuneGloom07 Talk 21:45, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

@JuneGloom07: I presume you mean the bit about creating their own article? If so, consider it removed. I didn't realise they were sockpuppet - my apologises. Soaper1234 - talk 06:14, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

I wondered if you would like any What's on TV scans for Gaskell's article? However I do not think you are using the "email this user" feature on Preferences > Email confirmation?Rain the 1 18:03, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Raintheone. That would be brilliant, thank you. I've been meaning to update his article, but haven't yet got round to it. I'll update my preferences now. By the way, I've really liked your new articles recently - nice to add some older characters. Soaper1234 - talk 18:07, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. I plan to make some more too. I emailed you and once you reply you can receive the scans. They make it so complicated. lolRain the 1 13:22, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

@Raintheone: Replied. I shall look forward to seeing some more of these articles then :) Soaper1234 - talk 13:49, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

I shouldn't haven't assumed that you knew who they were, so apologies. That editor is the one who has been targeting our various drafts and talk pages. I don't know if you've seen that your Dylan Jenkins draft had to be protected, but they're the reason why. - JuneGloom07 Talk 17:44, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you JuneGloom07. If I had thought, I would have checked their contributions so thank you for telling me. I had noticed the Dylan draft being protected - it serves as a constant reminder that I never did anything with that! lol Soaper1234 - talk 17:49, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Every time they disrupt one of my drafts, it kinda puts me off finishing it, so I move on to creating something else in the meantime. - JuneGloom07 Talk 18:14, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

@JuneGloom07: I know what you mean. I've been tempted to do some drafts offline when they do this. Soaper1234 - talk 19:29, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

I've got so many drafts offline! I'm currently working on a couple right now. - JuneGloom07 Talk 19:38, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

I did all of List of Casualty specials offline, but that's been it. I might try some offline in the future. I shall look forward to seeing these articles at some point in the future then! Soaper1234 - talk 19:46, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Halfway

Hi!

Would you like Halfway protected to try and prevent this happening again?--5 albert square (talk) 19:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

@5 albert square: Well, if you wouldn't mind? Please and thank you. Soaper1234 - talk 20:01, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Talking of Halfway, did you get the 28 April – 4 May issue of Soaplife? There was a great bit of reception for him in there. - JuneGloom07 Talk 20:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

@JuneGloom07: No, I haven't got it - would you mind sharing it with me please? Soaper1234 - talk 20:28, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Sure. I'll email the quote to you, as it's probably a bit too much to copy out here. - JuneGloom07 Talk 20:30, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

@JuneGloom07: Thank you very much. Soaper1234 - talk 20:31, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Done! - JuneGloom07 Talk 20:38, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

@JuneGloom07: Thank you! Soaper1234 - talk 20:40, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

 Done Set to indefinite protection so just send me a message on my talk page when you'd like it removed :)--5 albert square (talk) 21:04, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

@5 albert square: Thank you! Soaper1234 - talk 21:07, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Emmerdale characters (2000), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gary Turner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Halfway (EastEnders).jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:37, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK

Did you know what’d be interesting? You edit the Chicago franchise pages quite a bit… why not make articles for half of the motive characters on it? Especially the likes of Alvin, Connor, Jay, Sylvie, Boden, Ruzek, Trudy, Daniel, Will, Gabby or Maggie? Just an idea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.235.124 (talk) 09:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I don't know if you have me mistaken for another user, but I haven't edited the Chicago franchise before. Therefore, I wouldn't be able to create any character pages. Soaper1234 - talk 15:17, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

User:AnemoneProjectors/Episodes 5710–5713

Thanks so much for moving that over, I had no idea I'd even created it in mainspace! And I made loads of edits since.... though I did wonder why at one point I got an error when trying to edit a section! That'll be why ;-) I'm so glad you noticed. — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 10:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

@AnemoneProjectors: No worries. I'm glad I came across that then! Good idea for an article - there is loads out there in terms of sources and I've seen a fair bit of reception too! Soaper1234 - talk 10:31, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Did you find it through my contributions or some other way? I know a lot of the regulars stalk my contribs but I'm happy that any errors I make get fixed (usually by you!). I should have thought about starting a draft for those episodes sooner, I'd probably have half the article already. But so far I've only watched the one episode (about to watch the next one now). I hope I have time to write this one! — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 10:37, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

@AnemoneProjectors: Your talkpage is on my watchlist (so therefore, your main page is too) and you adding the draft popped up. I noticed it was a redlink so checked your recent contributions and saw that you had created the draft, but in mainspace and moved it. I think you'll enjoy the episodes - very EastEnders if I may say and Bonnie Langford is one to watch! Soaper1234 - talk 12:14, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Excellent stuff, glad I added the red link then! I wasn't planning to start the draft straight away, but then I just typed it into the address bar. I would have probably clicked on the link to start it if I had done it in the future! — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 12:28, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Well I hope all goes well with the article regardless. Soaper1234 - talk 13:19, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Ethan Hardy.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Shakil's funeral

Hi,

Just to let you know I've created this article in userspace about the EastEnders episode covering Shakil's funeral. Apparently the episode will make part of TV history as it's the first time something like this has been done! I would be grateful of any help :)--5 albert square (talk) 20:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

@5 albert square: Brilliant idea! You beat me to it as I had been thinking about creating one. More than happy to help you out :) Soaper1234 - talk 21:11, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, I heard somewhere this week that it will be a British television first because it changes the format that EastEnders is usually screened in because it will have input from real-life victims of knife crime. A few reliable sources have said it will be British TV history because no British soap has done this before. I don't remember any soap doing it before! I'm hoping it will be quite a big episode. I'm wondering if they will try and get every current regular cast member with the exception of Dot in it? One of the reliable sources showed Kat at the church which I was surprised at as Kat didn't really know Shakil. I hope Brooke Kinsella is in the episode but that's going to be weird as she played Kelly! Hard to believe it's 10 years since her brother was murdered.--5 albert square (talk) 21:54, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

@5 albert square: There are so many questions as to how they will do this! I think I read a tweet from Brooke Kinsella saying her father would appear in one segment. I'll try to find it and drop it into the draft. Soaper1234 - talk 10:26, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Halfway (EastEnders)

On 29 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Halfway (EastEnders), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that actor Tony Clay was asked "Dude, what have you done?" on Twitter when his EastEnders character, Halfway, shot a popular character? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Halfway (EastEnders). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Halfway (EastEnders)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Louise Mitchell

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Hunter McQueen

Then I suggest you look up the Soap nomination. Pdineen03 (talk) 18:01, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

@Pdineen03: I'm aware he has been nominated, but you did not provide a source to back this up. Soaper1234 - talk 18:35, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Didn’t think I had to Pdineen03 (talk) 18:43, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Everything should really be sourced on Wikipedia. Have a read of WP:OR for some more information. Soaper1234 - talk 18:50, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

@Pdineen03: Forgot to ping you! Soaper1234 - talk 18:50, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Ping????? Pdineen03 (talk) 19:15, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) A Ping is a way to notify a user of a discussion or reply, see Template:Ping. As well as reading WP:OR, you should definitely read WP:PROVEIT. - JuneGloom07 Talk 19:53, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Kim Butterfield

I spent ages writing that out why does it matter people will know more now. Do u have OCD or something? Was it effecting ur life that it was there. Don’t bother sending me a like about “being friendly in Wikipedia” because u dont deserve my patience. I’ll be writing out those storylines again👍 Pdineen03 (talk) 19:38, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Also you version looks like it was written by a 5 year old. Like c’mon Pdineen03 (talk) 19:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Pdineen03. Sorry that you feel like that. It is encouraged that plots are not lengthy and I believe the plot written by Raintheone was a lot less complex and easier on the eye too. I would also strongly disagree that the plot appears to be written by a 5 year old - I would even say that that is quite rude. Just a heads up, if the storylines return, they will likely be reverted. I'm more than happy to open a discussion about this on the talk page should you feel this is necessary. Thank you, Soaper1234 - talk 19:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Its written awful it makes no sense Pdineen03 (talk) 20:06, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Again, I would be inclined to disagree with you. Soaper1234 - talk 20:33, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Masood Ahmed.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Masood Ahmed.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Profile pictures

Thank you for changing Luke Morgan’s picture. Can you please change Mandy, Nancy, Russ, Myra and Mercedes please Pdineen03 (talk) 17:55, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

@Pdineen03:  Done Soaper1234 - talk 19:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Mercy McQueen.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Changing my edits

Please do not change my edits if you are uninformed. Mr Fitzgerald appeared as a one-off character, he does not deserve his own section (ESPECIALLY when characters who have appeared in multiple episode, like Tyler, are still in the "other" section. Also Evelyn appears before Vicky, so no idea why you vandalised that edit and placed Vicky first. Connorguy99 (talk) 20:12, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Connorguy99 - That's not how Wikipedia works. Nobody has "ownership" or "exclusivity" to article content, and you cannot tell other editors to stay away like this. If there's a dispute, you're expected to peacefully discuss them on the article's talk page and help them come to a consensus. Please do not message other editors like this and shoo them away; as a member of the community, you're supposed to help other users, be respectful, and encourage collaboration. Thank you :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:14, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

This user PURPOSEFULLY edited my work over a series of separate edits with the desire of PREVENTING me from reverting them easily. This was deliberate. Connorguy99 (talk)' —Preceding undated comment added 20:16, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

@Connorguy99: First of all, I'd like to make it clear that I don't appreciate being spoken to in such a rude manner. I haven't vandalised anything. A section had been created on Mr. Fitzgerald because there was enough sources. If you can find enough sources (for development/reception) for Tyler, he can get a section. He's only in others because nobody has created him a section. Please do not remove Mr. Fitzgerald from the list as he has enough development for a section. A reliable source is needed to say that Evelyn appears before Vicky. I will be reverting the recent edits on List of Coronation Street characters (2018) to the last safe revision. Please let me know if you have any other concerns, and thank you Oshwah for your input. Soaper1234 - talk 20:22, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

I didn't mean to speak to you rudely but it isn't nice to find work disregarded with so little care, with excessive edits to prevent swift reverts. If you revert the edits, so will I and we will be caught in an edit war. Connorguy99 (talk) 20:24, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

@Connorguy99: Thank you. Obviously, I would like to avoid an edit war so I am prepared to explain my reasoning. I would appreciate it if you could explain your reasoning too. Mr. Fitzgerald is a section I created, so likewise I don't want to see work disregarded with so little care. He remains with a section because there is enough development to have a section. When looking at the revert you made, other changes included in your revert include the unexplained removal of sources and more development in the Evelyn Plummer section, and the addition of names in the lead which don't need adding. Without sounding rude (and let me know if you feel I do), I don't understand what work I am disregarding by reverting your edits. Soaper1234 - talk 20:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

I have created a section in the talk page to discuss the matter. Connorguy99 (talk) 20:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

I have responded there. Soaper1234 - talk 20:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

@Connorguy99: I've noticed that you have reverted my edits again without reason. These edits include expansion of Evelyn Plummer's character and Vicky being moved below Evelyn, per your instruction, as well as the section of Mr Fitzgerald. I don't appreciate my edits being labelled vandalism as well, so I would be more than appreciative if you could stop calling it vandalism. Soaper1234 - talk 20:38, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Connorguy99 - It's quite understandable to feel frustrated and perhaps upset after seeing changes you've made and the time you've put into those changes being reverted - trust me, I know :-). But you don't want to run at other editors with pitchforks and torches because of what happened. Usually, there's a reasonable explanation for this. And don't worry, all edits made to every page are saved in the page's history and can be retrieved and viewed at any time. I appreciate your follow-up and for explaining that you didn't mean to be rude to Soaper1234. I encourage you to simply keep in mind how your messages and words can come out and be translated by other users, to do your best to use words that translate to others as civil and welcoming where possible, and to step back and take a moment if you're frustrated or upset and to never respond or message other users while you're feeling angry - that's when uncivil and heated words come out and statements made that you'll probably wish you could take back later. It looks like you've both started a discussion on the article's talk page - excellent! Work with Soaper1234 and come to a positive consensus. Keep positive, work together, don't edit war, and things will work out in the end :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:39, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

I have opened a discussion in the talk page, yet this user is still attempting to revert my edits. Connorguy99 (talk) 20:44, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

I have continued to revert your edits because you haven't given an explanation to why you continue to revert my edits and label them "vandalism". Soaper1234 - talk 20:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

List of Coronation Street characters (2018)

This message serves as my official warning that your edits to this article constitute edit warring - please stop. I've also left the same warning here on Connorguy99's user talk page as well and in order to be fair and neutral party to you both. I won't template you, but please treat this as the same warning that I just left for him. Thanks :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:47, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your help Oshwah. I'm just struggling to explain the situation properly. Soaper1234 - talk 20:55, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Soaper1234 - No problem, and yeah I understand. I'm reading the discussion and you're doing your best to try and help the user. Let me know if you need my help with anything and I'll be happy to do so. Best - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

@Oshwah: Thank you, I really appreciate it. I've asked some other editors for their help in explaining the situation too. Soaper1234 - talk 21:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Soaper1234 - Perfect; that should definitely help. Again, please don't hesitate to message me if things go out of control or if you need my help with anything else. Best - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

@Oshwah: I'm hoping so. Thanks for your help again. I've added back some detail that was removed, but the detail is irrelevant to the current debate, so it shouldn't be a problem. Let me know if it is. Soaper1234 - talk 21:09, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Soaper1234 - Fine by me. As long as it's not edit warring, have at it. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:11, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

@Oshwah: Thank you. Thought I'd best double check and see :) Soaper1234 - talk 21:13, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Sure, I understand ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:14, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

@Oshwah: The user believes I have broken the conditions of the edit war. Would you be able to explain why I haven't? No worries if you'd prefer not. Soaper1234 - talk 21:17, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

You did break the conditions, but this user is clearly biased - that was obvious from the moment they gave you this kind warning while giving me a brash almost robotic response. Connorguy99 (talk) 21:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

You know FOR A FACT I am both against your edits regarding Evelyn/Vicky as well as your edits on MrFitzgerald. But keep breaking the truce. Connorguy99 (talk) 21:32, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Connorguy99 - Soaper1234's edit to the article was to different content and didn't seem to involve the content in dispute... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:51, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Connorguy99, Soaper1234 - To keep everyone honest and to stop the finger pointing, I've applied full protection to the article. Now you both can focus on the dispute at-hand and work together to resolve it :-). ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:54, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

The dispute was against the Mr Fitzgerald section and the Evelyn/Vicky placing. Connorguy99 (talk) 22:00, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Episode 1094

Hello! Your submission of Episode 1094 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:45, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. I hope you don't mind that I tweaked it a bit more to get rid of the repetition ("production team"..."produced"). Yoninah (talk) 22:09, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

@Yoninah: Not at all. Thanks for doing so, it looks much better now. Soaper1234 - talk 22:25, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Happy Wiki-Birthday!

Hey, Soaper1234. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Wiki-Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 14:42, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

@ElectrodeandtheAnode: Thank you! I completely forgot about it, but 5 years does fly by. Soaper1234 - talk 17:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sacha Levy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sacha Levy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Episode 1094

On 4 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Episode 1094, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that to create the fireball effect in episode 1094 of Casualty, the show's production team packed ten different explosions into one blast? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Episode 1094. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Episode 1094), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:04, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

This fact just popped up in my Facebook feed [1]. :) - JuneGloom07 Talk 20:36, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

@JuneGloom07: Wow - that's incredible. A very popular article, obviously! Hope you're keeping well. Soaper1234 - talk 20:49, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

I think they must post a bunch of recent DYK articles during the day. It's fun to see something I actually know about there though. I'm good, thanks. Just getting ready to start exporting some more HighBeam articles. - JuneGloom07 Talk 20:59, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

@JuneGloom07: It makes for a nice surprise! Glad to hear it. Like I mentioned on Rain's talkpage, it's a shame they're shutting shop. Hopefully you'll be able to get everything you need before they close. Anything I can do to help, just let me know. Soaper1234 - talk 21:24, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Too Old for This Shift.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 19:25, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

User321a TP

Hello there. What is the deal with fellow Wikipedians editing other editors talk pages? I am aware that BrooklynGlassey123 has removed content from my talk page without valid reason to. I can see that you have reverted it, and I am grateful for that. Yes, I may have had this account for a year, but there are still a few aspects of Wikipedia that I am not familiar with. I am aware that the abovementioned Wikipedian has been known for making disruptive edits in the past, and that is why I have raised this. I would appreciate some advice as to what I can do about it, if there is anything. A response would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. User321a (talk) 19:43, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

@User321a: Hi, sorry if you feel my actions were wrong. I was only trying to be helpful. In regards to help with user issues, I'm not too sure. Have you tried raising the issues at a help page? The Teahouse is meant to be good for raising issues. Soaper1234 - talk 19:59, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

@Soaper1234: Don't apologise. You've done absolutely nothing wrong. I truly 100% believe you did the right thing. I believe that BrooklynGlassey321 has been known for causing disruption to the encyclopedia. Would it be against Wikipedia's policies to raise it on the user's talk page? User321a (talk) 20:04, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

@User321a: As long as it doesn't become distasteful, a discussion on the user's talk page can often help. However, you cannot guarantee that they will respond. Soaper1234 - talk 21:55, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

@Soaper1234: Thank you for your help. User321a (talk) 07:55, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Surnames on the Current List

A consensus was reached on the "List of Coronation Street characters" talkpage where it was agreed that the characters should be listed with their current names. Your repeated changes to this is vandalism. Connorguy99 (talk) 20:24, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

@Connorguy99: actually, one quick look at this discussion shows that the majority said to use WP:COMMONNAME rather than the characters' current names. Since this was the consensus, I'll revert your edits. Soaper1234 - talk 17:22, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

You are a liar, and I will once again revert your edits. The majority said that the names should be current. Connorguy99 (talk) 19:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Please watch your tone and remain civil in discussions with editors. As I have once stated, the majority did not say that. You said that. Soaper1234 - talk 19:33, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Archiving

Hi Soaper,

You enquired about archiving via an user script. Here's what I use:

IamBot put in the article title, and select "Add archives to all non-dead references (Optional)" to create archives for all references in an article. However, if you simply go to - View History on any page, then "fix dead links", it'll automatically fill in the title on the right page. You simply need to click the radio button, and submit to add archives.

There's a few scripts that I know of that make this work easier, such as Tidy Citations from Sam Sailor, or Evad's rater script that I would suggest! Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:49, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

@Lee Vilenski: Brilliant, thank you! I shall try it out now for Adrian "Fletch" Fletcher. Thanks for all your help. Soaper1234 - talk 14:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

No worries. I did a few more things to that particular article so you can see how they work. I particularly like the DMY script, as it makes everything uniform; which is something I look for in a GA. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

@Lee Vilenski: Thanks for the edits - it looks much better now! Soaper1234 - talk 18:35, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MyraMcQueen.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MyraMcQueen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:53, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Soaper1234. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dawn Steele, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monarch of the Glen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Slater family EastEnders.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year

	Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
	Hi Soaper1234, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy and Prosperous New Year, Thanks for all your help and thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia,    –Davey2010 Merry Christmas / Happy New Year 19:16, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much Davey2010. Merry Christmas to yourself too and all the best for 2019! Soaper1234 - talk 19:26, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome and thanks so much :), Thanks, –Davey2010 ^{Merry Christmas / Happy New Year} 15:50, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9