User talk:Smsarmad/Archives/2013/October

Familiarize yourself with Arbitration Committee Discretionary Sanctions, please.

Hi, SMSarmad. I just wanted to remind you that discretionary sanctions may be taken by Arbitration Committee for India-Pakistan related articles. Instead of engaging in revert wars, I suggest that you bring any issues you might have to Talk:Partition of India. Adding different points of view with citations or asking for citations for content you personally disagree with is most welcome. I noticed that most, if not all, of your edits on Partition of India are major reverts. It would be great if you added content instead of discouraging other editors from contributing meaningfully. Please familiarize yourself well with Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/India-Pakistan. :) --Bookishness (talk) 20:23, 1 October 2013 (UTC) — Bookishness (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sockpuppet of Crème3.14159 (talk • contribs). --SMS ^Talk 13:42, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Obvious sock of peepie/creampie. Wonder were he is editing from so he could avoid CU. Darkness Shines (talk) 07:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Wow, you guys saw through him pretty quickly! The secret service should be employing you. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 16:44, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

And your patience is admirable when dealing with such problematic editors. --SMS ^Talk 16:51, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Bahria University

who the hell are you boy? y u always revert my changes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohsin.khan92 (talk • contribs) 18:05, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

I am an editor here just like you. I have already explained each of my revert in the edit summaries and messages at your talk page, but I will do it again. So far I have reverted two of your edits and both because they violated Wikipedia's Copyrights Policy. You can't just copy content from any where and paste it here specially when it is copyright protected as is the case with content you copied to this article. I suggest you read this policy for a better understanding of why your changes were reverted. And persistently adding copyrighted content without due permission can get you blocked, besides you may also like to read Wikipedia's Socking Policy, because I suppose it was you who restored that content while logged out. Happy Editing! --SMS ^Talk 20:17, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Malik Noureed Awan - which version should stand?

You have recently edited Malik Noureed Awan. Please see Talk:Malik Noureed Awan#Call for reasons why the NPOV/poorly-referenced version should stand and contribute your thoughts. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:06, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

URGENT CONTACT

Dear Mr. SmSarmad

You have made some edits/ changes to an article Javed Malik. We need to update you on a few things as some of the details are not correct and we tried to correct them, and you have UNDONE the edits and restored the old article.

I am not a professional Wiki editor. I am working for Mr. Javed Malik's friend and we are just trying to make the article accurate with some details, and also add an image, but it seems that some wiki editors keep deleting our changes.

We would appreciate if you can please contact me, so that we can make this article with your kind help.

I am not fimiliar with wiki talk pages, etc........ can you please reply by e mail on

SandraRoberts21@gmail.com and can i have your e-mail ID

Many thanks, and waiting for your reply

Sandra — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameszapper (talk • contribs) 23:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

You've been editing on WP since 2006, and you're still not familiar with talk pages? --| Uncle Milty | talk | 23:27, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

I am sorry I don't prefer to talk off-wiki on this issue unless there is a need to do that but I don't find such a situation in this case. I suggest you share whatever you want to say here. Besides if you can point explicitly what information at Javed Malik article is incorrect, I may be able to help you. Thanks --SMS ^Talk 17:21, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Stupid User

Excuse me Smsarmad , WHAT IS PROBLEM WITH YOU??? (Abusing). You Edit my many articles that I made. You have no any work besiding changing the articles. But dont worry, i have send a report to wikipedia policy. Enough is Enough, if try one more time, wikipedia will block your account and yout IP address will not edit the articles. I give you a title Stupid User. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennai98.express (talk • contribs) 16:32, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Well I won't respond to your personal attacks but would like to advise you to divert your efforts to the List of festivals in Pakistan instead of creating duplicate articles. Besides there is no my or your article, no one here owns the article they edit/create. --SMS ^Talk 16:38, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

And please acquaint yourself with Wikipedia's Socking policy. I suggest you should make an unblock request from your master account instead of evading your block by creating new accounts. --SMS ^Talk 16:43, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia: Reporting Policy

Hello Smsarmad, A notice received from a wikipedia user Chennai98.express. He/She gave a report that you had tried to revert the articles made by him/her. The user Request wikipedia to block you from editing and note your IP address. But wikipedia giving you a warning

Chennai98.express gave an issue that article List of Festivals in Pakistan is the list of Pakistani Festivals for every year. But Pakistan National Events (Yearwise) is the list for different years.

Thanks, Wikipedia Reporting Policy

This is your last Warning. You will BLOCKED from editing without further notice

— Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiReportingPolicy (talk • contribs) 17:21, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the nicely formatted warning but I feel sorry for your incompetence or inability of understanding the issue at hand. --SMS ^Talk 17:25, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Ohhhhh..... Yes! Thank God that Wikipedia forbade you to reverting my changes. I think you will understood the issue of Festivals of Pakist6an Process — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennai98.express (talk • contribs) 17:30, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

• Facepalm Mar4d (talk) 17:59, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

please consider this

hello. you only gave edit.war warning to me not to the other user:BilCat. so answer me? warring is between two sides. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajaomair (talk • contribs) 15:08, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

BilCat is an experienced editor and I don't need to write him/her a message/warning about the Edit Warring policy before reporting him/her for any such violation. I have plenty of evidence that he/she is aware of this policy. The message I left at your talk page was to educate you about this policy and possible consequence in case you violate it. Now I see BilCat did participate in the edit war but didn't do more than two reverts. But you even after that message continued reverting. And the report I have filed at the Edit Warring Noticeboard is for violation of 3RR rule besides edit warring and any admin who will review it will also look into the behavior of the other party involved. I still suggest you read the edit warring page already linked above and in my message at your talk and see how can you escape a possible administrative action. -- SMS ^Talk 15:31, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Imran Khan edit

I edited imran khan birthay and its not incorrect, it s from an authentic source. In the recent biography published by Christopher Sandford,it's said that Imran Khan was born on the 5th of october. Not 25th November. Whereas,on the net it's mentioned it to be on the 25h November. It explains that "when he came to obtain his first passport,resulting in an official filling in the wrong date — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mustafa arif021 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

I have commented at the article's talk page, kindly discuss it further there. Besides please provide a quote from the book and page number if you have access to this book. -- SMS ^Talk 10:06, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Fairy Meadows

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

saraiki language

Dear sarmad Saraiki is a language also, Kindly look into matter, Do the same on merit.182.186.32.76 (talk) 11:50, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

You need to discuss this at the relevant talk page (that in this case is Talk:Saraiki dialect) with the editors who don't agree with you, instead of edit warring, as this is going to achieve you nothing except a block. -- SMS ^Talk 11:52, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

And as I already told you please read the Wikipedia's Sock puppetry Policy. -- SMS ^Talk 11:57, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Impartiality

Hello, brother I am sorry to say that what you are doing is appearing more than partial. To be a wikipedia editor you need to be aware of General Knowledge which you seem not to be or even if you are you are manuplulating it. Read CIA & RAW reports. They have clearly investigated & stated Laskar-E-Taiba is funded & protected by ISI (Pakistani Secret Agency). I believe you know ALL of these but you are just trying to be too much innocent. Anyways, you are the reviwer & I am not. Be it whatever you are I have no power to overrule your decision. Have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhruv2357 (talk • contribs) 02:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

I am sorry I can't give you a lecture here on Wikipedia's Neutrality principle, so its better to read the linked pages in my message on your talk. -- SMS ^Talk 03:43, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

editing living person etc.

Are you an official editor with Wikipedia? why is it that you are responsible for the content of pakistan military related pages? he was a B category pilot (no efficiency wing on his uniform) and he flew less than a bloody Wing Commander would because he was a coward (blue wing) which he controversially changed to red when he was appoint CAS. see his picture when he was meeting Musharraf, blue wing. also this link http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_20-3-2003_pg1_5 One of the biggest disgracers to not only serve but make it to the top at the expense of competently more professional pilots and commanders. Also he rented out his f-8 house to SAAB whom the Air Force has a billion dollar deal with. Google that and you will have your references. have a good day 115.186.137.234 (talk) 07:11, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

There is no official/unofficial editor thing at Wikipedia. Every editor works here as a volunteer and has every right to edit any article while following Wikipedia's Policies and Guidlines. Now about the article concerned, whatever information you are adding is unsourced and highly controversial, thus violating Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. And I have already checked and I am unable to find a single reliable source that supports the content you want to be added to this article. So I suggest you avoid violating Wikipedia's key content policies by adding such controversial information without a reliable source. --SMS ^Talk 17:14, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

where have you checked for a reliable source? I have already pasted a dailytimes link that shows his uniform also google SAAB with his name next to it? and one more thing. GO F**K YOURSELF!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.65.148.9 (talk) 15:13, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Does the image say that wearing a blue flying badge categorizes you as a B-category pilot? No. Its your personal knowledge and that too a concocted one. These badges (white, blue, red) only depict the flying hours one has completed. And about the SAAB induction read Wikipedia's Reliable Source Guideline for having a better understanding what a "reliable source" means. -- SMS ^Talk 15:51, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Dont jump to conclusions about my personal knowledge. The efficiency wing which he does not have that specifies what category a certain pilot is. you didnt read my first edit carefully. and here is something for your information about the SAAB deal http://paktribune.com/news/print.php?id=214025 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.186.137.234 (talk) 04:58, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Efficiency badge (the V-shape Falcon or the crown for ground branches) is given to those who receive consecutive three outstanding annual evaluation reports beside meeting some other conditions. Now this badge in no way categorizes one as a B or A category pilot.

And you want to say that the Pak Tribune's (copyrights violating news item) supports your this edit? First the content you added clearly violated the Biography of Living Persons policy of Wikipedia, even if it was a direct quote from any news paper. Secondly I don't find this information encyclopedic enough to include in this article but if you want to include it be aware of the Biography of Living Persons policy (linked above) or you will be reverted once again. And don't use the Pak Tribune link in the article as it violates Wikipedia's Copyright Policy. -- SMS ^Talk 15:57, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Block Warning

There is no use in issuing block warning to me my dear brother. I can write a paragraph of 200 words from from 200 IP adresses with a word from each. If you really want to slove an issue, talk to me about it. This time you cannot challege my edit. I have provided citations from Trusted news media. My sympathies for you this time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhruv2357 (talk • contribs) 03:59, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

ANI

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:_Smsarmad. --regentspark (comment) 17:13, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For dealing with Hate propagators like Dhruv2357 Malignea (talk) 16:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Bhural

Hi, do you see any reason that above mentioned user not be blocked indefinitely because he is bad faith editor, abusive, hate speech-er, biased nationalist and threatening. Allowing such aggressive user will cause unnecessary disruption to WP Language project. In my opinion we must discourage such users by permanent blocking and consistent attitude of no relaxation for abusing on WP. Kelly0987 (talk) 09:05, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Kelly, Bhural is indef blocked. Looking at their talk page, I don't see that changing anytime soon. --regentspark (comment) 16:53, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Anon IP impersonating you

I've just blocked User:119.160.118.139 and User:119.160.119.176 - undoubtedly the same person - for leaving abusive messages on my Talk page. He "signed" his most recent message with your username (presumably thinking I would be daft enough to block you instead of him). So keep an eye out! Deb (talk) 16:22, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Thankyou Deb! I just reported this IP at SPI. This IP is a sock of Yasir72.multan. -- SMS ^Talk 16:26, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	You seem to be attracting a lot of weirdos of late, and you deal with them well. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:51, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you DS. -- SMS ^Talk 17:59, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Smsarmad. You have new messages at RegentsPark's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK for Khaplu Palace

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:03, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Abdul Sattar Edhi Ethnicity

Hi Smsarmad,

I am from the Bantva Memon community, and it is well known that Abdul Sattar Edhi is a Bantva Memon. I have cited new articles that may be of a better standard to the previous one. Bantva Memons come under the classification of Halai Memons or Kathiawadi Memons as well. They are originally from the Sindhi Lohana caste who converted to Islam and became known as Memons. Those who stayed in Sindh became Sindhi Memons, those who settled in the Kathiawar district of British India became known as Kathiawadi Memons, and within the Kathiawadi Memons, those who settled to do business in the Bantva-Manavdar region became known as Bantva Memons. The Bantva region used Gujrati as the main language of the region, and since Memons had no script of their own, they began to write in the Gujrati script. Therefore, they are not Gujrati. I hope this satisfies any misunderstandings.

Regards,

A concerned Wiki user — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.131.110.119 (talk) 14:34, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Khaplu Palace

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Khaplu Palace you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 01:22, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Every Wiki user is corrupt

Wow Smsarmad...Wow! You Know that a section Annaul Events from the article 2013 in Pakistan is mine (from Tehwaar Calendar of Pakistan 2013) and you has deleted it many times because of already existing topic of your article. But why you not removing this section from 2013 in Pakistan now??. It is easy to say that you are all corrupt. such as Smsarmad, RHaworth, and Deb etc. Am i saying right haaaan....? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.160.118.43 (talk) 15:57, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks dear

Thanks for Removing the Section. Thanks dear! be an honest Wiki user. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.160.118.43 (talk) 16:16, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Khaplu Palace

The article Khaplu Palace you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Khaplu Palace for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 01:42, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Waar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Times (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Waar

Gatoclass (talk) 08:03, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello Respected User

I am not promoting anything so far. I just contributed information regarding Blogs. How can you prove Information as Promotional Stunt ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fatcat1991 (talk • contribs) 12:18, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia is a portal for information so you are not supposed to be biased over information contributed by other users on the page Waar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fatcat1991 (talk • contribs) 12:23, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and content here needs reliable sources that support it. The information you are adding is completely unsourced and promotes a person and his/her blog. Please read the related policy page (WP:NOTSOAPBOX) already linked in my messages at your talk for further information. Besides also get yourself familiar with Wikipedia's Edit Warring policy. Happy Editing! -- SMS ^Talk 12:36, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Sanam Baloch

Hey Sarmad, can you kindly explain me why citing pictures of some one wearing a religious symbol is not credible enough to specify some ones faith and is unreliable? Pakistani47 (talk) 13:53, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

First you need to present a reliable source that says that what she is wearing is actually what you claim and then that wearing that thing specifies one's religion or sect. This article is about living person and Wikipedia has a very strict policy regarding Biography of living people, thus we can't rely on these type of sources. Besides you may like to know we have consensus not to list someone's sub-religion/sect in the infobox. -- SMS ^Talk 13:59, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)@Pakistani47:When I am invited to religious ceremonies of a religion I am not, I may wear the garments of that religion if asked to do so by the host provided that it does not run counter to my own religious practices. In other words, a photo of someone in religious garb is not necessarily an indicator of their religion at the time the photo was taken. Even if it is accurate, there is no guarantee that the person's religion hasn't changed. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:14, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks Austro-Hungarian battleships of World War I Op-ed: Advice on reviewing Featured and A-Class articles

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:39, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

source

http://www.punjab.gov.pk/?q=gujranwala — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alauqab (talk • contribs) 13:49, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

That was a Copyrights violation. -- SMS ^Talk 03:05, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Philip Gunn

Smsarmad, I was wondering whether you could revisit your review here to check the ALT1 I just proposed. It adds only two words to the original hook, but I think it makes it significantly more interesting. Thanks for your time! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:44, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Done. -- SMS ^Talk 03:05, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:35, 27 October 2013 (UTC)