User talk:Sharvilak11

Contested deletion

This page should be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Sharvilak11 (talk) 14:00, 1 June 2022 (UTC) the title was set as Editing User: sharvilak11 instead of Elakshiben Thakore. I don 't know why that came up !! Anyways, I have created another page with correct title. So this is duplicate now. Please delete this.[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sharvilak11

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Sharvilak11 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 14:46, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elakshiben Thakore (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Many unsourced statements throughout article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elakshiben Thakore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elakshiben Thakore, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 15:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sharvilak11! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 15:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elakshiben Thakore moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Elakshiben Thakore, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move this into the main article space, as it is nowhere near ready to be published. Too much of the content is unsupported by referencing, and the few sources that are cited are not sufficient to establish notability. Also, you appear to suggest that you have a conflict of interest with regards to this subject, therefore you are not allowed to move this into the main space past the AfC review process. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:09, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Could you please help with what statements in the article require additional sources ? Sharvilak11 (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additional sources are needed to establish the notability of the subject per WP:GNG. These need to be independent and reliable secondary sources, providing significant coverage of her.

Additional citations are also needed to support the contents properly. Every material statement, as well as private personal details such as date of birth, family members, etc., must be referenced to a reliable source. Currently the entire 'Early life' and most of 'Personal life' are unsupported, which is unacceptable in articles on living people, per WP:BLP. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:31, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @DoubleGrazing , thank you for guiding me through my first article. I have updated the content, sources and citations. Mostly all statements in 'Early Life' and 'Personal Life' have sufficient references.

Could you please review now ? In case, anything is missing, please let me know. And Thanks a ton for the help! Sharvilak11 (talk) 06:36, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elakshiben Thakore (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

nrityabharti and YouTube are not reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elakshiben Thakore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elakshiben Thakore, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 14:52, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks. I have removed those sources and added sources from ccrtindia.gov.in which is an official Indian government website for cultural resources. Could you please review it again and let me know in case any changes are needed ? Sharvilak11 (talk) 04:08, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elakshiben Thakore moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Elakshiben Thakore, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:16, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elakshi Thakore moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Elakshi Thakore, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]