User talk:Seresin/Archive 8

This page is an archive of User Talk:Seresin (or perhaps something else). If you wish to discuss something here, feel free to bring it up again. The history for this page is here, not on the main talk page. Thanks.

Archives Until August 2007 — September 2007 October 2007 — November 2007 December 2007 — January 2008 February 2008 — March 2008 April 2008 — May 2008 June 2008 — July 2008 August 2008 — September 2008 October 2008 — November 2008 December 2008 — January 2009 February 2009 — March 2009 April 2009 — May 2009 June 2009 — July 2009 August 2009 — September 2009 October 2009 — November 2009 December 2009 — January 2010 February 2010 — March 2010 April 2010 — May 2010 June 2010 — to June 2013 to November 2014

Artistic Minds Societ

Thank you for your help. I was trying to explain the situation to that guy, but he did not want to hear me out. I don't know if you saw my message to him as I am still getting used to how this all works, but this is what I wrote to him. I only added the page because the Artistic Minds Society was listed in reference on the High IQ Societies article. In the article many of the societies listed had corresponding pages as well. This page does nor differ in any way from any of those, and if this one is deleted then those should as well. It makes no sense to allows all those societies to have articles but not this one.

There one nothing in this article touting it, making it sound better or special, or anything else that could be deemed as promotional. It is exactly along the lines of every other high iq society article included here.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmestre (talk • contribs) 04:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC) Now Im confused. If my article was taken down for rule A7, and I created it because the society was referenced in the article 'High IQ Society', and many of the other societies mentioned have their own articles. Why exactly was mine deleted, and more importantly...why have those articles not been deleted?

Did you look at the article 'High IQ Society'? I think you should check it out, then you would understand why I am at a complete loss.The format of my article follows those of the societies with articles. I see that editors have seen those pages before, none were list for deletion. Plus I used their formats as the template for my article. Is there someone in charge I can take this up with. On top of all that, I just checked and you have tons of societies with articles. So far none have listed why they are significant. Most societies in general are of historical significance. Which is why this site has so many listed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmestre (talk • contribs) 04:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Attempting to clarify!

Hi again Seresin. Sorry I couldn't answer your questions last night, it was nearly midnight when I'd returned from being out and I was too tired. Anyway, I see from your username history why you have a particular interest in this specialist area! You asked me "can non-crats mandate bureaucrats to act a certain way on specific requests?" I'd suggest that nobody can mandate anyone to anything in general. The community are 100% entitled to question and debate the way in which policies are derived and served so, as with most things, this would be a question of discussion and consensus. I'm not aware of a rename appeal process, I guess it would be handled on an ad-hoc basis on the WP:CHU talk page with a discussion initiated at a 'crat talk page.

As for withdrawing from a reconfirmation RfA, I'm inclined to say that re-sysoping would be out of the question. Should someone forgo their right to be re-sysoped without going through the process, thereby exposing themselves back to the scrutiny of the community, in my mind they have effectively forgone their right to be automatically re-sysoped. They should be advised that they need not go through the RfA process should they not be familiar with the ruling but if they insist on going ahead with it they should stand by the decision of the community. Again, I'm not convinced these scenarios are entirely covered by the rulings and I would discuss these with fellow 'crats but that's how I see things.

Thanks again for your ongoing interest and many questions! The Rambling Man (talk) 09:34, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey, once again apologies for my delay in responding. I'm just about to head to bed but I'll get back to you. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey again Seresin. Hope your Sunday is going well. I've been otherwise engaged today but as promised, this is me getting back to you! I guess you'd be referring to User:Majorly's re-sysoping after his withdrawn RfA. Well, I think I've clarified my position in the RfB, I'd say that if an editor wishes to be re-sysopped and declines the available instant reflag (assuming the admin didn't desysop "under a cloud") and opts for RfA, that's 100% their choice but they should be prepared to see the process through to the end. Majorly's re-sysop RfA saw 46 out of 189 not supporting, and a support rate of 85% but Majorly withdrew under (it seems) extremely stressful conditions. With three days to go Majorly would most likely have been re-sysoped without too much debate with that kind of support. Ryan Postlethwaite defended Majorly's decision (which was to reaffirm the community's support of his position, fair enough) but in my opinion it should have been allowed to run its course and Majorly should have respected the decision of the community. I believe, had I been asked at the time to re-sysop in these circumstances, I would have respectfully declined. But since I've spoken of specific editors here, I wish also to state that I wish no disrespect to anyone involved other than the scenario exposed a flaw in the re-sysop/reconfirmation RfA process that needs to be dealt with. Hope that (eventually) gets someway closer to answering your question and gaining a better view of my position with regard to the "hypothetical" situation you've presented me with! All the best, The Rambling Man (talk) 18:50, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Smile thanks

Thanks for the smile! It made my day. It was good to see you around as well, having first met you during your Alcamae and "I" days at the ill-fated TV Review project. It's all cycling round there again, but I didn't have the patience to continue! Ref desk is much more fun. Gwinva (talk) 01:00, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I'd imagine. Anyway. Nice to talk to you again. seresin | wasn't he just...? 01:32, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Curveball award

I award the curveball for throwing one in Riana's RfB today. Congrats, you're proving my oppose vote wrong and that's a good thing. Welcome aboard and thanks for the chuckle. Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:16, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

...couldn't remember if these were yours or someone else's before this, if the latter, feel free to reward them as these are the sorta things we should be asking. Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:16, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Why thank you. Although you didn't oppose Riana's RfB, so I'm mildy confused there :/ But thanks again. seresin | wasn't he just...? 18:24, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

No no, my oppose vote in your RfA I meant, and yes, I support Riana too but I was happy someone asked some questions which required more thinking than the average formulaic Q & A which I generally glaze over. Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:56, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh. That makes much more sense :D I'm glad I'm doing well. Thanks. seresin | wasn't he just...? 19:57, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

RfB questions

Thanks for asking those despite your support - I think it's very important that people make their decisions as informed as possible. I hope nothing in my answers makes you feel you should change your mind! ;) Feel free to ask anything else, if you need to. ~ Riana ⁂ 12:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Okay. As Lar pointed out in TRM's RfB, my first question very closely resembles a situtation that actually happened. Do you know which one this is? Will you comment on what you believe should have happened in that situation, and why? Thanks. seresin | wasn't he just...? 18:24, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Corrections.com

We are a state and federal contingency consisting of sheriffs, police, commissioners, wardens and jail administrators. We are relatively inexperienced at using Wikipedia and just reposted Corrections.com after we received feedback from JimBleak (wikipedia individual who deleted us last). He was very helpful at asking us to replace any subjective words with only factual and historical content. The new posting was based on the results from our last inter-agency meeting. We meet again for another inter-agency meeting in 5 days at the state house. Can you please provide us feedback on why we have been deleted so I may share with the group and make repairs. Thank you. March 2, 2008
cjneversleepsCjneversleeps (talk) 20:26, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Kebap 49

Please can you not delete my article Kebap 49 it is very important to me,and I want lots of people to find out about it!!!!!!!!!Mertozoro (talk) 21:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Huggle User Category

Hi there. I have seen that you use huggle by the fact that you have automatically updated the huggle white list(it does this when closing huggle). I was wondering if you would add the category [[Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle]] to your user page so that it fills out and we know who actually uses huggle. If you do not want to you do not have to. I am also sorry if i have already talked to you about this or you no longer use huggle but i sent it to everyone that has edited the page since mid January. I hope we can start to fill out this category. If you would like to reply to this message then please reply on my talk page as i will probably not check here again. Thanks. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

File:David,larry.JPG		My RFA
		Thank you muchly for your support in my recent request for adminship, which was successfully closed on 76%, finishing at 73 supports, 23 opposes and 1 neutral. The supports were wonderful, and I will keep in mind the points made in the useful opposes and try to suppress the Larry David in me! Now I'm off to issue some cool down blocks, just to get my money's worth! Kidding btw. All the best, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 11:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Cashel Dennehy Article

Thanks for reverting the article. I've been swamped with everything in life lately. If you reverted the article, that means it isn't online, right? Because I don't want another admin to nominate it for speedy deletion before I'm done with it. (Nothing against the admins, you people are great and I have so much respect for you). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bboy14 (talk • contribs) 18:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

That is correct. It will not be tagged for speedy deletion while in your userspace. seresin | wasn't he just...? 23:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

"Dance communication"

Hi. The user who posted this incomprehensible little tome was responsible for several similar items. Most were copyvios, all but this one were deleted. I'd like to go ahead and restore the speedy and leave word on the talk page as to why. Thanks. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

• Ah, glad I caught you online! In all honesty, I can't seem to find it online, but the style strongly suggests that s/he may have copied it longhand from a textbook or reference book, references and all. Normally, I'd agree 100% that something like this would be an AfD if not for the user's history. S/he put a lot of this same rambling text in existing articles as well. Thanks again for understanding. I don't like going against other editors without alerting them to what I plan to do, so I'm especially grateful that you were able to get back to me so quickly. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Guess the rules have changed. Thanks for the update. With the copyright paranoia that's permeated this site lately, I have a feeling that whoever decides on its fate will likely err on the side of caution and send it packing. Again, thanks for updating me. Much obliged.  :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Of course seresin | wasn't he just...? 06:02, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm Watching

Just so you know, you were right. I am watching the King Dedede page. You'll see many "anonymous users" editing it. However, it will just be me (mostly). --68.214.113.147 (talk) 00:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I have no doubt. seresin | wasn't he just...? 00:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and you probably won't see me "fixing" the Meta Knight article much. I just felt "generous" today. Well, I have to get ready to go to Gamestop to get Brawl. Goodbye, new "friend." --68.214.113.147 (talk) 00:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi There

Oh wiki your so fine your so fine you blow my mind (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks for taking the time to leave a comment on my page.

You're welcome. seresin | wasn't he just...? 01:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi there, I am "Oh wiki your so fine" under a new name. Thanks so much for explaining everything to me.

Adrian Fletcher (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thank you from Corrections.com

Thank you for the direction. I shared your feedback with the rest of the committee and we will begin the process of gathering articles that "give significant, non-trivial coverage and discussion of our site." Yes, we would find it very helpful if you could restore the article to a subpage until we are better prepared to move it back to the mainspace. Where would be access that? Thank you again for all your help. On behalf of the corrections community it is sincerely appreciated. Cjneversleeps (talk) 17:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Model for Corrections to Follow

One more question - our committee was using the following page as our format model -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Correctional_Association. After reading your feedback I am thinking their article may not be the proper one for us to follow? Are they considered different from us because they are a trade association in corrections? Would it be too much trouble to direct us to a better one to follow? Maybe something for an online community that hits the mark. Many thanks! Cjneversleeps (talk) 17:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Voting icons

See this. Will ^(talk) 21:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Okay thanks. You can re-add the SD tag, but I don't really feel comfortable deleting them under that; the disussion that deleted them was three years old, and I personally don't think G4 applies to a discussion that old. But another administrator could very well feel differently, so feel free to re-add. seresin | wasn't he just...? 21:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

"The Millionaires" deletion

I see that you have proposed The Millionaires for deletion. I wonder if you could take a look at the other pages from EmmaButton and 58.166.109.89. My suspicion is that this user is a sockpuppet of Nede, for the reasons I outlined on Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/EmmaButton. The links on The Millionaires to Antoinette Moliterno and Eden Montana-Caceda, which have been repeatedly created by Nede sockpuppets, makes this seem quite likely. Ttwaring (talk) 00:31, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

If EmmaButton is a sockpuppet of a serial hoaxer and repeatedly banned user, is there anything I should do to alert anyone to this? Ttwaring (talk) 00:40, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

FC Knyazha Schaslyve

Thanks for this note, I lose track of which ones are automagically notable. I've taken it to AfD :) TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 03:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I was just looking at the AfD when the bar showed up. seresin | wasn't he just...? 04:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

good timing then :) Have a good night TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 04:16, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Not dumb

Just in need of some coffee or sleep, or fresh air, depending on the time of day where you are. -- Zsero (talk) 02:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Or not spending too much time this stupid history paper that makes me think I know everything about history XD. Anyway, thanks. seresin | wasn't he just...? 02:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

"101 People" book

I'm glad that your Google search found some stuff about 101 People Who Are Really Screwing America and that you've deprodded it. I'm not going to take it to AfD; I view it as a stub to be improved. Could you please add some evidence of notability to the article? Thanks, CWC 03:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll see if I can do it. seresin | wasn't he just...? 05:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

case closed; much material may pass through a fan

With the case closed, and posts such as this, I expect a lot of stuff to pop-up on my watchlist; I have better than three thousand items watched and a huge number are tv stuff. I do not want to get into a pattern of edit warring, but I will be one of those who will be very aware of resurrected articles. Appropriate response from the admin-class will be needed if this re-ignites. Cheers, Jack Merridew 08:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

In Case You haven't Noticed...

...Take a look at King Dedede and Meta Knight. --72.155.80.144 (talk) 20:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I saw. seresin | wasn't he just...? 22:08, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

So did I. Cheers, Jack Merridew 08:53, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Eliot spitzer (and Richard nixon, it turns out...)

Hi, in your comment you said "I'm pretty sure it won't" -- presumably meaning that typing in a lowercase version of a name won't work in the Go box.

Simple exercise: try typing in

adam sandler

or

Adam sandler

...and you'll see that in both cases you go directly to the Adam Sandler page, even though no explicit redirect is present. (I originally tried "richard nixon" as my example, and found there was another bogus redirect defined.)

I've requested similar speedies for useless redirects before, and they've gone through. I think removing the spitzer (and nixon) links are similar cases to what I've requested in the past. Regards, --NapoliRoma (talk) 23:29, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Huh. I swear, Wikipedia is always so confusing. Usernames, for instance, are case sensitive on the second letter. But apparently articles are not. Feel free to re-add the CSD tag. seresin | wasn't he just...? 23:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I think I know what's going on. It's the search function. Even when you click Go, the software actually does a search to see if there is a page with the exact title that youre looking for. And that search is not case sensitive. (And if there is no page with the exact title, it gives you non-case-sensitive search results. e.g. searching up "poodnoobie" brings up the two articles that include that word.) If you try putting things like "adam sandler" directly in the URL (which is how I always navigate Wikipedia) it doesnt work. Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 18:32, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Corrections.com Update

Thank you for moving our page to a 'work area'. We're working on notability. We really appreciate the time and feedback you have given us.Cjneversleeps (talk) 09:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Of course. If you need anything else, feel free to ask. seresin | wasn't he just...? 13:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Riana's request for bureaucratship

Dear Seresin, thank you for taking part in my RfB. As you may know, it was not passed by bureaucrats. I would, however, like to thank you for taking the time to voice your support, despite concerns cited by the opposition. Although RfA/B isn't really about a person, but more about the community, I was deeply touched and honoured by the outpouring of support and interest in the discussion. I can only hope that you don't feel your opinion was not considered enough - bureaucrats have to give everyone's thoughts weight. I also hope that the results of this RfB lead to some change in the way we approach RfBs, and some thought about whether long-entrenched standards are a good thing in our growing and increasingly heterogenous community. I remain eager to serve you as an administrator and as an editor. If at any point you see something problematic in my actions, please do not hesitate to call me out. ~ Riana ⁂ 12:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Strongarm (Masters of the Universe)

No concensus to redirect. The closing admin's comments are quite clear:

"The result was no consensus for deletion, default to keep. Weak consensus to merge once the injunction is lifted." (my emphasis)

A proposal was made to merge into a new article. No mention of a redirect to He-Man and the Masters of the Universe was ever made. PC78 (talk) 01:08, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I disagree; I feel that your redirect goes agianst both the spirit of the discussion and it's outcome, and in the absence of an article to merge to we should rather "default to keep". Still, I am loathe to argue the point with you further. As it happens there is an existing list of characters to merge to, one that would perhaps make a new list redundant, and have redirected accordingly. I hope you find this satifactory. PC78 (talk) 23:17, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Corrections.com Subpage Deletion

Sorry to bother you again. We just received a 'nominate to delete' notice on the subpage you created for us. See, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cjneversleeps/Corrections.com. What should we do? Many thanks in advance. Cjneversleeps (talk) 16:18, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank-you

I can has mop?

Hi Seresin! Thank-you for your support in my RfA (91/1/1). I take all the comments to heart and hope I can fulfil the role of being an admin to the high standard that the community deserves. Seraphim♥ Whipp 18:00, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Also, thank-you for your additional clarifications :). Seraphim♥ ^Whipp 18:00, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I guess I'm just slow right now...what clarifications? seresin | wasn't he just...? 22:05, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

To Le Grand Roi :). (Sorry for my slow reply). Seraphim♥ ^Whipp 14:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Ah. You're welcome. seresin | wasn't he just...? 18:17, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Appealing a deletion

You deleted the Frederic H Dustin article even though there were more keep votes and there was a concensus from even those that originally voted for deletion that the article had merit. As I pointed out in my keep vote, this is a case of systemic bias where if he had spent his accomplishments happened in a US state, there would have been no question about notability. *You* thought it was non-notable; fine, that's your right to have an opinion but you overturned the concensus that formed by nearly all those who voted that the man is of note but the article needed work. So how do we appeal and reverse a deletion that did not reflect the beliefs of those who voted in the article for deletion?--72.1.222.140 (talk) 17:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Notability was met. The person who nominated the article and the first deletion vote in fact changed their minds. The man was a trailblazer in academic, business and philantropic sense. You just chose to invalidate the people who voted saying their reasons were lacknig in your view. I think you are wrong and so I ask again my last question: how do we appeal and reverse a deletion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.222.140 (talk) 17:49, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:DRV seresin | wasn't he just...? 18:05, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! ==Deletion Review for PAGE_NAME==

An editor has asked for a deletion review of PAGE_NAME. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 72.1.222.140 (talk) 18:16, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

== AFD ==th, 2008

Thanks for closing the AFD on Matthew Kozioł but you forgot to actually delete the article :) Reggie Perrin (talk) 23:54, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Egg -> Face. Thanks. seresin | wasn't he just...? 23:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute for Middle East Understanding

Hi,

You close the AfD with the result keep, possibly based on the majority of votes. However, if you read the discussion you can see that the institute in question does not meet WP:ORG and the article should be deleted, even if some voters think it should be kept (most of them are pushing a political agenda). Is there a way to nominate the article for deletion a second time? Thanks, -- Gabi S. (talk) 07:34, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Characterizing other editors' opinions in a deletion discussion as "pushing a political agenda" is not appropriate. There were several commenters who deemed the sources enough; only two editors other than yourself supported deletion, and one was weak. If you feel strongly enough, you can start a thread at WP:DRV. seresin | wasn't he just...? 07:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia: Articles for Deletion: Sunset of my Sunrise

Hi,

you choose to delete "Sunset of my Sunrise" stating it to did not indicate Importance/Notability. However based on the Criteria for Notability, more specifically, #12: Has been the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network, and in fact as the article in question stated, they were subject of an Hour long radio broadcast on March 8, 2008

re: Recall

Eh... there's a few reasons why I'm not restricting it. First, categories and portals do still provide some encyclopedic content, so I don't see much need to exclude those. Secondly, anyone with 1,500 edits is likely to be editing a lot more than just those anyway. Finally, MediaWiki is open to admins only, and there's no way anyone is passing an RfA with only 1,500 edits - in practice, less than 5,000.
As for the sentence, thanks. I've fixed it. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 01:48, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

OH! I see. I've clarified it now, I didn't even realize it read that way. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:03, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Grawp is back

This vandal has been mass-reverting me for three days;

If it's not User:Grawp, it's a copy-cat, one of my impersonators or User:Jon Hobynx

Care to review and block;

• Bestpower (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• Getstalking (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• Leftalso (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• Honorverse Guy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

See also; User talk:Sandstein#anon harassing my edits

Cheers, Jack Merridew 06:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, I'm not entirely sure the best course of action. I'm not great with socks and what to do about them. Sorry :( seresin | wasn't he just...? 06:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll ask Jéské. He's familiar with this guy; see [1]. I asked you because I saw you blocked User:Jewishfanofnsblackmetal, whom I'd just commented on at AIV; i.e. an admin online at the moment. Cheers, Jack Merridew 06:16, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

wasn't he just...?

I dunno...I think you could do with a new signature, personally. I'm starting to ask myself who you used to be, because I can't remember. Sad on my part, I guess. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 09:24, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. I've been trying to decide on a new one, but as usual, it's taking me a long time. I actually had my sandbox open and was playing with one. seresin | wasn't he just...? 18:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

The new one's pretty cool. Nice work. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 09:03, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

hey, thanks

Oh snap, the DEA is an admin

ASIMO I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which I'm very glad to say was successful at 81/7/0. Some of the very best that Wikipedia has to offer came out to support or oppose me and the kind words from all the editors has really given me confidence to be an admin and I can't wait to start. I will take the advice of the opposes and not jump into any content disputes immediately. As well, I will try to add more content myself. Anyways, in thanks for participating in my RfA, here's your very own personal humanoid robot. Enjoy! --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 13:55, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Subpage

I'd like a subpage for Goal Line blitz —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justafish2002 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Talk:List of minor characters in Biker Mice from Mars

Hi, the template you added says "result2=KeepTe". I'm assuming the "Te" is a typo, right? I'd not 100% sure or I'd just correct it myself. TJRC (talk) 05:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, it was. I was having a hell of a time getting that template to work >:[ Thanks for the note, though :) seresin ( ¡? ) 05:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Columbine

Thanks for your changes on this article. I'm so used to going in and finding what amounts to vandalism that I was pleasantly surprised to find intelligent design. Wildhartlivie (talk) 07:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome! That is always nice :) Thanks for the note. seresin ( ¡? ) 08:10, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

good work , congrats

so nice to see u working amazingly well ,saw some of ur decisions in some AFD decisions so just wanted to make a let u know . best wishes . regards Pearll's sun (talk) 14:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. seresin ( ¡? ) 17:30, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

• =)

my RFA

Thank you! Thank you for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (73/3/1), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you need help, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an admin. Have a nice day! :) Aleta Sing 17:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Astrobotic Technology

We use edit summaries to communicate. E_dog95' ^{Hi '} 18:46, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

We do. But they aren't required. Otherwise, it would not be possible to save a page without one. It is strongly encouraged, and one would hope a bureaucrat would use them, but they are not required; and lack of one does not give license to revert for that reason alone. seresin ( ¡? ) 18:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Please read Edit_summary#Recommendations for details on how (and why) to use the edit summary. E_dog95' ^{Hi '} 03:32, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

I know how to use an edit summary, and why they are reccommended, thank you very much. I also know that they are not required. seresin ( ¡? ) 07:10, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Re:Image

I've removed the image per your comment on my talk page. It wa placed there by King Vegita. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 23:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello!

How can i help on Ursup requests and name changes? --Cream (talk) 02:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Usurpation

Absolutely. Thanks for the warning, beforehand.

Regards: Mad Hatter (talk) 09:10, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Cheese Shop sketch

I've finished cleaning this up now if you still want to AFD it. I found that Feta cheese didn't belong in the list and can testify to its accuracy now. Colonel Warden (talk) 22:42, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

I decided against nominating it for now, and I'll wait until the current AfD is decided. I didn't include it in that one because it has other verification. seresin ( ¡? ) 23:22, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Monty Python - might like to hear from you - cheers SatuSuro 23:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Um, ok! seresin ( ¡? ) 23:22, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah well - thanks -:) SatuSuro 10:21, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

You're making excellent points and I can see where you are coming from at the debate - my problem above was that I have dabbled a bit in the Indonesian project (my user name being new years day in Indonesian) and we often have xfds occur over there in xfd space - and not once do proposers or others ever let know the project (which has obvious tags on talk pages of the articles or cats used) participants know - so thanks for your response - cheers SatuSuro 23:17, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. I was intending to do all those things, but I messed up the templates on all the pages, and then I had to leave, so it slipped my mind. Thanks for reminding me. seresin ( ¡? ) 00:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

YouTube Awards

On 25 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article YouTube Awards, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bobet 18:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

My RFA

Can you please see my response to your oppose here? Thanks, - Milk's Favorite Cookie 01:43, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I have seen your response, and I am still not able to support at this time. I wish you the best of luck, however. seresin ( ¡? ) 04:12, 26 March 2008 (UTC)