User talk:Seresin/Archive 30

This page is an archive of User Talk:Seresin (or perhaps something else). If you wish to discuss something here, feel free to bring it up again. The history for this page is here, not on the main talk page. Thanks.

Archives

Until August 2007 — September 2007
October 2007 — November 2007
December 2007 — January 2008
February 2008 — March 2008
April 2008 — May 2008
June 2008 — July 2008
August 2008 — September 2008
October 2008 — November 2008
December 2008 — January 2009
February 2009 — March 2009
April 2009 — May 2009
June 2009 — July 2009
August 2009 — September 2009
October 2009 — November 2009 December 2009 — January 2010
February 2010 — March 2010
April 2010 — May 2010
June 2010 — to June 2013
to November 2014

Wikipedia:Giant dick

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Giant dick, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 68.197.16.37 (talk) 01:24, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Giant dick

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Giant dick, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 68.197.16.37 (talk) 01:24, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

{{talkback|IBen}} {{talkback|IBen}} {{talkback|IBen}} {{talkback|IBen}} iBen^talk/_contribsIf you reply here, please place a talkback notification on my page. 01:08, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Smile

Hello Seresin, IBen has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

-- iBen^talk/_contribsIf you reply here, please place a talkback notification on my page. 04:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is madness

Great work on the BLP madness story. Do you think we should include something about MZMcBride and the new arbitration case as well? It's not directly related, but it's part of the broader BLP madness.--ragesoss (talk) 18:19, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You mean this case, I take it? I didn't want to include that, since I don't see any definite relation between MZMcBride's dispersal of the list and the onset of the deletions. I'm sure there is one, but it's not public or I haven't found it, and so I don't know that it belongs in this page. ÷seresin 21:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to look through my logs - I think I deleted maybe 70 articles. Kevin (talk) 01:09, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure where I got the hundreds number from, actually. Thanks for telling me; it's been fixed. ÷seresin 01:11, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Humanitarian response by national governments to the 2010 Haiti earthquake

Please don't threaten me for changing an outdated map. Either it gets updated by someone or I will update it. I have contributed to the article extensively and have done it productively. The map was outdated and I did the right thing of updating it. I will change it as news of new donor states are added.--XLR8TION (talk) 23:12, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost

Good article, but I couldn't winkle out the exact meaning from this:

"Opposers cited, among other things, dissatisfaction with amending—and in some opinions, completely undermining the purpose of—the PROD policy instead of devising an entirely new process;.."

Perhaps the solution will involve splitting it into two sentences or the use of a semicolon. Tony (talk) 05:38, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some disliked that PROD would be used for this instead of devising a new process entirely, and some specifically thought employing PROD this way would go against the purpose of PROD entirely. If you have a way to make that clearer, have at it :-) ÷seresin 06:19, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]