User talk:Sealman

Welcome!

Hello, Sealman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! RHB ^{Talk - Edits} 21:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:HPIM0076.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:HPIM0076.JPG. The copy called Image:HPIM0076.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 19:47, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

I like your addition of local pictures. Very nice. Thank you. Maramotus 09:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

National Service Medal (United Kingdom)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of National Service Medal (United Kingdom), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.cjmedals.co.uk/showcase/national_service_medal.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bentley T-Type.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Bentley T-Type.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Norman Church

I put the Chalfont St Giles church image you uploaded on my user page, hope that is okay. It is a church I know very well. Thanks, SqueakBox 03:23, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 21:53, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

20 July Plot

Hi. Thanks for your edits. Could you please add your source to the bibliography section and amend your citations to Author-date-page number please? Many thanks! Dapi89 (talk) 13:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

‎Vierow, Erwin

Just a friendly note on ‎Vierow, Erwin. I've moved it to Erwin Vierow which is the standard naming convention on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions if you want more info. HTH!--Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

General der Infanterie

Albert Bach, an Austrian general, had also the rank General der Infanterie, so I created a disambig site. Does it make sense to translate the name of the rank into English, is there anything comparable in countries out of the German language area? --Gamsbart (talk) 23:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Goodwin

Hey there. I've been working on clearing out Wikipedia:Biographical pages with several incompatible dates of birth, and one of the entries on the list was Ken Goodwin, an article which you created. The prose lists his DOB as April 7, but the infobox says April 17. I've tried finding an online ref to confirm one of the two dates, but all I can seem to find is Wikipedia mirrors. Think you can help me out? --Cryptic C62 · Talk 02:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thanks mate! --Cryptic C62 · Talk 18:01, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wilhelm Oxenius

Re. the new article Wilhelm Oxenius, could you please add some decent refs to it?

After a bit of a search, it looks like there are plenty available, e.g. from Google books.

Cheers! Chzz ► 09:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ilse braun

A tag has been placed on Ilse braun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WWGB (talk) 07:25, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gretl Braun

A tag has been placed on Gretl Braun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WWGB (talk) 07:30, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Gretl Braun

I have nominated Gretl Braun, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gretl Braun. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ~ mazca ^talk 07:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noddy Holder bio

Hi, do you happen to have a copy of Noddy Holder's autobio, Who's Crazee Now?? We're looking for any information regarding the contemporary reception of Merry Xmas Everybody. Please post here if you do. Thanks, Majorly talk 13:14, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Sealman! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Martin Young (journalist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Fred Housego - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ken Goodwin (comedian) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Issy Van Randwyck - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
John Pitman (journalist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Delena Kidd article needs additional references, as IMDB is not considered a reliable source. Regards, PDCook (talk) 21:47, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:32, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide yo do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:39, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links in new articles

Hi Sealman, for some reason the links to squadron histories on the RAF website in articles you've recently created in articles such as No. 326 Squadron RAF and No. 328 Squadron RAF don't work - the URL leads to a 'page not found' page on the RAF website. Also, adding the 'and more' to links to the RafWeb website seems unnecessary to me, especially as there isn't actually much more on offer there beyond a very brief history of the squadron and some photos. Regardsm Nick-D (talk) 11:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All Creatures

I noticed you created the article (kudos for that), but wondered where you got that the series had 91 episodes? - Dudesleeper talk 01:10, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Sealman! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Modest Barnstar
		In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.0.48 (talk) 13:52, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alfie Fripp (RIP): DYK nomination

Thanks for your work. Please see Template:Did you know nominations/Alfie Fripp. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 00:59, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Alfie Fripp

On 17 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alfie Fripp, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Alfie Fripp, the longest-serving and oldest-surviving British prisoner of war of World War II, "liberated" tools used in the excavation of the Great Escape tunnel (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alfie Fripp. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:02, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Addison Cresswell

On 9 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Addison Cresswell, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Addison Cresswell, agent to Jonathan Ross and Michael McIntyre, founded a company with Paul Merton and Julian Clary? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Addison Cresswell. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Axminster Church.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:43, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Bourne End Marina.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:03, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Chalfont St Giles Church.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:11, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Chalfont St Peter Church.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:14, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Chardstock Church.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:26, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Hulett

Do you intend to nominate this for DYK? Its just long enough.... nice article Victuallers (talk) 10:03, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Axminster Church.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Axminster Church.JPG

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Bounty Bible

Hello! Your submission of Bounty Bible at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk) 04:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bounty Bible

On 1 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bounty Bible, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Bounty Bible (pictured) was presented to the Pitcairn Islands people 160 years after the mutineers from HMS Bounty settled there? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bounty Bible. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks to you for your contribution Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Minky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Small portables

Please, I implore you not to put up photographs that locate small valuable items such a as exquisite icons in churches that are almost certainly not well protected. The mother of a man in Romania, last years burnt an unknown number of valuable artworks, including a Picasso, that her son had stolen. An icon may be more significant to its owners than any Picasso on the planet, but to a thief, it's money on the antique market and almost untraceable. Please use discretion in what you reveal concerning small portable items. On one hand, Wikipedia licenses you to put any factual information that you have access to, in the encyclopedia. On the other hand, the individual value of each such image is very slight (within the context of Wikipedia) compared to the interest of the owner of the object displayed. Amandajm (talk) 06:12, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you speak Romanian?

It's an ongoing problem with church articles, including those about churches in the UK. Unfortunately my experiences have made me acutely aware of the problem!

I have visited Romania, but only for four days, and those were almost entirely taken up with wedding arrangements and festivities. I would have loved to have had time to explore the wonderful little churches, but it wasn't a possibility. Maybe one day! Amandajm (talk) 09:22, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you put in more images, give them all captions, and don't double up. e.g. if you return pics showing structure, then describe what is going on with the joints or the decoration or whatever, so that each caption is informing you of something different. Amandajm (talk) 09:48, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Church of the Holy Archangels, Rogoz may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

with murals in bright colours by Nicholas Mann and Radu Munteanu from the village of Ungureni] who also produced wall paintings for the church in [[Deseşti]] and others in the Lăpuş area.<ref

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Church of the Holy Archangels, Rogoz

On 26 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Church of the Holy Archangels, Rogoz, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that according to tradition the Church of the Holy Archangels, Rogoz was built from two huge elm trees? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Church of the Holy Archangels, Rogoz. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it may be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your article from the DYK project Victuallers (talk) 10:22, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rohan (clothing)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rohan (clothing), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:41, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nazi Germany vs. Putinist Germany

Any familiar? German Occupation Medals and Crimea Shield vs. ru:медаль «За возвращение Крыма», medal For Return of the Crimea - Puppet of the Kremlin Aksenov received a medal for "For return of the Crimea" Пpecтyпнocти.HET - and ru:медаль "За освобождение Крыма и Севастополя" (article removed), medal For Liberation of the Crimea and Sevastopol - The ex-the mayor of Izmail after Aksenov received the medal "For Liberation of the Crimea" Пpecтyпнocти.HET ? --85.76.52.194 (talk) 11:06, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination

I heard Mary Beard and decided to start an article but you got there before me .... Victuallers (talk) 13:30, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Tom Hulatt

Hello! Your submission of Tom Hulatt at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! C 679 18:23, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tom Hulatt

On 6 May 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tom Hulatt, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Tom Hulatt came in third when the barrier of running a mile in under four minutes was broken 60 years ago today? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tom Hulatt. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:08, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Bodenschatz

Hello, Sealman. If you look at this man's German article, he is in the de:Kategorie:Richter (Volksgerichtshof). Translated literally this means "Judge of the People's Court", but the category itself sometimes includes other members of the People's Court. Do you know what capacity he had in the People's Court? - Hoops gza (talk) 19:05, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. Unfortunately, I don't have that book either. - Hoops gza (talk) 20:44, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fred Housego for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fred Housego is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Housego until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Laun chba ller 16:39, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Delena Kidd for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Delena Kidd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delena Kidd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Laun chba ller 16:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ray Mayhew has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBH (talk) 00:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Poldark (2015 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Just. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Coyne

For verification reasons, may I ask where you got April 2 as his date of death from? Rusted AutoParts 23:29, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, John Carver (footballer), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sealman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Medical Love Song

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Medical Love Song, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. T v x1 23:42, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Slang terms for money for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Slang terms for money is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slang terms for money until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anmccaff (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shirley Chambers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shirley Chambers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirley Chambers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Comics who appeared on The Comedians

Template:Comics who appeared on The Comedians has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:56, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox medical details

Template:Infobox medical details has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox medical person. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 21:08, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jaci Stephen

The article Jaci Stephen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. Apart from the present article being sourced to a self-description and a dead link, a WP:BEFORE shows almost zero biographical coverage about the subject - just bylines of articles by the subject, and most of those in deprecated source (hence not usable for notability) the Daily Mail. Is there any decent coverage of the subject elsewhere?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 16:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sunday Times Rich List 2015 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunday Times Rich List 2015 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunday Times Rich List 1989 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 14:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Fields for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Fields is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Fields until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 23:00, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nigel (dog) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nigel (dog) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel (dog) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Cupper52 (talk) 18:44, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Order of the Zahringer Lion has been nominated for listification

Category:Recipients of the Order of the Zahringer Lion has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]