User talk:ScrumptiousFood

Welcome!

Hi ScrumptiousFood! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 17:41, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nikolai Petrovsky (scientist) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nikolai Petrovsky (scientist), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more evidence that it meets either the WP:GNG, or, pereferable, WP:NPROF . I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's [ guidelines and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 10:56, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barry Schoub moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Barry Schoub, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs moreeveidence of meeting wither WP:NPOF or WP:GNG from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's [ notability guidelines and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 10:56, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robert F. Garry moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Robert F. Garry, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs evidence of meeting WP:NPROF, which usually requires being shown to be an influence in their field as measured by awards or citations. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 10:58, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Global Health Governance

The article Global Health Governance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal (published on a blog site). Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Apparently does not even have an ISSN. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 19:06, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yanzhong Huang moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yanzhong Huang, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs to show notability according to WP:PROF I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:PROF guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 02:46, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neil L. Harrison moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Neil L. Harrison, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs to show notability by WP:PROF 've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:PROFy guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 02:47, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charles H. Calisher moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Charles H. Calisher, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs to show notability by WP:PROF. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meet guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 02:49, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse D. Bloom moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jesse D. Bloom, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs information to show it meets WP:PROF. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 02:58, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kristian G Andersen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kristian G Andersen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs to show it meets one of the criteria at WP:PROF. . I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's guidelines and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 02:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Nunberg (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Novem Linguae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't appear to pass WP:NPROF or WP:GNG. Could not find a Google Scholar profile, so hard to evaluate how influential this person is. If you have anything that shows this person's h-index or # of citations for their papers, please edit it into the article (NPROF#1). Same for newspaper articles or books that cover this individual in multiple paragraphs of detail (GNG).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Nunberg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jack Nunberg, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–Novem Linguae (talk) 18:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ScrumptiousFood! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! –Novem Linguae (talk) 18:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important message

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—Paleo Neonate – 19:14, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lancet letter (COVID-19 origins) has been accepted

Lancet letter (COVID-19 origins), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

PK650 (talk) 22:30, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI and AE and aspersions

[1] It does one very little good to threaten to take things to a noticeboard. If you'd like to do it, do it. Even though I do not think it has risen to that level, and in general I would recommend against it, as WP:BOOMERANG is an imposing cautionary tale. Likewise, these boards do not appreciate it when conduct disputes are brought there instead of dispute resolution.

Repeatedly threatening to take another editor to these noticeboards is not taken kindly on Wikipedia, see: WP:ASPERSIONS, and can be construed as harassment. Especially when/if it is ever considered to be an attempt to discourage other editors from participating in a discussion. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 22:07, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd support any measure to topic ban Shibbolethink from Covid-19. 2600:1700:8660:E180:D8A4:BA26:75FB:A8FF (talk) 23:39, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Shibbolethink: dispute resolution was already attempted with the RfC, except that you are twisting its context [2] [3], contradicting your own !vote [4]. I don't think there is anything I or anyone else can say in any discussion that you won't retort to with some irrelevant policy just to WP:WIN. There is no consensus to remove the (attributed) allegations against the Chinese government, which Thucydides411 has been trying to remove from Wikipedia for over a year [5], now in coordination with other editors [6]. Both you and these editors have gone from arguing against a COVID-19 origin theory the Chinese government pressured the WHO to drop [7], to arguing against an account of the COVID-19 outbreak that the Chinese government denies, and for a containment strategy every government in the world has dropped. Patience is wearing thin. ScrumptiousFood (talk) 19:17, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thee are other forms of dispute resolution we could try: An RfC on the page itself. A WP:3O. the dispute resolution noticeboard. etc etc. I'm sorry that you feel that I've contradicted myself or attempted to WIN any discussion with you, that is not my intent. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 20:25, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shibbolethink, how do you figure those diffs don't show you contradicting yourself? ScrumptiousFood, I have more diffs if you want to take this to AE. This needs to stop. LondonIP (talk) 00:22, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

one diff is me asking an earnest question and the others are me making statements. I do not state things that are contradictory, I instead ask for your position on a specific question, so I can better understand the discussion. By assuming these edits "contradict" you are assuming what my opinion is of the best answer to that question, and I suspect you might be misunderstanding my position on it. If you want clarity, just ask, as I have done. As always. I am still awaiting answers to some of those questions.

I think there may be answers buried deep in replies to other threads on other pages from other users, but I cannot find them. I am asking your stance in that diff, @ScrumptiousFood. I would never assume that you would have the exact same opinion as anyone else, simply because you and they had agreed in some other discussion. I would hope you would grant me the same curtesy. Failure to do this is a component of WP:BATTLEGROUND behavior.

I disagree with the interpretation you have stated of my actions thus far, if that wasn't already clear. It rarely does one well to try and understand what is in the mind of other editors. I have already said many times that I think an encyclopedic attributed description of the allegations, in summary style, belongs in the article. I think our disagreement falls in what that summary looks like. Please do not ascribe views or opinions to me that I have not expressed myself, such as that I want to erase mentions of this, or that I am "arguing against" criticism of the Chinese government. I am doing no such thing. That is a small band of straw men in a field of scarecrows.. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 00:53, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very specifically, I would like to point out the differnece between "twisting...context" and the actual reality, which is that I may have misunderstood what was meant by "Chinese academic publications," since it was not clarified by the OP until very very recently. A misunderstanding is not "twisting context." The former is a factor of asking for clarity (which I did), the latter is an intentional act of malice (which I did not do). — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 01:51, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Shibbolethink: I find it difficult to accept your argument in good faith. I don't want to have to take this to WP:AE, but I also don't see why we should go through WP:DR when WP:NOCONSENSUS would advise to retain the undercounting allegations in the Chinese government response to COVID-19 and COVID-19 pandemic in mainland China pages. I checked the number of editors involved on both pages and observed a rough consensus to keep the allegations, and even a softening of stance, up till your incongruant analysis. ProcrastinatingReader's arguments for deleting the allegations and demand for scientific sourcing are likewise without validity, for a subject that is clearly political. Please edit the section in the draft I created. ScrumptiousFood (talk) 18:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an opinion?

See Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Zero_COVID.Moxy- 01:06, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CutePeach

Notifying you as an interested party. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 21:59, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: my alleged COI

[8] Either bring this to WP:COIN or let it go. The way you have continued to use it in an attempt to besmirch my reputation runs afoul of WP:ASPERSIONS: It is unacceptable for an editor to routinely accuse others of misbehavior without reasonable cause in an attempt to besmirch their reputations. Concerns, if they cannot be resolved directly with the other users involved, should be brought up in the appropriate forums with evidence, if at all.

If you do it again, I will bring it to WP:ANI for a more formal sanction. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 21:24, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Barry Schoub

Hello, ScrumptiousFood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Barry Schoub, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nikolai Petrovsky (scientist)

Hello, ScrumptiousFood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nikolai Petrovsky (scientist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yanzhong Huang

Hello, ScrumptiousFood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yanzhong Huang, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Neil L. Harrison

Hello, ScrumptiousFood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Neil L. Harrison, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Charles H. Calisher

Hello, ScrumptiousFood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charles H. Calisher, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jesse D. Bloom

Hello, ScrumptiousFood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jesse D. Bloom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jack Nunberg

Hello, ScrumptiousFood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jack Nunberg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesse D. Bloom has been accepted

Jesse D. Bloom, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cabrils (talk) 23:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yanzhong Huang (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yanzhong Huang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yanzhong Huang, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 08:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Camille Vasquez moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Camille Vasquez, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Owlf 📪 20:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Camille Vasquez

The article Camille Vasquez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A case of WP:BLP1E. Only notable for one high profile case.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 18:05, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Camille Vasquez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camille Vasquez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Vasquez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Atlantic306 (talk) 22:25, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bare URLs

Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references, as you did to Jixian Wang! However, you should know that adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to linkrot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources. A bare URL is a URL cited as a reference for some information in an article without any accompanying information about the linked page. In other words, it is just URL copied and pasted into the Wiki text, inserted between <ref>...</ref> tags, without title, author, date, or any of the usual information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum^[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already entered one or more bare urls to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles, and to avoid future link rot, please consider supplementing your bare URLs—creating full, inline citations with title, author, date, publisher, etc. More information can be found at Wikipedia:Inline citations. Thank you.

Ways to improve Ivan Oransky

Hello, ScrumptiousFood,

Thank you for creating Ivan Oransky.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Needs more in-depth coverage of the subject specifically. NYT js passing mentions and quotes. Yale is connected source. publicationplan is an interview

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Slywriter}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slywriter (talk) 16:59, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't think the New York Times piece gives him more than passing mention? ScrumptiousFood (talk) 16:35, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jack Nunberg

Hello, ScrumptiousFood. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jack Nunberg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:55, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 16:54, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Robert F. Garry

Hello, ScrumptiousFood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert F. Garry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kristian G Andersen

Hello, ScrumptiousFood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kristian G Andersen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kristian G Andersen (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TipsyElephant was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kristian G Andersen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kristian G Andersen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TipsyElephant (talk) 17:02, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert F. Garry (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert F. Garry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robert F. Garry, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 09:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles H. Calisher has been accepted

Charles H. Calisher, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 23:15, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barry Schoub has been accepted

Barry Schoub, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 23:29, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kristian G Andersen has been accepted

Kristian G Andersen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 00:22, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neil L. Harrison (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neil L. Harrison and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Neil L. Harrison, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 02:29, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 10:29, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stuart McGill (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is not sufficient information for an article. McGill is indeed notable , both because of Order of Canada , and his publication record, with citations in the hundreds for both his research and his review articles.

But the basic information is missing, and you can easily add it: the references you have with give the basic biographical data; google scholar will list the most cited articles..

It is unfair and unreasonable to expect others to do this work for you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stuart McGill and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 17:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikolai Petrovsky (scientist) (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikolai Petrovsky (scientist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:11, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert F. Garry (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

For each of the many highly cited articles, he is one of many dozen co-authors. There is no way of determining notability from that.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert F. Garry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 14:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital

Hello, ScrumptiousFood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Neil L. Harrison

Hello, ScrumptiousFood. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Neil L. Harrison".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Proximal Origins letter

Hello, ScrumptiousFood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Proximal Origins letter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stuart McGill

Hello, ScrumptiousFood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stuart McGill, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital

Hello, ScrumptiousFood. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:32, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nikolai Petrovsky (scientist)

Hello, ScrumptiousFood. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nikolai Petrovsky".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:27, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert F. Garry

Hello, ScrumptiousFood. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robert F. Garry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:54, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stuart McGill

Hello, ScrumptiousFood. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stuart McGill".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]