User talk:ScholarlyScribe

LudhianaUser, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi LudhianaUser! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

July 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Harjit Kaur Talwandi. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:59, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hi ScholarlyScribe! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 16:38, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kj cheetham. I will take care of the edits in future. Thank you. ScholarlyScribe (talk) 16:45, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paid articles

Please stop adding PR and brand paid placement to articles, as you did on Zaara Yesmin. "mid-day" will typically label these clearly as "brand media". Thanks. Sam Kuru (talk) 19:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Master Dev Raj Singh Talwandi (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Ranjit Singh Talwandi instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Master Dev Raj Singh Talwandi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:33, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dan, thank you for the review. I would like to bring to your notice that Ranjit Singh Talwandi and Master Dev Raj Singh Talwandi are 2 different persons. Master Dev Raj Singh Talwandi was elected from Raikot in 1977 and Ranjit Singh Talwandi was elected from the same constituency in 2002. Please refer to https://punjabassembly.nic.in/images/docs/Vidhan%20Sabha%20Compendium.pdf this link. Master Dev Raj Singh Talwandi is on 198 number and Ranjit Singh Talwandi on 723. This is the list of elected members to the Punjab Legislative Assembly from 1937 to 2017. Moreover, Master Dev Raj Singh Talwandi is the brother of Jagdev Singh Talwandi whereas Ranjit Singh Talwandi is the son of Jagdev Singh Talwandi (reference to these facts are provided in their respective pages). ScholarlyScribe (talk) 05:55, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aanal Kotak (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Week accepts submissions by users so is not a reliable source nor are press releases/announcements. Interviews and her comments are not independent so cannot be used to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aanal Kotak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 13:48, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aanal Kotak has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aanal Kotak. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 09:14, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karnail Singh Doad has been accepted

Karnail Singh Doad, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 12:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mehar Singh (politician) has been accepted

Mehar Singh (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 12:09, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manmohan Singh Brar has been accepted

Manmohan Singh Brar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 12:13, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avtar Singh Brar has been accepted

Avtar Singh Brar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 18:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ScholarlyScribe Please do add some more WP:CATEGORIES. Qcne (talk) 18:15, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Instant Bollywood

The article Instant Bollywood has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article with paid/ sponsored sources. Has no significant coverage apart from routine PR and trivial mentions

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:50, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Applus2021 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Applus2021. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

RoySmith (talk) 22:33, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ScholarlyScribe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@RoySmith:ScholarlyScribe (talk) 06:58, 18 October 2023 (UTC)I have been blocked on wikipedia as a sockpuppet. My username is ScholarlyScribe. I don't know any of the accounts that I have been linked to. This is my sole account on wikipedia. The edits that I have performed were because of the tags present on the gedela srinubabu page. The edits that I had performed on his page were solely because his content was published on reliable news websites. So, to improve the style and content of his page, I performed the edits.[reply]

Decline reason:

None of this addresses what is discussed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Applus2021 like the fact that this block is supported with technical evidence. 331dot (talk) 08:49, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ScholarlyScribe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@331dot:@RoySmith: I am on wikipedia since December, 2021. Contrary to mentioned in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Applus2021 that i have been on wikipedia since March,2023. I don’t know the other accounts which i am being linked to. The edits performed on Gedela Srinubabu page were solely because of the tags and to improve the style of the wikipedia page. I have always tried to follow wikipedia guidelines. In the categories sections of Gedela Srinubabu these was a section named “Businesspeople from Andhra Pradesh” which contains list of Businesspeople from Andhra Pradesh. In that list i tried to explore different pages and found that there were tags present in many of the pages. For instance, the page of Nimmagadda Prasad contains a long lead section which is not according to wikipedia guidelines. In fact, i added tags like Very Long and Sections tag but reverted them subsequently because i thought already 3 tags have been placed and addition of 2 more tags would not look like a readable format. Instead, I changed the “Giving Back” section title to “Philanthropy” making it more of an encyclopaedia tone. Secondly, in the page of Kavuri Samba Siva Rao in the Early Life Section it was written like "Born in 1943, he was educated at National Institute of Technology, Warangal" which is grammatically not correct. I tried to correct it. Also, i added the link of wikipedia page of Machilipatnam Lok Sabha constituency on this page which was not previously present. It was the first occurrence of Machilipatnam Lok Sabha constituency in the page. I just tried to correct the wikipedia pages in a good faith. Links to other accounts are purely coincidental.ScholarlyScribe (talk) 09:49, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. ArbCom has received an appeal. Cabayi (talk) 10:43, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@RoySmith: I would like to tell that I have been accused of sockpuppet for AustinTravis27 and James.Shaw2717 and not for User:Applus2021.This thing is mentioned in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Applus2021. AustinTravis27 was created on 28 April,2023 as mentioned in Public logs and James.Shaw2717 was created on 21 July, 2023 as mentioned in Public Logs. ScholarlyScribe was created on 15 December, 2021.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ScholarlyScribe. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Cabayi (talk) 11:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:André Abdoune

Hello, ScholarlyScribe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:André Abdoune, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:André Abdoune

Hello, ScholarlyScribe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "André Abdoune".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Amol Kagne

Hello, ScholarlyScribe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amol Kagne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amol Kagne

Hello, ScholarlyScribe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amol Kagne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roshni Kapoor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roshni Kapoor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roshni Kapoor (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Baqi:) (talk) 13:20, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]