User talk:Sayyid Mir Israfil

October 2020

If you are connected to someone or something you have written about (a few examples are writing about yourself, your business, your band, a member of your family, your client) then you should be aware that Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline discourages you from writing about that subject. The main reason for that is that experience over the years indicates that editors with such a connection to a subject they are writing about are likely to find it very difficult, or even impossible, to stand back from their writing and see how it will look from the detached perspective of an outsider, so that they are likely to write in ways that look promotional to others, even if they sincerely think they are writing in a neutral way. Also, if your editing forms all or part of work for which you are paid, whether as an employee, as a contractor, or in any other capacity, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require you to state who is paying you, and what your connection to them is. JBW (talk) 08:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sayyid Mir Israfil, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sayyid Mir Israfil! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Hello, I'm GreaterPonce665. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sayyid Mahmud Agha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 21:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sayyid Raphael Dakik

The article Sayyid Raphael Dakik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:BIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 00:39, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly see my answer concerning Sultan Masood Dakik as an analogy for Sayyid Raphael Dakik. Sayyid Raphael Dakik is his oldest son, who is commiting himself to lobbyism and business diplomacy in his young age.

To be honest you should remove every article of a prince of an abloished monarchy, when you want to delete these two pages.

Thank you in advance for your understanding. Sayyid Mir Israfil (talk) 03:34, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly notify, that I am very grateful for improvements from your side in order to make these articles better. Sayyid Mir Israfil (talk) 04:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sayyid Sultan Masood Dakik

The article Sayyid Sultan Masood Dakik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:BIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 00:40, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But the article on Sultan Masood Dakik does already exist in German and Persian.

Furthermore these people are present, living members of the family of Hazrat Ishaan, Sayyid Mir Jan and Sayyid Mir Fazlullah Agha, who all have Wikipedia pages and are well-known islamic saints.

It is not right to delete these pages of their living representative relatives.

If this page is to be removed, then there are too many other pages you should actually look first than this.

That the sources are "too close to the subject" are actually the most verifiable information and not to be disrespected negatively.

This is why a deletion is not legitimate.

I thank the Wikipedia community for their understanding in this concern and am looking forward to the acceptance of these articles, not to be deleted.

Thank you very much Sayyid Mir Israfil (talk) 03:30, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore the sources are from very known German media and press companies like NRZ, RP, the West etc.

The seriosity of these sources can in now way be contested. Sayyid Mir Israfil (talk) 03:43, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly notify that I am really grateful for improvements from your side to make this article better.

It will be great for you have very long experience. Sayyid Mir Israfil (talk) 04:05, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sayyid Raphael Dakik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sayyid Raphael Dakik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayyid Raphael Dakik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

... discospinster _talk 04:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sayyid Sultan Masood Dakik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sayyid Sultan Masood Dakik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayyid Sultan Masood Dakik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

... discospinster _talk 04:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Sayyid Sultan Masood Dakik. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:52, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly see the arguments I have given in the discussion page.

If you want to put some of these arguments at the discussion to the article you are free to do so. Sayyid Mir Israfil (talk) 06:56, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sayyid Sultan Masood Dakik, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 07:00, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Sayyid Raphael Dakik, you may be blocked from editing. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 07:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Sayyid Sultan Masood Dakik. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 07:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:49ersBelongInSanFrancisco may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 07:15, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is what he has done to my talking page. If you have anything to contribute than tell in the discussion page with arguments. Give your arguments against mine, surely you cannot bring forward any argument against us!. -Sayyid Mir Israfil

It is very offensive to edit around at my talking page and articles without having given ANY arguments against mine in the deletion discussion, which is already decided for our sake, for you AGAIN cannot bring ANY Arguments against us! -Sayyid Mir Israfil

Deletion tags

You may not remove deletion tags from an article while a discussion is underway. This is a basic rule of how English Wikipedia works. If you remove them again I will report you to an administrator for disruptive editing. The tags are there to bring other editors to the discussion so that we can reach a consensus. If you’ve contributed to the discussion that’s fine, now you just have to wait a week while the discussion continues. You can contribute to the discussion again if you wish to but you can’t remove the tags. Mccapra (talk) 07:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is so unjust. I have given my arguments in the discussion and you are not able to say anything against it.

If you put such a disresepctful template you should think 10 times before or edit to improve by yourselves freely, instead of exposing this article to such a shameful template.

Sayyid Mir Israfil

I want everyone to stop acts of vandalism!

Sayyid Mir Israfil

January 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 22:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hashim Al-Gaylani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hashim Al-Gaylani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hashim Al-Gaylani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alauddin Attar (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ezlev were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alauddin Attar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alauddin Attar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

warmly, ezlev. talk 03:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alauddin Attar

Hello, Sayyid Mir Israfil. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alauddin Attar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alauddin Attar (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This only has a single source - not enough to show notabilty

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alauddin Attar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alauddin Attar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sayyid Raphael Dakik

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sayyid Raphael Dakik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayyid Raphael Dakik. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mccapra (talk) 21:15, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sayyid Raphael Dakik (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was:

This is a hagiography, not an article. Wikipedia requires articles to be written in a neutral tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sayyid Raphael Dakik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sayyid Raphael Dakik, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tagishsimon (talk) 13:17, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No original research

Regarding your recent edit to Aisha (which has been reverted), there were several problems.

1. Please look at the policy Wikipedia:No original research. Wikipedia cannot publish your own personal analysis, interpretations, or conjectures.

2. Especially see the section WP:SYNTHESIS, which says that you cannot combine information from different sources to synthesize a conclusion that is not present in those sources.

3. Finally, the sort of sources required for the passage you added should be reliable scholarly works that reach the same conclusions, not Hadith, which are primary sources. The relevant policies are Wikipedia:Reliable sources and the section WP:PRIMARYSOURCES in the "no original research" policy.

I didn't revert your edit, someone else did, but I wanted to notify you about it and explain why your contribution didn't belong in that article. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:45, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please could you use Talk:Aisha to explain your edit to the article.-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:37, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mir Sayyid Raphael Dakik

Dear Mr. Kuru, I appreciate your work and your honest and good intentions. Could you be so kind as to help me to improve this article without deleting it, please? I express my gratitude to you in advance for your kind gesture. We really appreciate your help in this regards. In case you have some points to consider, do not hestitate to contact me in my talk page, please. With sincere regards.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sayyid Mir Israfil (talk • contribs)

The best place to do this would have been by working on a draft of the article. As you've chosen to move this back into mainspace, I've deleted it per the outcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayyid Raphael Dakik. Please consider this a final warning that any further additions of promotional material with junk sources will likely lead to actions restricting your editing abilities. Kuru (talk) 15:51, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]