User talk:Satrehsb

Welcome!

Hello, Satrehsb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:15, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Mohammed Shah Kazmi

Your new article is very confusing.

Kazmi lived from 1866 to 1951, yet the photo in the article shows a man somewhere between 30 and 50 years old, and so would have to been taken between 1890 and 1910, but the photo is clearly more recent than that, so it is very likely not a photo of Kazmi.
Your article states that Kazmi entered university at the age of 3. Really???
The reference you cite:
Qazmi, Shah. "Syed Mohammed Shah Kazmi Biography". Syed Shah Qazmi. 2nd. 30m³ (G.M Syed). Hyderabad: ETeam: 25. 654567875. nhvg {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); |format= requires |url= (help)

cannot be properly identified. It is noted as a PDF file, but no URL is given. The name of the magazine is given as Syed Shah Qazmi: are we to believe there is an entire periodical magazine devoted to this individual?
Other than being the father of G. M. Syed, your article makes no claim of any particular notability, so unless you can bolster the article with more facts, it is likely to be deleted.

-- WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:15, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Syed Mohammed Shah Kazmi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Syed Mohammed Shah Kazmi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Mohammed Shah Kazmi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:10, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Syed Mohammed Shah Kazmi. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:59, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Asim Jameel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Asim Jameel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:35, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Poonja Jinnah

The article Poonja Jinnah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bazj (talk) 12:44, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is not inherited

Please understand one of Wikipedia's policies on notability: notability is not inherited. This means that a person is not notable merely for being the father of a notable person. I understand that in certain cultures, one's ancestors are quite important. A member of these cultures will often identify themselves by identifying their father and grandfather. But at Wikipedia, a person's notability derives from the availability of sources that cover that subject in extensive detail. Merely being the father of this politician or the grandfather of that poet is not sufficient. I'm glad you wish to help build this encyclopedia, and I'd hate to see you continuing to spend effort on pages that won't be kept. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:52, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

I have undone your move of Zechariah (priest) to Zakaria (priest). The English Wikipedia uses the most commonly used English spelling for article titles, and in English this person is known as Zechariah. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 01:05, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to Syed Mohammed Shah Kazmi, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 05:58, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muzammil Memon (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PotatoNinja was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muzammil Memon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PotatoNinja^{(Talk to me!)} 18:05, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Satrehsb, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! PotatoNinja^{(Talk to me!)} 18:05, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. Your recent edit to the page Feroze Gandhi appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:41, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain?

Why are you creating hoax articles like Mubarak Ali Gandhi? —SpacemanSpiff 18:55, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mubarak Ali Gandhi

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Mubarak Ali Gandhi, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 18:58, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mithibai Jinnah (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Non-dropframe was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mithibai Jinnah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--Non-Dropframe _talk 19:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Satrehsb, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --Non-Dropframe _talk 19:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mithibai Jinnah (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mithibai Jinnah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 07:41, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Satrehsb, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 07:41, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Haris Qureshi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Haris Qureshi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 11:44, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please stop contributing articles about non-notable relatives of notable people, or of "Pakistani politicians" without specifying just what office they held. There are criteria for inclusion at Wikipedia; please familiarize yourself with them. You have been warned about this on several occasions; if you continue to introduce inappropriate pages, you will likely find yourself blocked. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:26, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miraj Begum

The article Miraj Begum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article seems to violate WP:note. Only source cited is a blog.Could not locate reliable sources to contribute to the article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 14:22, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Miraj Begum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Miraj Begum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:28, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Imam Bibi (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Imam Bibi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Satrehsb, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Haris Qureshi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Haris Qureshi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 17:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Haris Qureshi, you may be blocked from editing. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 17:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Imam Bibi Iqbal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Imam Bibi Iqbal, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Compassionate727 (talk) 14:57, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ibrahim Mujaab

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ibrahim Mujaab requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a specific animal, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:31, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Ibrahim Mujaab, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. You have been told on many different occasions that the mere fact of being related to a notable person does not make a person notable in themself. Please stop creating such articles. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:33, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain...

... this edit, in which you tagged Sajid Ali Abbasi for deletion under WP:CSD#G5 (creation by a banned user)? The creator of that article does not appear to have ever been blocked or banned. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:09, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ghulam Murtaza Bhutto

The article Ghulam Murtaza Bhutto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Ghulam Murtaza Bhutto produced a lot of notable descendants. That does not make him notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:10, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One more try

I'm going to try one last time to engage you in a discussion about your editing here at Wikipedia. With few exceptions, almost every one of your edits here has been undone, and every article you have tried to create has been or will soon be deleted. Multiple editors have warned you about this, both using Wikipedia's standard warning templates, and in direct contact as I am doing now.

You have insisted on creating articles about people who appear only to be notable because they were someone's father or mother or child. But you have been told multiple times that notability is not inherited. If you would click on that link and read the policy, what you would learn is that we don't include articles in Wikipedia about people solely because they were related to someone else. We require that the person have accomplished something of significance themselves, and that the accomplishments were of such note that independent sources wrote about them. I understand that in some parts of the world, a persons family is an important feature of their biography and of their identity. I believe that Pakistan would fall into this category (and, from your writing, I understand you to be from Pakistan), so I understand why you would wish to create these articles. But Wikipedia is not governed by Pakistani culture (or, in the ideal, but British or American culture either), so we don't use such cultural norms to decide which article will be included.

I would really encourage you to engage in the discussion here at your talk page so we can work through these issues in a collaborative manner. The alternative is to bring administrators into the process to prevent you from further disrupting the project. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:21, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ghulam Murtaza Bhutto for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghulam Murtaza Bhutto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghulam Murtaza Bhutto until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, I'm WikiDan61. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Sajid Ali Abbasi because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:17, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naseer Soomro (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Naseer Soomro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:34, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Satrehsb, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:34, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mithibai Jinnah (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jaaron95 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mithibai Jinnah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JAaron95 ^Talk 11:07, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Satrehsb, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JAaron95 ^Talk 11:07, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mithibai Jinnah (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mithibai Jinnah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 19:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Mithibai Jinnah

Draft:Mithibai Jinnah, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Mithibai Jinnah and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Mithibai Jinnah during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 19:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eshani Diana Jayapala (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eshani Diana Jayapala and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:03, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Satrehsb, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:03, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Dudman (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Dudman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:58, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Satrehsb, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:58, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Emibai Jinnah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Emibai Jinnah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PamD 13:38, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Emibai Jinnah

In this edit you removed a "Speedy deletion" tag from an article you had created yourself. Adding a "Hang on" tag before anyone else has proposed deletion is not useful, but shows that you realise that an article on a person which "does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject" is likely to be deleted. Being the cousin of someone famous is not sufficient to satisfy WP:NOTABLE, as has been explained to you above. Please stop wasting everyone's time in trying to add articles about people who are appear to be simply not of enough interest, as themselves, to be represented in the encyclopedia. If you have references in independent reliable sources which talk about these people as individuals, please add them to the articles. PamD 14:10, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Enough. Please stop creating articles on non notable family members of notable politicians. Please read and understand our policies on notability. Fiddle Faddle 15:36, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sir Dinshaw Petit (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sir Dinshaw Petit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 15:38, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Taufiq Rafat

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Taufiq Rafat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fiddle Faddle 15:40, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Sir Dinshaw Petit

Draft:Sir Dinshaw Petit, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sir Dinshaw Petit and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Sir Dinshaw Petit during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 15:59, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Howard Rees (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Howard Rees and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 16:02, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Babita. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Fiddle Faddle 16:06, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Shireen Jinnah. RichardOSmith (talk) 18:40, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being a sock puppet of SahabAliwadia (talk · contribs). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DrKiernan (talk) 16:05, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Howard Rees has been accepted

Howard Rees, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—Anne Delong (talk) 19:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eshani Diana Jayapala

Hello, Satrehsb. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Eshani Diana Jayapala".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Naseer Soomro

Hello, Satrehsb. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Naseer Soomro".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:32, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]