User talk:Sarahj2107/Archive 11

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Sarahj2107. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 9

→

How to demonstrate notability

Sarah Jane, Good evening. Can you help me with the concept of notability as it pertains to the recently deleted page, Preemptive Solutions? I saw a notice of potential deletion of the page because of concerns about notability and found that Wikipedia says: Notability should be demonstrated using reliable sources according to Wikipedia guidelines (not policy).[1] Reliable sources generally include mainstream news media and major academic journals I added several secondary sources and the page was deleted. I can’t find any indication as to whether the sources I added were appropriate/ inappropriate, or sufficient/insufficient in number or scope; there were no comments added after the resources were added. If you can give me pointers about their notability that would be appreciated. By the way, congratulations on the layout of your page—the formatting drives comprehension. MaxwellSO (talk) 22:50, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

@MaxwellSO: Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I can't verify the Pro J2ME source you added but the other one [1] isn't really enough to prove notablily. It only makes a passing mention to PreEmptive Solutions and doesn't go into detail about the company itself, which is what is needed. I would also question whether it is independent given the company's connection to Microsoft. Overall the sources in the final version of the article were not enough to prove notability and the people in the discussion felt that it was written in an overly promotional way. WP:42 is a good guide to notability, although it's not official. You will need to find multiple sources (probably at least 3 but the more the better) that are completely independant of the company and are considered reliable. These would be newspapers, news sites, books, or academic journals. To be reliable a source needs some sort of editorial oversight (eg. independent blogs are generally not considered reliable). Published press releases or anything written by a company they are connected with (ie. Microsoft) would not be considered independent. The Pro J2ME source would meet the criteria for reliable and independent but it would need to go into detail about the company, which I can't verify.

Deletion of Rebecca Wilson Edit

Please explain to me what article Rebecca Wilson has written that has an actual fact!! Its all made up and as far as being constructive...whats constructive about what she writes!! She can write what ever she likes and splash it on the front page of the paper but I cant change what she's actually known for.....bullshit articles!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.176.192.68 (talk) 09:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Userfy Digipas Usa

Can I get you to userfy Digipas Usa to the draft area, so everybody can view the article's edit history?

I am a declared paid editor, but the article is not mine, I was the only keep vote. Here is my perspective on what the article could (pretty close to original) look like (User:009o9/Digi-Pas), so a copy paste of the final pruned version is of no use. I'm in discussions concerning what it is going to take to change NCORP to reflect the local consensus, I think the article is a pretty good test case. The NCORP discussion is probably going to get me dragged to a dramaboard, a POV editor thinks that COI editors should have no voice in policy and WP:WPEDIT does not apply to his edits.

The guidance needs to be updated so that people are not encouraged to write the articles in the first place -- they appear to be unwanted as both product and corp articles. The edit history is kind of remarkable in the aspect as to how low some noble editors feel they have to stoop to get an article deleted. Thanks 009o9^Disclosure(Talk) 08:01, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

@009o9: So you would like to view the deleted history to get evidence to use in a discussion you think is going to get you dragged to a dramaboard? Is that the only reason, or did I read what you wrote wrong? Because if it is then I don't feel comfortable doing that.

Your draft contains more information than the final version of the deleted article and anything from previous versions was removed for valid reasons so I don't think you should use it. I don't see the need for two drafts of the same topic. If you have copied information from the deleted article that needs to be attributed then it could be restored to perform a history merge but you will have to ask someone else to do that as I'm not sure I can do it without making a mess. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes Sarah, your reading in your first para is correct. Thanks, I understand your discomfort, my understanding is that administrators can view the history, I would just like to be prepared with diffs. The same involved editor who selectively hatted conversations in the AfD, finished destroying the online version, I had to grab a copy and rebuild in my user space to keep him from destroying it too (I thought I was going to have to get the userspace version protected). BTW: my version was available at the AfD close, not sure if any voters read it. Thanks for your consideration, I have a pretty good file going already without it. 009o9^Disclosure(Talk) 09:49, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Looking at what was removed and the explanations in the edit summaries, it seems that a lot of sources were removed because they weren't reliable, didn't verify what they were supposed to, or only had trivial passing mentions that didn't support notability. The content those sources were supporting was then removed as well. You could argue that the content should be tagged at citation needed instead of being removed but I would be careful about making accusations of the article being destroyed. It comes across as a possible personal attack and failing to assume good faith, and it could backfire on you if you make the same claims somewhere like ANI. If you want to make a case that the removal of content from the article was inappropriate then any uninvolved admin commenting on it can view the history and make their own judgment without the need for diffs. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:00, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Red Eclipse

Infact, I disagree with the deletion of Red Eclipse, there was not consens reached. Vice versa, I showed that infact that the article fits (just) the requirements despite the OP claim. My argumentations and brought sources were not succesful challenged (beside straw man attacks on me or unfounded claims). At least, the article should be moved in the user space of Angeles (or me)... cheers Shaddim (talk) 22:37, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

@Shaddim: I determined consensus to be delete. If you disagree and think I closed wrong please take it to WP:Deletion review. If they endorse my closure or you decide not to take it there then it can be moved to your user space. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:08, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks will do that. Shaddim (talk) 07:33, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

==Deletion review for Red Eclipse==

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Red Eclipse. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Shaddim (talk) 21:47, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

While I'm disappointed with the deletion review (as the non-existing consensus was not discused but again a unfounded majority vote was enforced (despite User:Hobit counter position)), I'm requesting now at least the movement of Red Eclipse in the namespace of User:Angeles Shaddim (talk)

@Shaddim: You will have to ask someone else. I am done with this article and your continued bad faith accusations that I don't know how to judge consensus. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

It is what it is. Could you please move the article now? Thanks. Shaddim (talk) 13:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC) (About consensus: consensus is not reached when a majority votes for something. In this case there was a faction unhappy with the current state of discussion or the missing of discussion -> very clearly not a consensus. At least some more time could have been given, or I could have been asked what should and could be done to achieve a consensus. Instead, the aricle's community was bashed, sources were not properly reviewed and misrepresented. Well, whatever, time to move forward. )

@Shaddim: This has already be explained to you ad nauseum by multiple editors. There was consensus to delete. I did not count votes. You are really stating to piss me off now. Like I said above, I'm done will this, don't post on my talk page again. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

why my article seetha i. wickremasinghe was deleted.

ChanakaW (talk) 13:40, 3 June 2016 (UTC) please tell me why my article about Dr.seetha i. wickremasinghe was deleted.

@ChanakaW: Your article was deleted because there was consensus to do so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seetha I. Wickremasinghe. The concerns raised were that it did not meet the notability guidlines and it was promotional in nature. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:51, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

ChanakaW (talk) 10:27, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Please help me to Recreate this Article.Because She is the most valuable Sri Lankan academic and She did lot to the country,the field of Science & Technology (More than 30years) as well as the globe.And this is not self promotional Article.Please be kind enough to make an arrangement to recreate this valuable article.

@ChanakaW: I can't recreate the article no matter how valuable you think it might be, as that would go against consensus at the deletion discussion. I think the deleted version is quite promotional in tone so I don't think it should be userfyed. The best thing to do is to create a draft, try to find multiple independent, reliable sources which cover her in depth and write it in a neutral, encyclopedic tone. It can then be submitted to AfC. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:43, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

David Aronberg, Esq. deletion

Thank you for reviewing David Aronberg, Esq. page. I would like to discuss its deletion. There have been newspaper articles about David Aronberg and it is just as important to distinguish 2 noteworthy attorneys named David Aronberg and Dave Aronberg who practice law in Palm Beach County, Florida. Many people search for David Aronberg attorney and get Dave Aronberg and vice versa. Please reconsider your deletion. Thank you Trialattorney (talk) 11:35, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

The article made no claim of significance and was overly promotional in tone. You need to provide multiple, reliable source which cover the subject in depth to prove notability. The other article states that Dave Aronberg is a State Attorney and was elected to the senate which are claims of significance. It is not Wikipedia's responsibility to distinguish two similarly named people for people performing a search on an external website. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:48, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

New sources supporting Neon Blue claims

Hi. Just fyi. I have found a couple of sources supporting claims in the Neon Blue article citing touring & charting. I did find a page on the Australian Broadcasting Media website on Google.ca, listing Neon Blue as having the #1 Christian music single as of September 23, 2013 (see link below).

http://www.australianbroadcastingmedia.com.au/publishing/?p=175

Also off of Google.ca, a ticket sales site listing tickets available for a festival featuring Georgette Jones (daughter of George Jones & Tammy Wynette) that the band was also playing at.

http://www.ticketweb.ca/t3/sale/SaleEventDetail?dispatch=loadSelectionData&eventId=4293805 Thanks. CaptainCanuck101 (talk) 14:58, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

@CaptainCanuck101: Thanks for finding some sources. I'm not sure they will be enough to save the article from deletion though. If you find anymore then please add them to the article. Sarahj2107 (talk) 15:13, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Arvind Iyer

Given the unanimous !votes at the 2nd AfD I understand if you want this to go to DRV rather than just restoring the article directly; if that is the case would you please be willing temporarily copy the article into my user space so I can directly link diffs in the DRV? Thanks, and kind regards! VQuakr (talk) 19:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

@VQuakr: I have seen the discussion about this on Wikipedia talk:Deletion review. I'm not seeing any CSD nominations in the recent history; there was one malformed prod. There are similarities in the edit summaries of a number of accounts in the article history but none of the edits are particularly problematic and only one or two were reverted. Itelbot22 is the only one currently blocked, and even that is only a soft username block. I'm inclined to assume good faith and believe that Iyer did contact CorporateM and ask for the page to be deleted. As this is BLP issue I would prefer to err of the side of caution and leave it deleted so you're going to have to take this to deletion review. I will temporarily move the article to your userspace but I don't think there is any evidence there to prove your theory. Given the nature of the deletion, I will be deleting it again if DRV determines that the closure was correct. Sarahj2107 (talk) 20:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Temporarily restored and moved to User:VQuakr/Arvind Iyer. Sarahj2107 (talk) 20:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I plan to U1 the local copy once this is resolved. I'll have a look at the details as I easily could have been remembering wrong; it has been a couple of months. I'll follow up with you pretty soon either with the DRV notification or a heads up that I do not plan to contest your AfD closure. Thanks again! VQuakr (talk) 02:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Ok, yes I must have had my wires crossed on the CSD nominations. I agree with your closure and statement above regarding AGF; thanks for letting me check personally. VQuakr (talk) 03:01, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Deletion review for Taylor Lianne Chandler

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Taylor Lianne Chandler. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 04:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Frequency (Record Producer)

I don't understand why this page was deleted. Frequency is a Grammy Award winning multi-platinum music producer and songwriter. He is most notable for producing and co-writing "The Monster" for Eminem and Rihanna, which spent several weeks at #1 on the Billboard Hot 100, as well as several other US and international charts. He has also produced and co-wrote songs for dozens of notable artists on major label releases, including Snoop Dogg, B.o.B., MGK, Slaughterhouse, Ja Rule, Raekwon, Ghostface Killah, Melanie Martinez, Bebe Rexha, The Game, Lil' Kim, Jadakiss and the entire debut album for Misterwives, which was released last year on Republic Records. He has been the subject of articles written in major music print publications -- XXL Magazine, Music Connection and Scratch Magazine, for example -- and has been the subject of several online interviews and articles, including the highly respected webseries Pensado's Place. All of this was cited in the article that was deleted.

Frequency meets several categories on WP: Notability (music). The user that flagged this page for deletion called Frequency's career "shrouded in mediocrity." That sounds like a personal attack that is not based in fact. I'm not sure if a page can be reinstated, but I would like to recreate the page. I can shorten the discography and make it less biographical, which is what should have been done in the first place. Not deletion.Diplojosh (talk) 00:48, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

The page was deleted because there was consensus to do so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frequency (record producer). The editors there felt that there was no in-depth coverage in independent, reliable sources and he therefore didn't meet general notability guidlines or notability guidlines for musicians. I don't think the statement "shrouded in mediocrity" is a personal attack, just a comment towards the article subjects lack of notability. If the page is to be recreated you would need to provide, multiple reliable sources that are both completely independant of the subject and have significant, in-depth content about him. The article as it was before deletion did not have these. Please be aware that interviews are not independent and passing mentions in articles about another person are not enough to prove notability. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:35, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Sarahj2107. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

DARTHBOTTO_talk•cont 21:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Caleb Lawrence McGillvary

I'm just wondering why the page on Caleb Lawrence McGillvary has been deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeniDrake (talk • contribs) 18:51, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

@JeniDrake: Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. The article was deleted because there was consensus to do so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caleb Lawrence McGillvary (2nd_nomination). The concern was that there was not enough coverage in reliable sources to prove he is notable for anything other than one event. There were also concerns about that fact that the trail had not taken place yet (see Biographies of living people guidelines). Once the trail has taken place it can be looked at again and it may be restored. Sarahj2107 (talk) 17:35, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Jared Moshe

A similar request to User talk:Sarahj2107/Archive 10#Clive Matson: would you restore Jared Moshe which was deleted as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jared Moshe to User:Ampetersen99/Jared Moshe? Wikipedia:User pages now states "In case[s where] a userspace draft was moved to mainspace [by a user other than whose space in which it resided,] but is not fit to be in mainspace, it must be returned to the parent location." per Wikipedia:User pages/RfC for stale drafts policy restructuring#Should old user space drafts have an expiration date? (specifically Wikipedia:User pages/RfC for stale drafts policy restructuring#Where a userspace draft is moved to mainspace by a user other than its author, but is then found to be unsuitable for mainspace for reasons which would not apply in userspace, should it be returned to userspace rather than deleted? (B4)).—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 16:11, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

@Godsy: This has now be restored and moved. Sarahj2107 (talk) 17:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 17:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

World-class manufacturing

Dear administrator, I'd like to appeal to you to reverse the deletion of World-class manufacturing. I'll explain, as author of the deleted article. Being inexperienced at opening an article, my first attempt was no more than a rough draft, which resulted in a DGG recommendation to delete. Seeing that, I did a deep search of historical and current usages of WCM (as it is often called) and thoroughly updated the article to meet criteria for objectivity, relevance, etc. Next comment was that the article is an "orphan," so I looked up orphan and worked on that issue. Then, a comment mentioned that the article needed "categories"; but before I could work on that the article disappeared, and I was unable even to find evidence that it ever existed--which, I've been advised, is because a colon had been somehow added to the title, i.e., "World-class manufacturing:" That was fixed so that I was able to find that you had a hand in the deletion. Since I did not make a copy of the article, and it and all history of edits of it are now gone, I am not able even to argue specifics. However, I suspect that the decision to delete was based on my first, inadequate, version. First step might be to bring the article back as a temporary undelete. Perhaps you could help me achieve that. Then, I would like to make my case with you to reverse the deletion. Thank you.Known and knowable (talk) 16:21, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

@Known and knowable: I deleted the page because there was consensus to do so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Class Manufacturing:. The last person to comment in the discussion would have seen the version you had updated and they still !voted to delete. The changes you made did not address the issues raised in the discussion which were that it was a dictionary definition and that it contained original research and synthesis. I cannot undelete the page as this would violate consensus at the Articles for Deletion discussion.Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:08, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Now at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2016 June 24. —Cryptic 02:25, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Why Robin Systems startup page has been deleted?

Hello,

I am Krishna Yeddanapudi. I was the founder and CTO of Robin Systems. Robin is a startup company in Silicon Valley, well funded and growing well. Why did you delete the page of this company? I guess the page provides information about the history of the company and the present status.

Thanks, Krishna --Kyeddanapudi comment added by Kyeddanapudi (talk • contribs) 17:12, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

@Kyeddanapudi: The page was deleted because there was consensus to do so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Systems. The concerns raised were that it was too promotional and that there was no significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources to prove the company is notable. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

You've Got Mail!

Hello, Sarahj2107. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Funcrunch (talk) 15:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

BiggreyTrust

Hello Sarah,

My business page was deleted because i created a Service section on accident and it marked my account as promotional business. Is there anyway i can get the account back or be able to create a new one?

Thank you

Nina JaliashviliBiggreytrust (talk) 14:15, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

@Biggreytrust: It was not your "business page" it was your user page. Wikipedia is not a place to advertise your business. The page was overly promotional in tone which was why it was deleted and why I cannot recreate it. Please read WP:spam and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion before creating any more pages. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:25, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

I apologize for that. It is my first time creating a page on Wiki. I really didn't mean for that to happen. Will i be able to create another page? I'll make sure to follow the guidelines.

Thank you for your helpBiggreytrust (talk) 14:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

You can create another page if it complies with Wikipedia's policies and guidlines. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so much. I appreciate your help

NinaBiggreytrust (talk) 14:58, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	I am impressed by your user page. Can i contact you if i need some help? VarunFEB2003 (talk) 15:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you :). Absolutely you can contact me if you need help, just leave me a message or ping me. Sarahj2107 (talk)

you are welcome and thnaks --VarunFEB2003 (talk) 05:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Time box

Hi i see you have placed a box on your user page which displays the time. I too want to write a line that says I live in India and follow IST. The time here is __________. Can u tell me what code do I need to write for that automatically updated line with a purge link. Thanks and Regards --VarunFEB2003 (talk) 05:49, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi VarunFEB2003, the code you would use for the time box is

I live in India and follow IST. The time here is {{#time:g:i A|{{current hour}}:{{current minute}} +5 hour +30 minute <includeonly>{{{1}}}</includeonly><noinclude>0</noinclude> hours}}. ({{purge}} to update)

The #time allows it to be formated as time, g gives the time in 12-hour format, i gives the minutes past the hour. The "current hour" and "current minute" templates give the time according to the server which is in UTC. This is offset by "+5 hour and +30 minute" for IST. I can't remember why I have <includeonly>{{{1}}}</includeonly><noinclude>0</noinclude> hours in there, or what it does. Removing it does't seem to make a difference so you could take it out if you want. This page on MediaWiki gives more information about all the different parser funtions you can use. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:23, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

thnx a lot--VarunFEB2003 (talk) 07:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Chief Data Officer

Hi Sarah, thank you for the feedback. I promise the idea were not to sound promotional. Thank you for the updates, will try to expand where citations are still required. Regards, Danie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniejordaan (talk • contribs) 07:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Help needed

Hi again sorry to disturb. In the same way can i write a line I have been on Wikipedia for 41 days (1 month 11 days) and i have made ____ conributions. With the fiures automatically updated. that was for me. if i wanted to use it as a template that whoever places it on his page the figures update. --VarunFEB2003 (talk) 13:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

@VarunFEB2003: I think the best way to do the time is with

 I have been on Wikipedia for {{age in days|2016|5|19}} days ({{Age in years, months and days|2016|5|19}})

I'm not sure if there is a way to display your edit count automatically. You could ask at the Help desk, if there is a way to do it then you should get an answer there. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Technical Barnstar
	Awesome coding u do thnx a lot VarunFEB2003 (talk) 13:57, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks :). Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of both Lurking in the Shadows and WGames Studio.

Though these pages are new I felt they shouldn't have faced deletion. I in fact was not advertising, but simply putting information about the game and development company, both of which I have started. I still feel that these deletions weren't necessary. It makes me upset to a major level to feel such things. I will be sure not to use Wikipedia again, if other users can delete something I have worked hard on.MrJamesWeston (talk) 08:41, 3 July 2016 (UTC)7/3/2016 3:41 AM, good day.

It understandable to be upset that something you worked hard on was deleted but Wikipedia has strict rules on what is and isn't allowed here. Both these articles were overly promotional in tone, even if that wasn't you intention. They read as if their only purpose was to promote the subject. As I explained on your talk page, Wikipedia is not a place to advertise your company or product. Nor is it a place to "simply [put] information" about a subject; we summarize information that reliable, independent third parties have written about the subject. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:01, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Deleted and redirected article being recreated only weeks later

A month ago you deleted and redirected Ed Blaylock per This AFD. A seemingly new editor has recently recreated the page without attempting to fix the issues. I reverted it back to the redirect but the user has undone it and complained on my talk page. As the closing Admin please consider the options available. Is this a case of educating the user or locking the page. SephyTheThird (talk) 19:42, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

@SephyTheThird: Thanks for letting me know about this. I have re-deleted the article, restored the redirect and protected the page. If sources become available to prove the subject has become notable then it can be recreated in draft space and moved over. Sarahj2107 (talk) 21:30, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. SephyTheThird (talk) 21:32, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I hope you don't mind, but I just removed the personal attack that was here, and warned the poster. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (^Complaints|_Mistakes) 02:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Deletion Arkansas State–ULM Rivalry (Trail of Tears Classic)

I am confused on why you deleted the ULM/Arkansas State rivalry, when it all has facts in it. It is one of the most important rivalry in ULM and the Sun Belt. This is the same format that is used with almost all of American College Football Rivalries. There was no reason in the deletion of one of the most important rivalries in Louisiana–Monroe history. I realize that you are from Ireland region, and might not know much about college football, but this is very important to many people and they would like to know all the games that this important rivalry has had. No need to delete this when it was all factual. WillAndersULM (talk) 16:17, 10 July 2016 (UTC).

@WillAndersULM: Sorry for the delay in getting back to you, I’ve been taking a bit of a break. The Trail of Tears Classic page was deleted following a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arkansas State–Louisiana-Monroe football rivalry. The consensus among editors there was that it did not meet general notability guidelines. The fact that I know nothing about football does not matter because it was not my decision to delete it; I was just following the consensus reached at the discussion. It also does not matter that it is factual. For the article to be recreated there needs to be significant coverage in independent, reliable sources in order to prove notability. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:17, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

My user page

Hi since u are a coder i needed a bit of ur help if u could. My user page has many things that are placed with absolute placement using margin top, bottom code. Due to this they are viewed differently on diff screen sizes and diff zoom. Can they be fixed at a position so that they dont change according to screen size. VarunFEB2003 (talk) 11:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi VarunFEB2003. Sorry of the delay, I know it's been awhile since you posted this. I'm not sure if you have managed to fix your user page (it looks fine to me) but if you still need help with it let me know. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:30, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Ya thnx I fixed it. Thanks a lot you are too good. VarunFEB2003 (talk) 11:54, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Anda Adam

Hi Sarah,

Because of this edit, I've nominated Anda Adam for deletion. Because you reverted it to a redirect a while back, I thought you might be interested. --Slashme (talk) 17:42, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:31, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

$UICIDEBOY$

User:Sarahj2107,

I created The Wikipedia Page $UICIDEBOY$, because I have found many notable sources about the group. As Stated in the (Now Deleted) article a big part of there current fame is underground. Most of my sources were from YouTube, Twitter, And SoundCloud. I suggest(ed) you watch Videos on YouTube about $UICIDEBOY$, or maybe visit there website. I feel(Felt) this is a group worthy of a Wikipedia page, and I worked hard on creating it, and It would really hurt if it just got tossed with the other deleted articles. That's Is what I contested When they put this page up for deletion, It has now been deleted, and I don't think there's anything I can do about that. But I've been informed that you deleted this page, I worked hard on the code, the code that you would've seen when you click "Edit", and I would like my code back, To Draft a Wikipedia Page, and Publish when the time is appropriate. Can You Do That For Me? Please Keep Me Updated... Thank you User:EvanDanielCollett... Email: evwwk@aol.com 1:48, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Kris Kross Amsterdam page deletion

Hello,

I was wondering why you deleted the following page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kris_Kross_Amsterdam

I've been trying to keep this page up for months so please help me out.

These guys have a chart topping song in the USA at the moment, but you don't seem to know them. I would like to have contact with you about this issue.

Hope to hear from you soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwinddk (talk • contribs) 12:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Edwinddk, the page was deleted after a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kris Kross Amsterdam. The concern was that there was no reliable sources to prove notability. If they have a single or album that has charted in a national music chart they will meet the notability guidelines for music. They will need to be a reliable source to prove this though. Otherwise you need to provide multiple, independent reliable sources that talk about the band in detail in order to prove they meet general notability guidelines. I suggest you work on adding these to the daft you started, which at the moment doesn't have any sources at all. If you need any help with this then let me know. I will leave a standard welcome template on your talk page which has some useful links that should help. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Deleted page Promo Direct

Sarahj2107 (talk) I have provided all the available information in my article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promo Direct. Let me know what more information I should add to bring it live once again. SusanSmi (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi SusanSmi. The page was deleted because it didn't meet the notability guidelines for companies. For it to be created again there would need to be multiple reliable sources (such as newspapers, books or journal articles) which are completely independant of the company and talk about it in detail. If these do not exist then i'm afraid the company is not notable enough for a Wikipedia article at the moment. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:54, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Recreation of page MCskill ThaPreacha

Hi, The article MCskill ThaPreacha https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MCskill_ThaPreacha was deleted despite having credible sources both online and offline. The offline source especially being a very notable one. Wikipedia articles for living people should have atleast one credible source which that article clearly has.

Will appreciate a feedback on how soon the article can be restored.

Regards. MustaphaNG (talk) 13:24, 28 July 2016 (UTC) MustaphaNG (talk) 13:24, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi MustaphaNG. I determined consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MCskill ThaPreacha to be to delete. The concern was that there was not enough significant coverage in independent, reliable sources to prove it meet the notability guidlines. The living person policy requiring at least one credible source is the bare minimum in order for a page to not be deleted without discussion. This doesn't mean that it cannot still be deleted if the sources are insufficient to prove notability. If you think that I judged the consensus wrong when closing, or you have new sources that were not addressed in the deletion discussion and would justify the page being recreated, then you can make a request at WP:Deletion review. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:03, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

alright then, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MustaphaNG (talk • contribs) 00:39, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Welcome back!

Welcome back Sarah we are glad you are back. Hope you feel good and refreshed and have all stress relieved. We all know you shall be busy clearing up your own backlog, its okay! If you have something to do that free users like me can also do for you can, simply tell me and your work shall be done! Cheers and have a nice day! VarunFEB2003 (talk) 11:57, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Varun. I definitely feel more enthusiastic about editing now that i've had a bit of a break. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:26, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Welcome Sarah

. VarunFEB2003 (talk) 12:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Welcome

	Welcome
	Welcome ma'am! VarunFEB2003 (talk) 15:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)