Jump to content

User talk:Sander.v.Ginkel/Archive 9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11

Your draft article, Draft:Amy Steele Gant

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amy Steele Gant".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 02:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Costa Rican female weightlifters

A tag has been placed on Category:Costa Rican female weightlifters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 08:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Luxembourgian female artistic gymnasts

A tag has been placed on Category:Luxembourgian female artistic gymnasts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 08:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Barbadian female weightlifters

A tag has been placed on Category:Barbadian female weightlifters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 08:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Singaporean rhythmic gymnasts

A tag has been placed on Category:Singaporean rhythmic gymnasts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 08:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bahamian female artistic gymnasts

A tag has been placed on Category:Bahamian female artistic gymnasts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 08:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Moroccan female artistic gymnasts

A tag has been placed on Category:Moroccan female artistic gymnasts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 08:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Estonian female artistic gymnasts

A tag has been placed on Category:Estonian female artistic gymnasts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 08:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kári Árnason (disambiguation)

The article Kári Árnason (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not needed per WP:TWODABS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Kári Árnason (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kári Árnason (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kári Árnason (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:13, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Grant Cavit

The article Grant Cavit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lacks sufficient coverage in relaible sources. does not meet notability . fails NSPORT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:04, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Grant Cavit

The article Grant Cavit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lacks sufficient coverage in relaible sources. does not meet notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:05, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Team Specialiyed-lululemon jersey.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Team Specialiyed-lululemon jersey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nations at the 2016 World Single Distance Speed Skating Championships

Template:Nations at the 2016 World Single Distance Speed Skating Championships has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:54, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ailish Nolan (New Zealand artistic gymnast)

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ailish Nolan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 19:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andreas Neitzel has been accepted

Andreas Neitzel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

97198 (talk) 14:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bernd Metzke has been accepted

Bernd Metzke, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~ Winged BladesGodric 11:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Pierre Le Roux

Draft:Pierre Le Roux, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Pierre Le Roux and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Pierre Le Roux during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 02:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Ismael Esteban Agüero

Draft:Ismael Esteban Agüero, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ismael Esteban Agüero and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Ismael Esteban Agüero during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 02:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rina Bjarnason has been accepted

Rina Bjarnason, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kb.au (talk) 05:45, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janni Bach has been accepted

Janni Bach, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kb.au (talk) 05:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello!

Good to see you back. Hope you're well. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 15:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Rina Bjarnason for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rina Bjarnason is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rina Bjarnason until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 15:41, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Janni Bach for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janni Bach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janni Bach until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 15:42, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Bernd Metzke for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bernd Metzke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernd Metzke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 15:43, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Andreas Neitzel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andreas Neitzel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Neitzel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 15:43, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Sanne van Kerkhof for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanne van Kerkhof is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanne van Kerkhof until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 16:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandra Bowen (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:
Needs more citations (from news or books) that discuss the significance of her SecAd career.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
For writing so many articles about Olympic sports competitors. Ga zo door. Donald Trung (Talk) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 10:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

P.S. Did you know that Slowking4 has been defending your work? They've written several essays about you which you could find at Commons:User:Slowking4. It's a shame that content editors like you are discouraged here. --Donald Trung (Talk) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 10:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Dagmar Stelberg has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dagmar Stelberg. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 15:26, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Christian Scheffler has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Christian Scheffler. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
@Legacypac:, what is wrong with this sourcing? Sander.v.Ginkel (Talk) 15:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
I habe no opinion on the specific source, just postponing deletion so the sourcing can be verifoed and improved. Legacypac (talk) 15:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
OK thanks. I will verify it myself. Sander.v.Ginkel (Talk) 15:33, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

For your information

You are subject of an AN/I discussion here. Please respond there. The Banner talk 15:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

I moved your reply to this from AN to ANI, as you posted it on the wrong noticeboard. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:23, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dagmar Stelberg

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dagmar Stelberg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 18:27, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sandra Bowen has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sandra Bowen. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 18:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sandra Bowen (Volleyball) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sandra Bowen (Volleyball). Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 18:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Christian Scheffler

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Christian Scheffler".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 18:45, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 16:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sander.v.Ginkel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I used the other account, and told it without having to had an investigation. I used another account MFriedman at the time I was blocked. I used it including review my own articles I created. You can all check them and you won't find any main problems. When something was not in the reference, I added them. See as example here, here, here, here, here, here etc. It was months ago, but yes, I know it is wrong. I know that. I was not allowed to make those edits, altough there were of addition for WP. I just couldn't let it happen that so many good stubs were deleted (in my opinion way too fast, but that's another story). But the deletion made that I'm doing the job here with even more care. See also the barnstar above. Please check my recent contributions, and you will see that it is great added value for WP. Also; I wasn't aware how bad it is to use another account. Sander.v.Ginkel (Talk) 16:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Declining for now, pending result of discussion on ANI. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have upgraded this block from six months to indefinite per the discussion on ANI. This is quite clearly required in order to prevent further damage from an editor that apparently sees no need to follow the community's rules and expectations. Lankiveil (speak to me) 00:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC).

10k

Als ik er morgen om vijf uur uit ben, en kan streamen op mijn laptop, dan kan ik eindelijk een van die races live zien. Ik ben van de generatie waarvoor het enige Olympische goud van Piet Kleine was--in 1976, haha! We zijn verwend de laatste zestien jaar! Drmies (talk) 02:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Žikica Milosavljević has been accepted

Žikica Milosavljević, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!


Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 21:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rüdiger Borchardt

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rüdiger Borchardt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 04:57, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jörg Kunze

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jörg Kunze".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Cecilio Alonso

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cecilio Alonso".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:05, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Martin Rubin

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Martin Rubin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Monika Ludmilová

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Monika Ludmilová".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Miguel Ángel Zuñiga

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Miguel Ángel Zuñiga".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:07, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Miroslava Trainovskaja-Rickevičienė

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Miroslava Trainovskaja-Rickevičienė".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Xiao Jianhua (volleyball player)

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Xiao Jianhua".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 09:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Matthias Hahn

A tag has been placed on Draft:Matthias Hahn, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 05:17, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Peter Pysall

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peter Pysall".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:00, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Peter Hofmann

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peter Hofmann".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:01, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Stephan Hauck

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stephan Hauck".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 16:22, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Banned

This message is to inform you that you have been indefinitely site banned per community consensus. Swarm ♠ 18:35, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandra Bowen (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Missvain (talk) 20:30, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandra Bowen has been accepted

Sandra Bowen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 20:45, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Fuka Nagano for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fuka Nagano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuka Nagano until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:40, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sander.v.Ginkel/Archive_9&oldid=1073320414"