Jump to content

User talk:Sabrebd/Autoarchive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The Signpost: 14 August 2013

University rankings

Hi, I was hoping we could come to some agreement on displaying university rankings, as you've reverted my edits at University of Bedfordshire and Birmingham City University. If you look at any of the highly rate university articles such as University of Bristol they are using the rankings infobox, as I was implementing. There simply does not need to be rankings shown for the past 5/ 10 or more years on these articles. Rather the infobox provides a more concise and encyclopaedia style. Aloneinthewild (talk) 15:41, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

The Bristol University article had exactly one of these tables until February this year and its GA status is very old (2007), so probably not very relevant. Is there any particular reasons not to give previous rankings? This seems entirely encyclopedic to me. I have no objection to the new rankings being added to these tables, at least not if they are properly sourced. It is also worth noting that this is different for old and new universities. Old universities appear in far more rankings and do not tend to move much nationally. New universities tend to only be in three sets of rankings and move around a lot, so a snap shot of one or two years is not very helpful. I should also point out that this is probably a very bad time to be adjusting university articles, as they are rather sensitive to changes during clearing.--SabreBD (talk) 16:21, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 22:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Witch trials in early modern Scotland/GA1

I think you'll be pleased to know this has passed. Good work! Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks for all your work on this.--SabreBD (talk) 17:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Great Scottish witch hunt of 1649-50, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pricker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

Your GA nomination of Scotland in the Early Middle Ages

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scotland in the Early Middle Ages you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I will take a look at it tomorrow and start working through.--SabreBD (talk) 22:53, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Glam rock

What gives? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dearscrewtape (talk • contribs) 22:27, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Psychedelic music

The article Psychedelic music you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Psychedelic music for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 (talk) 15:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The nineteenth century saw some major engineering projects including [[Thomas Telford]]'s ((1757–1834) stone [[Dean Bridge]] (1829-31) and iron [[Craigellachie Bridge]] (1812–14).<ref>C.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:44, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Progressive rock

Thanks for your help policing the page. My computer can't access Wikipedia, apparently due to the new ULS feature, so I can't often be here to keep an eye on it. I appreciate your keeping the spam out. Dementia13 (talk) 13:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

No problem. We don't have that many good rock genre articles so we need to cling on to the quality of the few we have.--SabreBD (talk) 14:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doric (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:32, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

Your GA nomination of Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution

The article Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 12:27, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Awaiting your response..♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:28, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Yep. I hope to have some time over the weekend.--SabreBD (talk) 20:34, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

How are you doing on adding the details on this? Let me know when you think you're done.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:54, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

I am done. I cannot find any more details at the moment.--SabreBD (talk) 14:05, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

You're most welcome, sorry for the delay with it!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:42, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Kings of Alba

And Pytheas. Editor seems to be rewriting these using his own self-published works, eg [1]. Dougweller (talk) 06:12, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Eek. I am busy today - but will see what I can do tonight.--SabreBD (talk) 07:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Black Death may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • not appear again in Europe until the Black Death of the 14th century.<ref>J. N. Hays (2005). "[http://books.google.com/books?id=GyE8Qt-kS1kC&pg=PA23&dq&hl=en#v=onepage&q=&f=false Epidemics and

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

The 'Phonics

I suppose putting their nickname in the lead article with only one reference wasn't good haha. How many references would you say is justifiable in order to have it in the lead section? Ultra Violet Light (talk) 16:50, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Hard to say. The best thing would be a reliable source that says "also known as the 'phonics", but I am not sure that will be easy to find. I would probably be convinced by three or four reliable sources that use it.--SabreBD (talk) 16:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
I think finding a reliable source that says that would be the best thing to do, hopefully I'll come across it as that is what they are called time-to-time. Thanks for the response :) Ultra Violet Light (talk) 22:15, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berwick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 September 2013

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Psychedelic soul (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to George Clinton
Royal Scots Navy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Blackness

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2013

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scottish trade in the early modern era, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hanseatic and Haddington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Reverts to Led Zeppelin

As per Wikipedia:Overlink: Generally, a link should appear only once in an article, but if helpful for readers, links may be repeated in infoboxes, tables, image captions, footnotes, and at the first occurrence after the lead. (Emphasis mine). The Who has been linked to once in the article, in the very beginning, and this second linkage I added occurs much later. It is in no any way overlinking. It seemed ridiculous to link to the Rolling Stones but NOT to The Who, which occurred a word later in the same sentence. I'm also not sure why you removed the links to Stockholm and Copenhagen as they weren't linked to anywhere, and being rather major cities are certainly deserving of a link. Icemuon (talk) 15:11, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

There is little point in discussing it here. Why don't you take it to the article talkpage so that others can join the debate if they wish to?--SabreBD (talk) 15:14, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 20:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

I have placed the nomination on hold, since there are some remaining issues which need to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages/GA1 for details. All the best, – Quadell (talk) 15:09, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages

The article Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 13:12, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

I was delighted to see your improvements to Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages! I have updated the GAN review, and only two issues remain. All the best, – Quadell (talk) 12:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Music in Medieval Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holyrood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 October 2013

What to do

Salutations, almost everyday while patrolling I come across some IP who does mass changes to genres. Today, I found this one, take a look. Since this obviously isn't vandalism, very rarely someone reverts/warns them, and the first few times when I saw this, I did warn and mass revert them (it took painfully long). I am unfamiliar with these articles, but when IPs grossly start changing all the GAs/FAs without any reason, this is obviously disruptive. I feel uneasy just blindly reverting such edits and since I don't see everyone else doing it, I thought I was wrong/too harsh. What do you think? -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 09:01, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

No you were quite right to revert them, even though it can be a frustratingly long process. Genre warriors are a big problem on music articles. I usually just say that they need to take it to the talkpage, so the revert is under WP:BRD. If they persist there is a warning in the drop down menu for their talkpage to ask them not to make mass changes, so I usually leave a message with that. Most give up after a while. A few are more persistent. The truth is we do not have enough editors combating this so any help is much appreciated.--SabreBD (talk) 09:29, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your advice, I'll be more vigilant. I never thought this was actually a serious issue when I first saw the mass genre changes warning template. Have a nice day, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 09:55, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages

The article Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 12:22, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks for all your work on this.--SabreBD (talk) 12:24, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Issue

I've responded back to you in the talk page for the 'Honorific nicknames' article. WillieLimpD (talk) 20:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Small Faces Edit

Thanks for cleaning up after me. I don't know how I did that. Rojomoke (talk) 22:49, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

No problem, that sort of thing happens all the time.--SabreBD (talk) 23:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 October 2013

Global topic

Hello,

I ask you notify Jimmy Wales (if him not difficultly, he need write short text about respecting to John Lennon from The Beatles). Such text can appear in the his blog, for example: http://jimmywales.com

Because Jimmy - is the great man almost everywhere, his opinion will decorate the new International Day of the UN (in preparing via this political party). And this will the good proof that Lennon has the great right be in this list: http://www.un.org/en/events/observances/subject.shtml

Thank you! - 2.92.67.56 (talk) 21:38, 11 October 2013 (UTC).

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Poetry of Scotland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Brythonic and Acts of Union
Amy Winehouse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Duffy
Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Reed

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Humpty Dumpty's films

Hello, i am suprised that you reverted my contribution to Humpty Dumpty article, i thought that he appeared just in these, can you help me where i can find more about that? Where he also appeared? Thanks for your answer. Jirka.h23 (talk) 05:54, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I think this kind of list would present a problem for the Good Article status on Humpty Dumpty. A good place to start if you want to set up the article as a list is the IMBD here, where a number of films are given. However, I am not sure about the status of this page as a reliable source as it appears to be user edited. It is quite useful in that it gives the films and the actors playing the part, so perhaps a three column list would be a good idea. This is obviously not a complete list and there will be a lot more to find I think. Let me know if you start the article and I will do what I can to help and obviously we should link from the existing article.--SabreBD (talk) 12:29, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 11:42, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Architecture of Scotland in the Prehistoric era

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Architecture of Scotland in the Prehistoric era you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 17:52, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

I was prepared to quick pass this one but it seems you're busy... ♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:15, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Yep, sorry I had to work over the weekend and have two other outstanding reviews. I will try and find time in the week to get this completed.--SabreBD (talk) 15:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 October 2013

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Novel in Scotland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to The Changeling, Waverley, Stream of consciousness and Blackwoods
Scottish literature in the nineteenth century (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Jacobite, Montrose, Waverley and Blackwoods
Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to St Columb
Seven ill years (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Episcopalian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Scotland in the Early Modern Era

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scotland in the Early Modern Era you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 18:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages

The article Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 22:52, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks for all your efforts in review.--SabreBD (talk) 23:15, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Congrats on yet another Scotland overview GA! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:14, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks.--SabreBD (talk) 23:17, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • .</ref> The most visible fortlet is Kinneil, at the eastern end of the Wall, near Bo'ness.<ref>[http://www.historic-scotland.gov.uk/index/policyandguidance/world_heritage_scotland/antoninewall.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:23, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

The Business and Economics Barnstar

The Business and Economics Barnstar
Thank you Sabrebd for working to promote Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages to Good article status! Please accept this little sign of appreciation from me. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 03:00, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Wow thanks. I never thought I would get a business barnstar. The last award I had in business was an 'O' Level.--SabreBD (talk) 08:14, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Classical music in Scotland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Balmoral, Abbotsford and Margaret Morris
Scottish folk music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Balmoral, Abbotsford and Celtic Diaspora
Architecture of Scotland in the Prehistoric era (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wick
Music of Scotland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Celtic Diaspora
Scotland under the Commonwealth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to James Guthrie

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Architecture of Scotland in the Prehistoric era

The article Architecture of Scotland in the Prehistoric era you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Prehistoric era for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 20:22, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks for the review - much appreciated.--SabreBD (talk) 20:34, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

Your GA nomination of Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 17:52, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era

The article Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 21:12, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Literature in modern Scotland, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Changeling and Stream of consciousness (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 October 2013

Your GA nomination of Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era

The article Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 13:23, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks for all your efforts in the review.--SabreBD (talk) 13:49, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014

Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 01:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Scottish castles may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • the British Isles.<ref>B. Lowry, ''Discovering Fortifications: From the Tudors to the Cold War'' (Risborough: Shire Publications, ISBN 978-0-7478-0651-6, pp. 37 and 45.</ref><ref name=Reid2006p7>S.
  • to his work at Windsor.<ref>J. M. Robinson, ''Windsor Castle: the Official Illustrated History'' (London: Royal Collection Publications, 2010'', ISBN 978-1-902163-21-5, p. 121.</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:47, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Scottish castles

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scottish castles you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sagaciousphil -- Sagaciousphil (talk) 10:05, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 November 2013

Your GA nomination of Scottish castles

The article Scottish castles you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Scottish castles for comments about the article. Well done! 

Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sagaciousphil -- Sagaciousphil (talk) 13:36, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
The Good Article Barnstar
Well done on another GA; thank you for all the work you do producing Scottish overview articles, they are much appreciated. SagaciousPhil - Chat 13:41, 12 November 2013 (UTC) Looks like the bot got here before me!

The Signpost: 13 November 2013

Infographic on the article for United Kingdom

Hi Sabrebd

I've cut the infographic down (removed the section of the image on health) to remove the issue of it cutting into the next section (on the three screens I've tried it on) and looks fine on a mobile browser too, I guess on a very high resolution screen it may look funny? If it's still a problem with your screens I can cut it down a bit more. I think it adds value to the article as it gives people a way of visually understanding the information. I didn't understand your message in the edit summary "on for the tp", could you explain it?

Cheers

Mrjohncummings (talk) 13:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I think there is some problem with my notifications - I didn't see this message. This is not really the problem, but it needs to be discussed on the article talkpage where anyone can comment.--SabreBD (talk) 14:13, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 November 2013

GA

Congrats on getting Scottish castles up to GA! Any chance you could GA review Fort Al Jalali? Let me know if you want anything else reviewed.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:11, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I could do that. I will go and sign up.--SabreBD (talk) 20:35, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, I appreciate it. As a fan of architecture I thought it might interest you!♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for editing and reviewing this article. To me starting an article is just a sort of harmless hobby, like doing a jigsaw puzzle. It is interesting to see what shows up and how it turns out. Reviewing one seems a whole lot harder. Thanks again, Aymatth2 (talk) 23:07, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

FAC comment?

Hi. Would you be interested in voicing your support (or oppose/comment) at the FAC page for the article Of Human Feelings? If not, feel free to ignore this message. Dan56 (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

I will take a look.--SabreBD (talk) 07:30, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Art in early modern Scotland

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Art in early modern Scotland you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 17:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Great. Thanks for taking this one on.--SabreBD (talk) 17:14, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
All done, just some minor issues for you to address.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:43, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Queen of Pop

The redirect was the right thing to do. I wish I'd thought of it - so simple, and yet the idea of doing it eluded me. Thanks. Rockypedia (talk) 18:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 December 2013

Your GA nomination of Scottish literature in the Middle Ages

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scottish literature in the Middle Ages you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 00:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for taking his on.--SabreBD (talk) 00:15, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
No problem. I see from the above that you may not have time to look at this until later in the week. That's not a problem. – Quadell (talk) 00:14, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 December 2013

Your GA nomination of Scotland in the Early Middle Ages

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scotland in the Early Middle Ages you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 16:51, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks for taking this on. As you may notice, it was half reviewed before, but the reviewer did not have time to finish the work. I am pretty busy at the moment in real life, but hope to be a bit more free after the end of the week.--SabreBD (talk) 19:09, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Only some minor points, will pass as soon as addressed.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:20, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Scotland in the Early Middle Ages

The article Scotland in the Early Middle Ages you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Scotland in the Early Middle Ages for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 17:12, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Failed? Legobot having a bad day?--SabreBD (talk) 17:27, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Looks like it. I've fixed the article history template, and everything's in order now. (Obviously, the article did not actually fail.) – Quadell (talk) 14:42, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Art in early modern Scotland

The article Art in early modern Scotland you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Art in early modern Scotland for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 14:12, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Givors canal, another entry with Aymatth is at GAN if you're interested in reviewing. No worries if not.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:33, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

If you're uncomfortable with doing reviews can you let me know? I won't ask again if this is the case. I'm happy reviewing your articles for GA, but if you could do one or two of mine every now and then I'd appreciate it. Can you let me know? Thanks. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:30, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

No ask away its fine. I have just been a bit busy the last week or so and for some reason missed the previous comment in the thread. I will take a look at the article tomorrow all being well.--SabreBD (talk) 19:51, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps you could reserve it and review when you have a moment, no rush..♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:18, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2013

Your GA nomination of Scottish literature in the Middle Ages

The article Scottish literature in the Middle Ages you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Scottish literature in the Middle Ages for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 21:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

I have replied to your most recent comments. The article still needs just a little more. – Quadell (talk) 14:36, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Tomorrow the article will have been on hold for 7 days. If you need a little more time, let me know... – Quadell (talk) 21:25, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
I may need a bit longer, probably until the weekend if that is OK.--SabreBD (talk) 21:59, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
No problem, I'll set the due date to 23 December (Monday). – Quadell (talk) 18:47, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Government in early modern Scotland

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Government in early modern Scotland you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 09:43, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

FAC comment?

Hi. Would you be interested in voicing your support (or oppose/comment) at the FAC page for the article Of Human Feelings? If not, feel free to ignore this message. Dan56 (talk) 08:14, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Scottish literature in the Middle Ages

The article Scottish literature in the Middle Ages you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Scottish literature in the Middle Ages for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 15:12, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Heartland rock

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Heartland rock you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 18:10, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 December 2013

Your GA nomination of Heartland rock

The article Heartland rock you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Heartland rock for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 19:20, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sabrebd/Autoarchive_6&oldid=1181443109"