Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era

Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 3, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Scotland Mid‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Quadell (talk · contribs) 17:47, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator: Sabrebd

I will begin this review shortly. – Quadell ^(talk) 17:47, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking this on.--SabreBD (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very strong candidate. It is well organized, well written, and well sourced. I have a few suggestions below.

You mention "the Clyde-Forth line", but don't explain. What is this line?

The two major rivers that divide the Lowlands. Unfortunately Wikipedia does not have something obvious to link to, so I have linked both rivers.--SabreBD (talk) 18:51, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's an error in "with a characteristic outer wall within which a circle of stone piers".

Done--SabreBD (talk) 18:51, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I reworded further. Feel free to revert if you don't like it. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:07, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You link Firth of Clyde, but not Firth of Forth. Was that intentional? You should link to Carpow Roman Fort and Cramond Roman Fort, rather than just Cramond. You should also probably link Bo'ness and perhaps Kinneil (though I'm less sure of that one).

Done--SabreBD (talk) 18:51, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The last sentence of the article says (among other things) that Hadrian's Wall "collapsed in the fifth century". But that isn't in the source, and I can't find that explicitly claimed in the Hadrian's Wall article.

It was authority that collapsed, not the wall. Hopefully that is clear now.--SabreBD (talk) 18:51, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! That makes sense. Clear now. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:07, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put this nomination on hold, and if these issues are resolved in a reasonable amount of time, I'll be happy to promote the article. – Quadell ^(talk) 21:02, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article passes all our GA criteria with those proverbial flying colors. I'm delighted to promote it. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:07, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]