User talk:SCSchubert

Welcome!

Hello, SCSchubert, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello user, I have noticed your various big edits on pages for artists from Japanese management company LDH. I would like to ask you to refrain from deleting correct information and that you source the info you add correctly. Furthermore, several mistakes in form, grammar and spelling occur in your edits, which should not happen on an official page such as Wikipedia. Please contact me for questions or a talk. Kyugium (talk) 07:25, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SCSchubert, I am really grateful for your edits since you add a lot of information I couldn't find the sources for myself. My first message derived from a request of an administrator, I was notified that there was unsourced or incorrectly sourced information added to my edits and about 500 characters deleted by you. I have noticed that you sometimes add sources with hyperlinks that don't lead to the information needed. I had this problem myself in the past, I guess it's either a problem with Wikipedia's sourcing option itself or there is a problem with LDH related websites (official profiles for example). I'd suggest you to double-check your added sources, bc I often notice this mistake in my own edits. The deletion notification might have happened if you moved certain passages, because it will change the coding of the site. Furthermore, I understand your issue with the distinction between performers and vocalists in the groups. I just wonder if there might be are more elegant solution to it? Writing it into the introduction of each member is most likely necessary, but I think it might be enough to write what role the person has in the first sentence and then add which group(s) they are a member of. For example: Alan Shirahama (白濱亜嵐 Shirahama Aran, born August 4, 1993) is a Japanese performer, actor and DJ who is a member of J-Pop group Exile and also the leader of J-Pop group Generations from Exile Tribe. In this example it's only mentioned that Alan is a performer, actor and DJ. So I'd think people wouldn't think of him as a vocalist even though he is a member of 2 J-Pop groups. What do you think about that? I'd love to hear your opinion.

P.S.: This is just a small detail, but I'd like to ask you to add a title to all your edits and changes of articles. It makes it easier for other editors to see what info was added or changed and makes working together even easier. Kyugium (talk) 17:42, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another note: I have received reviews about the style and system of the pages from artists such as Naoki Kobayashi and Naoto Kataoka. I often reveive complaints that the surface is very confusing. Generally speaking it's more common to list all activities of a person in chronological order on Wkipedia, not categorized into certain activities (acting, fashion, etc.). Readers often feel confused and overwhelmed. Another aspect are time stamps in the introduction: it's not common to add certain years or dates when something started in the person's life into the introduction. It makes the reader lose interest and gives a feeling of unnecessary extension since all those details will be mentioned later on in the topic career/biography. Kyugium (talk) 18:00, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have just received another message from an administrator: The spelling and grammar mistakes in your edits are apparently very severe and there is a lot of superfluous information on those pages, so that the articles (together with my edits too) might get requested for speedy deletion. I would like to ask you to refrain from editing for the moment while I try to look for the mistakes. I will immediately notice you once I received a review and pass for the pages. Kyugium (talk) 18:19, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SCSchubert, after messaging back and forth with several administrators here are the suggestions and problems they notified me of:

1) The main problem were the grammar, spelling and sentence structure mistakes in those edits. However if they will be fixed, no further steps for any type of deletion will be commenced. Additionally, the wording in the articles would often be very informally which does not belong into a factual article on Wikipedia. For example the expressions of feelings on a topic, using emotion-related adjectives and adverbs such as 'beautiful' and including own thoughts are prohibited. It often happens that those type of expressions are used in articles from Japanese media, so it's necessary to word them differently instead of directly translating them. If you are not a native English speaker, I'd advise you to ask for help from other editors who are fluent in the language or rather edit the articles in your draftspace first, let a native English speaker check on them (look for mistakes) and then publish them after everything has been reviewed. For more info, please read the article 'Wikipedia:Drafts' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Drafts

2) The superfluous information was apparently directed towards the passages about Exile, Nidaime J Soul Brothers and Sandaime J Soul Brothers. Identical Information that appears several times in different articles will be flagged as 'spamming'. Since there are already existing articles about Exile and the different generations of J Soul Brothers, how about adding all your researched information into those? I checked up on them and they don't seem up-to-date and not as detailed as the passages you wrote into Naoki Kobayashi and Naoto Kataoka's article. What do you think about moving those passages from the members to those groups? Additionally, readers interested in specific members might be overwhelmed finding all those information about groups they didn't look for.

3) For biographies of living people, it's preferred to list the events in their life in chronological order instead of listing them according to certain topics or fields. This is mostly a stylistic choice, but since it gives a better overview of when the person started specific activities in relation to his previous life and since readers on the Wikipedia mobile app are unable to view sub-headings, it makes the surface of the article more usable. Personally, I use Namie Amuro's Wikipedia page as a reference for biographies since it's very detailed and a good blue-print. This third point does not affect the credibility of the article and is only a matter of style and personal preference, so we don't have to change it immediately and can work out a solution together. The same goes for my suggestion about the introduction in my last messages. Also of course you can mark albums, singles films and tours correctly, you can look at the pages of other LDH artists to see how other editors proceeded to mark them too (so that the style is in unity).

You might have not gotten a notification for the deletion request by the administrators because I was the last editor prior to you on the related articles. It's also common on Wikipedia that only the editor who worked in an article the most, if he created it or not, will be notified by administrators in case of sanctions, deletion notifications, blocks or other regulatory procedures to protect the page and obtain the credibility of the website. For more information on how to write biographies, how biographies are policed on Wikipedia, what causes sanctions and other issues related to biographies on this website, please read the article 'Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Writing_style

I want to thank you again for your hard work and the time you invest into researching. You are not trouble to me at all, I am very happy to see another person being motivated and enthusiastic to work on those articles related to LDH artists. I know from personal experience that editing on Wikipedia and keeping track of all the policies and rules can be exhausting and confusing, so if you have any questions, need help or want further explanations, feel free to message me anytime. Kyugium (talk) 15:14, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kenjiro Yamashita, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NTV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:46, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia page for Ryuji Imaichi

Hello SCSchubert!

Sorry for replying so late to your message, I have been on vacation during the winter holidays. I hope you had a nice Christmas and New Years Eve too! Concerning your question, it was actually not me who wrote this piece of information on Ryuji Imaichi's page, but one of the editors before me. I wasn't sure what to do with it myself since there were no sources attached, so I just kept it there to remind me to do some research on it. I haven't been able to do it yet but since you stated you couldn't find any sources, I guess we can just delete this sentence. I've also seen your edits on Ryuji Imaichi's article, thank you so much for your hard work! If it's alright for you, I'd like to correct a few grammatical errors, spelling mistakes and wording issues.

Best Regards, Kyugium (talk) 15:29, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SCSchubert!

Thank you for all the well-wishes and don't worry, I'm glad I'm able to help! I'm currently working on correcting the articles for Ryuji Imaichi and Hiroomi Tosaka, and I just want to give you a quick conclusion of what I've noticed concerning your writing style and which parts you should improve on: First of all, I see how much research you do. It's truly marvelous and I have a lot of respect for you because of that. However, you often start to ramble on extremely trivial things that do not need to be included in articles about a specific person. For example: you started writing about the High & Low franchise on Hiroomi Tosaka's article and went VERY into depth about the storyline and characters. Such shenanigans are not needed in the main article and make it hard to follow while reading. I strongly suggest you make a separate page for the High & Low franchise, its movies and TV shows to include the information you wrote. Some other examples for this case are the mention of album details from the group the artists are part of (e.g. sales) or which song was composed by the artist (mentioning the first composed song is fine, but after that everything just gets too much). If you want to share those details, create a separate page for the album (that includes those specific songs) and mention all the details there. Sandaime J Soul Brother's album Planet Seven indeed does have its own Wikipedia article for example. Going too much into detail about the themes and promotion details will be very confusing for the reader. Another concern of mine is your use of words in a way that may hint a bias towards the artist, it is better to keep it factual. This is especially noticeable in the 'Early Life' section of Hiroomi Tosaka and Ryuji Imaichi. Including words with emotional connections like 'important', 'enthusiastic', 'to love' etc. decreases the credibility of any article. Your style of writing reminds me more of a story or diary entry, not a factual article. I hope you consider my suggestions and solicitations. I can recommend you to talk with the editor of Sandaime J Soul Brother's Wikipedia page (Takacchin10_10)^[1] if you want get more help to improve your writing and style on Wikipedia. Lastly, I have a question: which articles do you plan on working on in the future? Do you want to edit the articles of all individual Sandaime J Soul Brothers members? Or do you want to work on more articles? I'd like to know so I can help you more, give you tips, and maybe teach you the difference in writing styles for articles concerning different topics (such as individual artists, groups, albums, movies, etc.)

P.S.: As I was going through the articles of Hiroomi Tosaka and Ryuji Imaichi, some sources other editors and me had attached seemed to have gotten deleted. This can happen when somebody implements big edits and also depends on the device used for the edit (mobile phone or computer), so you should be careful of that.

Best Regards, Kyugium (talk) 21:15, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SCSchubert,

I'm glad my suggestions and tips were helpful! I actually planned on doing the same thing once (creating more pages for various sub-topics of Sandaime J Soul Brothers to shorten their original articles), however I sadly never had the time to do so. I would really love to show you the list I had in mind since you seem so enthusiastic:

- High & Low (in general, what the franchise is about) - Road to High & Low (movie) - High & Low: The Red Rain (movie) - High & Low 2: End of SKY (movie) - High & Low 3: Final Mission (movie) - High & Low: The Story of S.W.O.R.D. (TV show) - High & Low Season 2 (TV show)

Basically, the whole High & Low franchise needs one big article and more articles for their individual movies and TV shows. Then it would also be practical if more albums and singles from Sandaime J Soul Brothers get their own article, such as:

- J Soul Brothers (album) - Tribal Soul (album) - Miracle (album) - Future (album) - Best Friend's Girl (single) - Powder Snow (single) - Spark (single) - S.A.K.U.R.A. (single) - C.O.S.M.O.S. (single) - O.R.I.O.N. (single) - Storm Riders (single) - Summer Madness (single) - Unfair World (single) - Welcome to TOKYO (single) - HAPPY (single) - J.S.B. HAPPINESS (single) - Scarlet (single) - Fuyuzora / White Wings (single)

for those articles it's important that you find creditable chart data, for example from Oricon or Billboard Japan. The latter is very good to do research on chart positions of specific singles, songs and albums since they save all their data in a weekly calendar.

It would also be amazing to see articles about the tours the group has done! So that's another suggestion for you.

I would be incredibly thankful if you could help me with this ambition, because I really don't find the time to do all of this.

Best Regards, Kyugium (talk) 22:50, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

also, I've found a very good Wikipedia article to help you improve your writing style:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch

Kyugium (talk) 22:54, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited High & Low: The Movie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yuta Nakano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

High＆Low The DTC

Just an fyi, but if you fix something an article's been tagged for, like cleanup on this article for instance, you can remove the tag yourself.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ryusei Kainuma moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ryusei Kainuma, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ashley yoursmile! 19:10, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ryusei Kainuma moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ryusei Kainuma, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Fiddle Faddle 13:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ryusei Kainuma (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ryusei Kainuma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ryusei Kainuma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 13:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SCSchubert! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 13:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ryusei Kainuma

Hello, SCSchubert. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ryusei Kainuma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ryusei Kainuma

Hello, SCSchubert. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ryusei Kainuma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ryusei Kainuma

Hello, SCSchubert. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ryusei Kainuma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:10, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Takacchin10_10

[1] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Takacchin10_10

[1]