Jump to content

User talk:SCB '92

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, SCB '92, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  KillerChihuahua?!? 11:57, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Tupac do you beileve he is still alive??? Rubberchix 14:55, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Like Glue.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Like Glue.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Likeglue 2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Likeglue 2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Like Glue.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Like Glue.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Crank That

[edit]

Hi, I removed it because Urban Dictionary is not a reliable source. It merely has a definition of what "superman that hoe" means and it doesn't actually say anything about the song's censorship. Spellcast (talk) 01:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I got confused with another edit. Anyway, the paragraph you added was unsourced. See WP:V - you have to cite your info. Unsourced info can be removed at any time. Spellcast (talk) 22:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Steal Hear

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Steal Hear, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Steal Hear. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 22:11, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Steal Hear

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Steal Hear, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steal Hear. Thank you. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 15:03, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New akon song

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Please provide sources to show this song will actually be released. Otherwise it will be removed --Realist2 (talk) 17:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

[edit]

Hi, about infobox genres, see Template:Infobox musical artist, which recommends generality, thanks. Spellcast (talk) 13:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:50 Cent-Before I Self Destruct.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:50 Cent-Before I Self Destruct.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:35, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lauryn Hill-Everything Is Everything.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lauryn Hill-Everything Is Everything.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: So Seductive

[edit]

Hi, Please stop adding the information about "Candy Shop" unless you can find a reliable source for it. It is unreasonable to assume that the song arose from that line. Thanks. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 18:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

After speaking with the blocking admin, I've decided to unblock you. Please, be more careful with pagemoves in the future.

Request handled by: SQLQuery me! 18:59, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:God's Plan.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:God's Plan.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Cartridge Family

[edit]

Don't worry about it. It would be interesting to include, but, because we can't source that the cuts were made, we cannot include it. Gran2 21:03, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Public Service Announcement 2000

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Public Service Announcement 2000, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Leonard(Bloom) 18:48, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Public Service Announcement 2000

[edit]

I have nominated Public Service Announcement 2000, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public Service Announcement 2000. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Do U(knome)? yes...or no 23:03, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

[edit]

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 20:14, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Freestyle B4 Paystyle.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Freestyle B4 Paystyle.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Talib Kweli-Hot Thing.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:55, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

[edit]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Rubzie Biggz 13 may be offensive or unwelcome. In general it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 22:14, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:P's and Q's.jpg)

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:P's and Q's.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:30, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hip hop WikiProject Roll Call

[edit]

Hello, fellow Hip Hop WikiProject members!

This message is being sent out to let all listed members of the project know to re-add your name to the members list, as all current names on the list have been erased in order to find out who is still active on the project. WikiGuy86 (talk) 19:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Ok, You're Right

[edit]

I have nominated Ok, You're Right, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ok, You're Right. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Lil-unique1 (talk) 21:55, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:38, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Advance Wars

[edit]

I have reverted your edits (moving Plot after Gameplay), as I feel that introducing people to the names and concepts of the world makes it easier to use them in the Gameplay section (as it was, the use of Andy and Nell in the COs section implied that readers knew who they were). - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 20:17, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Popping Cherry, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.foxcrimeasia.com/series/dexter/guide/1. As a copyright violation, Popping Cherry appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Popping Cherry has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Popping Cherry and send an email with the message to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Popping Cherry with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Popping Cherry.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 12:18, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Popping Cherry, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://sliceoflife.emsportal.info/season1.shtml. As a copyright violation, Popping Cherry appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Popping Cherry has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Popping Cherry and send an email with the message to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Popping Cherry with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Popping Cherry.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 12:23, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for adding the two other templates

[edit]

Sorry about that, this article would appear to have not been a copyvio. That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 12:50, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was wrong to add both of those templates, silly of me, please forgive. However, the Popping Cherry article just seems to be a recreation of the article's history. Does it really deserve its own article as it is? It doesn't have a plot any more and it has a list of trivia which is frowned upon in TV articles... That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 13:15, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

If you continue to copyvio, you may be blocked from editing. Please write the plot yourself. That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 14:48, 5 July 2011 (UTC) Additional: This is the third time that you've inserted copyright material into the article, do not do so again. Thanks. That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 14:51, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Air Cavalry (video game)

[edit]

The suspected copyright violation website cited in the tag for this article was broken but alternately, the text was taken from http://www.gamefaqs.com/snes/588191-air-cavalry. Do not paste text from other websites into Wikipedia or remove maintenance tags, particularly when you probably understood why it was tagged. If you have any questions, let me know.--NortyNort (Holla) 13:00, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality reviews of VG articles

[edit]

Hello, I noticed some of the articles that you've placed up for quality review at GAN and FAC. Specifically:

While your enthusiasm is very apparent from your edits (and appreciated), I feel I should suggest that you slow down a bit. Quality reviews, specifically FAC and A-class, are quite time consuming. Placing multiple articles up for review is sure to stretch you thin and minimize your effectiveness in meeting the criteria. Many review processes have limitations (many unwritten rules) to restrict the number of requests from a single editor. Other considerations are whether or not you've made significant contributions to the article. This is typically a good indication that the editor is familiar with the topic and article content, as well as shows that the editor has already made strides to meet the criteria.

All that being said, I'd like to invite you to post questions and comments at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games. This is where the more active and experienced VG editors discuss matters related to article improvement. I also suggest that you reach out to some of the regular contributors there, as they have a wealth of knowledge to offer if you'd like to bring some articles up to GA and FA. Let me know if you have any questions. I'm not very active anymore, but I'll certainly do what I can to help you reach whatever goals you may have for video game articles. (Guyinblack25 talk 03:58, 17 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Air Cavalry (video game)

[edit]

Dude, since you created this page Air Cavalry (video game), you should write a summary (using your words) about the game. --Hydao (talk) 08:23, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About your GAN on Super Mario Galaxy 2

[edit]

I noticed that you nominated Super Mario Galaxy 2 as a Good Article. I read the article for a bit and there was an image of the cover of the game, but there is no screenshot of the game as to illustrate the gameplay, graphics or whatever. Good articles must include not only the cover of the game, but a screenshot of the game as well. Some free images are optional to put in the article. So what i would've done is add a screenshot of the game before nominating it as a Good Article. (TheLoverofLove (talk) 21:27, 19 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Re:Thanks for telling me this

[edit]

Your Welcome. I may also put a screenshot of the Map screen in the sub section Setting and level design. Do you mind if i put the screenshot there? (TheLoverofLove (talk) 14:02, 20 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Re:Reviewing GA-nominees on video games

[edit]

Hey, I noticed them there. Someone will get to them eventually, but I'll certainly consider giving them a look over next time I'm doing some GA reviewing. J Milburn (talk) 18:16, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Top importance VG articles

[edit]

Hello. I noticed that you recently changed the importance rating of several video game articles to "top". However, the designation should be discussed at WT:VG per the guidelines outlined at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Assessment#Importance scale. (Guyinblack25 talk 04:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]



Your GA nomination of Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars

[edit]

The article Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars for comments about the article. Well done! Robin 14:08, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article promotion

[edit]
Congratulations!
Thanks for all the work you did in making Super Mario Galaxy 2 a certified "Good Article"! Your work is much appreciated.

In the spirit of celebration, you may wish to review one of the Good Article nominees that someone else nominated, as there is currently a backlog, and any help is appreciated. All the best, – Quadell (talk)

GAR

[edit]

Hi. I am letting you know that I have placed Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars up for a community GAR here. GamerPro64 15:49, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't You Wanna Stay

[edit]

Thanks for approving the article! I wasn't notified it was passed but anyway thanks! — My December (talk) 14:47, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

[edit]

Hi- Just popping in for some unsolicited advice. When editing, there is an option to leave an edit summary of the changes we make. It is a good practice to leave an edit summary as a means to communicate with your fellow editors. It can help provide quick information to others when looking at an article's edit history or the latest changes on a watchlist. Something I do is to avoid accidentally leaving blank edit summaries is to select the "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" option on the Editing tab of my user preferences. Let me know you have any questions. (Guyinblack25 talk 03:27, 12 August 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:P's and Q's.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:P's and Q's.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fallout_3

[edit]

An article you proposed for GA nomination is currently on hold. Please see the review accessible through the article talk page for details. ~ Don4of4 [Talk] 15:47, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agustín Ross Cultural Centre

[edit]

I find it unacceptable that you quick failed the good article nomination without even notifying me that you were reviewing it; the issues certainly wouldn't take a lot of time to fix. I will proceed to ask for a reassessment.  Diego  talk  18:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Specially since all the problems you pointed out were purely of consistency, which wouldn't take much of my time.  Diego  talk  21:57, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Peer review/Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song)/archive2

[edit]

Please strike issues at Wikipedia:Peer review/Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song)/archive2 as they are resolved to your satisfaction.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 12:12, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA promotion

[edit]

Thank you for having promoted the article I had nominated and for your message on my talk page! Cheers, --Europe22 (talk) 22:05, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for Super Mario RPG

[edit]
The Video game Barnstar

Congratulations are in order for the hard work you've put into Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars. Personally, I'm always happy to see former Good Articles return to form. And even happier to see articles about older video games get some attention. Just wanted to let you know that you efforts do not go unnoticed and are appreciated. Please keep up the good work. (Guyinblack25 talk 21:11, 10 September 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Halo 3

[edit]

Hi SCb '92 - Would you have a few minutes to revisit your comments at the FAR for Halo 3 (review page at WP:Featured article review/Halo 3/archive1)? The FAR appears to be getting close to being able to close, but it would be great to get any final comments you have, and if you feel the article can now be kept or if it still needs more work. Thanks, Dana boomer (talk) 12:30, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agustín Ross Cultural Center

[edit]

An article you reviewed has been taken to GAR. You may wish to comment there Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Agustín Ross Cultural Center/1 AIRcorn (talk) 02:13, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry did not notice the notification above. AIRcorn (talk) 02:30, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Risk parity GA Review

[edit]

Thanks for your detailed evaluation of the article. I have made all the changes and upgrades that you have suggested. Please have a look when you have time. Thanks again, -- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:06, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. The sources spell risk parity in all lower case, so I have corrected the article to conform with the sources. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 16:26, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A beer on me!
a pleasure working with you! — Keithbob • Talk • 17:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FAC withdrawn, unprepared per peer review

[edit]

I appreciate that you are acting in good faith, but it is best if featured articles are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. In this way, they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar enough with the sources to act on suggested improvements. Someone who has not worked on the article can not provide this input, so the nomination may continue until opposition to it becomes so overwhelming that the article is failed; this takes away time from reviewers. While the Big Gay Al's Big Gay Boat Ride article is of reasonable quality, it is not yet of featured quality, and principal contributors must be consulted before a nomination, as required in the featured article candidate instructions.

Please see the peer review and address issues raised before approaching FAC. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:31, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, SCB '92. You have new messages at Talk:Spanish general election, 1933/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, SCB '92. You have new messages at NuclearWarfare's talk page.
Message added 03:13, 23 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

NW (Talk) 03:13, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for this. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 12:12, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WPHILHIST

[edit]

An article you did a GA review of is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#Is the shooting down of 1 aircraft during the Vietnam war notable? Does it deserve GA status? you may wish to participate.Jim Sweeney (talk) 15:46, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Your GA nomination of Caesars Palace 2000

[edit]

The article Caesars Palace 2000 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Caesars Palace 2000 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Hammerbrodude (talk) 04:01, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done templates

[edit]

Hey SCB, just a reminder that per the instructions at the top of WP:FAC, you shouldn't use  Done and similar templates in FAC reviews. I've refactored the ones at the Oblivion review, and replied to one of your comments. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:20, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure...

[edit]

Are you sure there are no problem with the references here? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:21, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, SCB '92. You have new messages at Talk:Pon de Replay/GA1.
Message added 18:09, 8 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Calvin • Watch n' Learn 18:09, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Call of Duty 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sandstorm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Super Meat Boy FAC

[edit]

Hi, you reviewed the Super Meat Boy FAC last month. That nomination died due to a lack of response and has been restarted; would you consider coming to the new one to restate your opinion? Thanks! I'll swing by the Oblivion FAC later today, if I can. --PresN 19:30, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Talib Kweli-Hot Thing.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Talib Kweli-Hot Thing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:43, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Caesars Palace 2000 GAN

[edit]

Talk:Caesars Palace 2000/GA2 is on hold. Thanks, bridies (talk) 03:18, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do the final source checking within a day or two, hopefully tonight. bridies (talk) 03:47, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Passed. BTW, as I noted in the review, GameFAQs gets it release dates from GameSpot (or vice-versa, I forget) and they tend not to be very accurate. I don't think that's an issue with this article any longer, but you might want to double-check. bridies (talk) 13:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Risk parity

[edit]
Hi SCB'92 and happy new year! The Risk parity article that you reviewed and approved for GA status in Sept 2011 has been placed under reassessment. Seeing as its only received a dozen or so minor changes (ref improve, spelling and grammar) in the interim, this appears to be a challenge of your GA review. Therefore, I thought I'd invite you to the reassessment page in case you'd like to comment. Thanks for all your work on WP. Best, -- — Keithbob • Talk • 18:47, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2013

[edit]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2013, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

[edit]
Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members).

So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:

  • Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available".
  • Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497).
  • Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along.

A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk)

This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 15:03, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 10 Pin Bowling

[edit]

The article 10 Pin Bowling has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

After searching for reliable sources and only managing to find two, I feel that this article is not notable enough. While there may be coverage in print, GameRankings shows nothing and it's unlikely that a game that received virtually no coverage on the Internet would have gotten attention in limited-space print works. By the way, assuming you read this, I do hope you continue editing on Wikipedia. You seem to make good contributions from what I've seen.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 09:55, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ozumo 2.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ozumo 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Public enemy-night of the living.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Public enemy-night of the living.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:11, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Backyardfootball10.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Backyardfootball10.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dawnofdestiny.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dawnofdestiny.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling video listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of best-selling video. Since you had some involvement with the List of best-selling video redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:101in1partymegamix.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:101in1partymegamix.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Queen of Pop" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Queen of Pop. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 17#King of Rock and Roll until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Neel.arunabh (talk) 03:14, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Speed Power Gunbike cover.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Speed Power Gunbike cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rainy Dayz.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rainy Dayz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:101-in-1

[edit]

Template:101-in-1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. QuicoleJR (talk) 18:50, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:La Di Da Di.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:La Di Da Di.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Championmanage0203.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Championmanage0203.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to I Gotcha Back (GZA song) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I Gotcha Back (GZA song) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to I Gotcha Back (GZA song). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:I Gotcha Back (GZA song)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, SCB '92. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:I Gotcha Back (GZA song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Johnny Sindacco" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Johnny Sindacco has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11 § Johnny Sindacco until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SCB_%2792&oldid=1245261425"