Jump to content

Talk:1933 Spanish general election/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk contribs count) 10:10, 20 September 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]


I like what I'm seeing

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    in the first sentence it is missing an "on" so to read "were held on 19 November 1933"; also the next paragraph should read "The right formed an electoral coalition; shouldn't "Confederación Española de Derechas Autónomas" be italicized, like it is later, because it is in another language? shouldn't "Asociación Católica de Propagandistas" have an English translation? shouldn't "Confederación Nacional del Trabajo" also have an English translation ("National Confederation of Labour")? what does PSOE stand for (so what is "Spanish Socialist Workers' Party" in Spanish?; couldn't "A second round of voting was held in sixteen constituencies.[20] This was held on 3 December.[21]" be changed to "A second round of voting was held in sixteen constituencies on 3 December.[20][21]"? to avoid short sentences?
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    good
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    good
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    good
    C. No original research:
    good
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    good
    B. Focused:
    good
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    good
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    good
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    good
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    any chance of uploading an image of Alejandro Lerroux?
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    yeah, it was the prose that got me; you got a week to fix this
Fixed all those things, I think. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 10:21, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then, it's a pass-SCB '92 (talk) 11:55, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]