User talk:SAMsohot
This is SAMsohot's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
September 2021
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 19:50, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- @331dot: Hello admin, I have already talked to the other editor and she keeps reverting my edits. How am I the only one who is reverting here??? I did tell her of Edit Warring (clearly on the page history) and yet she directly reverted everything again. I have done my research and will continue to improve the page. I am not reverting anymore, but making small edits with summaries to help others understand the edits. Let me know if this works. The page was already biased by the reporters involved such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Scottstedman. Thank you! SAMsohot (talk) 20:08, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- I don't know all the particulars of this issue, but I do know that you cannot edit war to protect what you feel the page should be. Please discuss any grievances with the article on its talk page; after a time if that fails to resolve the issues, you may move to dispute resolution. 331dot (talk) 20:54, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- @331dot: For sure! Thank you!SAMsohot (talk) 21:00, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- I would strongly advise you to read WP:OUTING before commenting further about who other editors might be. If you believe that an editor has a conflict of interest that they are willfully not disclosing, you may bring that up at the conflict of interest noticeboard- again, being mindful of WP:OUTING. 331dot (talk) 22:22, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- @331dot: Yes, I just read it. I am going to post the concern in the right place. ThanksSAMsohot (talk) 22:23, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- I would strongly advise you to read WP:OUTING before commenting further about who other editors might be. If you believe that an editor has a conflict of interest that they are willfully not disclosing, you may bring that up at the conflict of interest noticeboard- again, being mindful of WP:OUTING. 331dot (talk) 22:22, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- @331dot: For sure! Thank you!SAMsohot (talk) 21:00, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- I don't know all the particulars of this issue, but I do know that you cannot edit war to protect what you feel the page should be. Please discuss any grievances with the article on its talk page; after a time if that fails to resolve the issues, you may move to dispute resolution. 331dot (talk) 20:54, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- @331dot: Hello admin, I have already talked to the other editor and she keeps reverting my edits. How am I the only one who is reverting here??? I did tell her of Edit Warring (clearly on the page history) and yet she directly reverted everything again. I have done my research and will continue to improve the page. I am not reverting anymore, but making small edits with summaries to help others understand the edits. Let me know if this works. The page was already biased by the reporters involved such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Scottstedman. Thank you! SAMsohot (talk) 20:08, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Sam Virtual Assistant
[edit]Hello, SAMsohot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sam Virtual Assistant, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Sky Pool
[edit]Hello, SAMsohot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sky Pool, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Fairness in Women's Sports Act
[edit]Hello, SAMsohot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fairness in Women's Sports Act, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Sam Virtual Assistant
[edit]Hello, SAMsohot. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sam Virtual Assistant".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:42, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Dunhuang Sandstorm 2021 moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Dunhuang Sandstorm 2021, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 15:40, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Dunhuang Sandstorm 2021
[edit]Hello, SAMsohot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dunhuang Sandstorm 2021, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Dunhuang Sandstorm 2021
[edit]Hello, SAMsohot. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dunhuang Sandstorm 2021".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:25, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
The article Scarface (lion) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV; all sourcing is puff pieces or promotional.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SilverTiger12 (talk) 18:07, 4 April 2023 (UTC)