Jump to content

User talk:Rushi1122334455

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rushi1122334455, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Rushi1122334455! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kandula durgesh (August 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Presented sources are dead links.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 17:34, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kandula durgesh (August 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources - sources provided are dead links
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 01:12, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kandula durgesh (August 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Waggie were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Previous reviewers concerns have not been addressed at all. All sources are dead links.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Waggie (talk) 06:27, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kandula Durgesh

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kandula Durgesh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:44, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vogeti ramakrishnayya

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vogeti ramakrishnayya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:46, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

book

[edit]

I found a good book source online for the article about Vogeti Ramakrishnayya: here, but you have to cite the book. If your article is deleted, work on it in draft space and when you are ready move it into main space. I can even do it for you JC7V-constructive zone 03:28, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vogeti ramakrishnayya

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vogeti ramakrishnayya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Rushi1122334455 (talk) 04:01, 22 August 2018 (UTC) yes and i have also edited that but can you please help me and remove the box.[reply]

  • Sort yourself out man! Applying a speedy tag to a page you have created yourself is pointless. Likewise the above message.
Work on improving draft:Vogeti Ramakrishnayya. When you think it is ready click on "Submit you draft for review" and follow the instructions.
Please explain what you hoped to achieve with this edit. I will unblock you as soon as you give a comprehensible reply. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:37, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to earn from this RHaworth but this is forgotten history of rajahmundry which I have researched and consulted many historians in this regard. I thought my research should take some shape even though if it does not give any kind of benefit to me. and thus I have chose wikipedia, not profitable organisation for it. and moreover I don't want any kind of benefit from it. there are few people who donated a lot for the development of a city ( rajahmundry). And to know about them i had read many books and met many historians, with their help help and books I read I thought that this should be made available to people, and thus I tried posting it on a non profitable and peoples friendly platform like wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rushi1122334455 (talk • contribs)

I don't know why the box is coming automatically RHaworth, that's why I tried seeking your help. Help me in this regard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rushi1122334455 (talk • contribs)

  • Rushi, the box is not "coming up automatically". It is coming up because you have included {{db-bio}} in your edit. More importantly, with this edit you reverted some formatting changes which I claim are improvements. Please study this edit carefully. By all means re-instate your better references but do not revert my edits. I will unblock you if you repeat back to me why the speedy delete box was coming up and agree with me that this edit was an improvement. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:25, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i agree to what you say and i will feel very happy if you yourself post that page, RHaworth. and even if you say that i can post it , i will, i will follow your suggestions. i will provide links which are not dead and what should be the heading be? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rushi1122334455 (talk • contribs)

  • For goodness sake! Learn to sign talk page messages with ~~~~. "What should be the heading be?" If you mean an heading at the top of the article, there should not be one: The wikitext starts with the AfC tag and then on the next line: '''Vogeti … . I am pleased to see your edits today. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:19, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you RHaworth. Why are you deleting the page which has all the necessary citations wihtout any dead links. i had made this and each and every point is included.RHaworth . you are the one who had said the article can be posted by some other because i am disowing it. but now i understood why speedy deletion came and i had made all necessary changes and followed your suggestions. but why again you deleted it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rushi1122334455 (talk • contribs)

  • If you leave another unsigned talk page message, I will block you. I have not deleted any of your edits. Once again you have reverted my improvements. Please study this edit carefully. Note the de-duplication of a ref to Google books and the correction of numerous capitalisations. I am not prepared to do anything else for you until you re-instate these changes. In any case, kindly have the humility to wait until an independent reviewer thinks your page is ready for publication. You said "when will peolpe be able to see it?" People can see it now. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:58, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, now i edited capitalisations and had made changes, and also the de-deuplications of the google ref were also stated why they are meant to be created in the title. Can you help me now? in making this draft Draft:Vogeti Ramakrishnayya an article.RHaworth -- Rushi1122334455 (talk) 16:12, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • No! At least you have learned to sign. Please learn to read a "diff report" like this one. Instead of de-duplicating the links to Google books, you have confused the issue by making duplicate links look different. What is your objection to copying my edit? Please reply. And as to capitalisation you have done just one. Do you think that Kanchumarthi Narasayya Naidu, for example, should have capitals? Please reply. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:38, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kandula durgesh moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Kandula durgesh, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 16:46, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

[edit]

Hello, I'm Dreamy Jazz. I noticed that in this edit to Vogeti Ramakrishnarao, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 21:15, 31 August 2018 (UTC) ````Actually i am making it but it is not clear and i want to edit it. will you help me in that regard?? Dreamy Jazz[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of zamindari estates in Madras Presidency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dharmavaram (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vogeti Ramakrishnayya has been accepted

[edit]
Vogeti Ramakrishnayya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 20:53, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Rushi1122334455. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Kandula Durgesh, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:40, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah ofcourse, but i dont have a particular relation with the person. He is just a politician from a historical families, and just found it interesting to make his page thas it. And i loved the way you made me understand the situation. but actually , i havent used any kind of words that are used to praise him. and i have no interest in paid contribution. Just want to make my article visible and there is no any over excitement. User:GSS can you please make my draft an article. Rushi1122334455 (talk) 10:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised please don't move your draft to mainspace and follow the AfC process. There are some questions that I want to ask so let's start with this image you uploaded as own work so can you please explain where you get this image from? Pinging RHaworth who protected Kandula durgesh and Kandula Durgesh in the past. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:33, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, actually i found it in google and accidentally ive kept own work.haworth had protected it because , i have not cited perfect links but dead links User:GSS.Rushi1122334455 (talk) 10:45, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please provide a link to that image on Google? GSS (talk|c|em) 10:46, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah ofcourse , but it is a twitter image, but you can type kandula durgesh on google images and you will find it. User:GSS.Rushi1122334455 (talk) 10:50, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I already tried to find this image on Google before posting the COI notice here on your talk page but it wasn't there so anyways I can see it on Google now. Also, Do you mind providing a link to his date of birth and parents name? espacialy for the early life and family history section. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:01, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are many youtube videos regarding him and if you can understand the regional language then i will surely give you the link. And if you ask me about family history, then i had been researching on many zamindars of andhra coastal region and had consulted many historians in that regard. In that i found him active in politics and thought of creating an article and if you ask me about date of birth then i had seen his facebook page. I cant create someones article without even knowing something about him right??User:GSS Rushi1122334455 (talk) 11:15, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are around 10 profiles and pages on Facebook under "Durgesh Kandula" and none have the date of birth. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:43, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Find the page that has 5k likes and it is the highest and it has a birthday. once go and verify.please. User:GSSRushi1122334455 (talk) 12:29, 29 September 2018 (UTC) You can also view his twitter account in which you can find about potula veerabadrarao his grandfather. Rushi1122334455 (talk) 12:30, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I can see that you are a new editor, but you need to know that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article Chilamkurthi Veeraswamy. I have removed the infringing text, but the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web, and when creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok , Thank you User talk:CwmhiraethRushi1122334455 (talk) 12:55, 30 September 2018 (UTC) I have considered your suggestion and made required additions in my own language.Rushi1122334455 (talk) 13:00, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kandula Durgesh

[edit]

Hello, Rushi1122334455. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kandula Durgesh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 22:43, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Meraka Veedhi Telaga

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Meraka Veedhi Telaga, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JK (talk) 19:06, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Meraka Veedhi Telaga moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Meraka Veedhi Telaga, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JK (talk) 19:12, 2 February 2020 (UTC) Sorry, i didnt notice your suggestion. I had made few edits and removed the data which i am unable to provide citations.I added more trsuted gazette information as the primary source and the details from biogrpahy of Chiefminster of Andhra(Tanguturi Prakasam Panthulu) etc. suggest me if i need to do any further changes.Thank you.User:Rushi1122334455 (talk)Rushi1122334455 (talk)JK 19:39, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
1292simon (talk) 11:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

[edit]

Hello, I'm TheImaCow. I noticed that in this edit to Draft:Meraka Veedhi Telaga, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheImaCow (talk) 13:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your encouragement and concern. In that para i have described the Pre-history of the area which the families occupied and i was notified that the article is not clear whether it described the area or the families. Thus i removed it to be more clear about the family avoiding the area description.Thank you TheImaCow .Rushi1122334455 (talk) 14:16, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I just realized you're the page creator. Well, that's all right then. Excuse me. :D
P.S.: You can erase the warning here, of course. TheImaCow (talk) 14:23, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
1292simon (talk) 08:04, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rowthulapudi Mandal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gangavaram (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:49, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

[edit]
For your efforts on Andhra Pradesh related articles IM3847 (talk) 16:20, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ananthavaram

[edit]

Please note that disambiguation pages like Ananthavaram are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

  • Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
  • Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
  • Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
  • Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
  • Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
  • Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 00:14, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for Villages in Andhra Predesh

[edit]

Thank you (talk) .Rushi1122334455 (talk) 13:40, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Rushi1122334455

Thank you for creating Karnikota.

User:Path slopu, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi greetings, please feel free to add more content to the page. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

PATH SLOPU 08:02, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit santha pydipala

[edit]

Can you please help me to do edit Santha Pydipala? Iamsuryachandra (talk) 03:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pasaruginne has been accepted

[edit]
Pasaruginne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meraka Veedhi Telaga (August 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Primefac were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Improperly sourced and utter nonsense as far as promotional tone goes.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Primefac (talk) 16:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ravu Venkata Swetha Chalapathi Kumara Krishna Rangarao for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ravu Venkata Swetha Chalapathi Kumara Krishna Rangarao is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravu Venkata Swetha Chalapathi Kumara Krishna Rangarao until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 22:18, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Same numbers in Infobox

[edit]

Hello. Thanks for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that the villages Poolova and Polamanugondi have same data in 'population' filed. Kindly correct it. --Gazal world (talk) 21:25, 19 January 2021 (UTC) Ho, Sorry i will correct them. Thank you.Rushi1122334455 (talk) 21:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Meraka Veedhi Telaga

[edit]

Hello, Rushi1122334455. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Meraka Veedhi Telaga".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:28, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Viraj Singh Gohil moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Viraj Singh Gohil, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 14:26, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes Hatchens. I have rechecked it. I have mentioned 8 points in which 7 were given sources and the one left is the general introduction. In the 7 sources i have mentioned, only one is the interview of the mentioned person and the rest 6 were independent sources. Whereas coming to its reliability the i have mentioned the Indulge express (a part of the most reliable 89 year old Indian Express Newspaper. I also mentioned Imdb mentions and The news minute newspapers artcile too. I also mentioned the new york times article too. Mostly they mentioned his name in crew members as a cinematographers which defines his role in those projects. Once again check it. I am not asking you to review it. but, as you raised a question please brief me again what exactly is missing in the artcile. Thank you.Rushi1122334455 (talk) 15:03, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viraj Singh Gohil (July 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 00:24, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chilamkurthi Veeraswamy for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chilamkurthi Veeraswamy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chilamkurthi Veeraswamy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:31, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

let me add other references too when he contested for member of legistlative assembly and garned 50 thousand votes.MPGuy2824 (talk)Rushi1122334455 (talk) 11:27, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Rushi1122334455, Please read WP:NPOL. Essentially for India, politicians who have won a seat in an assembly or parliament, are counted as automatically notable. Others have to meet WP:GNG. Please read through both those links and then participate on the deletion discussion page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:48, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Viraj Singh Gohil

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Rushi1122334455. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Viraj Singh Gohil, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Viraj Singh Gohil

[edit]

Hello, Rushi1122334455. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Viraj Singh Gohil".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:32, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nandigama Estate moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Nandigama Estate, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 11:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vidya Gajapathi Raju Singh for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vidya Gajapathi Raju Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidya Gajapathi Raju Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 09:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nandigama Estate

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Rushi1122334455. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nandigama Estate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nandigama Estate

[edit]

Hello, Rushi1122334455. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nandigama Estate".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 12:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rushi1122334455&oldid=1237565706"