User talk:Rudra Tenio Chakraborty

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, linking to your username, so that you will be notified.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Skip to the bottom ⇩ · It is 4:39 AM where this user lives in Bangladesh. ^(Purge)

September 2016

Hello, I'm Zppix. An edit you recently made to Death Note: Light Up the New World seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 16:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rudra Protap Chackraborty, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rudra Protap Chackraborty! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Rudra Protap Chackraborty! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:22, Tuesday, September 13, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

September 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please remember that Wikipedia is not a discussion forum. Pages such as the Teahouse, are for discussion of Wikipedia-related topics. Gestrid (talk) 17:58, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Rudra Protap Chackraborty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Gestrid (talk) 18:01, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Outing Yourself

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that all that personal information you have on your user page is not necessary. Many Wikipedia editors, including myself, prefer to edit without giving away information that personally identifies us. If you would prefer to keep such information private, you can remove it, and then contact one of the people on this list to delete the previous versions of the page that have your information on it. If you would like, you can also request that your account be renamed. -- Gestrid (talk) 18:08, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No,thanks.Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 01:25, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I was just making sure. Usually, most people don't who edit Wikipedia don't want others to know so much about them. I do want to warn you, though, that some (albeit very few) editors, especially in the few "war zones" we have on Wikipedia (such as articles having to do with the Arab-Israeli conflict), can get pretty wound up and may even go so far as to find out exactly where you live so they can threaten you. The information you've left on your userpage, especially your real name and where you live, could make it quite easy. Harassment on Wikipedia is not allowed, but it does happen. Be careful where you post your personal information. Even if you were to remove it right now, it would still be publicly accessible unless an administrator deleted the past versions of your page. -- Gestrid (talk) 03:49, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advise.I will remove it.Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 04:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removed plot

Can I know why you removed the plot from Death Note: Light Up the New World?Rudra 07:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Because everything added to an article must confirmed by a reliable source so it can be verified. For example, if I said that there are definite signs of life on Mars and added to the article we have on Mars, someone would likely remove it because it was most likely original research, which we don't allow on Wikipedia. However, if I said that and cited a reliable source (such as Time Magazine) that said that, then what I said is proven true and is verifiable. (By the way, take a look at Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners to learn how to cite sources on Wikipedia.) Do you understand? I'm going to go ahead and remove the unsourced text again, and you can add it back when you've found a reliable source.

One more thing. When you do find a source, don't just copy and paste the plot from the source into the article. That's copyright infringement. Instead, find a reliable source and then put what that source says into your own words.

Just so you know, everything that appears as a link in this reply is a link to a Wikipedia policy verifying what I've just told you. To read those policies more in depth, click the links.

-- Gestrid (talk) 16:29, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh,I see, thanks.Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 10:45, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Rudra Tenio Chakraborty. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Gestrid (talk) 18:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Death Note Manga Pilot

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Death Note Manga Pilot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from deathnote.wikia.com/wiki/Death_Note_Manga_Pilot. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay,I won't break the copyright rule anymore.Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 04:40, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

Hi Rudra Protap Chackraborty and welcome to Wikipedia. Since yu are still fairly new, you're probably finding out that Wikipedia has lots of policies and guidelines that we as editors are expected to try our best to comply with. Some of these have to do with the kinds of infomration we are allowed to put on our userpages. Wikipedia editors are allowed to personalize their user pages to a certain degree, but a userpage is not intended to be a subsitute for a personal website or a social media account, etc. It's OK to tell others a little bit about yourself, but the focus of a userpage should be on things Wikipedia related and it should not really be exclusively used to list our likes or dislikes or other things such as that. I suggest you take a look at WP:UP to see what kinds of things are considered acceptable for userpages and what kinds of things are not. One other thing to remember is that like the articles we create or edit, we do not own our userpages and they can be edited by anyone at anytime. Normally, experienced editors will not edit another editor's userpage as a courtesy unless there is a specific policy or guideline violation that requires immediate action, but userpages, like articles, can be deleted by an administrator or edited by another editor if they violate Wikipedia's userpage guidelines. In a sense, the Wikipedia community is letting us borrow our userpages to help use communicate with others so that we can help make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia, but the community will take action if we start to use our userpages for something else. I am just letting you know this because like some new editors your edits seem to be focusing on your userpage rather then trying to help improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia. Some personal information is OK, but your userpage should not be the primary reason for editing Wikipedia. I see you've already completed the Wikipedia Adventure, so maybe you should take a crack and trying to help improve some of the more than 5,000,000 articles that Wikipedia currently has. There are various WikiProjects that are always looking for new members to help improve and clean up exisitng articles or you can just click on "Random article" on the left of your screen and see if there's anything that needs fixing. Good luck to you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me and sorry,I will remove unnecessary things.I am new.I didn't know that wikipedians can't tell much about them.Thanks again for letting me know.Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 10:44, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image use on userpages

Hi Rudra Protap Chackraborty. Unfortunately, non-free images like File:Light from Death Note.jpg are only allowed to be used in the article mainspace per WP:NFCC#9 so I removed the image from your userpage per WP:UP#Non-free images. Freely licensed images such as those found at Wikipedia Commons, however, may be used on your userpage if you want. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:06, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me.Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 10:42, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Signatures

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Page name, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

You are signing your posts manually, but that was the signature is not linked to your user page, which is mandatory (see: WP:SIGN). You have to sign automatically as described. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:32, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks.Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 10:42, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Death Note: New Generation

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Death Note: New Generation, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Cmr08 (talk) 00:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay,thanks.Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 03:34, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kira Worshipers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kira Worshipers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kira Worshipers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 17:56, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Rudra Tenio Chakraborty. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by -- Gestrid (talk) 05:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Death Note characters into Kira Worshipers. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay,thanks for telling me.Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 15:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for inviting me.Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 04:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, don't want to deter you, but can you keep it to only substantial article improvements for the list. At least a paragraph of sourced text, full reference cleanup etc and they'll be accepted. Cheers.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh,I understood.Thanks.But can I add article improvements for the list which is not minor improvement? Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 16:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you've added at least a paragraph of text yourself, or really added a number of sources/noticeably cleaned up an article yes, add it. Minor improvements to articles already GA not sure worth adding.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi those are still minor unsourced additions though, not marked improvements. Please only add entries you've written and sourced yourself, look at some of the other entries.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:05, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, if you say so.

Welcome to Wikipedia Asian Month!

Hi there! Wikipedia Asian Month is about to start. Here is some information about participating in the event:

Please submit your articles via this tool. Click 'log in' at the top-right and OAuth will take care the rest. You can also change the interface language at the top-right.
Once you submit an article, the tool will add a template to the article and mark it as needing review by an organizer. You can check your progress using the tool, which includes how many accepted articles you have.
Participants who achieve 4 accepted articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard. You will receive another special postcard if you achieve 15 accepted articles. The Wikipedian with the highest number of accepted articles on the English Wikipedia will be honored as a "Wikipedia Asian Ambassador", and will receive a signed certificate and additional postcard.
If you have any problems accessing or using the tool, you can submit your articles at this page next to your username.
If you have any question, you can take a look at our Q&A or post on the WAM talk page.

Best Wishes, Addis Wang
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image use on userpages (2)

You've already been warned about this, as well as the assorted other warnings above regarding your disregard for copyright. Please stop posting non-free images to your userpage, or you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ignore all rules doesn't apply with regards to copyright, as this is not a Wikipedia policy but a legal matter. ‑ Iridescent 15:19, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see.But Dr. Blofeld did the same. What about him? Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 16:53, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, the images on the messages on my talk page were tagged/deleted images,♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm talking about your user page, Dr.Blofeld. There are many images on your user page. I did the same but Iridescent said it's copyright violation. Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 17:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not about featuring images on your user page. We have the Wikipedia Commons with 30 million + free images. You can use any of those images on your user page. But you uploaded copyrighted images which we can't permit here. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, what Blofeld said; only free images (that is, images to which nobody else has the rights) can be used on your userpage, and with very limited exceptions you can only use free images anywhere on Wikipedia. Because all content on Wikipedia (including your user page) can be reused anywhere, by anyone, for any purpose, by using a non-free image (a film poster, a record cover, a still from a video etc) you're committing an illegal act by trying to release something for re-use which isn't yours to release. If you click on the images on Blofeld's userpage, you'll see that they all have either been released into the public domain, meaning nobody owns them and anyone can use them for any purpose, or are released under a CC-BY-SA licence meaning anyone can reuse them for any purpose provided they credit the creator.

The only circumstances in which it's permitted to upload copyright material to Wikipedia is for use in articles on the material itself—e.g., it's permitted to include a still from a film in an article about that film, or a book cover in the article on that book—and even then there are strict restrictions and the material has to be uploaded at an intentionally poor quality to make it as difficult as possible for anyone to try to re-use, and has to be immediately removed if a free-use alternative is found even if the free-use alternative is of poorer quality. (You can read the full policy on when it's permitted to use copyrighted material at Wikipedia:Non-free content.) Normally, Wikipedia has a very flexible approach to enforcing rules, but because misusing copyright material has the potential to get both the person misusing it, and the Wikimedia Foundation itself, into serious legal trouble, this is one area in which a zero-tolerance approach is taken.

(This is expressly a suggestion, not an order, but if you do restore the section I removed I'd recommend not using the Featured Content star on any article which you haven't yourself taken to featured status. While it isn't forbidden to do so, our featured content often represents months or even years of work and substantial financial investments on the part of their authors, and Wikipedia editors tend to take a very negative view of people who claim or appear to be claiming authorship of featured content without having actually done so, so you'll struggle to be taken seriously if you're seen as either claiming credit for other people's work.)

Incidentally, I'd strongly suggest you request that Commons delete the photo of yourself which you've uploaded. I suspect you don't really understand the implications of you irrevocably agree to release your contribution; what you're doing by uploading a photo to Commons is giving anyone with access to the internet permanent consent to edit and use that image for any purpose whatsoever, which is something that can easily come back to haunt you later on. You'll notice that very, very few people upload photographs of themselves to Commons. ‑ Iridescent 04:12, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand now. And I did not know those were featured content stars, Sorry. Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 15:36, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 7 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Tale of Fairy Tail: Ice Trail page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will try to fix those references soon. Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 05:05, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Images

See File:Tale of Fairy Tail- Ice Trail volume 1.jpg for what image uploads need, most importantly a fair use rationale, and they have to be uploaded at a small size. Opencooper (talk) 07:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh,I see. Okay,thanks. Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 12:56, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Fairy Tail Gaiden- Rhodonite volume 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Fairy Tail Gaiden- Rhodonite volume 1.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:31, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Fairy Tail Gaiden- The Twin Dragons of Sabertooth volume 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Fairy Tail Gaiden- The Twin Dragons of Sabertooth volume 1.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:31, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Fairy Girls volume 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Fairy Girls volume 1.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:31, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rudra Protap Chackraborty. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Death Note: New Generation (2)

Hello, I'm KoshVorlon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Death Note: New Generation have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KoshVorlon 13:53, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, KoshVorlon. Why I shouldn't give much detail to plot summary? Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 14:46, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't quite it, yes your summary was a bit too long, however in one section you added " Yuki starts to worship Kira and becomes a cyber terrorist to make the shitty world a better place and to get closer to Kira ". We can do without the "Shitty world" bit. It's not personal either, I'm a Death Note fan since I first saw the Anime on Adult Swim ! KoshVorlon 15:03, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand! I will not say like that again "shitty world". I am also a Death Note fan like you are! I am much interested to contribute in Death Note articles. Anyway, Nice to meet you, KoshVorlon! Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 15:18, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Death Note New Generation poster.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Death Note New Generation poster.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:31, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fairy Girls volume 1.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Fairy Girls volume 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fairy Tail Gaiden- Flash of Great Lightning volume 1.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Fairy Tail Gaiden- Flash of Great Lightning volume 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fairy Tail Gaiden- Rhodonite volume 1.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Fairy Tail Gaiden- Rhodonite volume 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fairy Tail Gaiden- The Twin Dragons of Sabertooth volume 1.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Fairy Tail Gaiden- The Twin Dragons of Sabertooth volume 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tale of Fairy Tail- Ice Trail volume 1.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Tale of Fairy Tail- Ice Trail volume 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:15, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Attack on Titan: Smoke Signal of Fight Back

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:06, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Thanks. Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 18:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Attack on Titan: Smoke Signal of Fight Back

hello... you Created article of Attack on Titan: Smoke Signal of Fight Back; i'm Created another in language arabic in all information such as copy past but i don't now this information true or error, what is refrence and URL ... pleas speak me in the fact. there's film attack on titan in 2 part; 1- attack on titan (filme) 2- attack on titan: end the world I hear presence of Attack on Titan: Smoke Signal of Fight Back never but give and written refrences in your article and me copy and past to wikiprdia arabic ... good bay anwar bn al hosein^{call me} 18:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello, anwar bn al hosein. Please don't just copy-paste. Write from your mind. And I have given a reference in my article. And there are some unofficial wikis too. You can check those for information and then write in your way. Thanks. Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 18:34, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Attack on titan

Hello .. im not doing copy paste but there's Wikipedia arabic I working on translate in English to arabic fir the article attack on titan. Please do anwar bn al hosein^{call me} 22:04, 25 September 2017 (UTC) you have pictures of the article anwar bn al hosein^{call me} 22:04, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Even if I have pictures, how can I give you?Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 03:13, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Asian Month 2017: Invitation to Participate

Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.

Thank you!

- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Govt. P.N Girls' High School Rajshahi (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Govt. P.N Girls' High School Rajshahi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 05:27, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Govt. P.N Girls' High School Rajshahi (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Govt. P.N Girls' High School Rajshahi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 06:19, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Your addition to Draft:Govt. P.N Girls' High School Rajshahi has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:59, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa,Sorry for that. But I have a question. Is there any way to delete a draft? If you know, kindly answer please.Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 06:27, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Attack on Titan: Smoke Signal of Fight Back for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Attack on Titan: Smoke Signal of Fight Back is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attack on Titan: Smoke Signal of Fight Back until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 07:57, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Govt. P.N Girls' High School Rajshahi (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Worldbruce was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

For many years Wikipedia had two conflicting positions on high schools. The official guideline said that a high school must have significant coverage in independent, reliable, secondary sources to justify an article. There was an informal agreement, however, that proving a high school existed was sufficient to justify an article. That's why you see some school articles that only cite the Ministry of Education's list of secondary schools.

The reasons the much lower "existence" standard was tolerated are not entirely clear, but some editors felt it was more important to encourage young, novice editors (who frequently write about their high schools), than to strictly enforce Wikipedia's rules. The value of new editors was felt to outweigh the damage to the encyclopedia caused by poor quality articles about high schools. Over the years the number of such articles grew from a few, to hundreds, to tens of thousands.

This February 2017 RFC decided that the existence of a high school was not enough to justify an article about it. Of all the articles about schools in Rajshahi, the only one that meets the notability guideline is Rajshahi Collegiate School. All of the others will be deleted if they cannot be improved to meet the guideline.

The only source this draft cites that is independent of the school is the Ministry of Education, and that is only a directory-type list entry, not significant coverage, so the draft will not be accepted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Govt. P.N Girls' High School Rajshahi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Worldbruce (talk) 16:39, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Attack on Titan: Smoke Signal of Fight Back

Greetings. Your page is at the verge of being deleted. Please add more reliable sources to avoid deletion. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 16:44, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. Please unblock me. I have have to take part in an deletion process of an article.Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 14:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address, so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS. Yamla (talk) 15:00, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla, here's my IP address, 180.211.183.114 please unblock soon. Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 20:45, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That IP address is blocked for being an open proxy. I have just verified. Despite your claims to the contrary, it is indeed an open proxy. It's currently running processes on at least the following ports: 80, 179, 1723, 2000, 2222, 2323, 8080, 8081, 8291. As such, we will not be lifting that block. --Yamla (talk) 12:28, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla, Well, What should I do now? To edit again. Can you please tell me? I don't have any experience of this. Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 06:29, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop using a proxy. If this is not a proxy but is instead your IP address, you should consider your computer and your network compromised and seek help reformatting it and securing it. --Yamla (talk) 12:15, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla, I went to my computer's LAN settings and saw that my computer was using a proxy server. So I turned it off. I also turned off proxy from my browser. Now please check if the block can be lifted.Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 14:06, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can't check this. If you are still unable to edit, you need to tell us your new IP address, using the tool linked above. If you are able to edit, problem solved! --Yamla (talk) 14:16, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla,Yes, I'm still unable to edit. It says my block will expire on 29 July, 2018. And my IP address is still the same "180.211.183.114". What now?? I did stop using proxy.Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 14:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you are still using 180.211.183.114, you have not yet shut off your proxy server. You'll need to contact your network administrator or helpdesk in order to determine how to do this. --Yamla (talk) 14:27, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla, I fixed it. I can edit now. Anyway, thanks for advises.Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 17:58, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rudra Protap Chackraborty. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nin x Nin: Ninja Hattori-kun, the Movie (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDb can't be a reference

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nin x Nin: Ninja Hattori-kun, the Movie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nin x Nin: Ninja Hattori-kun, the Movie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 09:09, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: American Conjuring (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDb can't be a reference

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:American Conjuring and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:American Conjuring, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 09:15, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Memoirs of a Murderer (2017 film) (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from meniscuszine.com/articles/2017070343909/memoirs-of-a-murderer-2017-japan-cuts-film-review. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Memoirs of a Murderer (2017 film) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

joe decker ^talk 18:55, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Memoirs of a Murderer (2017 film) has been accepted

Memoirs of a Murderer (2017 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

joe decker ^talk 03:48, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Memoirs of a Murderer 2017 film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Memoirs of a Murderer 2017 film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
112	Death Note: The Musical (talk)	Add sources
2,724	Godzilla (franchise) (talk)	Add sources
184	Monster movie (talk)	Add sources
66	Wild Arms 2 (talk)	Add sources
108	Death Note original soundtracks (talk)	Add sources
1,631	King Kong (1933 film) (talk)	Add sources
63	Mars (manga) (talk)	Cleanup
246	Flame of Recca (talk)	Cleanup
66	Please Save My Earth (talk)	Cleanup
228	Platinum End (talk)	Expand
204	Attack on Titan: Before the Fall (talk)	Expand
19	Sakura Wars 3: Is Paris Burning? (talk)	Expand
72	Soul of Chogokin (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
517	Noblesse (manhwa) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
124	Mothra (film) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
264	Masamune Shirow (talk)	Merge
994	The Lego Movie (franchise) (talk)	Merge
25	Seburo (talk)	Merge
87	Wario Land: Shake It! (talk)	Wikify
78	Atashin'chi (talk)	Wikify
82	The Mysterians (talk)	Wikify
3	Zairaini Sarbini (talk)	Orphan
14	Multiplicity (psychology) (talk)	Orphan
3	Kazuhiro Sawataishi (talk)	Orphan
64	Max Borenstein (talk)	Stub
147	Sword Gai (talk)	Stub
70	Nobunaga no Shinobi (talk)	Stub
123	Kodoku no Gourmet (talk)	Stub
18	Tokyo Marble Chocolate (talk)	Stub
10	Combustible Campus Guardress (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Identity

Hi.
Even though not necessary, it is suggested that editors who are under 18 years old should not put their personal information on wikipedia. Even if you delete something from your userpage, it is visible to everybody in page history. If you take a look at my userpage User:Usernamekiran, you will see I dont have anything personal on there. Kindly let me know what you think, if you want to, I can ask an admin to revdel the information so nobody would be able to see it. —usernamekiran(talk) 13:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Usernamekiran, well, thanks for your advise. I am not really concerned about it though. I removed some information. But no need to revdel the information. It's okay. Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (talk) 17:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lana Rhoades

Hello, I'm Smjg. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Lana Rhoades. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Smjg (talk) 23:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Smjg, Actually I wanted to create a new article on Lana Rhoades. That's the reason why I removed the redirect and requested deletion as I wanted a fresh start. Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (talk) 23:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to write a new article on Lana Rhoades, go ahead and write it. There's no need to delete the original page first. Moreover, {{db}} requires a reason; moreover, there are set reasons that qualify, and this isn't one of them. — Smjg (talk) 23:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marsha May

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Marsha May requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 02:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Marsha May. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 03:01, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jennifer White (actress)

The article Jennifer White (actress) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 04:03, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just give me a bit time! I'm still editing it!Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (talk) 04:05, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jennifer White.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Jennifer White.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.hotmovies.com/porn-star/108619/Jennifer-White.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 05:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anime projects

Dear Rudra Tenio Chakraborty! Can you make an article about upcoming anime Cutey Honey Universe and Adieu Galaxy Express 999? Thank you! --178.71.223.165 (talk) 07:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

178.71.223.165, I created Cutie Honey Universe but Adieu Galaxy Express 999 is created before. Tell me if there's something more you want me to create.Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (talk)

Stop MovingPages

I have a headache from trying to work out what on earth you have done with Natalia Starr and finding the deleted history appears to be impossible. Plus stop creating porn star pages that have previously been deleted. please read WP:BLP to understand how sensitive biographies should be handled. Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Humbug!, It's a long story and I'm so sorry for messing it up! I beg your pardon! Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (talk) 08:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And how about porn stars like Sunny Leone, Mia Khalifa etc. They still exist while mine doesn't. -_-

They meet the GNG or PORNBIO and yours do not. Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:50, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice

Its taken me half an hour to go through all the messy redirects and cross namespace moves and then tidy up, There are a few things you need to learn before you go any further:

Template space is for templates not articles. Never move an article or draft into template space,
Wikipedia never hosts Non-free images of living people as its possible to take a free image. Consistently Taking copyrighted images and uploading them here will be you blocked so please don’t. Please read WP:NFCC - hopefully you will see what a compliacted area this is. Untill you are really confident you understand how we deal with non-free content I suggest you stay well away from it.
Creating BLPs of porn stars that do not meet WP:GNG or WP:PORNBIO is a waste of time as they will get deleted and your effort will be wasted - especially if there is already a consensus to not have the article after AFD or DRV. Check the talk page or page history for links to discussions.
Never create BLPs that have badly sourced negative content - especially if that content is sourced to the Daily Mail as that is the only paper we have a consensus on that it is not a reliable source for a BLP. This last one is very serious. If you repeat it could easily lead to a block. We take BLP very seriously.

Basically, it looks like you are an enthusiatic and well meaning editor who wants to contribute but your enthusiasm is running ahead of your experience and knowledge of our ways. Keep away from image uploads, BLPs ans Porn stars and you will be fine.Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well thanks, Spartaz. But I am not going to stay away from anything. My mistake did teach me and I think I can overcome it. Can you check this article Dillion Harper ? I am quite confident it meets WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. Danish, French and German wiki have this article also. Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (talk) 12:31, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Read the GNG and RS. This isn’t an acceptable article and you are wasting time that should br spent on proper article creation. If you refuse to heed advice then we have to start working out of you are a net negative or a net positive. Sucking editors intopointless debates because you refuse to heed advice suggests the former. Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, now you are behaving rude. Other sister wiki has this article, that's why I created on English also. What's wrong in English wikipedia?Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (talk) 13:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shizuka Marikawa.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shizuka Marikawa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shizuka Marikawa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shizuka Marikawa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shizuka Marikawa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dillion Harper for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dillion Harper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dillion Harper until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:33, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Poster

Dear Rudra Tenio Chakraborty! Can you find poster of Shrestha Bangali and songs and who sang these songs in this movie? Thank you! --178.66.111.34 (talk) 14:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

178.66.111.34, I can find the poster but the article is not acceptable. No reference. Wrong Information. It's not an upcoming film. It already released in 2017.Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (talk) 15:02, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ai Kurosawa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ai Kurosawa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://asianviesta.blogspot.com/2009/12/biograpy.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 17:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Your addition to Shizuka Marikawa has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. foundational copyvio of highschool-of-the-dead.wikia.com: see copyvio report. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:25, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Rudra_Tenio_Chakraborty

Sockpuppetry is disruptive. You are welcome to comment on the report I just lodged at ANI. I really wish you had taken the advice instead of sticking up two fingers. Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:30, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Another admin has redacted some information for your user page, and I've deleted most previous versions of it to remove it from history. As a minor, please don't leave personally identifying contact information like that on your user page. Please see Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors for other recommendations for younger editors. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits, see this ANI thread. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 21:00, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Got blocked for disruptive edits. But I did that by mistake. Can I get a last chance, User:Bishonen?Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (talk) 21:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unconvincing unblock request. Please read WP:GAB before making another request. SQL ^{Query me!} 23:10, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

non-admin comment: Rudra, a friendly advice, kindly go through guide to appealing blocks, and WP:ANI#Rudra Tenio Chakraborty. —usernamekiran(talk) 21:45, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know a discussion was running there. Well, I am accepting the punishment but can it be reduced to 1 week? 2 week is too much. I can't even stay 1 day.Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (talk) 22:04, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You were told about the discussion when it was first started; look 2 sections above. In fact, good grief, you participated in it! Your responses here do not make me want to reduce the block; if anything, they make me want to extend it. You have not given any indication at all that you understand what you've done wrong. That's going to be absolutely required before anyone considers reducing the block length. If you do not take these two weeks to understand what you're doing wrong, I am confident the next block will be indefinite (that is, it will never expire without someone deciding to unblock you). --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But I thought the discussion is over. And I do understand what I did wrong. But If I didn't do wrong, I wouldn't learn either. With each mistake, I'm learning the guidelines. You want me to convince you that I won't do it again, right? What if I lie? So I am going to be straightforward and make it simple that - I'm not going to do the same mistakes again. Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (talk) 22:45, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- Except Spartaz explained how you were being disruptive in a long post here yesterday, and you ignored him and continued with the disruption. Except that you've continued to add copyrighted material after you were first warned about it. Except that you unethically (clumsily) pretended to be 2-3 different people so your article wouldn't be deleted. Except that you completely ignored people telling you to remove personally identifying information from your user page, forcing others to do it. You don't seem to be learning from your mistakes at all. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:51, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Let me explain, about copyright material, are you talking about photos i uploaded? because i thought the 'next one' will not be copyright violation. Next, my personal information. They said it's their suggestion. It's not a must. But I still removed a lot information from my infobox except my photo, name and birth. (before the infobox was very very long including my hair color, eye color, height, weight etc.) But the little info I let remain it got removed also without my permission. Is that right? About Spartaz advise, I paid attention to it. So I tried to create another which would not violate the guidelines. Seeing some articles in other language wikis existing while the same in English wiki getting deleted (usernamekiran explained it to me later).. I got a bit angry.. thats why commented from 3 unlogged account.. I accept it as a guilt.. But not other things.. Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (talk) 23:07, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another example: you just removed your declined unblock request, and replaced it with an identical unblock request. If that happens again I will increase the block length to indefinite. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:22, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! the declined request itself said to request again! What did I do wrong! "Please read WP:GAB before making another request."Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (talk) 01:16, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Really? So this has just been one long multi-year troll? --Floquenbeam (talk) 04:02, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? What do you mean?Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (talk) 04:04, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) I will try to keep it short: you should have made the second unblock request without editing the first one. The deletion would have seemed a mistake, but your second request was exactly the same; ~~and you made reference to WP:GAB, using a shortcut; signifying you read the guide.~~ so it doesnt look like a second request, it looks like you removed the declination of the original request and made it appear that the request was never declined. —usernamekiran(talk) 04:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Floquenbeam: yeah, I didnt understand the multi-year reference either. —usernamekiran(talk) 04:17, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It means you're either not competent to edit here, or you're pretending to not be competent to edit here, and have been for the last several years. Since I find it hard to believe that anyone is this clueless, you must be trolling. Did you really think that "Please read WP:GAB before making another request" meant "Read that page, ignore everything it says, and then immediately paste the exact same worthless unblock request again, and this time it will surely be accepted"? No, surely not. At best, with all the good faith I can muster, assuming you aren't a troll, I think you're looking at an indef block until you mature for 2-3 more years. I'm too tired to deal with this tonight. --Floquenbeam (talk) 04:18, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

😐 2 week is 2 week. Not 2 years please.Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (talk) 08:06, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry investigation

Hello Rudra Tenio Chakraborty,

Another user recently opened a sockpuppet investigation into your editing activity. Sockpuppetry is the act of using more than one account and/or IP address to edit Wikipedia in a way that makes it appear as though you are multiple individuals, and in most cases it is not allowed. Our usual response upon discovering sockpuppetry is to block all of the offending user's sockpuppet accounts indefinitely and their main account temporarily, or to extend their block if they are already blocked as in your case. Since it seems that you have already recognized your mistake and removed the comments you made while logged out, I am not extending your current block at this time. However please use only one account from now on, and note that future violations of the multiple accounts policy will result in you being blocked again, probably for a long period of time.

If you have any questions about this please feel free to ask. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:54, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well thanks. That was the first time I used multiple accounts. I never did it before.Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (talk) 15:11, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reblocked

I am changing this block to an indefinite one. There are simply too many problems over too long a time. Look at all of the threads on this talk page. Almost every one of them is someone having to spend time correcting various mistakes you've made, and as I say a few paragraphs above, you do not seem to be learning from your mistakes. I do not think this is an easily correctable problem.

There are extenuating circumstances that lead me to make this an Oversight block, so an unblock cannot be considered through discussion on-wiki. I've removed talk page access. I've explained my reasoning to the Arbitration Committee, and pointed them to the now-oversighted ANI thread. If you wish to request an unblock, do so directly from them. You can email them at arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:18, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Floquenbeam, Please you unblock me. Or just give an expire date. The Arbitration Committee is not responding. 37.111.201.70 (talk) 12:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

page semi protected -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20626 was submitted on Feb 15, 2018 11:47:42. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 11:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rudra Tenio Chakraborty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no excuse for what happened and saying "I'm sorry" hardly seems adequate. But if you could forgive me this time, I promise you this will never happen again. Both the suffering that I've caused to other editors and the misery I feel now show me that breaking my word causes too much damage to other editors to let me contribute again. I know it may be difficult to believe right now, but I really want to make good contribute in Wikipedia. I’m asking for a last chance. I want to prove myself. Please. The user who blocked me, User:Bishonen, also got blocked 3 times. But this is my first block. I can swear that I will never do such thing to get 2nd block. Sorry for messaging like this. I can't edit my talk page even the notice says I can edit my talk page.119.30.35.52 (talk) 09:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

oversight block -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just expanding: since this is an oversight block, it's a private matter and administrators here can't do anything for you. Arbcom is sometimes slow, they're a small group of volunteers with an extremely high workload, but if you have sent a genuine request they will respond in course. It may take several days. Please do not evade your block by editing while logged out in the meantime, you've already been warned that you may only edit from one account. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 13:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your email

It is really not that difficult to understand: only ArbCom will review this block. I will not unblock you myself. I will not communicate with you by email. If you have emailed ArbCom and they haven't replied, keep in mind it takes time to consider unblock requests. You can email them again and ask if they got your first email. Remember to use a useful subject line instead of the default "Wikipedia email". Don't create new accounts to email people; I have blocked the one you created 2 days ago. --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:54, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Well, that pretty well sounds like more socking? oi. Yeah. give the ArbCom some time. They weigh carefully and deliberately. They carry a heavy burden. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:47, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Memoirs of a Murderer 2017 film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Memoirs of a Murderer 2017 film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Godzilla Kessen Kidō Zōshoku Toshi film poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Godzilla Kessen Kidō Zōshoku Toshi film poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: American Conjuring (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ammarpad was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:American Conjuring and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:American Conjuring, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–Ammarpad (talk) 12:32, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]