User talk:BlueShirtz

Welcome!

Hello, RadicalKid78, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Thrillopolis, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Quasar G ^{t - c} 19:12, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Thrillopolis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Thrillopolis. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Themeparks LLC. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Themeparks LLC – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Quasar G ^{t - c} 19:12, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Barack Obama, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 01:11, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Newton, New Jersey. ARV'd Creeperparty568 ~ Cool Guy (talk) 22:40, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:23, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Mae Beavers, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Jim1138 (talk) 04:14, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Krisle Elementary School

Hello, RadicalKid78. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Krisle Elementary School, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:03, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Randy Boyd (Tennessee)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Randy Boyd (Tennessee) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 02:59, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Randy Boyd (Tennessee). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 04:02, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Randy Boyd (Tennessee), you may be blocked from editing. reddogsix (talk) 15:57, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Randy Boyd (Tennessee) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Randy Boyd (Tennessee) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Boyd (Tennessee) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 20:04, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RadicalKid78. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bill Lee, Businessman

The article Bill Lee, Businessman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of actual notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 00:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:New VidLii logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:New VidLii logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:45, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of VidLii

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on VidLii requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —J. M. (talk) 02:32, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BitChute Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BitChute Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 05:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, I'm Mélencron. Your recent edit to the page Tennessee gubernatorial election, 2018 appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mélencron (talk) 18:53, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to United States Senate elections, 2018 does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! CoolSkittle (talk) 18:26, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RadicalKid78. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

T Series we Pewdipie

I just checked the number of subscribers. Your edits seems incorrect. I have reverted it Dheerajmpai23 (talk) 16:50, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries generally not provided

In November 2018, another editor suggested that you add edit summaries to your edits. You do that occasionally, but mostly not. It's not mandatory (obviously), but adding edit summaries is very helpful to other editors. And it will reduce the number of times that your edits are reverted. For example, I just reverted this edit because you didn't explain why you thought one image was better than the other. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:15, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Summit High School (Tennessee) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Summit High School (Tennessee), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Please see the school article guidelines which describes how the content of school articles should be organized, with the aim of providing general guidance to editors. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Steven (Editor) (talk) 00:33, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Trump. gnu 57 15:09, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guy (help!) 16:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BlueShirtz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

When the edits were made to the Donald Trump and Divine right of kings, I did not create the vandalism, and it was commited by another person who edited the articles when I was not present, this kind of offense hasn't happened in the past. This can be shown because of the numerous contributions I have added to the English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, as I have written numerous articles and contributed many original photos to Wikimedia Commons.

Decline reason:

You need to understand that you are responsible for edits made under your username. That includes safeguarding your computer and your log-on information so that no one else can edit in your name. Please explain what steps you will take to make sure this does not happen again. MelanieN (talk) 18:18, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is plausible, from your past edits, but we need to be certain you are back in control of the account. Guy (help!) 18:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

BlueShirtz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

When the edits were made to the Donald Trump and Divine right of kings, I did not create the vandalism, and it was commited by another person who edited the articles when I was not present, this kind of offense hasn't happened in the past. This can be shown because of the numerous contributions I have added to the English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, as I have written numerous articles and contributed many original photos to Wikimedia Commons. To protect my account, I will make a more secure password, safeguard my computer information, and monitor what devices/IP addresses I access my account on, I now understand that these two factors are important in maintaining a secure account.

Accept reason:

OK, I will unblock. You are a longtime constructive editor and you now appear to understand the importance of securing your account. MelanieN (talk) 19:28, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I should have added: yes, you need to protect against unauthorized use of your account. But you must also not allow authorized use of your account by anyone else. Wikipedia is very strict about not sharing accounts. One person, one account. Just so you know. -- MelanieN (talk) 20:18, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your attention needed at your username change request

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 06:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2022 United States Senate election in North Carolina for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 United States Senate election in North Carolina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 United States Senate election in North Carolina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jaclar0529 (talk) 08:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Summit High School (Tennessee) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Summit High School (Tennessee), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

Hi, thank you for creating the new Utah gubernatorial election pages, whenever you can would you mind creating pages for the past Delaware gubernatorial elections? Thanks again for all you do 47.223.78.205 (talk) 21:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, BlueShirtz

Thank you for creating Thrillopolis.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:52, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kentucky Kingdom

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kentucky Kingdom you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HickoryOughtShirt?4 -- HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 01:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Summit High School (Tennessee)

Hello, BlueShirtz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Summit High School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kentucky Kingdom

The article Kentucky Kingdom you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kentucky Kingdom for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HickoryOughtShirt?4 -- HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 23:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nashville Shores

Hey BlueShirtz, I see you nominated Nashville Shores for GA status, however, I don't think it's ready yet. Please don't consider this a review but I suggest taking a look at some articles through here and expanding on those one-line sections (ie. Adventure course + Campground + Marina). HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 01:40, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Join WikiProject Amusement Parks!

Hello, BlueShirtz! Thank you for your recent contributions on articles related to amusement parks. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a WikiProject which aims to focus collaboration and improve the quality of amusement park articles across Wikipedia. Feel free to stop by to learn more and sign up at the Participants page.
Hope to see you over there! --GoneIn60 (talk) 00:02, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Lee

Did you not see the notice at the top of the article? I placed it there in an effort to avoid edit conflicts. Bneu2013 (talk) 07:25, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited J. Bruce Saltsman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interstate 840. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Hey BlueShirtz,

In your user page there are errors in your infobox stemming from your use of a "salary" and a "residence" section. These sections do not exist according to errors found by previewing your user page.

Regards, PaulWebbtheTechExpert — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.5.44.230 (talk) 18:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Join WikiProject Tennessee!

Hey BlueShirtz! It seems that you have an extensive interest in the state of Tennessee. For this reason, I invite you to join WikiProject Tennessee to help with more articles regarding the state. Paul Webb (PaulWebbtheTechExpert) (talk) 17:44, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user invites you to join
WikiProject Tennessee.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tommy Tuberville, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doug Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

See Template:Did you know nominations/Julia Letlow. Thanks for your assistance! – Muboshgu (talk) 18:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Julia Letlow

On 16 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Julia Letlow, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Julia Letlow won the special election for a seat in the United States House of Representatives after her husband died from COVID-19 before he could be sworn into office? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Julia Letlow. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Julia Letlow), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"FreeTalk 45" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect FreeTalk 45. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 16#FreeTalk 45 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:46, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2021 Pentagon attack

The article 2021 Pentagon attack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable event

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 00:46, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2021 Pentagon attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2021 Pentagon attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Pentagon attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Jax 0677 (talk) 17:37, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clay County High School (Tennessee)

Hello, BlueShirtz

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Dr vulpes, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Clay County High School (Tennessee), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dr vulpes}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 22:41, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harriet Hageman (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Extraordinary Writ was:

At the moment, there's an article about Hageman in mainspace at Harriet Hageman. Feel free to incorporate any information from this draft into that article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harriet Hageman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clay County High School (Tennessee) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Clay County High School (Tennessee), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:03, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Liberty Creek High School

The article Liberty Creek High School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't pass WP:GNG and WP:INDISCRIMINATE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 23:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

We don't generally encumber the lede with the place of birth of a person. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daniel_Cameron_(American_politician)&diff=1129953531&oldid=1129896757 2603:7000:2143:8500:1858:4C1:E713:D14D (talk) 07:52, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@2603:7000:2143:8500:1858:4C1:E713:D14D Thats not true (a few of the articles that do: Dwight D. Eisenhower, George Wallace, Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard Nixon, Spiro Agnew, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, Dick Cheney, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi, Michael Mukasey, Eric Holder, William Barr, Mitt Romney, Bernie Sanders, Jerry Brown, Andrew Cuomo, Jay Inslee, Gretchen Whitmer, Elvis Presley, Justin Timberlake, PewDiePie) BlueShirtz (talk) 16:52, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it is true. I said "generally." I could list a dozen article in which we put the date of birth in the text below the lede - but that doesn't disprove the point that we don't generally do that, either.--2603:7000:2143:8500:59D2:653F:D02E:9E19 (talk) 18:02, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@2603:7000:2143:8500:59D2:653F:D02E:9E19 Many of those articles are GA or FA quality, so putting it in the lede is more than appropriate. BlueShirtz (talk) 18:08, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Caleb Hemmer

The article Caleb Hemmer has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Silikonz💬 01:46, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Clay County High School (Tennessee)

Hello, BlueShirtz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Clay County High School (Tennessee), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, BlueShirtz. Thank you for your work on Vivek Ramaswamy 2024 presidential campaign. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello! Hopefully you have a good day today. Thanks for creating this article. I encouraged you to make more! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:03, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Clay County High School (Tennessee)

Hello, BlueShirtz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Clay County High School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:36, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent contributions to Justin Jones (Tennessee politician)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Justin Jones (Tennessee politician). Not welcome at da SD (talk) 18:56, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was watching the House livestream and I misheard the clerk say he was expelled. My bad. BlueShirtz (talk) 18:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aftyn Behn has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aftyn Behn. Thanks! Hammersoft (talk) 00:08, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Don Sundquist

On 29 August 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Don Sundquist, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 07:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:2023 World Series has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2023 World Series. Thanks! MicrobiologyMarcus^{(petri dish•cultures)} 03:11, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 World Series has been accepted

2023 World Series, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MicrobiologyMarcus^{(petri dish•cultures)} 10:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Doug Burgum 2024 presidential campaign

Hello, BlueShirtz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Doug Burgum 2024 presidential campaign, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Doug Burgum 2024 presidential campaign

Hello, BlueShirtz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Doug Burgum 2024 presidential campaign".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bernie Moreno

Hello BlueShirtz. Please do not delete the word rights from the section regarding Moreno's political position because it might cause confusion. The section needs to be titled LGBT rights as it details his stance on the civil rights of the LGBT community. Calling it just LGBT would imply that this is his personal opinion of LGBT individuals as opposed to his stance as a politician. Also, the use of the word issue would give the section an unnecessary negative connotation. The word rights is much more neutral since it refers to civil rights. Radiohist (talk) 11:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The section itself only mentions that in the mid-2010s his businesses sponsored the 2014 Gay Games, that he has a son who is gay, and during his present campaign "accused LGBT activists of advancing a radical agenda of indoctrination." So I don't understand why the section shouldn't be titled "LGBT." As far as the personal opinion vs. opinion as a politician point goes, those would be considered the same. I guess some people think that Moreno changed his position on these topics to sound more appealing during an election year, but so far that theory is unfounded. It could just be that over the past decade his views on the subject have changed. So I don't understand the distinction if there is one. BlueShirtz (talk) 17:43, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wholeheartedly disagree. Every single thing in his page reflect his political stances, since he is a politician. Whatever he said refers to the civil rights of LGBT people. Radiohist (talk) 18:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What the section is about is his activities and his opinions surrounding the LGBT community. I still don't understand the difference between his personal beliefs and his political beliefs. BlueShirtz (talk) 18:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I started a discussion on the Bernie Moreno talk page about this topic. BlueShirtz (talk) 01:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hi BlueShirtz! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Bernie Moreno several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Bernie Moreno, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Remsense诉 18:34, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I started a section in the article's talk page. BlueShirtz (talk) 18:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Louisville Barnstar for you!

		The Louisville Barnstar
		For your excellent work in shepherding Kentucky Kingdom to GA status and for your fastidious upkeep of it over the years. This is a key subject for the Louisville area and I continue to be delighted at how well it is covered, mostly due to your efforts. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 00:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concerned about right-wing push edits

Hello,

I am concerned that several of your edits, such as at the 2024 debate article, push a right-wing point of view _pbp 01:19, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not pushing any political point of view. I think you're referring to the Tiananmen Square sentence specifically because you removed that from the article, and I added that sentence because it of its significance. Several news outlets such as CNN, NPR, and The New York Times wrote articles about that specific exchange, so I don't understand why adding it to the article would be giving it "undue weight." BlueShirtz (talk) 01:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It appears from scrolling up that I'm not the only one concerned about your viewpoint _pbp 01:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you be more specific in what you are referring to? BlueShirtz (talk) 02:52, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since Jan 1, 2023, your edits at the 2024 debates, Bernie Moreno, Justin Jones, and whatever got you a contentious topic warning. _pbp 04:04, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'll go over the specific ones you mentioned:

2024 debates: See my first comment in this section
Bernie Moreno: I didn't think the title "LGBT rights" section made sense on the Bernie Moreno article being that the section was only about Moreno's opinions and activities surrounding the LGBT community. I took that discussion to the Bernie Moreno talk page and other editors agreed that the title should be changed.
Justin Jones: Jones was expelled from the TN House in April 2023 and I was watching coverage of the expulsion vote. When I tuned in to watch, I mistakenly thought he had already been voted out of office and so I made an edit saying his term had ended. I realized the vote hadn't happened yet, and before I could change it someone had reverted the edit.

If you want to talk about my edit history as a whole though I have made many articles for different U.S. elections, as well as both Democrat and Republican politicians. But as I said earlier, I'm not pushing any personal political agenda through my edits, and I'm still not sure how the 2024 debates edit was "pushing a right-wing point of view." BlueShirtz (talk) 04:32, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics warning

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 World Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National League.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Senate Republican Conference leadership election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axios.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]