User talk:RodeoWrld

May 2020

Hello, I'm Coffee. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on JetsonMade, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 08:22, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know you're new here, so just wanted to inform you that Twitter is not considered a reliable source. WP:RS/P states In most cases, Twitter accounts should only be cited if they are verified accounts or if the user's identity is confirmed in some way. As JetsonMade's Twitter account is not verified, any statement from that account cannot be determined to be his own actual words as a primary source. Could you please revert your changes in that regard until you can find a better source? If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you! — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 08:39, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 6ixBuzz. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 09:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wtmitchell How was that vandalism? I was just re-phrasing it better in an effort to improve the article. RodeoWrld (talk) 09:03, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You should disregard that message from User:Wtmitchell. I reviewed your edit and it was in no possible way vandalism, and have thus restored your edit. @Wtmitchell: I'm sure that was a mistake made in the quickness of Huggle editing, can you please slow down a tad? Thanks. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 09:51, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Please see WP:V and WP:OR: we have to have sources for additions to the encyclopedia. Please let me know if you have any questions, you can just post {{Ping|Koavf}} and I'll see it here. Thanks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:04, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Koavf: No disrespect, but instead of removing the song from the category, I'd hoped that you would've contributed instead and find some sources to "verify" that it's a TikTok song if you really don't see so. I've found a handful of sources here, here, here, and so fourth that describe Uno as a single that emerged from TikTok. Thank you. RodeoWrld (talk) 01:16, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RodeoWrld, As you can see at WP:V (did you read it?) "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." You haven't provided that, so I am confused about why you are writing this. Additionally, Genius is not an acceptable source. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Koavf; Yes I read it, however I was saying that you haven't done the effort to resolve the issue, instead you just removed it. I've noticed that you were using a "gadget" to automate the categories, so you might've not noticed at first glance. I never added that category in the first place, but at least I tried to fix it. RodeoWrld (talk) 01:33, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RodeoWrld, "you haven't done the effort to resolve the issue, instead you just removed it" Yes, that's correct. As WP:V states, "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source." and ""I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons." There are literally hundreds of thousands of unsourced claims on this site: there is no way that I can find the sources of every hoax, embellishment, lie, etc. on this site. It's not my responsibility to prove someone else's claim, so I removed that. I know that you are newer here than me, so I want to make it clear that I'm not frustrated with you as such but with the process and the mammoth amount of work it is just to remove all of the unverified claims on this site, let alone the orders of magnitude more work it would be for me to source any crackpot, kooky claim that someone thinks he heard somewhere and adds to this site. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:39, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Koavf; In regards to citations tag, I'm unaware of this unwritten bias on this site according to you (well now written since you mentioned it), but also I assume that it seems to be unbeknown to many editors on here. If there's a tag implying the need for some information to be sourced rather than be removed (If that info was actually accurate), I simply search it up and found the appropriate sources to support it. I don't know, maybe it's just me or a handful of editors that actually follow along with that, so I'd say I agree to disagree on that factor. Also, that Genius article wasn't user-generated, it was written as a featured article by a staff writer employed by Genius. According to the sources page you provided, content under that category falls under no consensus, however it doesn't imply that it is unreliable. Not to push your buttons, but I think I could say the same about you not reading that, since you saw the Genius website and automatically assumed it was user-generated, which is fair since you've probably seen it a lot on here, however I believe you shouldn't discredit sources so quickly (unless it's a definite unreliable source) before checking it first-hand, then determining it after. RodeoWrld (talk) 02:07, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RodeoWrld, You're not at all pushing my buttons: you're trying to make the encyclopedia better and I totally respect the fact that you're willing to put forth free labor to do that. Per your explanation, I think this is probably an okay source to use to verify that this is a "TikTok song" but better still would be an unambiguously reliable source. Thanks again and let me know if I can help. I appreciate your thoughtful responses. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:14, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RMR (singer)

Howdy hello. I see you have been reverting to a version of RMR that has his supposed real name. But the sources provided were hardly even sources, and certainly do not meet the requirements of WP:BLP. To make such a bold claim would require a respectable reliable source to back it up. Thus I have removed his supposed name until better sourcing is found. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 00:56, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:CaptainEek Hi, thanks for responding. However, I kindly disagree with your reasoning, and from a quick peek from your account, I don't think you are familiar when it comes to music sourcing. Allow me to quickly explain. The sources included weren't added by me, but I've examined them and they appear to be reliable sources because they come from legal music metadata databases. BMI is an performing rights organization (PRO) used by thousands of artists and record labels to collect revenue generated by their work and pay out to people (artists/songwriters/producers/etc) involved in a song. This shows the songs currently registered in their databases under RMR's legal name Patrick Juteh Geegbae, which more I'm sure there's more to come in the future as more songs get registered. There are other PROs such as ASCAP and couple others in the U.S., with PROs in different regions of the world in their respective country. The two songs listed in BMI are actual songs by the artist RMR, with the other producers credited as songwriters in their legal name appears on the songs. The other source listed refers to a legal trademark registered in Georgia (which equates to RMR's hometown). Since the trademark source appears to come from a third party website, I've gone one step further and link the actual trademark from the USPTO here. This makes the link between BMI and USPTO for his name to be Patrick Juteh Geegbae. Since RMR is actually registered with ASCAP instead too, I've searched his name in their database and found far more songs registered under his real name here, with the same two songs also appearing from BMI here as well. Only difference is that in ASCAP, they show up as RMR, but it's not hard to make the distinction. Hope this all helps as I'm looking forward to reinstating his legal name. Let me know if you have any more questions. Thanks. RodeoWrld (talk) 02:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is original research in my view. How do we know Patrick is him? Could it not be his agent? A PR person? Rolling Stone could have easily done the same investigation you did, but they claim he remains unknown. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 02:34, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:CaptainEek Maybe Rolling Stone didn't know about BMI, ASCAP, etc or maybe didn't bother to do any more research on him. It can't possibly not be him because his name is listed on his own songs and his name owns his artist trademark RMR. However, I haven't added these sources, only reviewed them in an effort to improve the article. Not to mention, but I've noticed a couple other music related articles on Wikipedia that have used BMI as a source for music metadata. BMI is an official database that holds accurate info, nothing speculative because it's how artists involved are paid so it would have to be correct. Also another thing that they claim he remains "unknown" I believe is simply marketing for his image. RodeoWrld (talk) 02:43, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm away from PC at the moment, but I will raise the issue at WP:BLPN or perhaps WP:RSN for broader input. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 02:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:CaptainEek I guess we will see then. RodeoWrld (talk) 02:56, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, RodeoWrld! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Moneytrees🌴^{Talk🌲Help out at CCI!} 19:36, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good username! Moneytrees🌴^{Talk🌲Help out at CCI!} 19:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Moneytrees Thanks for the welcome and thanks for the complement! Much appreciated. RodeoWrld (talk) 19:42, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:SantanaWorld (+) - Tay K.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SantanaWorld (+) - Tay K.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 23:56, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Love Me Now Reloaded - Tory Lanez.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Love Me Now Reloaded - Tory Lanez.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:33, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Whats Poppin Remix - Jack Harlow.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Whats Poppin Remix - Jack Harlow.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Remixes Cover - Denzel Curry.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Remixes Cover - Denzel Curry.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Release date format

If you don't know that only the earliest known date that the album was released should be specified; later release dates (incl. re-issues) can be mentioned in a Release history section per Template:Infobox album#released. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 05:32, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheAmazingPeanuts I wasn't aware of this, sorry about that. RodeoWrld (talk) 07:09, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And when you added album covers that are very similar to the original, such as So Much Fun and My Turn, they might fails WP:NFCC#3a and probably get deleted as soon as possible. Somebody already files for discussion for the deluxe edition album cover for Love Me Now?. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 07:59, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheAmazingPeanuts Alright we'll see on that, thanks. RodeoWrld (talk) 15:57, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shoot for the Stars, Aim for the Moon Original Cover - Pop Smoke.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shoot for the Stars, Aim for the Moon Original Cover - Pop Smoke.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited PTSD (G Herbo album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donald Cannon. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:My Turn Deluxe - Lil Baby.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:My Turn Deluxe - Lil Baby.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Smoke Dawg, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:38, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nav - Brown Boy 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nav - Brown Boy 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:So Much Fun Deluxe - Young Thug.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:So Much Fun Deluxe - Young Thug.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Welcome to the Party Remix - Pop Smoke.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Welcome to the Party Remix - Pop Smoke.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, I'm FMSky. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tay Money, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 18:20, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anders (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nike.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Muhandes (talk) 17:21, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not replace covers without changing the source of the image

One of your main occupations here on Wikipedia appears to be replacing pre-existing cover artworks. This would be fine, except, for example, when you replaced the cover art of Me vs. Me, you did not cite a new URL for where you got the image from. You did not get it from the same Apple Music page, because there is not a still stickerless version of the cover there, and the cover is animated on that page anyway, so you clearly did not get it from a still frame. If you are editing these images to remove the Parental Advisory labels, stop immediately. We cannot accept edits that are made by editors. The cover must be commercially available without the warning. Until you cite a reliable source where you got the clear, stickerless version of that image from, it is not acceptable for inclusion on Wikipedia. Slow down your replacing of covers and start citing where you got your new versions from. Ss112 05:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please don't upload very similar images to an album's original cover if it has a deluxe edition. The deluxe version cover of Shoot for the Stars, Aim for the Moon was very similar to the original and did not need to be uploaded. Please see WP:NFCC: Minimal differences between images can and should be explained in prose. Instead of uploading another copyrighted image, you can simply explain that it's a version of the original cover, this time with the rose being held by a bird that is flying away with it. There. I explained it without needing to upload another non-free image. Wikipedia is not a gallery of covers. If you refuse to continue needlessly replacing images without specifying where you got the new versions from and not leaving edit summaries explaining why they needed to be replaced, I guarantee you're going to run into more trouble while editing here. In summary:

Do not replace images without specifying why you replaced it.
Always specify the new web page you got the new image from. It must be a reliable website.
Do not edit images yourself to remove Parental Advisory warning stickers.
Start leaving edit summaries. In your last 500 edits, you appear not to have left a single one.

Thank you. Ss112 06:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Doja Cat - Amala (Deluxe).jpg

The file File:Doja Cat - Amala (Deluxe).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This file is not used in any English Wikipedia articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Doja Cat - Amala (Deluxe).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Doja Cat - Amala (Deluxe).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Over the Top (Smiley song), you may be blocked from editing. Muhandes (talk) 15:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Muhandes (talk) 16:06, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noted this is not the first time other editors ask you to leave edit summaries. Please help us use our time more productively. --Muhandes (talk) 16:07, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:88GLAM Reloaded - 88GLAM.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:88GLAM Reloaded - 88GLAM.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help with my draft

Hello Can you please help me with my draft for Internet Money Music Producer KC Supreme,

It seems that the admins do not understand producers and i noticed you have contributed to a lot of producers wikipedia pages.

here is the draft in question:

Draft:KC Supreme 166.70.242.243 (talk) 16:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

166.70.242.243, the subject in the article would need more reliable press to help establish notability. RodeoWrld (talk) 16:23, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pi'erre Bourne - The Life of Pi'erre 4.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pi'erre Bourne - The Life of Pi'erre 4.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. DaCrashy (talk) 22:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:You Will Regret Reloaded - Ski Mask the Slump God.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:You Will Regret Reloaded - Ski Mask the Slump God.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Victor Victor Worldwide Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Victor Victor Worldwide Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]