User talk:Rocafellla

July 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rick and Morty (season 5) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rick and Morty (season 5) was changed by Rocafellla (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892325 on 2021-07-19T06:28:29+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:28, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Peter Capaldi have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Peter Capaldi was changed by Rocafellla (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928077 on 2021-08-03T04:57:12+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:57, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: D.M.B. (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:D.M.B. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:D.M.B., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 21:18, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rocafellla! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 21:18, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: D.M.B. (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the Youtube videos nor the genius.com source is a reliable independent source, which is what's required. The "background" section, in addition to being largely unsourced, comes across as minor trivia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:D.M.B. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 14:45, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:D.M.B.

Hello, Rocafellla. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:D.M.B., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Babylon

Why do you keep changing the box office gross of Babylon in the lead from an accurate figure to "over $X million"? An accurate figure is more appropriate to give a sense of loss the film will have made to the readers.

Your edits also don't involve any edit summary despite reverting me twice. In fact you rarely seem to use edit summaries anywhere. Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 07:57, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please answer by tomorrow or I will be forced to report you to the admins. Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 00:11, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 03:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond to the concerns brought up above. You have continued to edit without summaries and it will no longer be tolerated, nor will any further uncommunication, and you will face a block if you do not. Nate • (chatter) 21:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rocafellla it's been days. I don't expect you to necessarily accept my POV on how to write an article but at least you can respond and discuss? If you don't I'll have to ask for a block. Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 05:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Rocafellla (talk) 17:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's not acceptable. Please start using edit summaries and communicate thoroughly, or you will face a block from editing. Typing out only 'ok' to respond to all this is akin to saying you won't do it again, only to resume the same behavior anew, and will not be tolerated. Nate • (chatter) 20:26, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Surely you've been here long enough to know that message boards are not sources we used on Wikipedia, ever. And, per usual, no edit summary. Mike Allen 20:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got it Rocafellla (talk) 04:59, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries are required.

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Being incommunicative and refusing to talk about why you edited a certain page is not helping anybody, and Wikipedia is built around full collaboration. Please use edit summaries in the future, because otherwise this may not be the site for you and you could face a block. Nate • (chatter) 21:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One more time...I've noticed very few of your edits have any summaries at all. Start using them. They're not optional. This is a last warning (and this time, 'got it' is not an appropriate response, but using edit summaries will be). Nate • (chatter) 16:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm CastJared. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Zendaya seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. A list of her favorite things isn't really notable at all. CastJared (talk) 20:27, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm CastJared. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Zendaya seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Don't put distributor names in italtics. CastJared (talk) 20:18, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Castlevania: Nocturne (Netflix series) has been accepted

Castlevania: Nocturne (Netflix series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 06:45, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laura Harrier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 18:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

'By not communicating either on talk pages or through edit summaries, you are leaving no choice but for us to block you. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, where your not listening to advise by other editors will be seen negatively as it takes away productive time of our other editors who don't seem to be getting any traction from you. This is fwiw the final of the final warnings.

1. Please start leaving edit summaries for each major edit you make. 2. Please start responding to comments by other editors.

Thank you Lourdes 05:48, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: They Chose China has been accepted

They Chose China, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 13:54, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aoi Yamada has been accepted

Aoi Yamada, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ANU^writes 09:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]