User talk:Rob~enwiki

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics!

You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some helpful links:

Wikipedia:Merge, for information about merging, renaming and moving pages.
Wikipedia directory is also quite useful.
Meet other new users You may want to add yourself to the Wikipedia new user log.
Assign edits to your username from before you registered.
Be Bold!
Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
Play nice with others
Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
Tell us about you
How to upload files and image copyright tags.

By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.

Hope to see you around the Wiki! If you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page :)

Joe I 00:29, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Houghton I have commented on yr houghton discussion comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.43.45.192 (talk) 03:19, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ernest Farrar

Did I never reply to you. I'm sorry, just slipped my mind I guess, that usually doesn't happen :( I'm not the one to ask about images, I have yet to upload one, but here are some places you can try or people to ask...User:Karmafist , User:Johann Wolfgang , Upload Images , Copyright tags , Wikipedia:Help. Hope these help, somewhere there should be your answer :) Joe I 23:13, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: UK Theme

I've added the cover. I just tagged it as fair use of an album or single cover. JRawle (Talk) 12:53, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ely picture

Thanks for that. I agree, it does look better. Thanks for the feedback also Soloist 09:30, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Stanley Black article

Hey Rob - no I don't mind you expanding the Stanley Black article - that was good actually. I just made a start and feeling a bit lazy, pasted the Farnon Society article in (but I did acknowledge that). I question the "pioneer of jazz" statement in the opening para though. Also, why remove "Phase Four" from the Decca reference? Stanley Black put Phase Four on the map. Anyway, we both love Stanley Black - so that's good. I notice you have also written an article on Ronald Binge. My friend Wilfrid Jones (violinist) played with Ronny in the Mantovani Orchestra in the 1960's. He lives here in Canberra Australia now. I think he is about 85. He's had a distinguished career in many orchestras. I may add something about him to Wik soon. Cheers, Musicmaker 16:01, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

British Light Music Composers

I note that you have removed the paragraphs, which I had inserted, describing the work of Philip Sowcroft. As this work describes many lesser known composers, I feel that those wishing information on Light Music should be informed of its existence. The link in External Link means little by its title alone, yet it is a definitive work. I did not think it could be placed in your Notable British Composers as this category is too limited for such a wide work. I therefore will re-insert it under its own heading.

Please let me know if there was any other reason for you to remove it.

DonJay 11 December 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by DonJay (talk • contribs)

More on Light Music

Thank you for your prompt reply. I do not agree with you, but will not press the matter. Have you read many of the "Garlands"? I would say that they are more about the light music composed than about the composers. I am in no way pushing the link, but feel it is the only source, at least that I have found, of the greatest amount of light music and of numerous (about 1000) composers. It is not practical for Wiki to include most of this information and believe that more than a simple link and one-sentence description is required. I think that some emphasis should be made that Light Music is so much greater than that written by the few composers so far listed in Wiki.

Don (DonJay 20:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Complaint

so sorry...im not sure how to send you a message but i did NOT put false information on here intentionaly...and i would like it if you would NOT accuse me of such —Preceding unsigned comment added by Panchea (talk • contribs)

Sea Songs

On 19 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sea Songs, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 08:58, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for La Nativité du Seigneur

On January 7, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article La Nativité du Seigneur, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 15:55, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personent hodie at DYK

Nice article! I've suggested some minor tweaks to the hook -- please respond as soon as you can so that this doesn't get passed over. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 17:09, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Personent hodie

On January 14, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Personent hodie, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 10:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wi

Hi Rob, when redirecting to Wikitionary from an otherwise empty article, such as postlude, you can use the template {{wi}} instead of a soft redirect. Don't forget to use {{subst:longcomment}} as well though. Kind regards, Spitfire^Tally-ho! 11:54, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, can't except to remember every single template

Spitfire^Tally-ho! 11:59, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of I syng of a mayden

Hello! Your submission of I syng of a mayden at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Bradjamesbrown (talk) 19:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for I syng of a mayden

On January 11, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article I syng of a mayden, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 12:00, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

John Gordon (author)

Thanks for the welcome and article tidy Rob. You've done the reverse of John Gordon: born in the fens then migrated to the North-East!
I am in fact John's nephew and thought it a crime he didn't have a mention on Wikipedia. Although he made his splash over 40 years ago it's a shame he's not more widely known about and feel his article deserves a better rating than Low-Importance. Much of what I know is 'from the horses mouth' and some of his achivements I had to omit as they are hard to corroborate (such as his books being on the syllabus in many schools, his first book being read on Radio 4 by Martin Jarvis and another being rated Children's book of the week in the Guardian).
I have a couple of questions:

I wonder if Children's Literature rather than Novels would be a more appropriate WikiProject?
I'm thinking of adding a fuller bibliography on a separate page, what other additions could I make to improve the article and give it a higher rating?

Thanks again for your help.
Will Gordon aka Selseywill (talk) 22:20, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Eric Coates - Suite in Four Movements.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Eric Coates - Suite in Four Movements.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:26, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody had removed the rationale, for some reason. I've sent them a warning. Rob (talk) 07:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wisbech Grammar School

Hi Rob, you've put a lot of work into this article. If you have moment, do check out the talk page. Cheers, --Kudpung (talk) 06:51, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you misunderstood - the subtle suggestion was that you might like to nominate it:) --Kudpung (talk) 11:15, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rob, you've done something with your last edit that left a glaring red warning about one of the refs. I've tried to fix it but it looks as if the original ref got deleted. perhaps you will know what it was. Cheers, --Kudpung (talk) 10:14, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Unto Us is Born a Son

Hello! Your submission of Unto Us is Born a Son at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there is one minor issue that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 18:08, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. I've now approved the suggestion. But having read the instructions (which I should have done before!) I think I misadvised you. The instructions say nominate it on the day of creation (as you originally did), and then add a request for it to appear on a specific day. Sorry about that; I've not done one of these myself. So I think it will have to go back to where it was, plus a request for an appearance on December 25th.

This is not my favourite carol, but one which I particularly enjoyed as a choirboy, especially the verse about Herod (although that was usually sung just by the grown-ups).

As you seem to have an interest in churches, do you ever get involved with the FLC process? There is a nomination here which is getting comments rather slowly. I cannot support it myself because I have a vested interest in it, but you might like to make a comment, if you so wish. Cheers,--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 11:08, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: BBC Logo c.1988

Whoops! All fixed now, and as a bonus I've used the proper colours defined by the BBC style guidelines of the time, so it should now be quite accurate. Let me know if there's any issues. Thanks, AlexJ (talk) 21:58, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wisbech Grammar School

I've started the GA review of Wisbech Grammar School. It's a decent article, and there are only a few issues. I've listed them here: Talk:Wisbech Grammar School/GA1. It's mainly building the lead, and providing a bit more information on the school deciding to become fee-paying. The issue with the image can be resolved quickly by removing the image from the article. SilkTork *^YES! 01:26, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user helped promote Wisbech Grammar School to good article status.

Well done. You should improve it further and see how far you can take it; work on other articles to bring them to GA status; review other GA nominations as you clearly have a clear grasp of the criteria and Wikiedia's policies; and give some thought to helping out in maintanence and assisting other editors having problems or disputes. You have a positive attitude, are knowledgable, calm, informed and intelligent, so should give some thought to becoming an admin one day. Regards SilkTork *^YES! 12:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wisbech Grammar School

Hi Rob, let me be the first to congratulate you on getting Wisbech Grammar School to GA. Well done! I have been watching it very closely. I knew it would pass easily enough when I suggested you nominate it. --Kudpung (talk) 12:10, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I syng of a mayden

GA review started and some comments left; I've left it on hold for you. And now I've got the Britten setting going through my head - it's your fault! A nice little article. Bencherlite ^Talk 23:36, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And now I'm listening to the Hadley version on YouTube and remembering school days - your fault again! Bencherlite ^Talk 23:41, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And promoted; well done. 'Night, and Merry Christmas if our paths don't cross over the next few days (mind you, with the weather as it is, I might be stuck indoors for a bit!) Bencherlite ^Talk 01:47, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cuernavaca cathedral

Very odd that I forgot to add photos. My husband and I took a bunch, which are on Commons. Anyway, photos and a link to the rest on Commons are now in the article.Thelmadatter (talk) 19:40, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for David Gregor Corner

On 21 December 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article David Gregor Corner, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that despite his role in the Counter-Reformation, the abbot of Göttweig Abbey David Gregor Corner reluctantly included Protestant hymns in his 1631 Gross Catholisches Gesängbuch? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Virgin's Cradle Hymn

On 22 December 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Virgin's Cradle Hymn, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that "The Virgin's Cradle Hymn", a lullaby collected by Samuel Taylor Coleridge in Germany in 1799, was derived from a Flemish engraving by Hieronymus Wierix? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:02, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Henry Ramsden Bramley

On 24 December 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Henry Ramsden Bramley, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Henry Ramsden Bramley's Christmas Carols, New and Old (pictured), compiled in collaboration with John Stainer, is credited with creating a Christmas carol revival in Victorian England? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Merry Christmas from the DYK Project. Thanks Victuallers (talk) 18:02, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Piae Cantiones

On 25 December 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Piae Cantiones, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that although first published in the 1582 songbook Piae Cantiones (pictured), the Christmas carol Unto Us is Born a Son may be derived from 12th and 13th century French organum repertories? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Merry Christmas and thanks for your contribution Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Shaw article

If you'd like to help develop this article, could you email me from my talk page? Some good sources are available. Dougweller (talk) 20:20, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I see you're helping. Dougweller (talk) 21:54, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ian McIntyre

We appear to have been creating a page on Ian McIntyre at the same time, and mine appears to have overwritten yours. I don't have time to attempt a merger right now, but please feel free to do so yourself. I had tried to avoid duplicating material that is already on the Radio 3 page, but I don't object if you want to duplicate it.

Do you have any evidence that he is Scottish?

Are you about to create pages on Monica Sims or Tony Whitby - if so, I'll hold off. Jim Craigie (talk) 02:42, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish Redundant Churches Trust

Hi Rob, nice work on Scottish Redundant Churches Trust. I was surprised to see that your account wasn't flagged as either a wp:Autopatrolled or wp:reviewer, so I've taken the liberty of fixing that. There is a userbox at {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} if you fancy it. Ϣere SpielChequers 01:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much! Rob (talk) 01:30, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Scottish Redundant Churches Trust

On 23 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Scottish Redundant Churches Trust, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Scottish Redundant Churches Trust, a charity founded in 1996, looks after redundant Church of Scotland churches and currently has five buildings under its care? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 18:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Scarves

Hi Rob

No: I don't mind you asking at all: I was at Chad's - in spite of which, I'm reckoned to be mostly harmless. Kranf (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FLC

You may be interested to know that I have nominated List of churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust in the East of England at FLC. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 18:33, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/The Anti-Slavery Society Convention, 1840

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:The Anti-Slavery Society Convention, 1840 by Benjamin Robert Haydon.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 18:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

O Holy Night

I think you went way overboard. You blasted out about 20 different charted versions. I think the fact that multiple artists have charted renditions, even if on the country charts, is notable — particularly if the information is sourced. You also chainsawed out a lot more sourced info. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 04:26, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Rob! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Does the past catch up to us?

Hello again, Rob. Do you remember this? That review, plus some pretty tough real-life issues at the time, caused me to take a wiki-break. Looking back at the article now, the reviewer carried out a review and immediately failed the article, as of course she is entitled to. I did feel it unfair at the time, as I was given no chance to address her concerns. I feel like submitting the article again after the holidays. Would you be interested in taking a look then? --Senra (Talk) 02:07, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sloane MS. 2593

Hi Rob.

You left a note at Wikipedia:GLAM/BL a couple of months ago about work relating to Sloane MS. 2593, and I was wondering if you're still interested in working on this? I've just started as the Wikipedian in Residence at the BL, and I'm looking to pick up the threads of the past collaborations and see what I can do to keep them moving forward. If it's still a topic that you're looking at, and there's some way I can help, please do let me know... Andrew Gray (talk) 11:52, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warlock

I've just seen your kind meesage on the Warlock talkpage. I have no problem with the article being TFA for 30 October. I don't propose to nominate it myself, but please feel free to do so, with my concurrence. Perhaps let me know if you decide to. Brianboulton (talk) 18:47, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Rob,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:The Anti-Slavery Society Convention, 1840 by Benjamin Robert Haydon.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 29, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-11-29. —howcheng {chat} 18:36, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA: Ely and Littleport riots

Hi. A couple of years ago you exclaimed surprise at why the Ely and Littleport riots of_1816 article failed GA. I believe you offered to review the article if I put it up for GA again. Are you still up for the task? --Senra (talk) 14:04, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heads-up and a Happy New Year. I put the article up for a peer-review recently; Jojalozzo (talk · contribs) is the reviewer. Expect the article to be nominated at WP:GAN within the next few weeks --Senra (talk) 20:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ely and Littleport riots of 1816 is now a GAC at Wikipedia:Good article nominations#Culture, sociology and psychology --Senra (talk) 10:22, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unto Us is Born a Son - proposed title change

Rob, I have suggested a change in the title of the page Unto Us is Born a Son. Explanation on its talk page. Since you initiated the page, I won't take any action till you have commented, since I may have missed some reason for retaining the present title. Happy Christmas! And thanks for all your work on carols pages. seglea (talk) 21:57, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

O Little Town of Bethlehem

Hi Rob. Did you see what it says about the tune's origin in that article? Seems to be some kind of mismatch with Nailsea? Martinevans123 (talk) 18:32, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Denis Browne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Kennedy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trinity Carol Roll, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Henry V, Nativity and Agincourt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Trinity Carol Roll

On 29 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Trinity Carol Roll, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 15th-century Trinity Carol Roll contains eleven medieval Christmas carols and the earliest copy of the Agincourt Carol (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Trinity Carol Roll. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 12:01, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wisbech Grammar School badge.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wisbech Grammar School badge.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:31, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Rob. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Rob~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

02:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

18:12, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Your rename request

There is already a global account "Rob" (https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ACentralAuth&target=Rob). Please choose another username. Regards, --Stryn (talk) 20:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge request needs to be handled differently

The rename tool cannot handle your merge request. Please would you lodge the rename request at m:Steward requests/Username changes and we can manage it from there. — billinghurst sDrewth 03:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Belated Thanks

Hello, very belated thanks for your comments over the Ronald Corp entry in 2011 - when I was very new to editing, and did not realise it would have been courteous to respond at the time. The publishers' names were added as you suggested. Thanks again for the useful feedback which helped make the article more thorough and informative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parsonage1 (talk • contribs) 11:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rob~enwiki. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rob~enwiki. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lo! He comes with clouds descending

On 24 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lo! He comes with clouds descending, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Queen Victoria was displeased after an organist played an unfamiliar tune for the Advent hymn "Lo! He comes with clouds descending" at St George's Chapel, Windsor Castle ("Helmsley" tune pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lo! He comes with clouds descending. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lo! He comes with clouds descending), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Dam Busters (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chappell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of National Service of Remembrance

Hello! Your submission of National Service of Remembrance at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 17:38, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for National Service of Remembrance

On 11 November 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article National Service of Remembrance, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the BBC first televised the National Service of Remembrance from The Cenotaph in 1937? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/National Service of Remembrance. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, National Service of Remembrance), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rob~enwiki. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]