User talk:Roberto25664546825

Welcome!

Hi Secondary Capital SC! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Adakiko (talk) 09:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Glyph Comics Awards

Wikipedia uses multiple English variants. Glyph Comics Awards uses American English. Please keep this in mind. See wp:ENGVAR for information and policy. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 09:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Secondary Capital (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CNMall41 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Secondary Capital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 19:08, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Roberto25664546825! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 19:08, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Roberto25664546825. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Secondary Capital, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Secondary Capital has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Secondary Capital. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Roberto25664546825, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Roberto25664546825|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 09:19, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

I have no financial stake in promoting this. I declare I am not compensated for any wirting/submission. How can i declare that i am not paid and continue with submission? Roberto25664546825 (talk) 09:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you. You should also respond to the COI query I posted earlier, above. This covers other, non-paid types of COI, such as if you personally know the company owners, or used to work for them, etc. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

thank your for your comments.

As I am not paid and have no COI, What exactly should I declare on my user page? Can you please suggest the exact coding/wording?

I made few modifications, it would be very helpful if you could check if now it is complaint.

Draft:Secondary Capital

Best,

Roberto Roberto25664546825 (talk) 10:13, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It still reads as blatant advertising, it is hard to believe that you have no connection to this company. "Direct secondary market is still in a development phase and it is following the same trend as the LP stake market with similar penetration rate. Considering the combined value of all Unicorns companies and applying a 1% penetration rate, direct secondary market size in 2021 is estimated to be around $30B." for example is unsourced pure promotional marketing speak. Theroadislong (talk) 10:18, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have to say I agree with TRIL; putting AGF etc. aside for a moment, there is content in this draft which reads very much like an insider has written it. If it were all referenced to a published source, then fine, but much of it is unsupported, begging the obvious question — where is it all coming from? I also note that you've uploaded the company's logo as your own work, which similarly suggests some sort of affiliation. But since you say you have no COI, how would you then describe your relationship with the company, in your own words? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:31, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am only a passionate and professionals in the private equity space and I am following the evolution of this market tracking all the new firms emerging.

Do you think this is anyway a COI? If yes i will declare it.

Best,

V. Roberto25664546825 (talk) 10:40, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If that means that you work in the industry, even if not for this company, yes, that is a COI. 331dot (talk) 12:53, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Secondary Capital has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Secondary Capital. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:54, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

From my understanding this firm is quite new in the market, founded 2020, so I was not able to find sources referring to the firm. Roberto25664546825 (talk) 13:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which means that we can't have an article on them, Wikipedia articles are based on the significant coverage found in independent reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 13:55, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Secondary Capital (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources appear to mention Secondary Capital?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Secondary Capital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:43, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Secondary Capital

Hello, Roberto25664546825. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Secondary Capital, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Secondary Capital

Hello, Roberto25664546825. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Secondary Capital".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:46, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]