Jump to content

User talk:Rob Kam/Archives/2022/November

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


DYK: Sydenham Hill Wood

Updated DYK query On 14 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sydenham Hill Wood, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--PFHLai (talk) 08:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Deleting redirects

If you want to delete the Pulham family redirect, don't just delete the text. Instead, add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Since you were the only person to edit this title, you can delete it if you want. If other people have edited a page, you'll need to use one of the other deletion methods. --Russ (talk) 10:43, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Stub sorting

Hello Rob Kam/Archives/2022,

I noticed you marked an article as a stub using the {{stub}} template. Did you know that there are thousands of stub types that you can use to clarify what type of stub the article is? Properly categorizing stubs is important to the Wikipedia community because it helps various WikiProjects to identify articles that need expansion.

You can view the full list of stub types at WP:STUBS.

If you have questions about stub sorting, don't hesitate to ask! There is a wealth of stub information on the stub sorting WikiProject, and hundreds of stub sorters. Thanks! --BorgQueen (talk) 19:48, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

File:Sayes Court Park May 2009.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Sayes Court Park May 2009.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Oak sapling in Sayes Court Park.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Oak sapling in Sayes Court Park.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:24, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


Convoys Wharf

You've done some good work on Convoys Wharf - well done. I have, however, restored the previous name for the article, as that is what the place is currently known as, and under the WP:Common name policy, we need to be naming articles by the names they are most commonly known by. SilkTork *YES! 01:34, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. The article is still in need of a bit of work. --Robkam (talk) 11:36, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Blackheath and caves

Just saying thank you for your new article on the cavern under Blackheath. I am too old to go caving/exploring, but it's great to read about it, so I recently started the Bramhope Tunnel page, in response to local interest in it. Thank you for your own good work. Please let me know if you ever manage to add photos to your new page.

I wish someone would do a page on the railway tunnel under the Great Lines between Gillingham and Chatham. When I lived there in the 1950s there was an urban myth, which continues, of a secret branch line from that tunnel, in which is hidden a train-carriage full of goodness knows what. Of course local newspapers have published info that the story has been checked out and dismissed by the authorities, but the tunnel and myth have retained fascination for the locals.--Storye book (talk) 15:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you :-) ... There are some photos and maps at Subterranean Greenwich and Kent's Blackheath Cavern article. I've heard similar about there being a lost train in the old tunnels somewhere around the Crystal Palace. --Robkam (talk) 20:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Ah, thank you - I had missed the link at the bottom of your Blackheath Caverns page. And I'm glad to hear of the tale of the lost train under Crystal Palace. Mint.--Storye book (talk) 23:30, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Dockyards

Hi Robkam, nice work on correcting and clarifying which dockyards Royal Navy vessels were built at. I don't know my UK geography well enough to recognize an error or contradiction so am glad to see that someone is policing the issue. Regards, Acad Ronin (talk) 21:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks :-) ... Identifying the various yards, docks and builders can be tricky but it's around where I live so I should be able to figure it out. It's odd how little trace remains of all that history. --Robkam (talk) 23:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
That's why we have Wikipedia. :-), 69.253.70.154 (talk) 00:30, 11 February 2010 (UTC) Sorry, wasn't signed in. Acad Ronin (talk) 00:31, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles

Thanks kindly for the various well-referenced and well-written articles you've created! Speaking as a fellow London editor, it's a pleasure to have you here :). If you're up for it, we hold regular meetups in Holburn. Ironholds (talk) 03:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for that :-) I'll try make one of the meetups soon. --Robkam (talk) 17:04, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Article splits

Hi there. I notice that you created Church Wharf using text taken from Chiswick. Whilst this is a legitimate split there are a number of things you should have done, mainly to preserve the correct attribution under our Terms of Use. If you don't follow the process you are effectively creating a copyright violation. Don't worry, I have sorted out the attribution etc but for future reference what you should have done is:

  1. Noted in the edit summary for the creation of Church Wharf that it contained text from Chiswick
  2. Added the appropriate template (in this case {{split-to}}) to Talk:Church Wharf. It is also recommended to add {{splitfrom}} to the source article's talk although I have not done so in this case.
  3. Removed the bulk of the copied text from Chiswick

Finally, looking at your contributions I was wondering whether you would be interested in joining us at the Thames Wikiproject - you seem to have interests in the right areas...... Kindest regards, Nancy talk 15:35, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi. I have just had to remove large parts of Millwall Ironworks and also a sentence from Phoenix Wharf, Millwall as they were cut and paste copyright violations of copyrighted text. The source material for Millwall Ironworks is at http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=46519 and for Phoenix Wharf at http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=46517 both clearly marked For legal reasons we cannot accept copyrighted text borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or in this case, whole paragraphs/sections.

As you can imagine, Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Please can you go back through your contributions and remove any text which you know you copied from elsewhere. I will be working through them myself but it will obviously be easier for everyone, and look better for you, if you self-identify the problematic material.

Thank you for your co-operation in this matter. Nancy talk 16:20, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Further copyvio removals

Speedy deletion nomination of London Yard

A tag has been placed on London Yard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nancy talk 18:49, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Your comments at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Thames

Hi again.

I have read your comments over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Thames. It appears that you have not yet grasped the seriousness of introducing copyrighted material on to Wikipedia. We try to make the position on copyrights very clear, even including a note at the bottom of every edit window stating "Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted" as well as an instruction "Please do not copy and paste from copyrighted websites – only public domain resources can be copied without permission." This is not a policy quibble, this is a legal issue.

You complained that "instead of correcting and contributing" to your articles I just "ripped them apart" which again is to misunderstand the seriousness of the problem. There is no "correcting" of copyright violations, the only appropriate action is to remove them, including from the edit history if possible.

Whilst I picked off a few of the obvious ones last night, your contribution history is quite long and the number of copyvios so far is high (six articles already) so I will probably need to file a Contributor copyright investigation request. You should be aware that one of the outcomes of that may be that if you are shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of your major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately, in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations.

I will ask you once more to please co-operate and self-identify any other instances where you have copied material from another source either in to articles you have created or as additions to extant ones. I am hoping to be able to work constructively and collaboratively with you to clear up this problem and subsequently to help you find a way to create/contribute to shipbuilding articles without falling foul of copyright law.

Finally, if in future of you have a problem with any of my actions, the appropriate first step would be to raise any concerns with me directly either here in reply to my notes or over at my own talk. Nancy talk 06:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

If I knew where all the copyright violations were, I'd not have posted them in the first place. Probably it's everything I've posted in Category:Shipyards on the River Thames. --Robkam (talk) 10:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for that. I've noted it at the CCI request. Hopefully we can get this cleared up quickly and then start recreating the articles in our own words as it would be a shame to lose the topics. I'm no shipbuilding expert but I do have an interest in the Thames and will be happy to help you with the prose if you'd like. Nancy talk 11:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
I've opened the CCI. Fortunately, I don't see a need for presumptive removals here (such things I reserve for indef blocked users with no active cleanup effort). MER-C 02:53, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

CCI notification

Hello, Rob Kam/Archives/2022. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. --Nancy talk 08:54, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Deletions

Hi. I have deleted Greenland South Dockyard and Greenland North Dockyard per WP:CSD#G7 as requested. However, there are some links to those deleted articles that have now become redlinks, you may wish to change these links to better targets. Linking articles are HMS Winchester (1698), List of locations in the Port of London, HMS Serapis (1779), HMS Monck (1659) and Karteria. Polargeo (talk) 11:12, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

I have also deleted Phoenix Wharf and Phoenix Wharf, Millwall. pages with redirects are SS Archimedes and Henry Wimshurst. Polargeo (talk) 11:23, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Sayes Court

Sayes Court contained considerable copyvio so the copyright clean-up task has clear relevance to it. My request was a logical progression of the conversation as you appeared to be engaged with checking back to sources for SC so I was rather hoping to encourage you to do the same for others. I'm heartened to see that it seems to have worked in a roundabout way although {{db-author}}ing a bunch of article does seem a bit drastic - unless of course they were entirely copyvio, which I don't necessarily think was the case. Nancy talk 12:09, 9 April 2010 (UTC)In deference to your wishes I am posting here rather than continue on the article talk.

Articles for deletion nomination of Dulwich and Sydenham Hill Golf Club

I have nominated Dulwich and Sydenham Hill Golf Club, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dulwich and Sydenham Hill Golf Club. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nancy talk 16:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Sand Hutton Railway

Hi Robkam, I used to host the article online but not anymore. I have it; it's a pdf about 3MB. You are welcome to a copy. Oxonhutch (talk) 17:45, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi Oxonhutch, that would be great. At my user page there is a userbox to get in contact by email. Robkam (talk) 18:11, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Chaotic Daw for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chaotic Daw is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaotic Daw until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 15:52, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Synthesizer electronics

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Synthesizer electronics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. reddogsix (talk) 12:33, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WinClon

The article WinClon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable software. A Google News search and Google News Archive search produces no significant coverage from reliable and independent sources for "WinClon" and a Google News search and Google News Archive search produces no significant coverage from reliable and independent sources for "Saumsung Recovery Solution".

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OlYeller21Talktome 01:36, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

How to do a split?

{{admin-help}} I'd like to split Synthesizer electronics off from the Synthesizer article, (User:Robkam/Synthesizer electronics). However I don't know the protocols for doing this, such as how it's done with consensus and who is entitled to do it. --Robkam (talk) 09:54, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Splitting. I would start by suggesting it on the article talk page and see whether you get any comments. If the article history shows that there are editors who have taken a particular interest, you could drop a line on their talk pages to draw their attention. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:08, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of WinClon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WinClon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WinClon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. OlYeller21Talktome 12:26, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of DSO Nano

The article DSO Nano has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't think this project is sufficiently notable to meet WP:N, no external references that meet WP:RS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shadowjams (talk) 18:20, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lionel Jeans

A tag has been placed on Lionel Jeans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Harry the Dog WOOF 10:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Future_Retro_777

Hello Robkam,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Future_Retro_777 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 05:33, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Future_Retro_777

Hello, Robkam. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Future_Retro_777, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 06:21, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Copypaste Future Retro 777

Hi. It looks like this article was copied from another website. It may be that the other website is a Wikipedia mirror and copied from Wikipedia, but the other website does list its text as copyrighted. To establish notability, try to find a review in a music magazine. Eau (talk) 08:02, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Doug Curtis

The article Doug Curtis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that the subject meets the notability guidelines for inclusion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §FreeRangeFrog 14:56, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token 798b76d4f9a30427abeeed5361c61d2b

Speedy deletion nomination of Orain (wiki farm)

Hello Rob Kam,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Orain (wiki farm) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. JacobiJonesJr (talk) 09:08, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

10:14, 25 May 2014 Mike Rosoft (talk|contribs) deleted page Orain (wiki farm) (No claim of notability (Wikipedia:CSD#A7|WP:CSD#A7) - website) - 66 minutes later. --Rob Kam (talk) 08:16, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Analogue Systems

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Analogue Systems requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MelanieN (talk) 16:59, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Stoicheia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stoicheia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stoicheia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:36, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rob Kam/Orain (wiki hosting service)

A tag has been placed on User:Rob Kam/Orain (wiki hosting service) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:35, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

JSTOR cleanup drive

Hello TWL users! We hope JSTOR has been a useful resource for your work. We're organizing a cleanup drive to correct dead links to JSTOR articles – these require JSTOR access and cannot easily be corrected by bot. We'd love for you to jump in and help out!



Sent of behalf of Nikkimaria for The Wikipedia Library's JSTOR using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rob Kam/Archives/2022 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. I've been editing from this location for some years and it's the first time I've seen this message.Rob Kam (talk) 20:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

We need more information to investigate this; specifically your IP address (which should be given in the block reason). Please use WP:UTRS if you do not wish to disclose this publicly. MER-C 04:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rob Kam/Archives/2022 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Caught by an open proxy block" but I've already been editing from 165.225.80.0/22 for some years without any problem. The IP belongs to a multinational corporation. It's not my home IP, (which is unblocked).

Decline reason:

That multinational corporation seems to be using a proxy server. Such servers are blocked on sight. I suggest you edit from home, not from work. Huon (talk) 22:33, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well something has been unblocked anyway and I'm able to edit again. -- Rob Kam (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who enjoy reading has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wikipedians who enjoy reading, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. VegaDark (talk) 01:52, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Ben Dekker as Sauerlein, in Sam et Sally, S02E04, La Peau du lion.png

Thanks for uploading File:Ben Dekker as Sauerlein, in Sam et Sally, S02E04, La Peau du lion.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 04:36, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

File moved

You can find the file here: File:Port St. Johns, Ben Dekker by Olivier Page 2003.jpg - FlightTime (open channel) 16:56, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. -- Rob Kam (talk) 16:58, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

List of hobby electronics magazines moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of hobby electronics magazines, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Templates translation

Hi!

A few months ago you supported a proposal I wrote at mw:Global templates/Discuss. Thank you very much for that!

An essential part of that big project is now a community wish: m:Community Wishlist Survey 2021/Translation/Templates translation. I see that you even added a link to it to mw:Global templates, so thanks for that, yoo :)

It would be very nice if you could vote for this wish, and invite your friends to do the same. Every vote counts!

Thanks! :) --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 17:50, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rob_Kam/Archives/2022/November&oldid=1141044644"