User talk:Rkanstws

Welcome

Hello, Rkanstws, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ravensfire (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Rishton Ka Manjha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rishton Ka Manjha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:16, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gossips TV Official

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gossips TV Official, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:35, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bhagyalaxmi(BTF) moved to draftspace - unreferenced and unfinished

An article you recently created, Bhagyalaxmi(BTF), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and general quality standards, and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:07, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Please do not publish unreferenced articles — they have zero chance of staying in the main article space for very long, and will instead inevitably be either draftified or deleted. Every article must be supported by reliable, independent secondary sources to support the contents and to establish the notability of the subject.

Also, please familiarise yourself with the general quality standards in what comes to article layout, formatting, linking, etc., as well as paying attention to grammar and punctuation of the English language.

Thank you. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I've blocked you for a week for disruptive editing. Please read the advice and warnings above. Any future articles you want to create must go via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Deb (talk) 10:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ohk Sure..not a problem at all...I will improve myself during this duration👍.....and yes after the unprofessionally editing only I can become a expert creator well please don't delete any of my pages which I have created now they are all verified pages Like Bhagyalaxmi (BTF) and Gossips TV Official ...Thank You For Judging me Rkanstws (talk) 10:54, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rishton Ka Manjha (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rishton Ka Manjha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rishton Ka Manjha, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 08:15, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rkanstws! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 08:15, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rishton Ka Manjha (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This is not an article, It is just a list of stuff. I have not checked any references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rishton Ka Manjha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rishton Ka Manjha, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 09:58, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Khorkuto. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you.42.106.248.58 (talk) 10:32, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok...sorry for that. Rkanstws (talk) 20:23, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muskaan Bamne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crime Patrol. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Udaariyaan, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ManaliJain (talk) 10:41, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

This is to inform you that your recent contributions on Anupamaa, Imlie and Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin have been reverted because they were unconstructive. You can't add section like trp id on any tv serial's article and can't add twitter or instagram accounts as sources. They are Unreliable. You should read WP:ICTFSOURCES for this thing . Thank-you! Happy Editing! Pri2000 (talk) 11:08, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hii Pri,I have never asked you or anyone else,it is a Relevant Changes that I had made...And As of Instagram & Twitter accounts Ok,I will share Media Website is it ok?....HAPPY EDITING TO YOU TOO MAY GOD BLESS YOU,THANK YOU FOR YOUR ADVISE Rkanstws (talk) 10:47, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a rule to warn editors regarding those things which shouldn't be added and were added either by mistake or intentionally . Same us for TRP ID section. It shouldn't be added. Trp either ratings or position are added in separate tables present in ratings section and with reliable sources . You should read WP:ICTFSOURCES regarding reliable sources for television and film related articles. Thankyou! Happy Editing! Pri2000 (talk) 10:51, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm warning you again. It's your personal choice to own page like Tellywood Talk on instagram or Twitter. But if you continue to do unconstructive edits like prohibited TRP id section on tv serial's page you can be blocked from doing editing. Because trp is provided in tabular format in ratings section with reliable sources. You can read WP:ICTFSOURCES for it. Please refrain yourself from doing unconstructive edits. Thankyou! Happy Editing! Pri2000 (talk) 11:11, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 16:39, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]