User talk:Rizalninoynapoleon/Article 7

Japanese yen

Hi! I reverted your edit. The 1000 yen banknote with Natsume Soseki is still in use. See this. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 08:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! Would you please explain me why you removed the external link I provided here? What's wrong with the link? Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 06:20, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit above as you did not write the reason of the rm. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 06:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Euro coins

Template:Euro coins has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 21:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV tag

Read Wikipedia:NPOV_dispute on the proper way of adding a POV tag. The article Policies, activities and history of the Philippines in Spratly Islands is already tagged with {{POV}}. This template is already saying that the neutrality of the WHOLE article is disputed. Also, {{POV}} is not used for sections. {{POV-section}} has that job. However, since the whole article is already tagged with POV, there is no need for that. Estarapapax (talk) 05:34, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

templates on Singapore election

I like your work, but the Opposition in Singapore history has been varied -- the Opposition for the 2006 election for example was an informal coalition (composed of a formal coalition and several other parties) -- so there hasn't been a "leader" of the Opposition per se. As such, I'm going to revert the additions to avoid giving people the wrong impression, but don't worry, I'll still work with your edits! The current election template is too rigid to be useful. John Riemann Soong (talk) 18:12, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to create a new template -- I'll put the work you've already done into there, borrow some elements from the existing template but rework them to be more appropriate. John Riemann Soong (talk) 18:28, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're talking about - I only did the Template:Singaporean elections, and I don't see how parties are relevant to it. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 08:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Avelino2.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Avelino2.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 16:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ArturoTolentino.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ArturoTolentino.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --15:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Image:Bruneianpassport.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Bruneianpassport.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Bruneianpassport.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Bruneianpassport.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 22:02, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to President of Singapore, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Dave1185 (talk) 17:39, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Caution

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.

Replaceable fair use Image:TeofistoGuingona.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:TeofistoGuingona.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ViperSnake151 02:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Yes, please tell me the specific talk or discussion page and I will join your cause. Thanks for visiting my talk page.--Florentino floro (talk) 10:48, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request to move article Philippine constitutional plebiscite, 1973 incomplete

You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page Philippine constitutional plebiscite, 1973 to a different title - however your proposal is either incomplete or has been contested as being controversial. As a result, it has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:

Added {{move|NewName}} at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article. This creates the required template for you there.
Added {{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} to the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved, to automatically create a discussion section there.
Added {{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}} to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR (talk) 16:54, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hi! maxsch created an RFC for myself User:Florentino floro - Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Florentino floro [1] I would appreciate it if you would take a look. Max created this upon message to my adopting parent User:Diligent Terrier here[2] vis-a-vis the pending User:Diligent Terrier/Florentino floro and Maxschmelling (created on 18:38, 18 May 2008 by Diligent Terrier) Thanks.--Florentino floro (talk) 05:53, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ITN

On 21 July, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article(s) Nepalese presidential election, 2008, which you created or substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Banyan Tree 13:42, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check

Sure, forthwith. But please revise, review, amend and enhance my contribution to make it more encyclopedic rather than legal.Regards.[3]--Florentino floro (talk) 07:37, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had heavily contributed to your other articles, as you suggested and I found these articles timely now, especially with the Aug.15 Oral Argument in the S. Court, on GRP-MILF Moa amid Fr. Bernas' opinion. Please check my edits, the grammar spelling etc. and encyclopedic contents. Regards.--Florentino floro (talk) 07:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comment

Hi, may I respectfully ask you some time to share your view on this[4]. Essentially, I asked the WP:ANI on the validity of User:Cma vis-a-vis User:Flaminsky, - re Vandalism.

And if you have more time, please share more thoughts on the Rfc Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Florentino floro, Thanks.- --Florentino floro (talk) 09:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Election infoboxes

Can you please double check when you designate someone as a party leader in these infoboxes? In this case, you had both of the leaders wrong. In this one, one out of two was wrong. Everyking (talk) 14:26, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sonia Gandhi didn't become PM because of a big controversy about the fact that she's originally from Italy: see here. As for Kenya, yes, presidents do hold seats in Parliament there. Everyking (talk) 05:22, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Asif zardari.jpg

Don't remove no source tags without adding source information. Superm401 - Talk 05:11, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Asif-ali-zardari-ex 792497f.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Asif-ali-zardari-ex 792497f.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Superm401 - Talk 02:43, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done

I shared my opinion here, backing yours.[5] --Florentino floro (talk) 11:14, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please fix my lost archive 3

I just replied, and I found my talk page User talk:Florentino floro a new section now. So, I restored the archives 1 and 2, but the 3rd archive is red, so please help me restore the valuable archive 3, #January 3 2008 to February 27 2008 please. Regards.--Florentino floro (talk) 09:11, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:African National Congress/meta/shortname

A tag has been placed on Template:African National Congress/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:03, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Appointed

A tag has been placed on Template:Appointed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:09, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Benigno Aquino Sr..jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Benigno Aquino Sr..jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:01, 22 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 20:01, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at Template:CurrentCongDeleg that you edited today

I think your edit today results in red links in several templates, such as title bar here. Would you mind correcting this? Thanks WVhybrid (talk) 04:01, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-voting delegates election map

Sorry for the delay, had some bandwidth issues (both Internet and brain). But here is the map for non-voting delegates: Image:Non voting US House delegations-2008 race.svg

Thanks for the idea! —Mr. Matté (^Talk/_Contrib) 22:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

United States Senate election in Minnesota, 2008

Hi there. I'm just letting you know that I undid the edits you made to the info box for this article. Specifically, you removed the election totals, removed Dean Barkley, and changed the time reference to this being an upcoming election. I'm not sure why you made these rather large changes, as you provided no reasoning on the page's history, nor did you participate in the discussion. Please join in on the discussion page so we can better understand your reasoning for the changes you want to make. Brash (talk) 22:26, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Jonathan321 (talk) 02:37, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:12. Francisco de la Cuesta , O.S.H. (1707 - 1722).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:12. Francisco de la Cuesta , O.S.H. (1707 - 1722).jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:04, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:NMI Delegates‎

Template:NMI Delegates‎ has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. —Markles 13:46, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Simba Makoni.png

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Simba Makoni.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 19:02, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The image is from REUTERS, author is Emmanuel Chitate, the claim of authorship, the licensing and even the date is wrong. You can check this here: http://www.nancarrow-webdesk.com/warehouse/storage2/2008-w08/img.139909.html. Seems like you have had some problems with copyright, if you uploaded other images without the authors permission you should nominate them for deletion. --Martin H. (talk) 19:02, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mutambara.jpg is listed for deletion on Commons. --Martin H. (talk) 22:40, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfree images from Senate.gov

Hello. Please note that the images posted on the Senate website for the new senators are only temporary and were not created by the Congress. The Mark Begich image you uploaded, for example, is actually from here. So, I'm tagging them as replaceable fair use. --Tom (talk - email) 18:40, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page United States Senate elections, 2010 has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://rothenbergpoliticalreport.blogspot.com/2009/01/2010-senate-ratings_24.html). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:36, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Somali presidential election, 2009

On 1 February, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Somali presidential election, 2009, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 04:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Senate election, 1970

Your edit to Australian Senate election, 1970 was well intentioned, and obviously took a bit of work, so it was a pity it had to be reverted. But it had to be reverted because it wasn't really appropriate - the election was not for the House of Representatives (which chooses the Prime Minister), so the addition of the Infobox didn't really make sense, and parts of it were misleading. I'm letting you know so that you don't waste your time by adding an Infobox to the other Australian Senate election pages. Peter Ballard (talk) 11:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

No, it's a very bad idea. No-one can predict who will be top 3, top 4, top 6 or whatever. If we'd had that box last time round, people would have insisted on Likud, Labour and Kadima being in it, even though in the end, Likud came 4th and Yisrael Beiteinu were a very close 5th. Gil came 7th even though no-one thought they'd cross the threshold, and a party with 7 seats may well be 6th place this time round (so only having the top six now would mean that some like the Green Movement wouldn't be on it, even though they might spring a similar surprise). The only NPOV option is to include all the parties (including the ones that aren't in the Knesset), and it would simply be too big. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 11:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's unnecessary and not NPOV; for all we know Meretz could overtake Shas. There really is no need for the template on the page. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 15:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it again as a NPOV violation - this time you included Meretz - they could be beaten by any party (even those shown as not crossing the threshold in polls) if last time is anything to go by. Also, for people viewing on 800x600 the infobox takes up the entire width of the screen. Very bad idea all round. Please stop re-adding it. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 11:48, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Elections on Australian PM infoboxes

Please cease re-removing them. I have already said in the previous revert summary that the community already formed consensus it. You do not WP:OWN the page. You also seem to make strange edits to many different countries elections which may be why you do this - but each country is different, each can have their own way of doing things. Please leave things the way they are. Timeshift (talk) 19:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2007 election

There were debates over whether Rudd was the -elect or the -designate when he came to power. The election infobox however, has never been disputed, as the PM prior to power was Howard, and post-election, was Rudd. -elect or -designate is the temporary name. That does not have any difference over who the PM is post-election, so -elect/-designate is not needed. I suggest you gain consensus for such changes. On a side note, i'm not one to revert genuine contributions, biased/politically motivated edits aside. You however, seem to make some bizarre changes that I do revert, perhaps because you seem to edit political pages all over the world and expect that they should all conform. Well they don't. It seems whenever you make an edit to an Australian page, i'm more often reverting it than leaving it because you're changing something that's already been agreed upon (election links in PM infoboxes) or things that don't make sense (Senate infoboxes, election infobox elect/designate). Perhaps it's best to suggest on talk pages first. Timeshift (talk) 13:25, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Political Party Standings

FYI, I reverted your edits to Template:40th Canadian Parliament standings because Dyck was an NDP independent member on election day, and we still need to account for that. Cheers. --Natural R_X 16:31, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Jose_Yulo.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Jose_Yulo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bluemask (talk) 10:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Next Czech legislative election

I have nominated Next Czech legislative election, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Czech legislative election. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Radiant chains (talk) 04:13, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've withdrawn this nomination. Another editor explained why the article had to be named as such, due to the special circumstances. It was a misunderstanding on my part. Radiant chains (talk) 09:39, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Hi. Please refrain from making edits against consensus. I refer to your addition of COPE to the table at South African general election, 2009. The relevant discussion is here. Thank you. Zain Ebrahim (talk) 19:23, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John C. Calhoun

Hi. I've not read the full article yet, but you added a POV tag to the Calhoun article without elaborating on why. If you could point out where the problem is, it will help me improve the article. Thanks! Recognizance (talk) 20:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indonesian legislative election, 2009

Hi, I reverted your edit of the chairman of the Democratic Party. Although Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono is the party's most high profile member, he is chairman of the advisory board (Ketua Dewan Pembina), not the party chairman (Ketua Umum), the position held by Hadi Utomo. This may be only a difference in title for political reasons, but it how the party website refers to the two men and is consistent with the titles used for the other Indonesian political parties. Regards Davidelit (talk) 15:31, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In the Indonesian legislative elections, voters voted for parties, not the leaders of the parties (and SBY is not the chairman of his party anyway). Also, there are problems with some of the images of the leaders, hence my revert. Davidelit (talk) 03:24, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When will Mugabe go away

Until when will Mugabe go away from Zimbabwe Zimbabwe presidential election, 2008 at 2nd round Mugabe got vote back by 85%. How much longer until he leaves office? Is it likely for him to still stand after 2012?--69.229.243.248 (talk) 00:14, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the news

On 28 June, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 Honduran coup d'état, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

-- Sandstein 20:08, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Death of Corazon Aquino

The article Death of Corazon Aquino has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is shorter than the section in the main article about his death. nn independently.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tim Song (talk) 15:06, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Death of Corazon Aquino

I have nominated Death of Corazon Aquino, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Corazon Aquino. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Tim Song (talk) 18:11, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:List of special elections to the United States Senate#Two questions

Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at Talk:List of special elections to the United States Senate#Two questions. Thank you. —Markles 10:51, 3 September 2009 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ozamiz.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Ozamiz.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bluemask (talk) 11:06, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Muhammedmian Soomro.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Muhammedmian Soomro.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —SpaceFlight89 14:17, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Img157.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Img157.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:36, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

POV tag on Ali Khamenei

Hello, I see you added a POV tag to Ali Khamenei on June 29. There has been a lot of activity on that page since then. Do you still have an issue with the current version? I created a section in talk:Ali_Khamenei where we can discuss specific concerns. Thundermaker (talk) 00:09, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Rizalninoynapoleon! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 312 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Victor Wood - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jamalul Kiram III - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Joseph Ace Durano - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notable races

There must be a reason why you keep removing those. –Howard the Duck 14:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I moved them to the bottom and fixed it under the regions. Rizalninoynapoleon (talk) 14:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jeez. That's why you'd have to use edit summaries, so we'd know what you were doing. I'd be more in favor of keeping it in the top since the tables must maximize the entire length of the screen. –Howard the Duck 14:34, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The races are crowded and as you know there are many notable races for the House, as such it would be better to move to a bigger space. The Results will be on the top as such will be the new status quo Rizalninoynapoleon (talk) 14:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's no problem in prose text text being crowded. I'd actually want more of them there. That's the reason why I placed it there to allow the prose text reach the bottom of the infobox so that the results tables will maximize the entire length of the screen. –Howard the Duck 14:48, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Japanese House of Councillors election, 2010. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. --220.101.28.25 (talk) 18:01, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Taipa Macau stamp.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Taipa Macau stamp.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Mike moral ♪♫ 04:30, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2010 TVB corruption scandal

The article 2010 TVB corruption scandal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems like something that is better suited for Wikinews

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PoeticVerse (talk) 03:44, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Next Thai general election

The article Next Thai general election has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Straight fail of WP:CRYSTAL. They don't know when/if the election will occur.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ray^Talk 11:19, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nude, Green Leaves and Bust

Hey, great work on that article. It's been nominated to appear on the In the news section of the Main Page and I'm almost ready to put it up, but I'd appreciate it if yo clean up those references. Also, {{current event}} is only supposed to be used on very high profile articles that are changed by hundreds of people a day. You might like to comment on the nomination at WP:ITN/C#Picasso when the references have been formatted an I should be able to put it up. :) Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:56, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Nude, Green Leaves and Bust

On 5 May 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Nude, Green Leaves and Bust, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Nice work. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:34, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Party and campaign colors

Please do not be confused with party colors and campaign colors. They are different. Thanks. –Howard the Duck 13:31, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Party changes

Are those changes you are doing before or after the elections? If those are after those would have to be reverted and there'll be a note at the bottom that they switched parties. –Howard the Duck 15:27, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. –Howard the Duck 08:33, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Operation Big Bird. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Please don't add unsourced edits and words like "croonies" to articles. --moreno oso (talk) 10:29, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:46, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Benigno Aquino III

Hello, you placed a request to edit a semi-protected page on Talk:Benigno Aquino III. That page is not currently semi-protected and even if it was, you should not have been restricted from editing it. If you meant something different in your request please respond either here or on the talk page and I can help direct your request appropriately. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:20, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Presidential style

Hi, could you explain why you reverted this edit? I looked through the given reference and nowhere in there does it say "His Illustrious Excellency, The Right Honourable President of the Republic of the Philippines Benigno C. Aquino III". TheCoffee (talk) 12:58, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This page will be fixed thoroughly.Rizalninoynapoleon (talk) 13:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

edit summaries

I noticed this edit in which you removed an image from Black Wednesday. Alas, you provided no edit summary, so it required more work than it should have to determine if the edit was an improvement, which it was. Thanks. A helpful summary for this would have been remove deleted image. Your edit history shows that you have never provided an edit summary. The summaries that do appear are autogenerated.

In the future, please provide a short description of the purpose or rationale for each of your edits to help other editors understand what you are doing. This greatly helps all editors, especially in identifying vandalism, since vandals often provide no explanation. Thanks, —EncMstr (talk) 08:15, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed this when you made an odd revert to {{infobox election}}. I've undone this change until a rationale is provided. Thanks. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 19:32, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jigme Thinley.jpg listed for deletion on Wikimedia Commons

An image or media file you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons or altered there, Jigme Thinley.jpg, has been listed at Commons Deletion requests.

You can read and participate in the deletion discussion if you are interested or do not wish the file to be deleted. You may have to search for the title of the file to find its entry. Jigme_Thinley.jpg Martin H. (talk) 18:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC) --Martin H. (talk) 18:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Paintings by Vermeer

Hi There's a discrepancy on this page, which i think you might be interested in. I;ve started a discussion here: [[6]]Jimi 66 (talk) 20:54, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]