User talk:Ritabrata88

This is Ritabrata88's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Classic Drivers Club (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Classic Drivers Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 16:53, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ritabrata88! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 16:53, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Classic Drivers Club (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need to see significant coverage of the club itself, not of some indirectly related matters, in multiple secondary sources that are reliable and independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Classic Drivers Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Classic Drivers Club has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Classic Drivers Club. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Classic Drivers Club (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the coverage is written by Ritabrata Mukherjee who is a team member of the club, so this is not independent coverage. See WP:NORG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Classic Drivers Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Ritabrata88. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Classic Drivers Club, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Curb Safe Charmer, Thank you very much for the feedback.

I wish to clarify the points mentioned, as below:

1. I am not the founder of this club nor am I employed by them.

2. The articles mentioned as contributed by me, was a mistake on my part in terms of understanding whose name is to be mentioned. I have corrected them by mentioning the correct people and they can be further verified by checking out the links.

3. The articles that were contributed by me has been mentioned. Ritabrata88 (talk) 19:35, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Classic Drivers Club (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CoconutOctopus were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Classic Drivers Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 19:32, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Classic Drivers Club (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CoconutOctopus were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please stop submitting this article without significant improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Classic Drivers Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 20:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @CoconutOctopus,

Please state the issues with the article.

All issues cited by the previous reviewer have been resolved. Ritabrata88 (talk) 20:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The issues raised (namely "We need to see significant coverage of the club itself, not of some indirectly related matters, in multiple secondary sources that are reliable and independent of the subject") have still not been resolved. There is no significant, independent coverage in the sources linked; multiple of the sources are written by individuals associated with the club, or are simply links to youtube videos (which are not reliable). CoconutOctopus talk 20:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @CoconutOctopus,

Please check the references, a number of independent correspondents of notable news agencies have provided coverage. There are 2 YouTube videos, 1 by an eminent news agency in Kolkata called ABP Ananda and the other by an independent member of the Club. Gabriela who is the chief of the Romanian Federation has also independently acknowledged in the FIVA article. Ritabrata88 (talk) 20:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, i would like to state that a Club is acknowledged by its activities, which is how its is in this case. All articles mentioned are directly related matters - events organized by CDC. Ritabrata88 (talk) 20:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%A9d%C3%A9ration_Internationale_des_V%C3%A9hicules_Anciens

There are hardly any valid references provided compared to this article on CDC. Ritabrata88 (talk) 20:25, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Classic Drivers Club (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Promotional. Review WP:PUFFERY

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Classic Drivers Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 12:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Classic Drivers Club (February 8)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 14:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! @MicrobiologyMarcus

Please help me! I want to publish this article. I need your assistance! Ritabrata88 (talk) 16:54, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Classic Drivers Club has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Classic Drivers Club. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]