User talk:Rishabisajakepauler

April 2018

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Like I Would. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Ss112 05:01, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rishabisajakepauler, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rishabisajakepauler! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:08, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Stop

Stop adding unsourced (and poorly sourced) information to List of 2019 albums. You will continue to be reverted, will be warned and may be blocked. Next unsourced editing spree of yours will result in a warning. Ss112 07:04, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I second the above.

Proposed deletion of Hands Up (Merk & Kremont song)

Hello, Rishabisajakepauler,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Broccoli and Coffee and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Hands Up (Merk & Kremont song), for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Broccoli and Coffee}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

– Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 04:37, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hands Up song

Hi, I don't think this song is notable enough for a Wikipedia page. However, if you'd like to work on building an article worthy of including here, I would suggest creating a draft or working on it in your sandbox. Please don't build on the talk page or main article page until it has been approved. Let me know if you have any questions. – Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 00:20, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Old Town Road, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 05:18, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Clout (Offset song). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:03, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop with irrelevant analysis of the "Only Human" (Jonas Brothers song) music video that is unsourced and purely based on opinion.

Consider the above a final warning for adding unsourced content or personal analysis. Any additional problems please report to WP:AIV or WP:ANI. StaticVapor message me! 07:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andy Altig

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Andy Altig requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lapablo (talk) 00:36, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 21 (DaBaby song). Jalen D. Folf (talk) 01:49, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:30, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Death Race for Love, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erika Costell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Bacon (song). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 04:11, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bacon (song). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:25, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this problem resumes after your block expires, the next one will be indefinite. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:26, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note An account editing the same article (Kent Jones (rapper)) was blocked as a suspected sock puppet created to evade this sanction. N.J.A. | talk 14:02, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saint-Tropez (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saint-Tropez (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint-Tropez (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 05:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Keyshia Ka’oir

Hello Rishabisajakepauler,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Keyshia Ka’oir for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:16, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What I'm Supposed To Do moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, What I'm Supposed To Do, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 04:15, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hollywood's Bleeding, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 20:43, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Gucci Mane. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Cold (Maroon 5 song). Binksternet (talk) 04:35, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:43, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:What I'm Supposed To Do concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:What I'm Supposed To Do, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:What I'm Supposed To Do

Hello, Rishabisajakepauler. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "What I'm Supposed To Do".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 21:28, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of People to People (EP)

The article People to People (EP) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability. should redirect to DNCE discography

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pikachu6686 (talk) 00:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rishabisajakepauler, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 01:36, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I was trying to bring back 1000 ways to die seasons page. I didn't realize i could look back at past edits. Now I know I don't need to bring the pages back to see it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattcataco2 (talk • contribs) 18:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rishabisajakepauler, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Jalen Folf (talk) 23:45, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #71266

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:44, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, it looks like you were socking in January of 2023. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:46, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unban request

Hello. I finally figured out the login to this account after many years and am here to apply as part of the standard offer to get this account unblocked. When I made this account many years ago, I was still a kid and just trying to play it however. Now I am older and have gained so much more experience even while I was socking. That being said, I would like to appeal this.

@NinjaRobotPirate, Ad Orientem, and Deepfriedokra: I am pinging you guys so one of you can hopefully review my request. Thank you guys so much. Rishabisajakepauler (talk) 21:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your unban request has been posted at WP:ANI for community discussion. I am opposed at this time. That said, it is not a "never under any circumstances" oppose. You have been evading your block far too often and far too recently. My advice is to wait a couple years and come back. That said, this is a community discussion, so it's not up to me. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are not eligible for the standard offer, as it is nowhere near to six months since the last time you edited. What is more, less than three weeks ago you posted what was not only a completely childish silly attack on an editor, but also racially offensive. Every time you do something like that, you make it less likely that you will ever be unblocked. Anyway, for the present, the discussion on the administrators' noticeboard has declined your request. JBW (talk) 11:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. You will not believe me because I am blocked, but I did not use any racial slur. Also, I haven't even edited for a few months at all. Not trying to lie or act innocent, but I am very confused and have no idea about what incident you are referring to. Please elaborate a little more on this. Rishabisajakepauler (talk) 23:54, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]