User talk:Rey grschel

WELCOME TO MY TALK PAGE!
Home · About Me · Talk · Projects · Edit History

Your submission at Articles for creation: Creating redirect to another, nonexistent, page (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Creating redirect to another, nonexistent, page and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Creating redirect to another, nonexistent, page, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:25, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rey grschel, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:25, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Rey grschel! Thank you for your contributions. I am Drewmutt and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 01:49, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know I already said this on the IRC, but thanks for the introduction and the cookies! I greatly appreciate it. Rey grschel (talk) 22:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
89	Citrus Heights, California (talk)	Add sources
13	Courtland, California (talk)	Add sources
28	Westwood High School (Austin, Texas) (talk)	Add sources
859	Bagpipes (talk)	Add sources
49	Shasta Lake, California (talk)	Add sources
49	Manvi (talk)	Add sources
20	Mikhail Kornienko (talk)	Cleanup
31	Bowie High School (Arlington, Texas) (talk)	Cleanup
36	John Jay High School (Cross River, New York) (talk)	Cleanup
62	Orangevale, California (talk)	Expand
301	Sheikh Muszaphar Shukor (talk)	Expand
4	Yuba-Sutter Transit (talk)	Expand
16	Great Irish warpipes (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
36	Sir Winston Churchill High School (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
143	Rancho Cordova, California (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
13	Kashtha Sangha (talk)	Merge
71	Gens de couleur (talk)	Merge
70	Huastec people (talk)	Merge
9	K. C. Kondaiah (talk)	Wikify
23	Rufus Harley (talk)	Wikify
18	Serena M. Auñón-Chancellor (talk)	Wikify
6	Accelerated Learning Laboratory (talk)	Orphan
7	Mandagere Subbarao Krishnamurthy (talk)	Orphan
4	Shuttle pipes (talk)	Orphan
5	Need, California (talk)	Stub
8	Norristown, California (talk)	Stub
16	Sloughhouse, California (talk)	Stub
8	Michigan Bar, California (talk)	Stub
4	Paintersville, California (talk)	Stub
27	M. D. Nanjundaswamy (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:55, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Haim V. Zakut (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Haim V. Zakut and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Haim V. Zakut, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 04:21, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: McCallum Bagpipes Ltd has been accepted

McCallum Bagpipes Ltd, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

VKZY^LUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 10:20, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting this over here! Hope you can fix the issues with the bot. {{u|Rey_grschel}} {Talk} 06:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Actually I'm not the one who made the bot XD VKZY^LUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 15:12, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Teisterbant has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Teisterbant. Thanks! Oo7565 (talk) 07:32, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination issue

Hello... Your analysis of the timeframe failure for my DYK nomination for the Template_talk:Did you know#Kenny Biddle article is wrong. This was pointed out by another editor who got the facts right immediately below yours. I don't know why you mentioned the 11 January date in any case, as that was a non-sequitur, but I did manage to make it just under the wire. Can you amend you comment to reflect this? RobP (talk) 17:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

According to the DYK analyzer tool, it showed that your article is too old, not sure why. Also, the issue wasn't the date, but the nomination date has to be within a week of its creation. So, I am still correct, but it doesn't disqualify you from nominating it. Also, I don't think I should edit that (as those comments are there for posterity, as far as I know).{{u|Rey_grschel}} {Talk} 19:04, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of McCallum Bagpipes

Hello! Your submission of McCallum Bagpipes at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 15:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Creating redirect to another, nonexistent, page

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Creating redirect to another, nonexistent, page, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 23:33, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for McCallum Bagpipes

On 17 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article McCallum Bagpipes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 2015, Kjell Lindgren played a plastic set of bagpipes made by McCallum Bagpipes on the International Space Station? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/McCallum Bagpipes. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, McCallum Bagpipes), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moved page

Hey there! I wanted to let you know that I've moved Rey grschel/userboxes/Windows 10 to User:Rey grschel/userboxes/Windows 10, and tagged the redirect automatically created for deletion per WP:CSD#R2. This is because all userboxes belonging to a personal user belong in the user namespace, rather than the main namespace. The actual userbox won't be deleted (unless you request for it to be deleted), and it can still be used just the same - it's just now in your user namespace, as it's not an actual article. Just thought I would clarify this for you. =)--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 21:38, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I made a mistake when copy-pasting stuff around. {{u|Rey_grschel}} {Talk} 00:49, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Herman van Malsen

Hello, Rey grschel. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Herman van Malsen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 22:24, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stuart McCallum

Hello, Rey grschel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stuart McCallum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 06:37, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tulip diagram moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tulip diagram, is complete, lacks clarity because there is no diagram, & does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 09:40, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I should have put it in draftspace to begin with. Thanks for covering my tracks for me! {{u|Rey_grschel}} {Talk} 00:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tulip diagram (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tulip diagram and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tulip diagram, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:23, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tulip diagram concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tulip diagram, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tulip diagram

Hello, Rey grschel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tulip diagram".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 15:25, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Vitamin K-dependent clotting factor deficiency concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Vitamin K-dependent clotting factor deficiency, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vitamin K-dependent clotting factor deficiency

Hello, Rey grschel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vitamin K-dependent clotting factor deficiency".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:21, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Trojan Horse anesthesia

Hello, Rey grschel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Trojan Horse anesthesia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:25, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Musladin-Leuke syndrome

Hello, Rey grschel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Musladin-Leuke syndrome".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Musladin-Leuke syndrome has been accepted

Musladin-Leuke syndrome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Maude Latour

Hello, Rey grschel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maude Latour, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:24, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Maude Latour

Hello, Rey grschel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maude Latour".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]