Jump to content

User talk:RevinCBHatol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Teahouse logo

Hi RevinCBHatol! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

11:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

What do you think about AIs on Wikipedia?

[edit]

Hi RevinCBHatol,

Welcome to the Wikipedia community!

Did you know that Artificial Intelligences (AIs) support Wikipedia? I saw your post on Teahouse, and I’m personally contacting a small handful of new Wikipedia editors to make sure your voice is heard as we build and refine these AIs.

Will you please provide an interview to share your thoughts about AI on Wikipedia? It would only take about 30 minutes over phone or video chat. We will send you a $15 Amazon gift card as a way to thank you for your time.

I am working in collaboration with Wikimedia Foundation staff to do this research, so if you decide to participate, your opinion could help build the future of Wikipedia. Hope to talk to you soon!

PS. You can learn more about our study here.

Best, Bowen, aka Bobo.03 (talk) 19:17, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's just normal, but it could be dangerous overtime. RevinCBHatol (talk) 05:22, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for the reply, @RevinCBHatol:! Would you mind sharing more of your thoughts about why you think it's dangerous? It would be very helpful to hear from you directly through an interview. Can I connect you with my colleague Estelle, aka FauxNeme, to set up an interview time? Bobo.03 (talk) 16:07, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, anytime. RevinCBHatol (talk) 03:47, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WELCOME

[edit]

Welcome to my talk page! I may be new here, but I think you would ask me for mistakes and additions. Let's keep in touch!

RevinCBHatol (talk) 05:22, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi RevinCBHatol! You created a thread called Semi-protected pages at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


List of Aikatsu Friends! episodes (season 1) moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, List of Aikatsu Friends! episodes (season 1), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:25, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Aikatsu Friends! episodes (season 2) moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, List of Aikatsu Friends! episodes (season 2), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:25, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Aikatsu Friends! episodes (season 2) has been accepted

[edit]
List of Aikatsu Friends! episodes (season 2), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 18:29, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Aikatsu Friends! episodes (season 1) (April 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:21, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Aikatsu Friends! episodes (season 1) (April 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Completely unreferenced.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:33, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
RevinCBHatol (talk) 04:32, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
RevinCBHatol (talk) 04:32, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Season 2 was already created, while season 1 yet to be. So please, be it such as the episode list to be created.

RevinCBHatol (talk) 04:32, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Akane Matsunaga

[edit]

Hello, RevinCBHatol,

Thanks for creating Akane Matsunaga! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 02:19, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Aikatsu Friends! episodes (season 1) (April 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Phospheros was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Phospheros (talk) 10:38, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Aikatsu Friends! episodes (season 1) (April 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Zingarese was: undefined The comment the reviewer left was: I'm sorry, but continuing to re-submit this draft without even attepmting to address the concerns repeatedly brought up will never work.
Zingarese talk · contribs 05:09, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Katipunan ng Kamalayang Kayumanggi moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Katipunan ng Kamalayang Kayumanggi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 17:16, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Katipunan ng Kamalayang Kayumanggi concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Katipunan ng Kamalayang Kayumanggi, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at WTTG. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The MGM/UA Premiere Network is not a network, but a syndication service. No use making it a category either. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:48, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:MGM/UA Premiere Network has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:MGM/UA Premiere Network, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:51, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Learn to post references

[edit]

If you are told to post references, maybe you should take that advice. I noticed a lot of your edits lack a reference. You don't want to be reported because you are stubborn in keeping your original research that have no reference whatsoever, right? Consider this as a warning.TheHotwiki (talk) 23:56, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at At Home with GMA Regional TV. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.TheHotwiki (talk) 23:59, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References should be posted in the article not in the edit summary! Are you trolling by doing that?TheHotwiki (talk) 05:17, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Katipunan ng Kamalayang Kayumanggi

[edit]

Hello, RevinCBHatol. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Katipunan ng Kamalayang Kayumanggi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:26, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maupay nga Aga Kapamilya moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Maupay nga Aga Kapamilya, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 18:19, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rochelle, Illinois, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:26, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

[edit]
Stop icon

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at A2Z (Philippine TV channel). If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 11:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for sharing. RevinCBHatol (talk) 11:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to KTVA has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's even a talk page for that. Talk:KTVA --RevinCBHatol (talk) 02:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Miss Earth titleholders by year templates

[edit]

A number of "Miss Earth titleholders by year" templates, at least one of which you created, have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 25#Miss Earth titleholders by year. Nigej (talk) 12:04, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, KGLA-DT, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:54, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen the MU '22 page that NBC and Telemundo will be the official broadcasters, so I thought it would be even better if I add their local affiliates. RevinCBHatol (talk) 23:09, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Wilhelm Friedrich, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:26, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter II, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein has been accepted

[edit]
Peter II, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

PK650 (talk) 00:28, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nicolas Cantu. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. There is a draft article being actively worked on. Contribute to that draft article becoming accepted and don't bypass the draft process and the efforts other editors are putting into improving it. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:45, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalizing by removing references

[edit]

Why in the world did you remove all the references for Draft:Asawa ng Asawa Ko? That is blatant vandalism especially you gave zero reference to removing every reference.-TheHotwiki (talk) 01:29, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't notice it. RevinCBHatol (talk) 21:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. TheHotwiki (talk) 01:29, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Cayetano in Action with Boy Abunda, you may be blocked from editing. TheHotwiki (talk) 02:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  04:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi RevinCBHatol. Thank you for your work on Montezuma, Alabama. Another editor, Cocobb8, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Meets WP:NPLACE, but requires more sources for verification

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Cocobb8}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 12:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DrKay (talk) 16:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RevinCBHatol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm so sorry for all that unsourced content, I even undid some of them in good faith. If I were to be blocked right now, I would be banned. RevinCBHatol (talk) 14:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not a coherent unblock request. Yamla (talk) 14:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RevinCBHatol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit it: Carlo Alessandro, 3rd Duke of Castel Duino was also a Greek and Danish prince through his mother Princess Eugénie of Greece and Denmark, and so his descendants are also Princes (i.e. Dimitri, Alexandre, Louis and Maximillian) and Princesses (i.e. Constanza) of Greece and Denmark due to their descent from King George I of Greece. RevinCBHatol (talk) 14:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't see what this has to do with the reason for your block, nor does it tell what you will do differently. 331dot (talk) 14:57, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you understand English? Have you read and understood WP:GAB? It's fine if you don't understand English or can't understand WP:GAB. Your unblock requests strongly indicates you don't. Perhaps you'd have more luck contributing to the native language version of Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 14:58, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources are required for all content. You will not find any for this content as it is not true. Danish and Greek royal titles are not inherited through cadet matrilineal lines. DrKay (talk) 16:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RevinCBHatol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry, and I promise to not do it again. RevinCBHatol (talk) 15:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. DrKay (talk) 08:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's very clear that WP:CIR applies. To the next reviewing admin, please strongly consider revoking talk page access to prevent this user wasting any more of our time. --Yamla (talk) 15:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RevinCBHatol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

About Ichthys, the eight-spoked wheel can be used to represent Christianity as a whole. But only a few people in Christendom took it seriously, like Truth Bible Church, Inc. in Metropolitan Oklahoma City[1]. So please, forgive me for my wrongdoings. RevinCBHatol (talk) 21:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please only make one unblock request at a time. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RevinCBHatol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I REPEAT: I am sorry for my mishaps, and I promise to not do them again. RevinCBHatol (talk) 21:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. DrKay (talk) 08:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tutok 13

[edit]

There's a new "Star Tracks" anchor on Tutok 13, her name is Mavica Batac. RevinCBHatol (talk) 23:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So that means, I'm blocked PERMANENTLY?

RevinCBHatol (talk) 12:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry.

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RevinCBHatol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know you expect me to be banned for citing unsourced content, but in any case It was totally fun while being at Wikipedia. I know you were right to block me that day, and I know how it feels.RevinCBHatol (talk) 12:10, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not a real unblock request. There is no request of any kind. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RevinCBHatol (talk) 12:10, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RevinCBHatol&oldid=1233123629"