User talk:Renné

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Renné, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:08, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of List of Ricky Martin awards

A tag has been placed on List of Ricky Martin awards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:08, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Natalia Oreiro re-edición

A tag has been placed on Natalia Oreiro re-edición requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 17:38, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jaleo

A tag has been placed on Jaleo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 09:06, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Jaleo has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ollie Fury _Contribs 16:32, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please excuse the above warning. I saw you blanking the page ans so reverted your edit. I have tagged the page as an author-requested speedy delete. Ollie Fury _Contribs 16:39, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Ricky Martin Latin Grammy 2006 - Person Of The Year Award.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Ricky Martin Latin Grammy 2006 - Person Of The Year Award.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://wireimage.com/SearchResults.aspx?igi=242614&s=ricky%20martin&sfld=C&vwmd=e. As a copyright violation, File:Ricky Martin Latin Grammy 2006 - Person Of The Year Award.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Ricky Martin Latin Grammy 2006 - Person Of The Year Award.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:File:Ricky Martin Latin Grammy 2006 - Person Of The Year Award.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:File:Ricky Martin Latin Grammy 2006 - Person Of The Year Award.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Ricky Martin Latin Grammy 2006 - Person Of The Year Award.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 19:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading copyrighted imaged

You cannot upload images taken from copyrighted web sites and apply the Creative Commons license. I have deleted your latest image twice now, please don't upload it again. Kevin (talk) 22:07, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Shakira Photos.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Shakira Photos.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kevin (talk) 22:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC) --Kevin (talk) 22:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Ntalia Orerio cover debut album.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Ntalia Orerio cover debut album.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kevin (talk) 22:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Natalia Oreiro 1999.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Natalia Oreiro 1999.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image links

Hi
Per our external links guideline we do not normally link to fan sites, and in particular we must avoid linking to a direct copyright violation: Those images are copyrighted, and I don't think they can be used on that fan site under a claim of fair use.
If you have questions about it, feel free to ask.
Amalthea 12:03, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Ricky Martin 17 promocional pictures.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Ricky Martin 17 promocional pictures.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Ricky Martin 17 promocional pictures.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Denniss (talk) 20:13, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Top 10 at 10

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Top 10 at 10, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Insufficient context - top 10 in which country, when? Is this even relevant or notable?

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~Excesses~ (talk) 15:59, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. — Σ xplicit 18:36, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Pavarotti & Friends For Guatemala And Kosovo

A tag has been placed on Pavarotti & Friends For Guatemala And Kosovo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pontificalibus (talk) 21:10, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Top 10 at 10

A tag has been placed on Top 10 at 10, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Passportguy (talk) 14:27, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for a reference to your addition

Hello, I have been trying to limit all new additions to the List of best-selling singles worldwide to referenced titles only. I notice from your edits that you must be very familiar with his career. Could you please cite a reference for your addition of Ricky Martin's "Livin' La Vida Loca"? I enjoy the song and a number of his others too, and I don't doubt the claim, but I need to improve that list by making sure there are no unreferenced entries that could be removed by other editors. Thanks, Abrazame (talk) 16:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's claimed in the Wikipedia article (Top awards and selling latin pop) Top selling latin pop singles. You had to ask the one who wrote the number. I think it was a man Borkan85 where is this information--Renné (talk) 17:17, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Renné[reply]

This with Google translator because I do not know English.

Enrique Iglesias

I've had to remove that image because we cannot use fair-use images for living people if they can be replaced with a free image- which we already have. I suggest you review our policy on this, particularly Paragraph 1. Thanks. Rodhull andemu 19:52, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Content concern

Hi. Please don't create articles about albums which are solely comprised of the track listings and have no other identifying text. This is not in practice with this site's style and content requirements which you can find both here and here. Thanks. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 21:26, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Ricky Martin Promocional - 17 years.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Ricky Martin Promocional - 17 years.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Σ xplicit 18:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding this image into the article Ricky Martin. It violates our non-free content guideline as it is a non-free image of a living person where a free image exists. Continuously adding this image may lead you into a block. — Σ xplicit 19:02, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. The next time you add a non-free image to an article of a living person where free images exist, you will be blocked from editing. — Σ xplicit 19:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shakira - Photoshoots - 2009 .jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shakira - Photoshoots - 2009 .jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ---Scarce |||| Talk -Contrib.--- 23:35, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Your recent addition to Ricky Martin has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Σxplicit 18:55, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Photoshoot - Greatest Hits.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Photoshoot - Greatest Hits.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 10:52, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Song She Wolf.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Song She Wolf.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 21:45, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Untitled English Album (Ricky Martin)

A tag has been placed on Untitled English Album (Ricky Martin) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KMFDM FAN ^(talk!) 16:26, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Madonna (entertainer)

Though your edits are really good, it has been reverted as it doesnot comply with WP:BIO Manual of Styles. We donot included tables for the discography list and neither are non-free images allowed. So I request you to please stop re-adding them because it will be reverted. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:15, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Upcoming English album (Ricky Martin album)

I have nominated Upcoming English album (Ricky Martin album), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upcoming English album (Ricky Martin album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. JohnCD (talk) 09:21, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Renné. I think the sources you've used to reference a forthcoming album, already at the recording stage and knowing the producer's name, is a good example of when that kind of website/blog sourcing is appropriate for an article. However, at this time, you should add that information to Martin's bio, and not an article about the album. We don't create an article for a notable piece of commercial art (a major artist's film, album, book) until it is commercially available or until notable reliable sources have made substantive statements about it. (For example, reviews released in the days leading up to release.) A good guideline is, if it doesn't have a title yet, it shouldn't be an article yet. I know it can be frustrating, especially with the language barrier, but keep up the good work and keep learning about Wiki policies so your time and efforts go toward edits that remain here at Wiki. Best, Abrazame (talk) 09:50, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To add to that advice: have a look at Notability (music), particularly the section "Albums, singles and songs", and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. The point is that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and deals in facts backed up by reliable sources, not in rumours and speculation about things that might happen in the future. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:35, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have reverted your redirect of this article, for two reasons: (a) "redirect" is one possible outcome of the AfD, but you should wait until the discussion concludes, and (b) a redirect is only useful if the title is a likely search term, as it might be if the album title was known, but I don't think that's the case here. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:05, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Untitiled Upcoming Spanish album (Shakira album)

A tag has been placed on Untitiled Upcoming Spanish album (Shakira album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. noq (talk) 18:05, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Untitiled Upcoming English album (Ricky Martin album)

A tag has been placed on Untitiled Upcoming English album (Ricky Martin album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 18:08, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your "Untitled upcoming album" articles

Please read these links, which explain why "untitled upcoming album" articles are bound to be deleted and are a waste of everybody's time:

WP:HAMMER - that's an essay, not an official policy, but it's based on:
WP:NALBUMS: "Articles and information about albums with confirmed release dates in the near future must be confirmed by reliable sources. Separate articles should not be created until there is sufficient reliably sourced information about a future release. For example, a future album whose article is titled "(Artist)'s Next Album" and consists solely of blog or fan forum speculation about possible titles, or songs that might be on the album, is a WP:CRYSTAL violation and should be discussed only in the artist's article, and even then only if there is some verifiable information about it."
WP:CRYSTAL

The point is that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a fan gossip site, and deals in verifiable facts, not rumours. JohnCD (talk) 19:00, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop creating inappropriate pages

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as List of number-one Pop Songs, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. - eo (talk) 19:06, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Forthcoming 4th english studio album, you will be blocked from editing. De728631 (talk) 19:19, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Forthcoming 4th english studio album

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Forthcoming 4th english studio album, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.latina.com/blogs/sound-check/follow-ricky-martin-studio. As a copyright violation, Forthcoming 4th english studio album appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Forthcoming 4th english studio album has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Forthcoming 4th english studio album and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Forthcoming 4th english studio album with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Forthcoming 4th english studio album.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 19:18, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For Shakira so well penetrated a similar way.--Renné (talk) 19:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)Renné[reply]

Celebration (Madonna song)

Your revision as of 14:30, 30 September 2009 added <ref name="UK Dance Chart"/> to the article. That reference is causing a cite error. Could you go back and and add the full reference to the page? Thanks. 75.69.0.58 (talk) 14:40, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shakira singles discography

Hello Renné. Thanks for helping with everything related to Shakira, but I do not see the need to create a full article on the Shakira singles discography, by which this article is too small, there being no need to create, besides being unnecessary this article is complete in Shakira discography. There is nothing new in this article so it is unnecessary, besides This article has no lead section, so one should be written.

Shakira singles discography complies with this template:

.

And finally you should apply the template Template:Db. Thanks. --Dan6hell66 (talk) 21:11, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shakira singles discography

The article Shakira singles discography has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is unnecessary, because everything here is already mentioned in another article more complete, Shakira discography. No need to continue writing in this article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan6hell66 (talk) 21:16, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Shakira She Wolf (Latin American Edition).jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Shakira She Wolf (Latin American Edition).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — ξ ^xplicit 04:01, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Shakira photographed September 2009 cover of Rolling Stone.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Shakira photographed September 2009 cover of Rolling Stone.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 19:29, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shakira photographed September 2009 cover of Rolling Stone.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shakira photographed September 2009 cover of Rolling Stone.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 20:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:17 DVD - Ricky Martin 17.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:17 DVD - Ricky Martin 17.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 20:17, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Bendig

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jan Bendig. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ricky-Martin-Livin-La-Vida-Loc-353718.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ricky-Martin-Livin-La-Vida-Loc-353718.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 13:49, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ricky-Martin-Livin-La-Vida-Loc-Mexican CD single.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ricky-Martin-Livin-La-Vida-Loc-Mexican CD single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 16:26, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gitana (Shakira song). CD Single.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gitana (Shakira song). CD Single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:58, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Livin' la Vida Loca.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Livin' la Vida Loca.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 23:27, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

This is your last warning; the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Lo Major De Mi Vida Eres Tú‎‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Crusio (talk) 20:17, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can not English!so I use Google Translate

CZECH: Ja chtěl jen vytvořit diskusní stranku.

Google Translate: I just wanted to create a discussion page. --Renné (talk) 20:25, 5 November 2010 (UTC)Renné[reply]

CZECH: a omylem sem vytvořil hlavní.

...and I accidentally created a major

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ricky Martin Awards

Template:Ricky Martin Awards has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:39, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American music task force

Hello Renné! I've noticed your hard work on articles relating to Latin American music especially on articles related to Latin pop. I would like to invite you to join the Latin music task force a collaborative effort which aims to create, expand, and maintain Latin American-related articles. If you'd like to join, please sign up here. Magiciandude 14:08, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move of Thalía

You moved Thalía to Thalía (entertainer) earlier this year. I was wondering why you made the move, when the primary topic name isn't used except as a redirect. --Izno (talk) 02:55, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Natalia Oreiro 2001 (Czech republic).jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Natalia Oreiro 2001 (Czech republic).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Life (Ricky Martin album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Urban

Ricky Martin Live: Black and White Tour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Urban

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Latin pop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Menudo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Latin Pop Airplay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aşk ve Ceza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Murat Yildirim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover of the single I Don't Care by Ricky Martin.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cover of the single I Don't Care by Ricky Martin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:36, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:La Bomba (Song).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:La Bomba (Song).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ricky-Martin-Tal-Vez-286235.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ricky-Martin-Tal-Vez-286235.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:12, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Single Loaded by Ricky Martin.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Single Loaded by Ricky Martin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:14, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BIGGEST SINGLES listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect BIGGEST SINGLES. Since you had some involvement with the BIGGEST SINGLES redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BIGGEST SINGLE listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect BIGGEST SINGLE. Since you had some involvement with the BIGGEST SINGLE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:21, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hit Collection 2000 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hit Collection 2000 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hit Collection 2000 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

English Studio albums listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect English Studio albums. Since you had some involvement with the English Studio albums redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:50, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Coming soon - Ricky Martin listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Coming soon - Ricky Martin. Since you had some involvement with the Coming soon - Ricky Martin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:01, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Ricky Martin's ninth studio albun" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Ricky Martin's ninth studio albun should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 24#Ricky Martin's ninth studio albun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Regards, SONIC678 01:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tal Vez (Martin songs)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tal Vez (Martin songs). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 17#Tal Vez (Martin songs) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 17:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Natalia Oreiro 2001 (Czech republic).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Natalia Oreiro 2001 (Czech republic).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Related articles" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Related articles and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 14#Related articles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:54, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Natalia Oreiro Tu Veneno(2000 album)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Natalia Oreiro Tu Veneno(2000 album) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 11 § Natalia Oreiro Tu Veneno(2000 album) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 23:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]