User talk:Remembergeorge

Hi! Welcome to my talk page.

Click here to leave me a new message. Also, please remember to always sign your messages with '- - ~ ~ ~ ~'

Welcome!

Hello Remembergeorge, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

In Wikipedia, new Users do not automatically receive a welcome; not even a machine-generated welcome. Welcome messages come from other Users. They are personal and genuine. They contain an offer of assistance if such assistance is ever desired.

I suggest to everyone I welcome that they may find some of the following helpful — there’s nothing personal in my suggestion and you may not need any of them:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on Talk pages (ie discussion pages) using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Dolphin51 (talk) 21:32, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Panarama moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Panarama, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 04:44, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mccapra, with great surprise and also disappointment I learned that my article does not comply with Wikipedia's guidelines. This surprises me even more, as my article is the exact translation of my German-language article about Panarama: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panarama

In the German Wikipedia there were no problems with the publication. You have to know that I am a friend of the musician Hermann Weindorf and that my information is first hand. I can't contribute more than the two sources given in the article. So where is the problem? Remembergeorge (talk) 11:44, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Panarama article moved to draftspace

Hello Mccapra, with great surprise and also disappointment I learned that my article about Panarama does not comply with Wikipedia's guidelines. This surprises me even more, as my article is the exact translation of my German-language article about Panarama: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panarama

In the German Wikipedia there were no problems with the publication. You have to know that I am a friend of the musician Hermann Weindorf and that my information is first hand. I can't contribute more than the two sources given in the article. So where is the problem? Remembergeorge (talk) 07:31, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Panarama

Hello, Remembergeorge. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Panarama, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Panarama for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Panarama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panarama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:52, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neuschwanstein (band) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Neuschwanstein (band), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:59, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just have edited my article and added some more sources. I hope that fits now. The same article was published in German and French with the same sources without any trouble. A Dutch version with the same content is coming soon, too. Kind regards Remembergeorge (talk) 09:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battlement

Hi - you write very well and you obviously know a lot about your subjects. But I wanted to let you know that there are problems with some of your sources. The different language Wikipedias all have their own different rules, so while some sources might be acceptable on the German Wikipedia, for example, they might not be acceptable on the English Wikipedia. I've had a quick look at the Battlement article, and one big problem that I can see is that it depends heavily on blogs and community websites from around the world. These fail WP:USERG, so it means none of the critical reception section can be used, unfortunately - reviews have to come from professional journalists in reputable sources, for example, music magazines or newspapers. I realise this makes it very difficult to find reliable sources, especially as the album is from such a long time ago and any reviews from music magazines from th3 time of the album's release won't be available in digital form on the internet... I have the same problem when writing about British music from the 1970s and 80s.

I also moved some of the sections of the previous Neuschwanstein album that you wrote... track listing and personnel usually go at the end of the artcle. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Album article style advice gives you an idea of the order that the sections of album articles normally follow. Richard3120 (talk) 03:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neuschwanstein (band) (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neuschwanstein (band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Neuschwanstein (band), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 21:48, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Remembergeorge! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 21:48, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neuschwanstein (band) (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

not clear how they pass WP:NBAND?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neuschwanstein (band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Neuschwanstein (band), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:17, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am sure that Neuschwanstein meets the criteria of WP:NBAND.

In my opinion, it is especially points 5, 7 and 9 that apply.

No. 5: Two albums released on Musea, the biggest progressive rock label worldwide.

No. 7: Hundreds of articles and reviews worldwide are a clear sign of the group's importance for this style. See also my articles on the 3 albums, Alice in Wonderland, Battlement and Fine Art.

No. 9: See my article on Alice in Wonderland.

As Bernard Gueffier, the general manager of Musea Records assured me, "Battlement" was one of the best selling albums in the entire Musea catalogue.

Kind regards -- Remembergeorge (talk) 14:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alice in Wonderland (Neuschwanstein album)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alice in Wonderland (Neuschwanstein album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:03, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Neuschwanstein (band)

Hello, Remembergeorge. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Neuschwanstein (band), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Neuschwanstein (band) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Neuschwanstein (band). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:56, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Double spaces

Just an FYI... You may not know that the Wikipedia "engine" cleans up excess spaces. So if you look at the next line using the editor, you will see that ...

this line has multiple excess spaces

but when rendered it is shown cleaned up. So there is no need to spend time correcting excess horizontal spaces. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:47, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Remembergeorge (talk) 19:50, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neuschwanstein (band) has been accepted

Neuschwanstein (band), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 10:36, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]