User talk:Ravishingrama

Draft:FFACE concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:FFACE, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:FFACE

Hello, Ravishingrama. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "FFACE".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 13:00, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neil Roy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neil Roy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Roy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andrew Base (talk) 16:12, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Mimi Chakraborty, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:27, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of FFACE

The article FFACE has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article about talent management agency refbombed with unreliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 21:40, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of FFACE for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FFACE is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FFACE until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 10:44, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mccapra I have just noticed your Articles for deletion and may I know what makes you think it doesn't have any relevant sources? All the reference are from notable print media like the Times Group, Republic Network, Millennium Posts, Telegraph etc. All of them are notable and the Organisation is extremely popular in Eastern India. You can find multiple articles from Google for FFACE / FFACE Calendar etc. Can you be more specific on what exactly is the problem with this article? Thanks, Ravishingrama (talk) 11:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of FFACE

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on FFACE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Loksmythe (talk) 14:29, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Falaque Rashid Roy

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Falaque Rashid Roy has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:40, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ravishingrama, can you please explain why you thought it would be appropriate to resubmit an exact copy of a previously deleted article? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:48, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia solely to promote FFACE and the individuals affiliated with the brand.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ponyo, am a part of a Media Firm which writes Wiki articles about subjects known to us locally. You are correct in assuming we have been writing about FFACE and FFACE associates who we thought were credible and should be a part of the Wiki. I would definitely love to have some assistance from experienced editors like you to guide me the right process. If you could help me understand, a) If there is a problem writing about a subject or its associates even if that makes good reason to be on Wiki with relevant authentic sources? b) If I can make a declaration somewhere that we write articles about relevant brands/associates. Also it may not be in exchange of any payment. Any assistance will be helpful and guidance. If you could also unblock me and tell me what are prohibited, and will ensure compliance. Ravishingrama (talk) 11:45, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:PAID for the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use requirements when editing in return for monetary gain. There are instructions on how to request an unblock in the block template above which you can use to make an appeal, but please note that it is unlikely that any adminstrator will unblock an account that belongs to a media firm attempting to use Wikipedia to promote its clients due to the extensive conflict of interest it presents.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:27, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Khwaishein - The Desires of the Lost

The article Khwaishein - The Desires of the Lost has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Simply does not meet WP:NFILM nor WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:50, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Films and Frames Digital Film Awards has been accepted

Films and Frames Digital Film Awards, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nightenbelle (talk) 18:20, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]