User talk:Ptb1997

Welcome!

Hello, Ptb1997! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (chat) @ 17:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Thanks!

	The Minor barnstar
	I saw a nice but small edit you made, checked your contributions, and concluded that you deserve to be awarded this Achievement In Minor Edits barnstar for all your efforts, which are noticed and appreciated Herostratus (talk) 21:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, roadfan!

Hello, Ptb1997, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

If you are interested, there is already a community of users who are roadfans or who edit articles about roads, just like you! Stop by any of these WikiProjects—WP:HWY (worldwide), WP:AURD (Australia), WP:CARD (Canada), WP:HKRD (Hong Kong), WP:INRD (India), WP:UKRD (United Kingdom), or WP:USRD (United States)—and contribute. If your interest is in roads in the United States, there is an excellent new user's guide. There is a wealth of information and resources for creating a great article. If you have questions about any of these WikiProjects, you can ask on each project's talk page, or you can ask me!

If you like communicating through IRC, feel free to ask questions at #wikipedia-en-roads ^connect as well. Here, there are several editors who are willing to answer your questions. For more information, see WP:HWY/IRC.

Again, welcome! Rs chen 7754 17:29, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers

Some of your changes to baseball player articles are going against the Manual of Style. More specifically, they go against the part of the MoS that deals with numbers. Please read up on these before you make any more changes that involve changing the formatting of numbers. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 20:26, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please read and stop violating WP:NUMBERS. If a single-digit number is in word form rather than number form, do not change it to number form. It violates the MoS and is therefore considered disruptive, especially after you have already been told to stop. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 02:30, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers…again

Buddy, this is getting old. This edit is inappropriate according to the Manual of Style. Low numbers, such as three, should be SPELLED OUT. This may begin to be considered disruptive editing if you continue to make these changes. And on top of this, I know you're getting the messages since you continue to blank your talk page and remove the warnings we've given you. Please edit according to the guidelines. Thanks, --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 12:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers response

I'm sorry. I just want to make improved edits to articles whose contents I believe need changed or new wording. I don't like leaving low numbers, such as five or three, spelled out. I just like them to be in number form (e.g. 5). I try to leave low numbers in letter form from now on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptb1997 (talk • contribs)

Thank you for responding. I will acknowledge that some of your changes have indeed been constructive. However, the Manual of Style makes it clear that single-digit numbers are to be in letter form, so if they are already, do not change them. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 16:40, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please also know that numbers should be spelled out even when it's first, second, third, etc. The change you made with this edit where you changed third to 3rd is incorrect. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 16:46, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If it's a number that has more than one digit (such as two or three), do I leave it in number form or letter form? Or can I do both? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptb1997 (talk • contribs)

When I say "single-digit number," I'm referring to numbers from 0 through 9 that have only one digit when written in number form. Those numbers should be written in word form when in a sentence. As such, the same also applies for writing out first, second, third, and so on, all the way up to ninth. When you reach numbers 10 and above, they can be written in number form. Also, please make sure that you're signing your talk page comments by putting the four tildes (~~~~) at the end. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 16:51, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand it, but I already know what you mean when you say "single-digit numbers". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptb1997 (talk • contribs)

Again, do not put 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. in number form, either. Write them out as first, second, third, and so on. Only put them in number form for 10th or above. Also, do not put an apostrophe before the s in RBIs, and do not put 0s before the decimals of numbers like batting averages. This edit made all of the mistakes I just mentioned. And please, sign your talk page comments by putting the four tildes (~~~~) at the end. This automatically generates a signature with your username and the time your comment was added. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 17:36, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Opps!! I almost forget.Paul T. Backes (talk) 21:06, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ptb1997: I'm sorry if I came off as rude. I've just been frustrated with the amount of vandalism that I've had to deal with over the past few months, and most of it comes from inexperienced editors who do not care about the MoS. As Christ says in the Lord's Prayer (by the way, @A guy saved by Jesus:, LOVE the username), we are to "forgive those who trespass against us." While I wouldn't necessarily consider this to be a sin, it was something that needed to be corrected. That being said, I was once an inexperienced IP editor myself who was making all kinds of similar MoS errors. Because of this, I am hesitant to reprimand others because I know I was doing similar things just a few years ago. I ask for your forgiveness and hope you continue to enjoy contributing! Thanks, --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 21:47, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ptb1997: Yeah, I'm sorry if I came off as rude too. Patience is something I don't always do a good job of showing, but I can understand that you weren't aware of these parts of the MoS since you had probably never read them before.

@Bentvfan54321: Thanks for the compliment on my username! --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 22:02, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You weren't being rude; in fact, neither of us were. And...uh...you're welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptb1997 (contribs)

I wasn't saying thanks to you, Ptb1997. I was thanking Bentvfan54321. He complimented my username (look at his comment and you'll see it). --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 22:34, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, excuse me. I'm sorry. I thought you were saying thanks to me. But I know you weren't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptb1997 (talk • contribs)

@Ptb1997: Just remember to sign your posts (don't lose that much sweat over it, I've forgotten a few times myself). --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 23:45, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mariah Carey

There is consensus to list both years, do not remove it until you read the message in talk page. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 12:34, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Care to chime in

Care to chime in on the latest topic on the WP:NASCAR talk page? Since you're one of the most active members on the project like myself, I wanted to see what you think of the idea.--Nascar king 17:30, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Back That Thing Up

Do you care to explain to me why you keep re-inserting the dead link to The 9513? The site was pulled down years ago. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:47, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) TenPoundHammer I'm not commenting on the appropriateness, but there is an archived version here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:17, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi, Ben again. Just letting you know that edit summaries are intended to be useful tools for you to EXPLAIN your changes. Leaving summaries and notes such as these (1, 2) show that you are passionate about the changes you are making; however, they do not explain why you are making those changes. If you believe your wording is more encyclopedic, then please explain why, instead of asking Sjones23 to just "leave it." Thanks, --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 15:30, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful

Paul, please make sure you read these warnings that editors such as SNUGGUMS are giving you. Removing them within minutes without ANY explanation implies that you are not reading them and do not care about your non-constructive edits. We are only trying to help you learn the ropes in terms of what is right and what is wrong. If you are not willing to obey the Manual of Style (which you should generally know by now), you may be putting yourself in danger of being blocked. Thanks, --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 19:22, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Corkythehornetfan 19:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've been told about it above and when looking through your contributions, it looks like you use your edit summary very seldom. Please use it as it doesn't take to much to write a summary of what you did... even if it is just a couple of words. Corkythehornetfan 19:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just another note to both you and @Nascarking: These edit summaries (Ptb1997's Nascarking's) have no merit to them and are inappropriate. Also, Ptb1997, if you "wanted to say something to Nascarking," do it on his talk page, not with a WP:DUMMYEDIT. Dummy edits are to be used if the wrong edit summary was entered, not to deliver messages. Thanks, --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 19:44, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bentvfan54321: I know it was inappropriate. I just get annoyed real fast when I try to submit an edit and I get an edit conflict message. I understand perfectly that all are welcome to edit these articles, but I have far more experience writing these race reports and have been the only person doing so the last two seasons.--Nascar king 21:42, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Nascarking: All I was doing was trying to tell you that you don't cuss at me, especially with the "dammit". That was not very nice of you. Ptb1997 (talk) 21:48, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bentvfan54321: I also know it was inappropriate. I didn't do that so it could be inappropriate. And...uh...also, I kept forgetting to use the talk page. I am really, really sorry. I will try to use the talk page if I would want to say to say something to another user rather in the "Edit Summary" box. Please accept my and forgive me, alright? If so, good. Thank you. Ptb1997 (talk) 21:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ptb1997: Please use the edit summary when editing. I don't think it is that hard to do, and quite frankly, I'm not sure how many times you need told. It helps other users know what edits you've made. Corkythehornetfan 22:22, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ptb1997: I hate to beat a dead horse, but please—pretty please?—leave edit summaries for every edit you make. If you have time to make the edit, you have time to describe it. This recent edit would have been adequately described with any of these:

"Rephrase."
"Minor rephrasing."
"Rephrase potentially confusing sentence."

Also, a tip I've personally found quite helpful:

To avoid accidentally leaving edit summaries blank, you can select "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" on the Editing tab of your user preferences, if you have created an account.

Thank you!

Rebbing (talk) 00:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ptb – it would really be helpful if you could use your edit summary... Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 16:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Careful when changing wording of quotes

For future reference Paul, when you change the wording of a quote as you did with the John Oreovicz quote in 2015 Bojangles' Southern 500, put what was changed in brackets such as "doesn't do anything until [they decide] it's a good idea..." That shows that, while essence of the quote remained unchanged, the quote wasn't used verbatim. I'm taught in journalism that you can get in a lot of trouble for changing around the wording of a quote without marking the changes. It's nothing major in this case since you just did a simple rephrasing, but just remember to mark changes like that in the future.--Nascar king 16:34, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Avril Lavigne, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invisible comments in 1999

The question is not what should have been there before being replaced by the template, or what is presently displayed by the template, but what was replaced by the template. Even if you were to take the grammatically questionable stance that those semicolons should be commas, it's not appropriate in the comment. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:45, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Class Act

Ptb1997: that's a solid, classy and gentlemanly edit. Jmg38 (talk) 23:11, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) re: this, I agree. Thanks, Paul. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2003 Mountain Dew Southern 500, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grainger. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to A&W Restaurants does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! bojo1498 talk 14:28, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mario Andretti may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Fame Inductee]] (U.S.)<br>1992 Driver of the Quarter Century<br>Motorsports Hall of Fame of America]] inductee (1990)<br>1978, 1979 ([[IROC VI]]) [[International Race of Champions]] series champion<br>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:25, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jdcomix (talk) 13:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SUBCAT

Please avoid putting higher level (parent) categories on pages which already contain a lower level (child) category. See WP:SUBCAT for more details. Thank you! EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 16:09, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Meet the Parents may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Office Mojo]]. Accessed April 1, 2010.</ref> It remained in the Top 10 grossing films until its [[th week.<ref name="MOJO-WEEKEND" /> In the [[United Kingdom]], the film had its theatrical premiere

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:38, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jenna Lee

Please note that on your most recent edit to Jenna Lee, you added her birth date to the article which overwrote previously cited information. As you did not add your own sources for your claim (whether the information presented is correct or not), I've reverted your change. Per WP:DOB and WP:BLPSOURCES, her date of birth should be discouraged if we are unable to reliably source said date over a wide number of places. GauchoDude (talk) 13:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Linking in bold

Please read WP:BOLDAVOID. We do not link the bold wording in the lead. A perfect example of linking would be the Appalachian State Mountaineers men's basketball article. In the season articles, you can do the same, except do it for the main athletics article, not the football one since that is already linked in the infobox. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 00:26, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ptb1997. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ptb1997. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you fix your copyvio?

With this edit on 8 July 2015 you created a section which is a blatant copyright violation. Can you please fix it. Moriori (talk) 01:11, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Coming Home (Keith Urban song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Do not add unsourced genres or recording years. Ss112

Okay, I'm sorry! PTB1997

Would you please change your signature so that you are not copying another Ss112's. This looks like petulant mockery at best, and impersonation at worst. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:48, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry again! PTB1997

Please see WP:SIGAPP and please make your signature legible. Off-white against a background of white makes it extraordinarily difficult to see your talk page link, especially for people with visual impairments. I do hope that your signature settings don't become a major topic of discussion. This seems like a needless waste of time on both of our parts. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John F. Kennedy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adlai Stevenson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of style

You've been consistently altering formatting on 9/11 related featured articles. While all articles occasionally can be tweaked, you've been changing formatting mandated by the manual of style to non-MoS forms on articles that have been extensively reviewed for MoS compliance. Please take the time to learn why the articles are set up the way they are, and please avoid style changes to FAs without discussion. Acroterion (talk) 11:56, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The changes that I reverted here [1] make no sense - you are adding dashes where none are needed, and changing "their child" to the vague "a child". Acroterion (talk) 11:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Your edit to the San Jose, California was unacceptable; how could San Jose be the 10th most populous in California? Please don't do any such edits again. ImprovedWikiImprovment (disputationem) 00:12, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making grammar edits as you did on Heathrow Airport and Sydney Airport as the grammar was already correct. ImprovedWikiImprovment (disputationem) 00:28, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive Editing

I have just declined a report against you at WP:AIV. Some of your editing has been deeply problematic. You need to tighten up or you are going to end up at ANI. And in case you have not been there let me tell you that it is not a place where good things happen with great regularity. You should regard this as a formal Warning. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:33, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please do not insert unnecessary comma's in the American Airlines Flight 11 article. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 18:08, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

*Also do not insert duplicate and unnecessary words to Casualties of the September 11 attacks. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 20:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

*The same comment applies to your change to caption on United Airlines Flight 93. Please stop these unnecessary changes now. David J Johnson (talk) 16:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gillioz Theatre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Clinton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ptb1997. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Real Fine Place, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Target (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please stop making totally unnecessary grammar alterations to American Airlines Flight 11 and other 9/11 pages. Your changes only increase the duplication of airline names. You have been warned regarding this before, please stop now. Thank you and regards, David J Johnson (talk) 13:39, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2000 Winston 500, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dupont (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:28, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Please take a moment to read MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:38, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited U.S. Route 63 in Missouri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand Gulf State Park.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

University of Maryland, College Park

added a link pointing to English

University of Missouri College of Arts and Science

added a link pointing to English

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Exit list notes

Since the notes in an exit/junction list aren't full sentences, they should not have terminal punctuation, just like photo captions. That's why we separate parts of the notes with semicolons and not periods. Imzadi 1979 → 01:17, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of 2013 NFL records and milestones for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of 2013 NFL records and milestones, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 2013 NFL records and milestones until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Your recent editing history at Albert Pujols shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/Player style advice. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:21, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but those stats needed to be added. Paul T. "Ptb1997" Backes (talk) 22:22, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, they don't "need to be added". Especially for someone like Nolan Gorman who just debuted. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:28, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but I don’t want to listen to you. Paul T. "Ptb1997" Backes (talk) 22:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:30, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please stop adding unnecessary stats that don't need to be there to player infoboxes. Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/Player style advice is the consensus so you need to follow that. Malmmf (talk) 09:31, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Updated during games

Hey, I've noticed that some of your stats updates are being done while the player's game is still ongoing. As a result, the information may not be correct once the game is over. Our standard practice is to wait to update the articles until after the game is over. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 05:18, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Your edit to You Can't Take the Honky Tonk Out of the Girl has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:52, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Kansas City Chiefs season

Number 1, do not revert edits without an explanation in an edit summary. Number 2, weekly or monthly awards aren't notable enough for inclusion on team pages. Please do not add again without getting a consensus.--Rockchalk7 17 22:46, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, stop adding this without a consensus per WP:ONUS.--Rockchalk7 17 21:09, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For a 3rd time, STOP ADDING THAT SECTION!!!! Stop editing without edit summaries and stop the lack of communication.--Rockchalk7 17 04:30, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 02:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Enough with the unexplained edits. Too many people have asked you already, for years now. Drmies (talk) 02:05, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Career highs for interceptions and fumbles

A consensus was recently reached at WT:NFL to reword to career best and add the career low for negative stats like fumbles and interceptions. Please stop changing this on articles.--Rockchalk7 17 22:52, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Travis Kelce

Don't add every "fastest to ____" record for a player, just major milestones. This has been discussed at WT:NFL and it was decided to only use major milestones and for Travis Kelce that is 10,000 yards.--Rockchalk7 17 16:51, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2002 Aaron's 499, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sprint.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Colors and contrast issues

Hi there - just wanted to drop a note to warn about changing the colors in stats sections of sports articles; I have undone several of your recent changes of this nature because they introduce a color combination that does not contrast enough and is therefore not very readable - this creates accessibility issues for some readers and is very impractical, which is why I often default to white text in these situations. Just something to keep in mind. Thanks! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 19:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've also reverted some of your edits for the same reason. Corky 00:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Same reason. Please stop. glman (talk) 17:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And again! Are you not understanding what we're asking or do you figure your personal passion for making it so other people can't read parts of certain articles is more important than the accessibility of the encyclopedia to all readers? Rhetorical question, since I don't expect an answer judging from your talk page habits and favorite hobby of ignoring people just to make the same mistakes(?) over again. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 19:37, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 Houston Astros season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rafael Montero.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stats

Do not update infobox stats mid game. Yankees10 18:35, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to go one step further on this. Stop adding interceptions, defensive touchdowns, and pass deflections to defensive linemen infoboxes. We determined at WT:NFL we should only include stats important to the players position and those stats are more important to defensive backs not defensive linemen.--Rockchalk7 17 16:57, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Rockchalk7 17 17:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for an indefinite period..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Lourdes 06:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to confirm that you will start responding to requests from other editors and start communicating with them. Till then, you will be unable to edit articles. Thank you, Lourdes 06:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will start responding to requests from other editors and start communicating with them from now on. Paul T. "Ptb1997" Backes (talk) 17:49, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ptb1997 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need to get back to editing.

Decline reason:

But we don't need you to. Not a reason for unblock. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:15, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Paul T. "Ptb1997" Backes (talk) 00:49, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ptb1997 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't do anything wrong to get me blocked.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:48, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note the user created a sockpuppet: Ptb19975555 (talk · contribs) to evade this block. PhilKnight (talk) 12:58, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

Hi, Ptb1997. A few days ago, the community became aware that the administrator who blocked you, User:Lourdes, had been editing in violation of a ban on a previous account. Before anything else, I'd like to extend an apology that this happened and was not caught by other administrators. To my knowledge, this is the first time in 14 years that a banned user has become an administrator, but I realize that from your perspective that is probably little solace. So again, I am sorry.

I and several other administrators have looked through some of Lourdes' more consequential blocks to determine if they were blocks that a reasonable administrator would have made. In your case, we determined^permalink that the block was heavy-handed and that your comments post-block allow for an assumption of good faith that the issues will not recur. Admins usually do not unblock users who do not have open unblock requests, but given the exceptional circumstances I have elected to do so here. I am unblocking you with the following warnings:

You are warned to communicate better with your peers. If someone comes to your talkpage and asks you to stop doing something, please discuss with them here rather than continuing to do it. If you are unable to reach an understanding here, follow dispute resolution steps.
You are strongly warned for sockpuppetry. Blocks and other sanctions apply to the user, not to the account. While I am not formally placing you under a one-account restriction, please understand that if you violate the sockpuppetry policy again, you are likely to be blocked indefinitely. I would strongly suggest only using this one account; if you do have some need for a legitimate alt, it should be clearly indicated as such.

Cordially, -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 15:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Ptb1997! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Fermiboson (talk) 15:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Serial commas

Don't change the established comma style of an article. See MOS:SERIAL. Binksternet (talk) 06:27, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! NM 06:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! You have had several other editors mention this on your talk page but it does not seem you are using edit summaries. Kimen8 (talk) 01:45, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong with redirects?

Hi Ptb1997, what's the purpose of edits like these? Don't the redirects already work fine as is? Ajpolino (talk) 02:18, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cell Padding assistance request

It seems that you figured out how to add cellpadding to colored tables. Can you help me with List of Football Academic All-America Team Members of the Year?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:35, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of acts of the 118th United States Congress

Hi, @Ptb1997! Could you join the discussion at Talk:List of acts of the 118th United States Congress#Remove_Sponsor_and_rowspans, since you have made a bunch of edits adding sponsors? Thanks! jhawkinson (talk) 17:23, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of acts of the 104th United States Congress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Hayes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maternal and Child Health Stillbirth Prevention Act of 2024 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Maternal and Child Health Stillbirth Prevention Act of 2024. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 19:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing?

Your edit warring un supported information in the Cook County article and messing up the source. The source is https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/ and it does not match what you said. What are you doing? Alanscottwalker (talk) 21:38, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]