User talk:Prof. Pod

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Prof. Pod/Metamono has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Metamono, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 23:36, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Metamono.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ~ Matthewrbowker ^{Talk to me} 01:20, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Metamono concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Metamono, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 03:20, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Metamono has been accepted

Metamono, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~KvnG 00:45, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Wragg (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Styyx was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Wragg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Styyx^Talk? 22:02, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gary Wragg has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gary Wragg. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:59, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Wragg (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lots still unsourced; External links still not removed in Tai Chi section; remains unclear why he's supposed to be notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Wragg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:28, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Prof. Pod! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:28, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gary Wragg has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gary Wragg. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Wragg (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Is the subject living or dead? If he is living, remove the 2022 from the short description. If he is dead, provide documented information about his death.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Wragg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:02, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Wragg (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is supposed to be an objective entry about a living person, not some personal narrative about how this person achieve fame in his field. Please use less flowery language. Phrases like Wragg's ongoing explorations and contributions to painting of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries wrestle with the dynamics of bodily energy in relation to abstraction and figuration are problematic. Some of the content here is taken from sites like this, please rewrite or remove them.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Wragg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 00:40, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Corinna Belz

Hello, Prof. Pod. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Corinna Belz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Prof. Pod. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rika Ohara moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rika Ohara. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:50, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello,

I assume, based on your username, that you are the person described in Kumo (musician)? In which case, please see WP:AUTOBIO for our policy on writing about yourself, which is strongly discouraged.

Furthermore, I assume also that you have a real-life external relationship with the subject of Draft:Rika Ohara, which I have just sent to the draft space. You must make a formal conflict-of-interest (COI) disclosure, and avoid directly editing or publishing on topics where you have a COI. This article (now draft) needs to be reviewed by the AfC team before publication.

Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Thanks for your edits and for contacting me. The Kumo (musician) entry is indeed about me. I posted a very rudimentary page back in 2008 which was subsequently edited and expanded by 28 or more different editors. I've maintained their edits and contributions unless factually incorrect. With so many editors involved can it really be considered an autobiography? It's pretty up to date now and I'm happy to leave it as it is for other editor to expand.

As regards Draft:Rika Ohara it's clear from the links in the page that Rika and I have worked together so you are correct. Nevertheless I created the entry independently on the basis of the entries for her film The_Heart_of_No_Place and subsequent productions not having a page for their director. I'm happy to edit the draft, make a COI disclosure and the submit to the AfC team.

I hope you can see that these are genuine entries that are referenced elsewhere on Wikipedia and beyond and I apologise for appearing to distort the integrity of Wikipedia which was never my intention.

Yours

Prof. Pod Jono Podmore (talk) 20:49, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I look forward to your COI disclosures.

RE "With so many editors involved can it really be considered an autobiography", 84.1% of the Kumo article (as it currently stands) is written by you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:59, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Wragg (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Wragg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:42, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Studio for Music Production HfMT Köln

Hello, Prof. Pod. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Studio for Music Production HfMT Köln, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rika Ohara

Hello, Prof. Pod. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rika Ohara, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Studio for Music Production HfMT Köln

Hello, Prof. Pod. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Studio for Music Production HfMT Köln".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:38, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]