User talk:Poriman55

December 2023

Hello, I'm 64andtim. I noticed that you recently removed content from Quebec Maritimes Junior Hockey League without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – 64andtim ^(talk) 06:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was decided in Wikiproject Ice Hockey to remove the maps – Poriman55 - Meddela mig! 09:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Puljujärvi

Hey! My name is HickoryOughtShirt?4 and I am an admin (and hockey fan) on English Wikipedia. I noticed you nominated Jesse Puljujärvi for Good Article status and I have some concerns. I am not going to officially review this article but I recommend doing some more work before nominating it because there are some big issues. I don't mean to come across as rude here, I am simply offering some advice since I know you are new to Wikipedia. Good Articles are supposed to be broad in coverage, which I do not believe Puljujärvi's article currently is. For example, the Return to the Oilers section (which covers three years) is just two sentences. This is definitely not showing broad coverage. The same can be said for the Penguins section. Also, the international section is missing citations and broad coverage of his other tournaments besides 2015 and 2016. This is just my opinion and you are free to ignore it, but I have a lot of experience with GA reviewing and submitting and these are my takes. If it makes you feel better, I didn't nominate an article to GA status until three months or so into officially editing (I did some IP work previously). HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 03:11, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jesse Puljujärvi

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jesse Puljujärvi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 23:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jesse Puljujärvi

The article Jesse Puljujärvi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jesse Puljujärvi and Talk:Jesse Puljujärvi/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 16:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jesse Puljujärvi

The article Jesse Puljujärvi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jesse Puljujärvi and Talk:Jesse Puljujärvi/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 15:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jesse Puljujärvi

The article Jesse Puljujärvi you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Jesse Puljujärvi for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 09:04, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nakkilan Nasta (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The two Sydän-Satakunta articles are the only ones that meet the WP:GNG standard (and even of them, the first one is borderline at best), and they are not enough to establish notability, especially as they are both from the same publication. I'm not saying this club couldn't be notable, but these sources don't yet demonstrate it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nakkilan Nasta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Poriman55! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nestor Noiva (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheTechie was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nestor Noiva and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 17:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ultras (ice hockey) (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Broccoli and Coffee was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article should explain what the term actually means...

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ultras (ice hockey) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 05:02, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024–25 Liiga season has been accepted

2024–25 Liiga season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

LR.127 (talk) 22:55, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nakkilan Nasta (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Superboilles was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nakkilan Nasta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Superboilles (talk) 18:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ultras (ice hockey) has been accepted

Ultras (ice hockey), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Conyo14 (talk) 05:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One thing I would recommend is to look at WP:LEAD about the refs. There should be very few refs in the lead, or none. However, I think the article is well-written and adjusted well to the comments. Conyo14 (talk) 05:32, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for takeing the time to review the article. I will try to improve it soon! – Poriman55 - Meddela mig! 10:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Liiga 50th anniversary logo.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Liiga 50th anniversary logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 03:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spellgoth moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Spellgoth. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:15, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2013 SM-liiga playoffs has been accepted

2013 SM-liiga playoffs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ToadetteEdit (talk) 08:23, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jesse Puljujärvi

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jesse Puljujärvi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 20:05, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of HC Ässät Pori

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HC Ässät Pori you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chipmunkdavis -- Chipmunkdavis (talk) 11:24, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of HC Ässät Pori

The article HC Ässät Pori you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:HC Ässät Pori for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chipmunkdavis -- Chipmunkdavis (talk) 06:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jesse Puljujärvi

The article Jesse Puljujärvi you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Jesse Puljujärvi for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 13:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]