User talk:Pokemon315066

October 2011

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Ryulong (竜龙) 02:15, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Pokemon315066/sandbox

User:Pokemon315066/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pokemon315066/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Pokemon315066/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:24, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Pokemon315066/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Pokemon315066/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 13:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop.

Stop making up information. 71.239.172.110 (talk) 05:37, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe this information is accurate, it will need to be backed up by credible sources online.71.239.172.110 (talk) 06:02, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to live out your fantasies in your user sandbox provided here; there is no need to fill an article with information you well know is not true or accurate. 71.239.172.110 (talk) 06:03, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder that your own personal sandbox is right here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pokemon315066/sandbox

No one else but yourself can edit your sandbox. 71.239.172.110 (talk) 06:05, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - A user sandbox is still subject to Wikipedia policies, and in particular, WP:NOTWEBHOST would mean that it is not appropriate to play fantasy reality games in your sandbox, and it most certainly isn't allowed in article space. -- Whpq (talk) 12:04, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Asia's Next Top Model (cycle 3), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... discospinster _talk 04:01, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Asia's Next Top Model (cycle 3). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:14, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bad Girls All-Star Battle (season 3)

The article Bad Girls All-Star Battle (season 3) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Too early for this, violates WP:CRYSTAL, no sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 02:20, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Safiel: This is likely a hoax. This editor has made up fake seasons in their sandbox as well as adding false information to articles. The article infobox claims a starting air date of Feb 25 2015, but despite how close to airing we are, a web search finds now sources writing about a third season. -- Whpq (talk) 03:20, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Pokemon315066/sandbox

User:Pokemon315066/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pokemon315066/sandbox (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Pokemon315066/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 23:55, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bad Girls Club (season 14), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:09, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 31 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Wikipedia:Tutorial/Formatting/sandbox page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please do not remove compliance with the Manual of Style from articles. Like all articles on Wikipedia, Bad Girls Club (season 14) is required to comply with the Manual of Style. Specific sections that the article violated were MOS:ACCESS, MOS:DTT, WP:COLOR, MOS:BOLD, MOS:ABBR, WP:OVERLINK, WP:REPEATLINK and WP:V. All of these violations have now been fixed, but your recent reversion restored many of them. It should be noted that the constant restoration of these violations resulted in Bad Girls Club (season 15) being protected. That other articles may not comply with the MOS is not an excuse for reverting Bad Girls Club (season 14) to a non-compliant state, it is justification for fixing the other articles. --AussieLegend (✉) 04:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you read the sections of the MOS that I have linked to above, you will see the answer to this question. WP:COLOR says Ensure that color is not the only method used to convey important information. Especially, do not use colored text or background unless its status is also indicated using another method such as an accessible symbol matched to a legend, or footnote labels. Otherwise, blind users or readers accessing Wikipedia through a printout or device without a color screen will not receive that information. The labels in the tables are required for compliance with WP:COLOR. We are not permitted to discriminate against visually impaired readers. Please do not remove MOS compliance in future. If you are unsure as to what not to remove, please ask for guidance on the article's talk page BEFORE changing anything. Removing content because you do not understand it is inappropriate. Instead, follow the links that I have provided and learn why the changes were made. --AussieLegend (✉) 07:36, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But why NOW? Of all times, suddendly you decide that you can just change the BGC articles? I can think of MANY articles that don't follow this and they haven't been changed due to MOS. You're just changing everything to the way you like it. The articles were FINE before. I'm not going to stop until its back to how they were. Pokemon315066 (talk) 08:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why now? Because it's only now that somebody has discovered these articles, and no, I'm not just "changing everything to the way [I] like it", I'm changing it to the way it should be.

"I'm not going to stop until its back to how they were" Be very careful. You're essentially saying that you're going to be disruptive until you get your own way, which is to ignore the MOS. That can only end one way, with you being unable to edit Wikipedia at all, while the article will comply. As I've said, we are not permitted to discriminate against visually impaired readers. --AussieLegend (✉) 11:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pokemon315066, I am an administrator on the English Wikipedia. Though I can appreciate your frustration to see a favorite article changed, the entire point of this collaborative project is to create and to improve articles. The various Manuals of Style represent existing community consensus for how articles and grammar and numbers and so forth should be presented. As such, they should be followed unless a local consensus is established to the contrary. As AussieLegend correctly points out, we need to make sure that our data is accessible to everyone, not just people with great eyesight, and that often means that we have to sacrifice aesthetics for accessibility. Here, for example, I had to convert what some might consider an aesthetically pleasing table to a blander one to make it easier for computerized screen readers to process. Editors should not impede good-faith improvements like this, as we do not allow for article ownership. The articles belong to Wikipedia, and community consensus should dictate how they appear. Hope that helps. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:58, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

Wikipedia:Citing sources provides guidance on how to create references. The simplest method is to use one of the templates created specifically to make the process easy: {{cite web}} and {{cite news}} are the two most common. The most basic form though is to simply add "ref" tags to the url. For example, at Bad Girls Club (season 15), you would type <ref>http://www.oxygen.com/bad-girls-club/season-15/blogs/bad-girls-club-twisted-sisters-premieres-tuesday-march-15-at-87c</ref> in the "Source(s)" field of the table. Since the reference is used more than once, the reference should be named so, in this case, <ref> would become <ref name=names>. At each occurrence where the reference is reused, it's then simply a matter of adding <ref name=names /> instead of adding the whole reference. There is also a tool called Reflinks that makes the referencing process almost automatic. I'll shortly edit the article to add the references, just look at the edit history and see what changes I made. Then, do that next time you need to add a reference. --AussieLegend (✉) 04:57, 17 December 2015 (UTC) Thank youPokemon315066 (talk) 05:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bad Girls Club (season 15), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allentown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Pokemon315066/sandbox

User:Pokemon315066/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pokemon315066/sandbox (3rd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Pokemon315066/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asia's Next Top Model

Please do not switch the alignment of the tables. Their alignment should match that of the other Top Model articles, such as the following:

America's Next Top Model (cycle 1)
Australia's Next Top Model (cycle 2)
Britain's Next Top Model (cycle 1)
Germany's Next Topmodel (cycle 1)

Linguist 111^talk 02:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC) But the tables were aligned to the left before a user blatantly decided to switch the tables, so no. The tables should be aligned to the left as they always were before. Pokemon315066 (talk) 05:19, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Linguist 111^talk 11:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, if you look at the articles for the other versions of Top Model, the alignment of the contestants tables is now centred. Therefore, the AsNTM tables should be centred too. Centring the tables does not "damage" them at all. Since the other tables have been centred, these tables should match them. I edited the info in the tables to match that on the official AsNTM pages: the hometowns are not sourced, only the countries they represent. Also, the tables have to list the contestants' birth names: Jessica's birth name is Rattana Yimchan (according to an article sourced by her page). I can't find a reliable source saying that Rani's birth name is Raniyan; if you have a source for that please include it. Linguist 111^talk 12:42, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Linguist 111^talk 11:39, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Linguist 111^talk 11:48, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Linguist 111^talk 01:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism, as you did at Asia's Next Top Model (cycle 4). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:24, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The length of the block has been increased, principally because you have been evading the block, both by editing without logging in and by use of a sockpuppet account. The original block was of a really minimal length, considering your extensive history of disruptive editing of many kinds, including both those documented above and others, such as re-creating pages deleted as a result of consensus at deletion discussions. Also, you have misused this talk page while blocked: if you do so again, talk page access is likely to be removed. A talk page is for messages and discussions related to editing the encyclopaedia, not for evading blocks by making in a talk apge edits which you might have made in an article if you were not blocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have persisted with evading the block, the block is now indefinite. If you make an unblock request, you should make it clear that you will accept Wikipedia policy in future. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:51, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pokemon315066 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not know the rules of using multiple accounts beforehand, and I will not continue with vandalism but make edits with good faith which I have been doing which has been mistaken as vandalism. I will follow the rules since I have read them and not take things hostile. Pokemon315066 (talk) 7:08 pm, Yesterday (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

You are lying. You were warned here to stop evading the block at 18:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC), but you continued sockpuppeting after that (using the IP). Vanjagenije (talk) 10:16, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblocking Part 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pokemon315066 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry if I did not clarify, I was using the other IP and did not check my messages on this account until I saw I was blocked indefinetly which I think may be a little harsh, I'm new to the rules of wikipedia but haven been on for 2/3 years, so I just ask that I don't get blocked indefinitely but with a expire date. I have read the rules and I will follow them. Thank you Pokemon315066 (talk) 22:28, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't see a net positive for Wikipedia by unblocking you. We already have plenty of users arguing about reality shows and other useless topics. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment: While editing using the IP 208.54.39.135, they commented on their sockpuppet investigation (which was their second investigation, after another user and IP were blocked after being suspected of being their sockpuppets and the case was closed as duck) admitting that they were evading their block, and it seems they knew that their main account had been blocked. Linguist 111^talk 13:48, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Comment:" I actually did not know that I was going to be blocked indefinitely but thought I was gonna be unblocked with an expired date, I commented on that investigation because the other two users were falsely accused as I was only using that IP to evade the block which I did not think was going to lead me to be blocked indefinitely but now that I have read the rules I will follow them and make edits in good faith without vandalizing and not being hostile.Pokemon315066 (talk) 23:58, 8 March 2016 (UTC) Comment: I understand, but can I at least get an expiry date on my block? Getting blocked indefinetly is far too harsh in my opinion. Thank youPokemon315066 (talk) 01:17, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pokemon315066 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, thank you for looking at my request, I'm not necessarily looking to be unblocked immediately, but to have my block have a set expired date since I think getting blocked indefinitely is a little harsh, I understand what I did was wrong as I have stated above and I will listen and follow Wikipedia's rules and conduct. I will not vandalize articles, but I will try to edit articles on Wikipedia with sources and back up all my information. Thank youPokemon315066 (talk) 07:12, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Under the circumstances, the Standard Offer approach could be considered for this case. PhilKnight (talk) 01:22, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pokemon315066. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking part 3

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pokemon315066 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It has been over a year since I’ve been blocked on Wikipedia, I have read up on the rules and procedure and would like to be unblocked, thank youPokemon315066 (talk) 13:52, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In order to be unblocked, you need to address the circumstances that lead to the initial block. Specifically, your vandalism, disruptive editing, abuse of multiple accounts, and block evasion. Yamla (talk) 13:58, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.