Jump to content

User talk:Pigsonthewing/Archive 38

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 35Archive 36Archive 37Archive 38Archive 39Archive 40→Archive 45

Clarification sought on use of Talk pages to resolve edit disputes

I wonder whether you are able to help on this.
For the first time I am trying to resolve a dispute with another editor by discussion, following the procedure recommended on the page, Dispute Resolution. To start this I posted on the other editor's talk page, explaining I wished to initiate a discussion, and he replied briefly on my talk page. The discussion is now likely to become quite detailed and extensive, so if we continue in this fragmented manner it will be difficult for anyone else to follow. Should we continue on a single talk page, e.g. mine, with each of us adding new posts (or editing the previous one) or should we transfer the discussion to the talk page of the material in dispute? --Socialambulator (talk) 11:49, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Most editors prefer to concentrate discussion on one talk page; whether it's one or other of your talk pages, or that of the article concerned is less critical, but I suggest the latter is bast. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:32, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks.

--Socialambulator (talk) 20:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

WP on hand-held devices

In an earlier exchange of views (apropos of info-boxes – pax!), you mentioned how WP looks on hand-held devices. May I ask for your thoughts on a related matter? I have lately been PR-ing Description of the Western Isles of Scotland, and commented "On my screen (a smallish one) the pictures after [xxx] cause a four-inch gap of white space before [yyy]." My smallish screen is a desktop affair, not a hand-held device, and I wonder:

  • is it helpful to comment on white space in layouts when WP appears on so many different-sized screens?
  • are there any guidelines for placement of images with hand-held devices in mind?

Any comments gratefully received. Tim riley (talk) 20:01, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

In the first case, generally, no. In the second, no; Wikipedia's mobile view displays images thus: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Description_of_the_Western_Isles_of_Scotland Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:11, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for that. I'll pursue accordingly. Tim riley (talk) 21:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Classic Albums: Pink Floyd – The Making of The Dark Side of the Moon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Wright (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

Invitation to WikiProject Hotels

Hello, Pigsonthewing.

You are invited to join WikiProject Hotels, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of hotels, motels and lodging-related topics.

To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:24, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Old unresolved at Template:Election box.

Just answered another question on the Template talk:Election box page and saw your old unresolved issue there about hcard microformats. Didn't know if it was still an issue, since the question was several years old, but thought I'd look into it and reply. Hope this helps. Thank you. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 15:03, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
Good Job Dove1954 (talk) 21:09, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Some hlist help

I've been busy reimplementing {{Compact ToC}} to use hlists. The sandbox shows what I've got already, which almost perfectly matches the old behaviour; however, I'm having difficulty getting centring working (see the test cases). Any thoughts? Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:56, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Richard Wagner

Richard Wagner was born on 22 May 1813, a reason to celebrate. His article is up for FAC.

  • I suggested an infobox, in my sandbox, please look. How would I start a new line for the translation of a title?
  • I suggested template lang, and even "permitted" to add it to Wagner, - do terms get marked the first time or every time?
  • What I don't like in infobox person: Work(s), Spouse(s), these brackets. Could we have work or works, spouse or spouses, as we have page or pages in cite templates? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:30, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
I agree about brackets; that's a perennial discussion at Template talk:Infobox person. In a meeting; so will look at other issues later. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Non-English text should be marked up with {{lang}} at each occurrence. You can use <br /> to create new lines. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thanks, new lines done, more to come, I am sure. - In general: I read in the FAC about "not a FA requirement", - how can we influence the FA process to at least encourage accessibility, if not require it for new articles? Can you tell them specifically what to reach for? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
I've tried, and will do again, to do so in small steps. The recent changes on headings was a good move. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:36, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations to your impressive milestone, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:32, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:36, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Timeline

I like the timeline concept in Wagner. How would that be applied to {{Infobox Bach composition}}, more than one entry possible for both "composed" and "performed"? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:33, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Do you have an example? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:17, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
I use it in BWV 18, but it doesn't show right because the template expects date_composed and location_composed. I am not sure how to change the template. The equivalent field in {{Infobox person}} looks complicated ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:25, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
I have now 4 performances in BWV 82 which will be on the Main page tomorrow, please check. There is a "–" showing because of "location", I am not sure how to get rid of it, chaging the template, without creating a mess. The cantata will be on the Main page tomorrow, the other one a little later ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
That parameter is only set up for one performance; I'd just list the first. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:18, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
(edit conflict) The problem here is that you're putting a timeline inside another timeline. {{Infobox Bach composition}} expects two parameters, |date_performed= and |location_performed=, which are then fed into {{Timeline-event}}. However, in Ich habe genug, BWV 82, you're leaving |location_performed= blank but passing a plainlist (containing four {{Timeline-event}}s) through |date_performed=. If you want to show multiple performances, I think that you need a separate parameter which accepts ready-processed data, and which doesn't attempt to do further processing on it. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:20, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Thank you, both! I kept the template simple, please check, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:53, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Dates

In {{start date}} and {{end date}}, I could imagine a parameter saying &nbsp or not, because sometimes I would want to force it, sometimes not. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:37, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

You can use <nowrap>{{Start date|2012|02|01|df=y}}</nowrap>. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:15, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
I thought of this but would prefer to have an option --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:42, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Ah, yes. See Template talk:Start date#Non-breaking spaces. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Brackets

Distantly related to Wagner, Ulf Schirmer, I bet you can fix the [] in the url of ref "Schott" #3? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:56, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Not if I get there first. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thanks! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
(in brackets, this is closer to Wagner, who gets there first? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:50, 8 February 2013 (UTC))

Template {Persondata} in joint biography

Hi. More than five years ago you concluded one bit of Wikipedia talk: Persondata (where the Template talk redirects) regarding use of template {{Persondata}} in joint biography.

I have skimmed the archives and cross-referenced the five-year-old with two more recent discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Persondata#Joint biography. The latest is one year old, concluding with Rich Farmbrough's suggestion that multiple templates should be completed because they do no harm as far as we know.

--P64 (talk) 23:42, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #44

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Development
    • Deployment of the first parts of phase 2 (infoboxes/statements) on wikidata.org done - see it live for example here, here and here
    • Diffs for statement edits can now be shown
    • Started work on query definitions
    • Edit links are now disabled in the interface when the user does not have the rights to edit
    • Edit links are now hidden when viewing old revision
    • Worked on search field for WikibaseSolr
    • More work on Lua templates for Wikibase entities
    • Worked on bugfixes in the statement user interface
    • New features in the statement user interface (references counter/heading)
    • JavaScript editing for table showing labels and description of the same item in different languages
    • Repaired and updated the demo system
    • Resumed work on Linked Data interface
    • Support for enhanced recent changes format in client
    • There are automatic comments for statement edits as well in the history now
    • Special page for unconnected pages, that is pages on the client that are not connected to items on the repository
    • Added permission checks for statements, so a user that can not edit will not be able to edit or that only a group can be allowed to do some changes like creating statements
  • Discussions/Press
  • Events
    • FOSDEM
    • upcoming: office hour (English; German later)
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
  • Open Tasks for You
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 16:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: January 2013



Headlines
Read this edition in full • Single-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 20:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Courtesy heads-up

Hi Andy - FYI, I have mentioned you in my statement opposing Carrite's request for adminship (see #37 under Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Carrite#Oppose). Prioryman (talk) 21:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations

100000 Edits
Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that very few editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.

This user has been awarded with the 100000 Edits award.

```Buster Seven Talk 21:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Even if the sheer number counts but doesn't mean too much, your contributions also carry meaning! Thank you, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Pigsonthewing. You have new messages at Template talk:Infobox person.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Redrose64 (talk) 22:27, 11 February 2013 (UTC)


COI, QRPedia

hi pigsonthewing, i usually have big respect for what you do around wikipedia and write in wikipedia. but in the case of QRPedia, it would be nice, if you would stop edit the article QRPedia. as you state yourself that you "are one of the persons behind QRPedia", this might be perceived as a clear conflict of interest. as you know the turmoil around QRPedia, it might be wise to let people work on this article, who are not as deeply involved as you are. i'm leaving this notice here, because Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents to request an editor block suggests to discuss it first here. --ThurnerRupert (talk) 23:36, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

I'm fully aware of our CoI policy, and comply with it. You should familiarise yourself with our policy on writing about living people, before you breach it again, or make threats. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:41, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Repeated blanking on content that's unfavourable to you? I think you need to re-read WP:COI. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:56, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
That's a blatantly false allegation. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 00:58, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
No, it's not blatantly anything. This whole mess is a fog of suspicions and half-truths, encouraged by WMUK failing to act when it needed to and by your COI editing of this article. Maybe the whole QRpedia issue was innocent, maybe it's not true that you have to "pay a consultant to get your town covered on Wikipedia". However the actions of some WMUK members since these issues first arose, and their failure to defuse the issue when it was trivial, have now created an atmosphere of suspicion as to just what was going on. Your repeated blanking of content that looks as if you're trying to further suppress this coverage continues to fan the issue and make it worse. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:17, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
I make no comment, here, about your views on Wikimedia UK or the wider case, nor have I removed anything on that basis; I removed material from one article, which was a clear breach of WP:BLP, having already been removed from that article by another editor for that reason; about which an uninvolved editor has advised you at WP:BLPN, and for which your allegation was both blatantly false and unwarranted. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 01:26, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

FYI

Edit warring to make a page look bad while it is in deletion discussion is not acceptable. I left a short note at ANI as I am going to bed now. Hans Adler 00:44, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

I didn't make any pages look bad. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 00:46, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

George Warner Allen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wallingford
Polly Samson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Morning Star

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

{{infobox hotel}}

Ping. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:52, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Pink Floyd—The Wall

There is a rename discussion at Talk:Pink Floyd—The Wall#Requested move 2. Since you are sourced in the article and are familiar with Wikipedia naming policy I think your opinion would benefit the discussion. Betty Logan (talk) 23:24, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

monmouthpedia and qrpedia

hi. you stated that monmouthpedia is not based on qrpedia. but you state otherwise in this edit. would you mind clarifying please? if monmouthpedia is indeed not based on qrpedia, then the article on monmouthpedia needs corrected. 174.141.213.8 (talk) 07:51, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

I do not "state otherwise". "Using" != "based on". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:49, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

Good interview! Hoping for readers ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:55, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Notification of discussion

A few months ago, you participated in a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Did you know about Gibraltar-related DYKs on the Main Page. I am proposing that the temporary restrictions on such DYKs, which were imposed in September 2012, should be lifted and have set out a case for doing so at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Gibraltar-related DYKs. If you have a view on this, please comment at that page. Prioryman (talk) 22:03, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

non-infoboxes, but *boxes

I understand the concept of the Infobox, and happy to see them, but i feel the need to complain about the apparently random naming, for i have found: Campaignbox, chembox, drugbox, Geobox, hockeybox, infobox, Kent_College_Infobox, Mtnbox, navbox, Pfam_box, Planetbox, Pwcompanybox, Quote_box, Reactionbox, starbox, superherobox, Superteambox, taxobox, WPMIXInfobox, and wrugbybox. Note i mention the "infobox" as distinct from "Infobox". I feel that making up new names for an Infobox is sabotage against sharing the data in the boxes, because in the search for the "Infobox" on a topic, "superherobox" is going to be missed.

I'd also like to rail against mentioning in the <comment> tag that a specific {{Infobox template was used, as a text search for the "{{Infobox" header will trip up on that mention.

Also, there is random use of the "|" divider, sometimes many on one line, some at the end of a line, some at the beginning of a line, and this makes parsing somewhat difficult if you are trying to not ignore the "\n" used inappropriately too.

I am also not fond of the nesting of {{ }} in each other, perhaps {2, {3, or {{ and {{{ can be used? I can parse the {{ blah {{ foo {{ blarrg }} bar }} bloof }} (i did not write Template:Blarrg in that nest, wikipedia added it there) out of the page ok, but the nesting gives me the crawly skin that something is going to go wrong with an unclosed }} somewhere, because after all, there's already unclosed "{{Infobox" within <comment></comment>.

75.120.28.171 (talk) 06:22, 14 February 2013 (UTC) aikat

This is not the place to raise such issues. Try WP:VPT. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, but when i saw :

If you wish to be involved in this project, please add yourself to the below list and/or add the userbox: {{User WikiProject infoboxes}}. To tell us all a little about yourself, please list any infoboxes that you have been significantly involved with: Andy Mabbett

— Talk to Andy Mabbett: Particularly interested in accessibility; standardisation issues; merging similar infoboxes; and adding microformats to infoboxes - see the microformats project

I assumed you'd be interested in the non-standardization in Infoboxes going on.

75.120.28.171 (talk) 19:48, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

I am; but you came here to "complain about the apparently random naming" and "rail against mentioning in the <comment> tag" and so on. This is not the place for that. Besides, I watch the relevant project pages. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:04, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Ok, i am clueless. I'll back out of the "If you wish to be involved in this project..." part as well, even tho i did parse the entire wikipedia article download and discovered this problem. I'll just work around the various issues (bugs or features) without contributing my time or fixes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.120.28.171 (talk) 20:14, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #45

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Development
    • Deployment to English Wikipedia
    • Fix various minor bugs in client, including watchlist toggle with preference to default to always show Wikidata edits
    • Added the new Baso Minangkabau Wikipedia (min)
    • Fixed wrong revision of statements being shown in diff and old revision view
    • Diff visualization for claims (simple version for main snak)
    • Diff visualization for claims (extended version for references, qualifiers, ranks)
    • Tooltip that notifies about the license your contributions will be covered by while editing (can be disabled by each user)
    • Started with valueview refactoring
    • Started with user interface handling of deleted properties
    • Started with refactoring of local partial entity lookup
    • Started with refactoring of toolbar usage in jQuery.wikibase view widgets
    • Finished improvement on jQuery.wikibase.claimview’s edit mode handling
    • Improved search by using entity selector in search field instead of normal MediaWiki search field
    • More work on Lua-based templates for entities
    • Specified the capabilities of the query language we need
    • Created query object
    • Proper bot-flagging of edits (bugzilla:44857)
    • Use of ID to directly address an item or property
    • Search should give more of the complete matches now
    • Special:ItemByTitle should work for canonical namespaces and later on for local namespaces
    • More robust format for notifications of changes on the repository to the client
    • Started work on refactoring API and autocomments code
    • Started to maintain documentation of configuration options in git
  • Discussions/Press
  • Events
    • Upcoming: Wikipedia Day NYC
    • Upcoming: office hour in English tomorrow
    • Note: changed day of next German office hour to March 8
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
    • We have a time scheduled when Wikidata will be read-only for a database migration. The window for that is Feb 20 19:00 to Feb 21 2:00 UTC.
    • New features and bugfixes on Wikidata are planned to be deployed on Monday (Feb 18). This should among other things include:
      • Showing useful diffs for edits of claims (they’re currently empty)
      • Automatic comments for editing of claims (there are currently none)
      • Ability to add items to claims by their ID
      • Better handling of deleted properties
      • More results in the entity selector (that’s the thing that lets you select properties, items and so on) so you can add everything and not just the first few matches that are shown
    • We’re still working on the issue that sometimes editing of certain parts of items or properties isn’t possible. If you’re running into it try to reload the page and/or change the URL to the www. version or the non-www. version respectively.
    • Deployment on all other Wikipedias is currently planned for March 6 (a note to the Village Pumps of all affected projects will follow soon)
    • Check out a well-done item
  • Open Tasks for You
  • Help expand en:Wikipedia:Wikidata
  • Help expand and translate Wikidata/Deployment Questions
  • Hack on one these
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 21:29, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Authority control categories

I'm doing the changes now, can you get the categories created? -- WOSlinker (talk) 21:31, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Working in it. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:35, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
I did a few of them myself as well. All done now I think. -- WOSlinker (talk) 22:05, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Not all those templates you wanted the changes making to are protected but I did them all anyway. -- WOSlinker (talk) 22:07, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. I think they should all be protected. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:11, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
I've added the protection & removed the parent cat from the template. -- WOSlinker (talk) 22:19, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Thank you again. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:30, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Finnish exonyms for places in Norway: Finnmark for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Finnish exonyms for places in Norway: Finnmark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finnish exonyms for places in Norway: Finnmark until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bazonka (talk) 09:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Finnish exonyms for places in Norway: Troms for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Finnish exonyms for places in Norway: Troms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finnish exonyms for places in Norway: Troms until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bazonka (talk) 10:01, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata

You been monitoring the developments of it? I see a bot is creating entries on wikidata so the interlinks will no longer me needed. I understand the next phase will be listing data for infoboxes. Any idea if there is a plan to have a single infobox for all wikipedias feeding off the same data? That would be a good idea I think but I'm not sure people are willing to give them up in favour of something centralized.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 11:09, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

AFAICT, the decision-making process hasn't got that far. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:45, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
It could potentially be done though couldn't it?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 12:02, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Yes. See also Wikipedia:Wikidata#Infoboxes (Phase_2) - you may wish to join discussion on the talk page there. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:10, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

Language templates

  • I just noticed your (cough) discussion with Ryulong about language templates here. The templates wrap the enclosed text in lang="(whatever)" HTML tags. The effect of this is to (1) tell the browser what language is enclosed, so the browser can use an appropriate font, and (2) improve accessibility by telling screen readers what language to read.
  • To explain (1): (a) Japanese encoded in Shift JIS but without the proper HTML language tags is usually displayed as garbage, as the browser usually can't guess what language it's encoded in, (b) some Chinese and Japanese characters share the same Unicode code points (same character codes), but the Chinese and Japanese versions of the character are noticeably different, so the lang tag is needed here, so that the correct font is used. (c) Latin characters embedded in Japanese text look really gross unless the Latin characters are wrapped in the proper language tags, because the Latin characters included with standard Japanese fonts are really gross looking. The special templates for Japanese and Chinese tag the Japanese- and extended Latin-character parts separately so that they are displayed with appropriate (nice-looking) fonts. If your PC doesn't have the special Japanese fonts that come with Japanese Windows then maybe this is not a problem for you. Does that explain it sufficiently? LittleBen (talk) 14:23, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
All non-English text in this Wikipedia (and non-base-language text on others) requires a lang attribute, regardless of the font or characters used, per the W3C's HTML specifications, and as I explained in that discussion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:19, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Romanizations don't count and never have, Andy.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:20, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Ryulong's right: Romanizations are the English-language equivalent of foreign-language words, and are read by screen readers as English. "Tokyo" and "Kyoto" are English-language romanizations, they are not foreign-language words. Complex diacritics are a different story: some POV-pushers on Wikipedia will tell you that French, German, and even Vietnamese names of people and places are really English—and so it's OK to use them in the body of articles, or even in article titles, without templates—which is nonsense. By way of example: Recently the Vietnamese government switched to using only romanized versions of names of people and places in English—so now all major English newspapers (inside or outside Vietnam) and all major encyclopedias use only romanized versions of Vietnamese names without exception. However, the POV pushers are systematically creating articles that don't have romanized versions of names either in the article title or the article body—they use only Vietnamese names in article title and body, and no language templates—and they are stacking RfMs and eliminating romanization such that it is surely impossible for somebody with a screen reader to read the articles. LittleBen (talk) 16:05, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #46

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 17:19, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Messiah

I added a few parameters (from Bach) to {{Infobox musical composition}} and used it here, please check if I broke things, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:28, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Looks OK to me, except that you've hard-coded a link to List of Bach cantatas and the template is used on articles about compositions by composers other than Bach. Best, perhaps, to move the legend to a separate page. See the "legend" link on Netherton Tunnel Branch Canal for an example.
In Structure of Handel's Messiah you shouldn't use the |location= for publisher names; use {{event}}. I've fixed that. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:39, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Thank you, I'll think about the legend, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:20, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Help with template variable

Hello, I've contacted you as I've found your name on the list of WP:templates. I have created a new award I desperately need assistance with in its template. template sandbox because looking here advanced templates i think the answer to my dilemma is in there but my coding background is limited. What I would like is a variable added to the usage format of the template such as a 'revert count=' or just 'count=' and you can say 3,4,5,6,etc. and dependent on that returns the string i put in the template such as; 3 lousy reverts were exchanged, 4 combative reverts were exchanged, 5 heroic reverts were exchanged. Anyway thanks in advance for any assistance. Sincerely, Geremy Hebert (talk | contribs) —Preceding undated comment added 11:29, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

nvm I've resolved the issue.Geremy Hebert (talk | contribs) 00:40, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Infobox Monastery

Hi Pigsonthewing, I've been trying to update and expand Template:Infobox monastery to make it look like what is proposed on it's Discussion page, but I've got little or no idea how to do it. How can I do it? Can I just copy and paste certain sections from Template: Infobox church? Other than updating the template documentation, what else do I need to take account of? Any help with this would be terrific. All the best, Pjposullivan (talk) 17:31, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christ the Saviour Cathedral (Pristina), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Pristina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:16, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Coordinates in Infobox television episode

Hello, Pigsonthewing. You have new messages at Template talk:Infobox television episode.
Message added -- Trevj (talk) 10:41, 27 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Pigsonthewing. You have new messages at Deor's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

I find the Kosovo article project very interesting, but you have to wikilink those articles throughout wikipedia otherwise they won't be accessible. In order to find them I had to check WP Albania's recent articles bot.--— ZjarriRrethues — talk 19:31, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #47

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Development
    • Extended diff view to include references now
    • Fixed bug where incorrect statements revision was shown in diff view
    • Added first version of Linked Data interface (RDF/XML); will be accessible from Special:EntityData
    • Updated the demo system
    • More work towards using Solr for our search
    • More investigation and fixes of search issues
    • Fixed several bugs in the entity selector and improved its behavior
    • Worked on refactoring of how our widgets use the toolbar
    • Worked on implementation of missing data model components in JavaScript
    • A lot of bug fixing
  • Events
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
    • Rollout of phase 1 (language links) on all remaining Wikipedias is still planned for March 6
    • Next update on wikidata.org is also planned for March 6. This will have bugfixes and if all goes well string as a new available data type.
    • Proposal was made to the Hungarian, Hebrew and Italian Wikipedias to be the first batch to use phase 2 of Wikidata (infoboxes). Scheduled timeframe for this is end of March
    • d:Wikidata:Database reports has some useful reports like the list of most used properties
    • The interwiki shortcut :d was changed to always use www in the resulting link (to prevent editing issues on other URLs).
    • The list of available properties is growing and a whole bunch of new ones are being discussed
    • Reasonator gives you a nice adapted view of an item about a person
    • Items by cat helps you find missing items in a certain Wikipedia category
    • A few more additions to d:Wikidata:Tools that you should have a look at if you’re editing statements
    • We now have more than 2600 active users on Wikidata. Thanks for being awesome. <3
  • Open Tasks for You

WP Composers in the Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Composers for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 08:12, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Broadband 4 Rural North, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lancaster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Tourism in Kosovo

Hi there POTW. You probably don't realise the problems you caused me personally on Tourism in Kosovo when you reverted me. Although your statement that I should discuss changes is technically correct, ordinarily it should have been the other party that tried for consensus first given that his edit - despite providing new material - radically amended the article to a form that would not be acceptable and could easily land an editor with an WP:ARBMAC warning (as I have been on since 2012). The Balkans are a sensitive issue, Kosovo doubly so. There are two reasons I cannot discuss changes here, the first is because it is impossible to hold a discussion with account whose catalogue is this in full. The second is because I am aware of Kosovo-based policies as an experienced editor and it would not take an administrator versed in dealing with Balkan-issues long to establish that removal of the Kosovo-template is a major blooper. It was created precisely as a disclaimer so as not to broach the political elements which are the elephant in the room - to proponents of Kosovan independence, Kosovo is a state; to opponents, it remains a Serbian province subject to UN Res 1244. As editors, we are neither allowed to present "Kosovo is a country, the newest country in Europe blah-blah-blah" any more than "Kosovo is a Serbian province held by rebels in breach of UN 1244 blah-blah" but these are the two actual standpoints over which world nations are split. Much of the rest of the other user's editing pertained to this sensitive issue.

Be that as it may, I have taken into consideration your summary which acknowledged a good faith contribution and it is visible that a lot of information was added. To this end, I have on this occasion restored the neutrally-worded version along with the extra material provided by MarigonaK. I think (99% sure) I have restored everything. If not it is only because the process of handling two such different revisions is difficult and never did I know when installing Safari what a nuisance that browser is. I never intended to wipe out the masses of statistics when restoring my edits - that happened by itself. It has a mind of its own and my Explorer works like absolute trash, that's the reason my summaries ALL contain missing letters (when using Explorer) from where it fails to register and my typing is too far ahead. There must be corrupted files in this laptop. Either way, I was just writing to let you know that my intentions really are in good faith and if there is anything I can do to improve the article, just tell me - I will definitely look into it, it's better than mass-reverting which brings us back to square one. Thanks. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 11:46, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your recent changes; though I would urge you to reach out in a collegial manner to the new editor and to welcome and open a discussion with them, assuming good faith. You appear to have left a broken reference, which you might like to fix. Wikipedia's "preview" function may be useful to you, to review edits before you commit them. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:53, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks Andy - since you're happy first first name association you are free to call me Stefan. I'm still examining the article from top to bottom so there may be a handful of edits yet. I'll try to repair that broken link. As for the editor, yes I am 100% in agreement with you that all users should extend the hand of friendship, I don't suspect this is a bad-faith editor but I have this strange inclination that the person with the account is not new and that we won't see another contribution from it. I could be wrong and if so, I will certainly communicate warmly with him or her. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 12:10, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Bingo! The same source was being used twice with varying format by the editor. That's done, thanks for being patient. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 12:27, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Your suspicions are misfounded; the editor is one of a group if young people I recently taught to edit Wikipedia. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:21, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Well you personally know this, I don't but I take your word anyhow. I wish that user well. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 12:11, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Duration

Template:Duration has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lachlan Foley (talk) 00:06, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

Shuaip Pasha`s House

Well, i must say that we have a little problem over there. Shuaip Pasha`s House - Almost half of that stub is identical copyvio from here. Then, article needs inline citations to verify content. Then you should use Kosovo note on it, and then article names, like Prizrenska Bistrica and League of Prizren, instead of error red links. Only then article should be linked with the rest of wiki content. Please, as i understand that you are taking care of that new group of editors, try to help them to follow established wiki guidelines about neutrality and WP:AT. All best. --WhiteWriterspeaks 14:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

I'm curious for the basis for your assertions that inline citations are required; that red links are errors; or that I should do anything on that article. What have you done to welcome and support new editors? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:32, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
I have already edited more then several articles in order to present the way articles should look like. But if other editors should run over all new artices and fix them, we are not on a good way. If you wish, i can talk to them about errors in their articles, but i wanted to tell you, as i understood that you where the one who tough them ? Then, it would be by far useful if you inform them, then i, or anyone else.. That was my idea. --WhiteWriterspeaks 14:36, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Anyway, i will fix this one also, if that would help anyone... --WhiteWriterspeaks 14:39, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
I didn't ask you waht you'd edited, I asked you about welcoming new editors. I'm quite happy to talk to you about their edits, but not for you to make assertions about what should be done, which appear to be based on a false reading of Wikiepdia policies and practices, or which appear to be instructions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:42, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Interesting... --WhiteWriterspeaks 15:06, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #48

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pigsonthewing/Archive_38&oldid=965791077"