Jump to content

User talk:Philip Sugarman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Philip Sugarman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Meh did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Wham2001 (talk) 15:28, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Philip Sugarman

Thank you for creating Doug Richford.

User:Whoisjohngalt, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for adding to the corpus of Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whoisjohngalt}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whoisjohngalt (talk) 19:39, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you. This is a work in progress. All statements will be fully referenced in due course. Philip Sugarman (talk) 19:44, 17 June 2021 (UTC) @Whoisjohngalt: Hi, I have uploaded a picture of Doug richford supplied by his son. I took a phone pic of a photo print. I have uploaded this but got the usual copyright gobbledegook back. Despite endless reading about creative commons etc I simply do not know what to type where or what to click on to solve this license issue. Can you help?[reply]

thanks Philip

Niche but nice

[edit]

Hi Philip: I really must congratulate you on your extremely thorough and dedicated work on History of the Jews in Kingston upon Hull‎‎. I only stumbled on it by accident, perhaps through some check or other I sometimes make, and I have enjoyed watching its continuing and careful development. Well done and thank you for all your very hard work! Cheers DBaK (talk) 20:18, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind comments. Any suggestions for improvement very welcome. Philip Philip Sugarman (talk) 21:07, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Home-Start UK (October 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 19:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Philip Sugarman! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Home-Start Worldwide. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 19:16, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at User talk:Possibly, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 07:38, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 14:49, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Board position and editing

[edit]

Hello! I hope you have read WP:COI. We very much do not want representatives of companies (a board member is an active representative for the best interests of a company/society, wouldn't you say?) editing the company or society's page directly. Editing drafts directly is OK, as they are not visible to the public, but for "live" articles please use talk page requests as we aim to keep Wikipedia neutral. A Wikipedia page is not a promotional extension of a company or society, but rather a factual restatement of what has already been written about the organization. Please do participate in the above COIN discussion so that we know you understand this. --- Possibly ☎ 05:51, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Home-Start UK (October 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Jews of Leeds

[edit]

Hi the article creator wants the article redirected. Why are you reverting? Mccapra (talk) 16:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I don't think the change of title is justified, it sounds inappropriate, almost dismissive - what is the reason for the change? Philip Sugarman (talk) 17:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well it’s consistent with other articles on Jewish history. In any case you shouldn’t keep just flipping it back without discussing it either on the article talk page or in the talk page of user:747pilot. Mccapra (talk) 18:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There are more pages entitled "Jews of" in wikipedia as far as I can see, so that point doesn't hold at all. And you flipped/tried to the flip the title without any discussion, whilst I was editing. And the software insisted at the end of two major edits that I make a choice between versions. I did not accept your title as you gave / I saw no reason at all, but I did accept constructive changes by others such as categories. Philip Sugarman (talk) 19:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I’m afraid I didn’t realise you were editing it, so I should have looked. User:747pilot asked me on my talk page why his page move wasn’t working and I redirected it to resolve the issue he raised. Anyway we now have two near-duplicate articles which isn’t going to stand, so there needs be a discussion about the preferred title. Mccapra (talk) 20:57, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK thanks for your intervention Philip Sugarman (talk) 21:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of the Jews in Leeds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Countess of Harewood. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In this case the title Countess of Harewood is what is needed, so the disambiguation page, which lists a series of incumbents, is perfectly appropriate Philip Sugarman (talk) 15:13, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You might already know this, but "DPL bot" is a bot (a program), so it will not see your reply. Your reply is great for historical reasons though. Cheers. 73.127.147.187 (talk) 10:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting articles into list and history

[edit]

Hi Philip,

What would you think about splitting History of the Jews in Kingston upon Hull and History of the Jews in Leeds into an article and a list each? That would result in four articles: History of the Jews in Kingston upon Hull; List of Jews in Kingston upon Hull; History of the Jews in Leeds; and List of the Jews in Leeds. This would resolve several issues currently facing the articles, including WP:BLOATED, WP:OVERCITE, and WP:PAGESIZE. Each article already has portions that would lend themselves well to a list format. See for example List of Jews in sports. As a general note, even there each entry only has one ref to back it up; for noncontroversial assertions that's generally all that's needed.

Thanks, Lkb335 (talk) 15:33, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi yes I will look at this option , thanks Philip Sugarman (talk) 15:39, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see there is a wikipeida page on how to split articles, but like so much else in wikipedia I find it very technical. I am away for a week and will study it on return. Do you have any basic tips on how to split articles most efficiently - so as not to have to re-enter references? thanks Philip Sugarman (talk) 22:48, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'll propose a split on each article's talk page. Lkb335 (talk) 16:01, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest with History of the Jews in Kingston upon Hull and Original Research

[edit]

Please advise whether you have a conflict of interest with the topic, as you appear to be using yourself as a source for content including entirely inappropriate original research which are cited as "personal communications".Slywriter (talk) 20:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disappearing for a month then editing the article without addressing the Conflict of Interest is in poor form. Please answer this question or it will be escalated.Slywriter (talk) 23:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Slywriter Hi. Have been busy. Sorry if I have broken any rules in contributing to Wikipedia. I do my best to find references which meet all requirements, used my own book as a last resort as best I recall. Sorry it seems to have upset you. Suggest you just delete offending references. No problem. Keep up the good work 😃 Philip Sugarman (talk) 18:21, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Home-Start UK

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Philip Sugarman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Home-Start UK, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:35, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"The Leeds Jewish Community"

[edit]

Hello, in History of Jews in Kingston upon Hull you have used "The Leeds Jewish Community" as a reference (currently no 70). The date of publication is quoted as 1988 but I cannot find that book, is it a typo and should be 1998? Thanks. Keith D (talk) 13:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Keith
Certainly Murray Freedman publishes multiple books, chapters and pamphlets about the Jews of Leeds, som privately. I think this is the full reference: M. Freedman (1988) "The Leeds Jewish Community" pp. 161–174 in L. S. Tate (ed) Aspects of Leeds ISBN 1-871647-38-X
thanks for your interest.
Philip Philip Sugarman (talk) 16:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keith
Actually, I see that the first edition is 1998, indeed you are correct. It looks like I had picked up this error from the City of Leeds wikipage, which I have just corrected, as I was keen to use the earliest date for an overview work by Freedman. I don't have all of his publications..
Philip Philip Sugarman (talk) 16:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Jews from Kingston upon Hull, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Two Thousand Years.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Philip Sugarman. Thank you for your work on Albert Chait. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:21, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of History of the Jews of Grimsby

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on History of the Jews of Grimsby requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.jewishgen.org/jcr-uk/community/Gr/index.htm#:~:text=Although%20there%20had%20been%20a,attractive%20place%20to%20travel%20through. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fathoms Below (talk) 15:59, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Philip Sugarman, I saw that you changed the content in that article so that it's no longer eligible for G12. I know the nomination for deletion was a bit hasty, but it involves a Wikipedia policy with legal ramifications. Just please be careful when reading sources not to paste copyrighted content, and I saw that you said here that you were "editing down the source" or changing the content from a cut and paste I presume? I wouldn't recommend that since editing down the source can easily result in close paraphrasing, which can create more problems with copyright. Please make sure to write all content in your own words without a similar structure to the sources we use. Thanks, Fathoms Below (talk) 16:24, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your advice, I will not cut and paste again. Philip Sugarman (talk) 08:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_Sugarman&oldid=1254710809"