User talk:PeterCanthropus

Your user page

Your user page was categorised in Category:Category needed, which is a category used by Wikipedia articles. I edited it to link to the category instead. Thanks, Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 18:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

F. Scott Fitzgerald

Hi Peter, I saw you tried to redirect the article F. Scott Fitzgerald. Wikipedia has a policy called WP:NAME about what is the proper name for an article. Since all of Fitzgerald's books, such as The Great Gatsby, were published as "F. Scott Fitzgerald" this is what the name of his article should be. --JayHenry 03:16, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths in 2007

Thank you for your recent additions to the Deaths in 2007 section. For future entries, could you please place the name of the deceased in alphabetical order within the date of death, and not at the bottom of that date? Also, where the citation/reference is in a language other than English (for example, Spanish) please add (Spanish) after the citation. Finally, if there is not a Wikipedia article about the deceased, please consider starting one, at least a stub. Redlinks are generally deleted after one month. Thanks, WWGB 06:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Hi -- just wanted to let you know that I'm nominated Time 100: The Most Important People of the Century for deletion. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of Time 100. Dylan 15:37, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Núñez de Lara

I am not sure I understand what you are trying to do. Do you want to write an article about this person. If so, just write over the redirect. You don't need to delete the redirect to do that. There was a double redirect which was now fixed but other than that it looks Ok, I think. Let me know what you want to happen and I will see what I can do. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 05:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC) OK, makes more sense. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 00:53, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Red Link Recovery/Repeated letters

I think this is the most tricky list. What I do is the following: I make a little research. I search for the name in red and, if it is a different person than the name in blue, I strike the name giving a short description of the two guys. If I see that many books or media just use both writings for the same person I create the redirect adding {{R for alternate spelling}} in it. Other users, with more knowledge, in the first case, the create an article for the person in red. I think I did that only once or twice so far.

If both links are blue or red please feel free to remove them from the list. Let's go hunting! -- Magioladitis (talk) 11:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Philip Robinson (musician)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Philip Robinson (musician), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Philip Robinson. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Caraca

Caraca is the form under which Guadalajara is known in some ancient texts. Some editors are pushing their POV negating any Iberian or Latin foundation of the city, ascribing it solely to the Arabs, but alas for them, works predating the advent of Islam prove the contrary. I have restored that text which had been removed. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:17, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Polly Toynbee

My comments that after spending time working on minimum wage Ms Toynbee returned to her well paid lifestyle are a fact - in what way is it unconstructive, other than presumably not being to your taste. Surely the fact that she always knew she would return to her wealthy lifestyle has a direct impact on her capacity to empathise with those who have no choice but to live on such low wages? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.168.124 (talk) 09:50, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the neutral point of view article on several occasions - I stated a fact, maybe the "as she always knew she would bit" could be construed as biased, but it is an indisputable fact that she ultimately had the luxury of returning to a highly paid job, unlike her temporary colleagues. In fact I'd go so far as to argue that by attempting to remove this sentence, YOU are the one guilty of bias 86.143.168.124 (talk) 09:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How can a fact violate it? Please show me which section? As far as I can see, I made a statement of fact, or are you trying to claim that she stayed in her low paid job? Had I said something like "She ultimately returned to her high paid job, proving that she is not really in a position to comment on others lives, then fair enough, but I simply added that she did return, allowing the reader to draw their own conclusions - letting the facts speak for themselves in fact, as per the NPOV guide. Please explain to me how I have shown bias, and where in the guidelines it suggests I am in breach of them, otherwise I will revert the edit 86.143.168.124 (talk) 10:07, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm letting the facts do the implying, as advised by the guildlines. 86.143.168.124 (talk) 10:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So now you're changing your argument? I thought you told me it was because I was in violation of NPOV guidelines, now you claim I'm repeating already stated facts, so which is it? I suspect what I've actually done is added a fact that was not to your own personal taste? Fair enough, why didn't you say so? I will leave the article as it is. 86.143.168.124 (talk) 10:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, so presumably if I find verifiable sources elsewhere commenting on this situation, along with recorded sales figures for the book she published on her experiences then you will presumably leave that alone? 86.143.168.124 (talk) 10:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apology from Iceflow: Huggle Newbie

Hi Peter. I am sorry if anything appears in your user log regarding a revert and warn from Huggle... I was just in the process of doing a revert and warn when you popped up having already reverted and warned using Huggle. If anything goes pear shaped, simply ignore it - its my mistake! Thanks. Thor Malmjursson (talk) 10:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Gregory

——Hi Peter, Mighty sorry for displeasing with my contribution to the "Louis Gregory " article. Do let me know the criteria for calling an intervention that I though appropriate "vandalism." Since I understand your message can reach me in any case, I am not worried for you not being able to do so. Yours truly, Jefferson Davis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.208.47.22 (talk) 05:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BAGHA JATIN

Dear Peter, thanks for touching up the article on BAGHA JATIN. What about including it in the Spanish section ? Can you take the initiative ? Enjoy the day.--BobClive (talk) 06:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Most cordial and anticipated thanks.--BobClive (talk) 06:14, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will you find time to continue ? Thanks again.--BobClive (talk) 07:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HEARTY THANKS FOR YOUR KIND RESPONSE.--BobClive (talk) 07:37, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anailson redirect

Eubot created the Anailson redirect to Atlético Clube Goianiense because there was already a redirect at Anaílson. The latter was deleted on WP:RfD, and therefore I've deleted Anailson as well. Thanks you for niticing this! -- Eugène van der Pijll (talk) 18:39, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Thanks! May be it's just for the fun of it. I'm glad you can share that emotion :) Also, I'd like to know your opinion on Maddie's case. Perhaps you think that what is on papers is what is important...

--Paleofreak (talk) 21:58, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Peter! Conversación edificante la nuestra.

Tomarse tiempo para navegar por Internet no tiene costo de oportunidad cuando uno trabaja en una oficina, creémelo. Y veo que no entendés cómo funciona el mundo real: por supuesto que al tener tu propio artículo modificás quién sos, por ejemplo, tuve más ofertas laborales y tengo más dinero, ergo satisfago más caprichos. Entiendo tu desacuerdo ético, aunque no entiendo por qué pensás que la novela no fue publicada o no existe :)

Sobre el tema de la niña McCann, sólo puedo decirte que es un error creer que cuando alguien no está de acuerdo con algo, es porque "no lo entiende" (como la política de Wikipedia sobre relevancia). Precisamente no se puede disentir de algo sin comprenderlo. Lo que vos considerás un error periodístico se refiere a un sistema de relatividad ética limitado (el de la profesión). Es como si dijéramos que no asesinar gente es un error asesinístico, y por supuesto que lo sería, pero es acertado en un marco de referencia más amplio.--Paleofreak (talk) 21:10, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Increíble tu disposición para el intercambio de ideas y tu capacidad para generar e intercambiar argumentos... tampoco conocés la agresividad... por mucho menos en la Wiki española me han denunciado por falta de wikietiqueta... Pensé que podíamos hablar con cierta altura..

En fin, que estés bien. --Paleofreak (talk) 17:51, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marcelão

Hi! Yes, Anderson Marcelo da Silva, Ânderson Marcelo da Silva and Marcelão are the same person. He briefly played for Brasiliense in 2007, and he is indeed currently playing for Asteras Tripolis. Regards, --Carioca (talk) 04:35, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Guelaât Bou Sbaâ municipality

Hi. I'm working on WP:RLR, fixing some red links, and I stumbled upon two Algerian articles: Bouchegouf District and Guelaât Bou Sbaâ District. My question is: both districts appear to contain Guelaât Bou Sbaâ municipality. We are talking about two different municipalities with the same name? Or is this a mistake? Thanks for your help. --PeterCantropus (talk) 04:40, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My fault... it should be Bouchegouf municipality, thanks for telling me! --ANONYMOUSPUSSY 09:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain more fully...

You proposed Kenyan captives in the war on terror for deletion, based on WP:NOT#NEWS. I checked. It says:

Routine news coverage of such things as announcements, sports, and tabloid journalism are not sufficient basis for an article.

Surely information about the use of the highly controversial technique of Extraordinary rendition can hardly be described as "routine".

So, what am I missing? Geo Swan (talk) 11:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Polly Toynbee

Peter, I have raised the problem with this article on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents page. Philip Cross (talk) 22:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Michal Jordan

Sorry about that. In January of 2007 I hadn't heard of the Czech hockey player named Michal Jordán. Jecowa (talk) 10:42, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

15 AUGUST

Let this day of India's Independence inspire us all.--BobClive (talk) 05:55, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will you find time to complete Bagha Jatin in Spanish ? Thanks.--BobClive (talk) 05:53, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BAGHA JATIN

Dear Peter, lack of inspiration ?--BobClive (talk) 05:12, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Damages 1x02.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Damages 1x02.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Damages 1x03.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Damages 1x03.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Damages 1x04.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Damages 1x04.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 22:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of She Spat at Me

The article She Spat at Me has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable (and unreferenced) episode.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magioladitis (talk) 22:55, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A Regular Earl Anthony

The article A Regular Earl Anthony has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable (and unreferenced) episode.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magioladitis (talk) 22:56, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of And My Paralyzing Fear of Death

The article And My Paralyzing Fear of Death has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable (and unreferenced) episode

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magioladitis (talk) 13:58, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tastes Like a Ho-Ho

The article Tastes Like a Ho-Ho has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable (and unreferenced) episode

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magioladitis (talk) 13:58, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Damages 1x02.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Damages 1x02.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 20:19, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Damages 1x03.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Damages 1x03.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 20:19, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Damages 1x05.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Damages 1x05.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 20:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Damages 1x06.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Damages 1x06.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 20:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Tastes Like a Ho-Ho

I have nominated Tastes Like a Ho-Ho, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tastes Like a Ho-Ho. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Magioladitis (talk) 03:01, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Damages 1x04.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Damages 1x04.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:09, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello PeterCanthropus! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Jorge de la Rúa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:27, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Odet-Cascadec-Bolloré

The article Odet-Cascadec-Bolloré has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable organization; fails WP:ORG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. M4gnum0n (talk) 09:56, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shoah

Hi Peter, I noticed your Shoah page and wanted to see if you could add to a discussion of Chelmno survivors: Talk:Chelmno_extermination_camp#Two_or_three_survivors.3F. Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 10:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of All-time Argentine Primera División table

The article All-time Argentine Primera División table has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable per precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-time English Football League 1st Division Table.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jenks24 (talk) 19:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of All-time Argentine Primera División table for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article All-time Argentine Primera División table is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-time Argentine Primera División table until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jenks24 (talk) 07:05, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Stories Project

Aloha!

My name is Victor and I work with the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that supports Wikipedia. We're chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community around the world, including those from readers, editors, and donors. Stories are absolutely essential for any non-profit to persuade new people to support the cause, and we know the vast network of people who use Wikipedia have so much to share.

I find stories that drive our annual fundraising efforts. It's important to convey the incredible diversity of people who've come to rely upon Wikipedia every day.

I'd really like the opportunity to interview you to tell your story, with the possibility of using it in our materials, on our community websites, or as part of this year’s fundraiser to encourage others to support Wikipedia.

I will be in Buenos Aires from the 10th - 11th of March 2012.

I'm hoping you will elaborate on your story with me. Please let me know if you're inclined to take part in the Wikipedia Stories Project!

Thank you,

Victor Grigas

user:Victorgrigas

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Victor Grigas (talk) 01:45, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

¡Hola!

Yo también te quiero, es una relación de años... :=) --Againme (talk) 19:54, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

user:Againme

If user:Againme (re)creates any more redirects/articles related to Damián Beanato then I suggest nominating them for speedy deletion per WP:CSD#G4. I've given them a warning, which will hopefully suffice, but if not you might want to consider escalating the warnings and/or bringing his actions up at WP:AN/I or other suitable venue. Thryduulf (talk) 01:21, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cover art of Threat Vector novel.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Cover art of Threat Vector novel.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation

Hi there, thanks for your articles! Just a question, what is the best way to disambiguate:

Juan de la Abadia, marrano
Juan de la Abadía, painter

Cheers In ictu oculi (talk) 00:37, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Harney, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Western and American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Floyd Mayweather vs. Marcos Maidana

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Amortias (T)(C) 19:45, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MayweatherVsMaidana.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MayweatherVsMaidana.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:15, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fertoszentmiklós listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fertoszentmiklós. Since you had some involvement with the Fertoszentmiklós redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 03:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, PeterCanthropus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello PeterCanthropus! Your additions to Hard Cell have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 02:39, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Das fidele Gefängnis moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Das fidele Gefängnis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 00:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Das fidele Gefängnis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Das fidele Gefängnis. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 00:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Das fidele Gefängnis

Hello, PeterCanthropus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Das fidele Gefängnis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]