User talk:Pervezmusk.

Hello, Pervezmusk., and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 21:38, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Golden Horde

Your recent editing history at Golden Horde shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Stop edit warring on your erroneous edit on the template. Beshogur (talk) 19:56, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 18:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Reliance Global Corporate Security. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 00:31, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Stop removing the AFD notice. It will not stop the process and is considered disruptive. You can end up blocked from editing if you continue. Please stop. Ravensfire (talk) 13:52, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Please read this and comply! UtherSRG (talk) 14:18, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Beshogur (talk) 15:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Beshogur (talk) 15:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reliance Global Corporate Security

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reliance Global Corporate Security, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. // Timothy :: talk 02:23, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Reliance Global Corporate Security for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reliance Global Corporate Security is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reliance Global Corporate Security until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

// Timothy :: talk 21:26, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Glock. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. As stated by WP:SEEALSO, do not add links to the see also section that are already in the main article. Loafiewa (talk) 11:33, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added the glock switch article in also see page of glock because the glock switch article relate to glock pistol. So please do not remove the glock switch from see also page of glock article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pervezmusk (talk • contribs)

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Glock, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Your personal preference does not supersede the MOS. Loafiewa (talk) 13:53, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

This is the third time I've warned you about this. I will block you if I see you do this again. UtherSRG (talk) 14:40, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Private security company. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:10, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 15:40, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at AK-103. Loafiewa (talk) 15:48, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. You were just unblock and now continue the same thing. Please stop. Starship 24 (talk) 17:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what disruptive editing I have done

please can you explain it Pervezmusk. (talk) 16:27, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Huh. I'd have blocked you for a lack of competence. You've made 420 edits here, and for the longest time you didn't sign posts properly, you don't indent in threads, and you are not writing complete sentences that all editors can understand. And now you're asking *someone" to explain why you're blocked--who are you asking? I just happened to see this, and going through your edits I can see why you were blocked. Please learn how all this works on this website. Drmies (talk) 16:30, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'll tell you one more thing: stop editing while logged out. It is highly disruptive, and against our policies. Drmies (talk) 16:36, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have repeatedly explained that you must sign your talk page comments with four tildes above, and warned that if you didn't comply, I'd block you. If you aren't going to be bothered to read the warnings and other communications placed here on your talk page, do you really think you aren't going to get blocked? But as Drmies said, you have more than one type of bad behavior. I just picked out one that no one else had yet called you on. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:46, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok understand i will not repeat the same mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pervezmusk. (talk • contribs)

You just did! - UtherSRG (talk) 19:51, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=because I want to improve my article [[Reliance global corporate security]] and want add more info about [[ak 74]]}}

. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pervezmusk. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i doing good contribution in wikipedia why I got block and what disruptive editing i have done and ("not getting the hint" what is that) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pervezmusk. (talk • contribs)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Please see all of the warnings and temporary blocks above. Those are your hints. UtherSRG (talk) 11:03, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UtherSRG please unblock my account

UtherSRG please unblock my account I want add more information about reliance global corporate security Pervezmusk. (talk) 10:19, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. If you can not read and understand the instructions of the block above (which you have failed now twice; I've corrected it once), and given your history of not being able to follow instructions or edit cooperatively, I see no reason to unblock you. Nor do I see a reason to have you continue to thrash on your talk page. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. UtherSRG (talk) 12:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that they've also been evading with 103.109.95.23 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) (I have blocked). SmartSE (talk) 11:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And now Dighor3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). SmartSE (talk) 20:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fun. Ok, I've squelched their edits. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another sock User:Pyropmc.117. The main page for Reliance may need protection. // Timothy :: talk 22:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've protected the Reliance page for now. - UtherSRG (talk) 00:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Nittin Das per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nittin Das. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 16:11, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]