User talk:Persona2two

Hi dear user I want to inform you that you are doing some editing in the page on Shahzad Sidhu I have read the notability guideline and this page meets the notability guidelines you are adding the tag again and again. because it's not worth it You do not need to do any type of editing in that page If you do this, you can be blocked by any administrator of Wikipedia. I see that you have tampered with many pages I have added strong sources in it. Zimidar (talk) 07:04, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Persona2two!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, S0091 (talk) 19:06, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fateh Muhammad Jalandhari (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Noahfgodard was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fateh Muhammad Jalandhari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noahfgodard (talk) 20:35, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Persona2two! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noahfgodard (talk) 20:35, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aur Tabdeeli Galay Par Gayi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Aur Tabdeeli Galay Par Gayi. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and please, read Wikipaedia’s policy on press releases. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 21:28, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft of your article in draftspace or in your userspace first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 13:34, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 17:05, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Persona2two (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was gradually switching to my this account for legitimate reasons. I've never been involved in any type of sockpuppetry. You can check my edit history to confirm it. So please unblock me. Persona2two (talk) 04:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Clear and blatant violation of WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 11:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There were multiple instances of both accounts being used to edit the same pages; I could find no declaration of the connection between the accounts on either userpage. What were the legitimate reasons? Girth Summit _(blether) 08:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. I kept both accounts very separate. The only pages where you can find edits from both accounts are Pride of Performance and Kamal-e-Fun Award but that was only to add wikilinks for any newly created biographies in their award sections. This is not an abuse. Persona2two (talk) 10:47, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to inactivate the Insight 3 account after finishing this Draft: Stephen Ogweno. I wanted a new account without any history of paid editing, as I am not doing it anymore. Persona2two (talk) 11:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The editor interaction analyser says differently. Creating a new account because your previous account had been blocked for undeclared paid editing sounds a lot like an attempt to evade scrutiny to me. Girth Summit _(blether) 11:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is unfair. If I had any ill intentions, I wouldn't have said it so openly. That was an embarrassing thing for me and I wanted that stain away from me. I didn't do anything wrong since then.

Also, this new account was created on 4 July (about 80 days before) and the analyzer is showing the same pages that I mentioned above in that range of time. Why don't you check the nature of edits on those pages? And please be gentle and don't judge me wrong. I really want to contribute to the project in a positive way. Persona2two (talk) 12:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Samina Khalid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samina Khalid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samina Khalid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vanjagenije (talk) 23:47, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aur Tabdeeli Galay Par Gayi

Hello, Persona2two. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aur Tabdeeli Galay Par Gayi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aur Tabdeeli Galay Par Gayi

Hello, Persona2two. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aur Tabdeeli Galay Par Gayi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]