User talk:Perfectcheck373

Welcome!

Hi Perfectcheck373! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Schazjmd (talk) 21:24, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, I'm YesI'mOnFire. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of people from Rochester, Minnesota have been disallowed by an edit filter as they did not appear constructive. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you believe the edit filter disallowance was a false positive, please report it here. Feel free to ask for assistance at the Teahouse whenever you like. Thank you. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelly Cooney Cilella (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBritinator was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kelly Cooney Cilella and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBritinator (talk) 14:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Perfectcheck373! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBritinator (talk) 14:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Perfectcheck373. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Kelly Cooney Cilella, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. C F A 💬 15:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelly Cooney Cilella (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Linkedin.com is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kelly Cooney Cilella and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:28, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelly Cooney Cilella (August 18)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CFA was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

C F A 💬 15:36, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any info on how can i improve that article. Perfectcheck373 (talk) 15:37, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. 331dot (talk) 16:03, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Perfectcheck373 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am a legit account, I’m not a sockpuppet. I’m a new user this is a legitimate account. I was trying to create a brand new article, finding out that a sockpuppet create it was surprising. I tried clear my name but admits framed me for this. This is wrong, this should not happen to me Perfectcheck373 (talk) 16:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:59, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

can someone create an article for Kelly Cooney Cilella

Im desperate needed someone to create an article. Perfectcheck373 (talk) 16:16, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While blocked, you may only use this page to ask to be unblocked. What is the source of your desperation? 331dot (talk) 16:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

She is a famous film producer. I have legit sources for that article. Perfectcheck373 (talk) 16:29, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Being famous is not a part of the relevant criteria at WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 16:32, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a sockpuppet account, I used this as a legitimate account. Perfectcheck373 (talk) 16:32, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't answer my question. What is the source of your desperation? Why did you select this person to edit about, and why do your edits seem to be about people who might benefit from paid editing services? Now is the time for total openness and honesty if you are not a sock(or meat puppet) 331dot (talk) 16:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My source of my desperation and selecting of that person is becuase I am a huge fan of a movie they created, I am totally honest for this question. Perfectcheck373 (talk) 16:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe you're just a fan, but it's not me you need to convince. 331dot (talk) 17:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I was trying to get everyone’s attention with this. Perfectcheck373 (talk) 17:25, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have now been checkuser confirmed as abusing multiple accounts. Until you are honest, there is no pathway forward, and anyone who attempts to write about this person will be blocked. You're making it harder, not easier. 331dot (talk) 17:27, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am completely honest. Perfectcheck373 (talk) 17:38, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then you will need to provide a plausible explanation as to why technical evidence would connect you to other accounts that have done the exact same thing as you. 331dot (talk) 17:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The evidence is that it was my ip address that mightive cause technical admins to connect me to the other account, most of my edits are completely not connected to the other accounts. Perfectcheck373 (talk) 19:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to make a new unblock request for someone else to review, but that's not going to fly. You'll also likely have to agree to completely abandon efforts to edit about Kelly Cilella. 331dot (talk) 19:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will abandon my efforts Perfectcheck373 (talk) 19:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Perfectcheck373 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will be honest and promise to follow Wikipedia rules of editing, and clearing any sockpuppet claims, I will make edits that are not connected to other accounts. I promise not to do any vandalism for this website.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. I cannot tell from your unblock request whether you are admitting this is true, or denying the accusation. PhilKnight (talk) 17:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Perfectcheck373 (talk) 19:16, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]