User talk:Pdcook/Archive 5
This is an archive of past discussions with Pdcook. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
< Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 > |
All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - ... (up to 100) |
from Brenda of accounting
Does that mean that if someone shamelessly promotes their company or creates an article about their company or returns periodically to write about their company, that they will be disciplined, particularly if they are upper level management or the founder of the business? As for me, I'll stay away from the Hyatt. It's actually a boring topic but today is a boring day at work.Brenda of accounting (talk) 21:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- If someone's edits are found to be in violation of the policies or guidelines of verifiability, neutral point of view, conflict of interest, then those edits need to be scrutinized and reverted if necessary. Certainly if what they're writing is spammy, the edits need to go. People who make such edits are warned, and if they continue, they may be blocked. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 21:09, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- What if it is an obscure company and they invent an article but use verifiable sources? I think that should not be allowed. Is that permitted? For example, if I started an article on a specific Hyatt hotel (which I won't, too boring) or if someone started an article about some dotcom company that they own and cite a source. Not allowed? Brenda of accounting (talk) 00:36, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
- It still violates the conflict of interest policy. That, however, is not immediate grounds for deletion of the article or blocking of the user. It certainly is conceivable that someone with a conflict of interest could write a neutral and appropriate article (although harder than one might think). If that is the case, the article should just be checked over by someone uninvolved. However, if the person created something that is not neutral or even spammy, those edits need to be reverted and/or cleaned up. If the user has persistent issues with this, they could be blocked for disruptive editing. As for the article itself, if the company meets the notability guidelines for companies and organizations, it ought not to be deleted, but just cleaned up. However, if the company simply isn't notable, as indicated by an absence of coverage in reliable sources, then the article should be deleted. I hope this helps. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 20:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- What if it is an obscure company and they invent an article but use verifiable sources? I think that should not be allowed. Is that permitted? For example, if I started an article on a specific Hyatt hotel (which I won't, too boring) or if someone started an article about some dotcom company that they own and cite a source. Not allowed? Brenda of accounting (talk) 00:36, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Sid Rawle
Thanks for the messages. I had thought about making a page about Sid when I was looking at the Stonehenge Free Festival's page, and the Windsor Free Festival, but decided against it, as Ubi Dwyer and Wally Hope (both deceased) already had one each, and Sid was living rather quietly in a bungalow near Symond's Yat. As you can see from the edit I reverted, he was controversial on many levels, and now he is dead, I thought it might be as well if he had a page up and running, to satisfy the curiosity of those who will inevitably be looking him up online now. There is no doubt that he was a notable figure, and knew just about everyone on the alternative scene, from Tony Benn to Jon Cainer and George Harrison. Allegations about him will doubtless surface, and may present difficulties to anyone interested in editing or watching his entry, but that's a risk which goes with the territory. g88keeper (talk) 17:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- There seems to be decent coverage of this person in reliable sources, so I think I can take the notability tag down. The sourcing is a little bit iffy, and I've been working on that a little. It's important that all claims in the article are backed up by reliable sources. So as long as the article is sound and well-sourced, people can add as much controversial info as they want, it will just get reverted unless they can prove their claims and follow Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Best regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 13:47, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
I do agree that verification is most desirable, and have researched as widely as I can, to supplement my own knowledge of the subject-matter, and have restored the references to Sid's part in the film Winstanley http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winstanley_(film) - I once wanted to add a photo of Edwin Greenwood, my late mother's first husband, to Greenwood's page on the IMDB, and it was not easy! Also, I saw the film ages ago, and Sid is definitely in it. There is a blog by Philip Carr-Gomm, dealing with Sid's death. Philip is the Chosen Chief of OBOD, a worldwide Druid Order, and a man of impeccable veracity. I wish I could say the same of Michael McGrath, who posted comments on the blog as himself and as 'druideire', but McGrath was associated with Sid in London in the early 70s, and I don't doubt that he is factually correct when talking of matters in which he was actually involved. I hope you will forgive me for restoring the material you had removed, which I would not have done without the certainty that it will, eventually, be verified. I have a lot to learn about how to engage with the format of Wikipedia, and am very grateful to you for your help in the first days of this article. g88keeper (talk) 20:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 September 2010
- Book review: Cognitive Surplus, by Clay Shirky
- WikiProject report: Putting articles in their place: the Uncategorized Task Force
- Features and admins: Bumper crop of admins; Obama featured portal marks our 150th
- Arbitration report: Interim desysopping, CU/OS appointments, and more
- Technology report: Development transparency, resource loading, GSoC: extension management
Lebanese American University
I do have a client with an interest in the LAU. Most of my changes I made were to better organize the page. Of those changes that added new information, I did source the changes. Please let me know if there are particular edits that you take issue with, or feel free to edit them if you feel like they are not neutral. I'm not sure what your interest is in the LAU, but the article itself is poorly written and needs work, so anything you can do to improve it would be greatly appreciated! LebaneseAmerican (talk) 13:23, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
- I have responded here. Basically, some of your edits seems OK, but others aren't particularly neutral. If I get time I can go through the article and clean things up. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:56, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
I'm so sorry for not following through with talking to the user. Other stuff came up and I've been out of the house since. Apologies, Mr. R00t Talk 00:03, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
- No worries. Thanks for the note. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 01:59, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Ever consider....
Adminship? I was the one who gave an editor review. While I was still new at the time and didn't understand RFA that well, I've gained experience around RFA and other parts of Wikipedia. You've popped up on my watchlist a few times recently and after some rsearching, I believe you could be a good admin. Derild4921☼ 00:03, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- I have considered it, and thanks for your support. It's an intensive process and I don't want to jump into it too quickly. I'll have to stew over it for a few days. I'll be out of town for Labor Day weekend, so I'll get back to you next week. Thanks, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:39, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. Just think it over the weekend. I'll also be busy in the weekend so get back whenever you can. Thanks! Derild4921☼ 14:44, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Just badgering you for a reply :P. Derild4921☼ 00:29, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- Gosh, here we are and it's Friday already. I think I'm going to have to kick this down the road a month or so. I've got a full plate next week and will be out of town for a portion of the week after. Maybe bug me about this again later! Thanks, though. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 00:33, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- Sure no problem! :P. Derild4921☼ 00:35, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- Gosh, here we are and it's Friday already. I think I'm going to have to kick this down the road a month or so. I've got a full plate next week and will be out of town for a portion of the week after. Maybe bug me about this again later! Thanks, though. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 00:33, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- Just badgering you for a reply :P. Derild4921☼ 00:29, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. Just think it over the weekend. I'll also be busy in the weekend so get back whenever you can. Thanks! Derild4921☼ 14:44, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Reverted article
Thank you for the response to my question on help desk. I had explained why the article Baloch people needed massive corrections. Is it possible for you to have a look at my [Sandbox] for the article? I do not know what else to do after wasting so much of time and I also do not get time to fight online wars with long term editors who keep reverting my article. I believed I made considerable improvements in the article after first warnings, but then the page got reverted again by another editor. I fear this happening again and again as I think the article was being closely watched to prevent healthy contribution because what was already there had massive inaccuracies including signs of personal attack but went unnoticed. Thank you for your time. BalochMedia (talk) 20:17, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- I am not by any means an expert on this topic and thus I shouldn't be the one to review your version. I think AtticusX's comments on your talk page are the way to go. Link to your sandbox article from the article's talk page and see what others think. You also might want to draw attention to the matter by mentioning it at the various WikiProjects listed the top of the article's talk page (WikiProject Ethnic groups, WikiProject Iran, etc.). You could also try Wikipedia:Requests for comment. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 20:23, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- It seems this has been sorted out. Thanks for discussing this. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 19:43, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 September 2010
- News and notes: Page-edit stats, French National Library partnership, Mass page blanking, Jimbo on Pending changes
- Public Policy Initiative: Experiments with article assessment
- Sister projects: Biography bloopers – update on the Death Anomalies collaboration
- WikiProject report: Getting the picture – an interview with the Graphic lab
- Features and admins: "Magnificent" warthog not so cute, says featured picture judge
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 20 September 2010
- From the editor: New ways to read and share the Signpost
- News and notes: Dutch National Archives donation, French photo raid, brief notes
- In the news: Rush Limbaugh falls for Wikipedia hoax, Public Policy Initiative, Nature cites Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: All Aboard WikiProject Trains
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Dispatches: Tools, part 2: Internal links and page histories
- Arbitration report: Discretionary sanctions clarification and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Hi Pdcook
Hi :) Dropped in here to say a quick thanks for your vote in my RfA. More than the vote, I loved your comments :) Went a long way. Thanks and best. Wifione ....... Leave a message 15:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 September 2010
- News and notes: French million, controversial content, Citizendium charter, Pending changes, and more
- WikiProject report: Designing WikiProject Architecture
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: EEML amendment requests & more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Grand Valley State University
I have started a GA review and left a few thoughts. You have obviously worked hard to improve the article. It will take some time for me to check these sources and references, but the work has begun. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 11:46, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- Great! Thanks for your input. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 12:07, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- I've been trying to fix some issues the best I can with the time I have. I might also have another editor interested in helping. Let me know if there is anything in particular you need help with. Demhem (talk) 05:05, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help! I would say concentrate on the points Racepacket made on the GA page. The second reviewer brings up some good points, but generally it's the first reviewer's decision whether the article passes or fails. We can address the other comments later. Unfortunately I have several documents I need to write for work, and my writing energy will be quite depleted for the next several days. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:10, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- Any energy coming back? Racepacket (talk) 09:50, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- I'm wrapping up this project for work today, and after that I'll be out for the weekend. I suspect next week I can get back to the GVSU article. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 13:54, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Any energy coming back? Racepacket (talk) 09:50, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help! I would say concentrate on the points Racepacket made on the GA page. The second reviewer brings up some good points, but generally it's the first reviewer's decision whether the article passes or fails. We can address the other comments later. Unfortunately I have several documents I need to write for work, and my writing energy will be quite depleted for the next several days. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:10, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- I've been trying to fix some issues the best I can with the time I have. I might also have another editor interested in helping. Let me know if there is anything in particular you need help with. Demhem (talk) 05:05, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Brenda Jean Patrick (Orphan Status)
Dear Pd,
Earlier in the year, my article on Brenda Jean Patrick was accepted for Wikipedia, but listed as an orphan because there were no internal Wikipedia links to it. I have discovered that one of her clients--Prosper Independent School District (Proper ISD)--has mentioned her in its listing. However, where her name is the typeface has not turned blue (indicating a hyperlink, I assume) as it did when articles referenced in her article created links automatically. Shouldn't a link have been created automatically in the Prosper ISD article? If not, how do I create a link?
Thank you. Captaincorgi (talk) 22:23, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- To add a wikilink to an article, edit the page and add a double pair of brackets around the title of the article. For instance, to link to the Texas article, you would type [[Texas]]. Please review this page. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 03:14, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 October 2010
- WikiProject report: Hot topics with WikiProject Volcanoes
- Features and admins: Milestone: 2,500th featured picture
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Code reviewers, October Engineering update, brief news
Bicycle sharing
On the Bicycle sharing system page, the list of systems has reached the point where it deserves its own page, I think. Please leave any comment at the talk page. I plan to implement that in a few days. Earthlyreason (talk) 11:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Commented there. Thanks, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:52, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Bothering...
Bugging you as promised! Derild4921☼ 19:53, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks again. I recently undertook the endeavor of making Grand Valley State University a good article. That is going to occupy much of my time. Perhaps after I get that squared away. Here I go again kicking this down the road... P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:54, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 October 2010
- News and notes: Board resolutions, fundraiser challenge, traffic report, ten thousand good articles, and more
- In the news: Free culture conference, "The Register" retracts accusations, students blog about Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Smithsonian Institution
- Features and admins: Big week for ships and music
- Dispatches: Tools, part 3: Style tools and wikEd
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Drug Strategies Article
Dear PD,
A couple of months ago, my article on Drug Strategies was deleted for lack of sufficient documentation of notability. I have found a few more web-based sources and am wondering if you can take a look and let me know if these satisfy wikipedia's requirements? The extra sources are about Drug Strategies' nation-wide awards, the Nancy Dickerson Whitehead Awards, that they presented to journalists reporting on drug issues for ten years. URL's are below and I've rewritten the article to include mention of the awards. Thanks so much and please let me know if I can provide any more information.
http://web.kitsapsun.com/redesign/2003-11-14/local/315884.shtml
http://www2.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/11-15-2001/0001616954&EDATE=
http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_product=RO&p_theme=ro&s_dispstring=(oxycontin)&p_field_date-0=YMD_date&p_params_date-0=date:B,E&p_text_date-0=2002&p_field_advanced-0=&p_text_advanced-0=("oxycontin")&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&xcal_useweights=no
Sybilcarpenter (talk) 15:54, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- I'll look into this a little more later, but in my opinion, those references aren't substantial enough to pass WP:CORP. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:56, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
RE: Kaplan False Claims Act Lawsuits / USDOJ Backs Fraud Lawsuits Against Kaplan
...No so-called "undue weight" whatsoever, ol' chap.
With regard to the sections *I* authored on Kaplan:
- THIS*** IS WHO THESE PEOPLE ARE!!!
- THIS*** IS THE RECORD **THEY CREATED** FOR **THEMSELVES**!!!
- BY THEIR DEEDS, YOU SHALL KNOW THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!*****
Prospective students frequently tend to reference online sources in attempting to make an INFORMED decision in charting their higher education pathways in life.
THE TRUTH IS ***OWED*** to these prospective students with regard to the RECORD that this institution has EARNED FOR ITSELF in the courts with regard to these NUMEROUS FRAUD COMPLAINTS!!!
Once again,
- THIS*** IS WHO THESE PEOPLE ARE!!!
- THIS*** IS THE RECORD **THEY CREATED** FOR **THEMSELVES**!!!
If *I* were in the place of these prospective students, *I* would want to be informed of an institution's INFRACTIONS AGAINST THE LAW *PRIOR* to plunking down my hard earned cash!!!
Again, I repeat, THE TRUTH IS ***OWED*** to these prospective students!!!!!!!!!!!!
I HAVE MET THE *VERY* HIGHEST STANDARDS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY.
FURTHERMORE, AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, BY PERMITTING THIS INFORMATION TO BE PUBLISHED ON A MASS SCALE --
WIKIPEDIA *ITSELF* MEETS THE ***VERY HIGHEST*** STANDARDS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY!!!!!!!
Accordingly, I apologize for precisely nothing.
Ever the gentleman, -V- HeywoodJabloeme (talk) 11:02, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Please review WP:UNDUE again. And please don't shout. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:55, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 October 2010
- News and notes: Wikipedia fundraiser event, Frankfurt book fair, news in brief
- WikiProject report: Show Me the Money: WikiProject Numismatics
- Features and admins: A week for marine creatures
- Dispatches: Common issues seen in Peer review
- Arbitration report: Climate change case closes after 4 months
- Technology report: Video subtitling tool, staff vs. volunteer developers, brief news
The Signpost: 25 October 2010
- News and notes: Mike Godwin leaves the Foundation, ArbCom election announced
- In the news: Good faith vs. bad faith, climate change, court citations, weirdest medieval fact, brief news
- WikiProject report: Nightmare on Wiki Street: WikiProject Horror
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- ArbCom interview: So what is being an arbitrator actually like?
- Arbitration report: Case closes within 1 month
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Happy Halloween
Puffin has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween! |
Puffin Lets talk! 13:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 November 2010
- In the news: Airplane construction with Wikipedia, lessons from the strategy project, logic over rhetoric
- WikiProject report: Scoring with WikiProject Ice Hockey
- Features and admins: Good-lookin' slugs and snails
- Arbitration report: Arb resignation during plagiarism discussion; election RfC closing in 2 days
- Technology report: Foundation office switches to closed source, secure browsing, brief news
I believe I fixed what you suggested today.
Please review and let me know if this is acceptable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranman13 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- There are still a few issues. The link provided in one of the references appears not to work. I have marked as a deadlink. There are also many statements about his personal life and experience that are not cited. Where did that information come from? If you are this person or you are closely associated with him, please be aware of Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline. I have tagged the article as containing original research. Once you can show that all of the information in the article comes from reliable and verifiable sources, then the OR tag can be removed. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 13:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 8 November 2010
- News and notes: Second Wikipedian in Residence, {{citation needed}} for sanity
- WikiProject report: WikiProject California
- Features and admins: No, not science fiction—real science
- Election report: The countdown begins
- Arbitration report: No cases this week; Date delinking sanctions reduced for one party; History ban extended
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 15 November 2010
- News and notes: Fundraisers start for Wikipedia and Citizendium; controversial content and leadership
- WikiProject report: Sizzling: WikiProject Bacon
- Features and admins: Of lakes and mountains
- Dispatches: A guide to the Good Article Review Process
- Arbitration report: No cases this week; Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Back again :)
And here I am for the first, second, third, fourth time (I think) and hopefully last time to badger you on a RFA as it seems you have returned to a normal amount of editing. Derild4921☼ 00:42, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, hi. Sorry I didn't see this posting. I can't say I'm back to a normal amount of editing. It's sill an on-off thing for me right now, as work is keeping me quite busy. When I do get back into things (which will probably be January), I want to spend some time dealing with the Grand Valley State University article. Even though they say being an admin is no big deal, the RfA process has become a huge deal. The tone of some of the comments there over the past few months astonishes me. If I go through with such a thing, I want to give it my full attention. Would anyone co-nom me? It would certainly make a stronger case. Just a thought. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:54, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- No problem, just hit my talk page whenever you're ready. I'm not sure if anyone is willing to co-nom...has anyone offered a nomination before me? Derild4921☼ 20:26, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Someone offered a couple times before, but he's since retired. I'll let you know when I'm ready. Thanks and happy editing, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 20:54, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- No problem, just hit my talk page whenever you're ready. I'm not sure if anyone is willing to co-nom...has anyone offered a nomination before me? Derild4921☼ 20:26, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 November 2010
- News and notes: No further Bundesarchiv image donations; Dutch and German awards; anniversary preparations
- Book review: The Myth of the Britannica, by Harvey Einbinder
- WikiProject report: WikiProject College Football
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: Candidates still stepping forward
- Arbitration report: Brews ohare site-banned; climate change topic-ban broadened
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Grand Valley State University
I hope that you have not given up your aspirations to elevate the article to GA. If you address the prior concerns, I would be happy to give it a prompt review upon renomination. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 19:46, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- I have not given up. I got a bit overwhelmed with the additional points GrapedApe brought up and needed a break. Now I'm quite busy and probably won't be able to do much with it until January. Thanks for all your help! P. D. Cook Talk to me! 21:27, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 November 2010
- In the news: Fundraising banners continue to provoke; plagiarism charges against congressional climate change report
- WikiProject report: Celebrate WikiProject Holidays
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: Voting in full swing
- Arbitration report: New case: Longevity; Biophys topic ban likely to stay in place
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Thank you
Thank you for your support at my RfA last week. I'll do everything I can to live up to your expectations and if you ever need help from a janitor please feel free to drop me a line! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 22:30, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 December 2010
- News and notes: ArbCom tally pending; Pediapress renderer; fundraiser update; unreferenced BLP drive
- WikiLeaks: Repercussions of the WikiLeaks cable leak
- WikiProject report: Talking copyright with WikiProject Copyright Cleanup
- Features and admins: Birds and insects
- Arbitration report: New case: World War II
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 13 December 2010
- Rencontres Wikimédia: Wikimedia and the cultural sector: two days of talks in Paris.
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Algae
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: The community has spoken
- Arbitration report: Requested amendment re Pseudoscience case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Papandreou Family
It is common knowledge amongst the Greek people that the Papandreou spouses were all Jewish. The fact that there are no reliable quotable sources should be obvious- the authorities in Greece, run by the Papandreou mafia, have suppressed the truth. Believe me they are technically Jews-after all in the Jewish religion if your mother is Jewish then you are Jewish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.25.223.96 (talk) 14:45, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
- If you are going to claim that someone is a cryto-Jew, then per WP:V, you'll need to provide a source. Please review WP:BLP as well. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:48, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Papandreou Family
You say I have to pr0vide a source. Why not classify me as a source?
- Please review WP:V. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 16:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Template:Expand has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 22:49, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
- I generally don't !vote in issues when someone seems to be canvassing me, so I'll sit this one out. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 04:01, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Needed references, but actually not notable
User talk:Eddster created Porters Sideling, Pennsylvania and you said it needed references.
I agree, needed references, probably not notable, but Eddster continues to create a great many such articles in Adams County, Pennsylvania and York County, Pennsylvania, so I am looking for help in stopping this pattern of creating many basically useless articles. In a few cases, unincorporated places may be notable because of their history or nearby bridges or the like, and I created one myself, but if they are complete orphans, there is no point.
What would you suggest we do? Can you help? --DThomsen8 (talk) 15:10, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry I didn't get back to you right away. I agree the notability is in question here, and I certainly wouldn't be making articles about such insignificant places myself. However, I think there are many who believe that physical places such as unincorporated communities are inherently notable, so you might get a little resistance at AfD. As long as WP:V is satisfied, I personally don't see much harm in the articles. I think there is less concern here than there would be for less notable people, businesses, bands, etc. If you want a wider opinion, you could drop a line at WP:N/N. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 18:58, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 December 2010
- News and notes: Article Alerts back from the dead, plus news in brief
- Image donation: Christmas gift to Commons from the State Library of Queensland
- Discussion report: Should leaked documents be cited on Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: Majestic Titans
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motion passed in R&I case; ban appeals, amendment requests, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 27 December 2010
- Ambassadors: Wikipedia Ambassador Program growing, adjusting
- WikiProject report: WikiProject National Basketball Association (NBA)
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Registered username
Hello,
I have received this message from you:
"Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username (Infonomics Society) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it gives the impression that this account is registered to a group or organization. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 17:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC)"
First of all, thank you for the welcome and please be patient as I am new here and not familiarised with the rules.
I have created this account for the organisation named Infonomics Society. I am in charge with promoting the activities organised by Infonomics Society on the Internet. May I use this user name?
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Infonomics Society (talk • contribs) 12:36, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Welcome again! You may not use that username. Please review the WP:USERNAME policy. Usernames must be registered to individuals, not organizations. I recommend changing your name or simply registering a new one. Also please review WP:NOT, as Wikipedia is a reference source, not a place to promote an organization. Please ask if you have anymore questions. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 15:49, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 3 January 2011
- 2010 in review: Review of the year
- In the news: Fundraising success media coverage; brief news
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Redux
- Features and admins: Featured sound choice of the year
- Arbitration report: Motion proposed in W/B – Judea and Samaria case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Hello, I created the page List of songs by Taylor Swift without aware/known that the page List of Taylor Swift songs previously nominated for deletion.
The page created by mine has new layout and I really hope that it will be kept, as I will make further improvement to it. Have your say here, thank you. I will notice other users joined above AfD, too. Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 08:40, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'd still say delete, but thanks. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 20:26, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 January 2011
- News and notes: Anniversary preparations, new Community fellow, brief news
- In the news: Anniversary coverage begins; Wikipedia as new layer of information authority; inclusionist project
- WikiProject report: Her Majesty's Waterways
- Features and admins: Featured topic of the year
- Arbitration report: World War II case comes to a close; ban appeal, motions, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 17 January 2011
- WikiProject report: Talking wicket with WikiProject Cricket
- Features and admins: First featured picture from the legally disputed NPG images; two Chicago icons
- Arbitration report: New case: Shakespeare authorship question; lack of recent input in Longevity case
- Technology report: January Engineering Update; Dutch Hack-a-ton; brief news
GVSU Notable Alumni
I have a list of GVSU Notable alumni that I would like to create pages for. I would also like to know if you think that they are notable within wiki standards.
- State Representative Thomas Hooker
- State Representative Bob Genetski
- State Representative Frank Foster
- Host of new Travel Channel series "The Wild Within" and author, Steven Rinella
- Author Paul Clemens who has several published books and recently was interviewed on the Daily Show with John Stewart
Let me know what you think. I personally believe they are worthy of a page as there are numerous publications about them on the internet and within printed publications. I would possibly like someone to collaborate with as I am not very experienced with biographies. Demhem (talk) 06:38, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm glad to see that you want to create more pages! The guideline of notability (and thus weather or not the article should be made) is expressed here. The general notability standard is that multiple, independent reliable sources give in depth coverage of the topic/person. So a quick minor mention of someone in the Grand Rapids Press would not make the person notable, but if a few articles about that person were published in newspapers, magazines, books, etc., the s/he probably satisfies the notability guidelines.
- There are also special notability guidelines. One of them is WP:POLITICIAN. This states that (I'm paraphrasing), among others, members of any federal/national or first sub-national level (state) legislatures are inherently notable. Therefore, the first three people are definitely notable and worthy of articles. Just be sure that WP:V and WP:RS are being followed. It's OK to use their government page as a reference, but be a little cautious about using their campaign page as the only source (it's probably OK to reference it for biographical detail). It's best to find sources in newspapers or publications from non-partisan groups.
- The other two folks you mention might also qualify under special guidelines as well, such as WP:ENT, WP:CREATIVE or WP:AUTHOR. If they've won a notable award, they are notable. But it will probably come down to coverage in reliable sources. If you want to create userspace drafts (User:Demhem/Steven Rinella and User:Demhem/Paul Clemens), I'd be happy to look over the references and give my opinion. Good luck! P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:43, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, and definitely familiarize yourself with WP:BLP, the policy regarding the biography of living people. If you just stick to the facts as presented in reliable sources, you're probably OK. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 15:14, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 January 2011
- News and notes: Wikimedia fellow working on cultural collaborations; video animation about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Life Inside the Beltway
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: 23 editors submit evidence in 'Shakespeare' case, Longevity case awaits proposed decision, and more
- Technology report: File licensing metadata; Multimedia Usability project; brief news
Thermo Fisher
I noted that Thermo Fisher had been removed as an employer. The site in Fitchburg employs over 400 employees, ranging from manufacturing and production to PhD level scientists and engineers. We actively recruit a diverse candidate base from around the US (and globe) and it is beneficial to have it listed as an employer. I am the corporate recruiter for the site and I respectfully ask that you leave it posted. It is in fact larger than some of the small biotech companies that remain.
Kind regards,
PMcMillerPMcMiller (talk) 22:37, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- A couple of points. First, generally companies that are founded or headquartered in Madison are listed in that section. Other companies that maintain large branches are sometimes listed. Some folks say a company ought to have 500 employees to be listed there, but that might be a bit arbitrary. I do not own the Madison article, and if you want to add it back, you could mention it first on the article's talk page. But as you have indicated above, you are affiliated with the company and have a clear conflict of interest. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 22:43, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 January 2011
- The Science Hall of Fame: Building a pantheon of scientists from Wikipedia and Google Books
- WikiProject report: WikiWarriors
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Evidence in Shakespeare case moves to a close; Longevity case awaits proposed decision; AUSC RfC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 7 February 2011
- News and notes: New General Counsel hired; reuse of Google Art Project debated; GLAM newsletter started; news in brief
- WikiProject report: Stargazing aboard WikiProject Spaceflight
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Open cases: Shakespeare authorship – Longevity; Motions on Date delinking, Eastern European mailing list
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Covance Inc.
This is in response to Covance Inc., being removed from the 'Business' section on Madison's wiki page. While Covance Inc. might not be the biggest employer in Madison, they have atleast a 1000 employees here (and they have a major presence in the area). Also, it is one of the top Contrat Research Organizations in the country (and is very well known atleast in the pharmaceutical world).
By CNN Money (in 2009): "In addition to the university, the Wisconsin state government is the area's other biggest employer. But recently, the economy has moved away from government-centered jobs as more biotech health services companies, including Covance, Epic Systems and Meriter Health Services, moved in to support " http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2009/moneymag/0912/gallery.Best__places_employment.moneymag/7.html
By the Wisconsin State Journal (in 2006): "It's a call for arms from Covance, one of the world's largest drug-testing companies and one of Madison's biggest employers. " Reference: http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/478731/at_covance_people_volunteer_for_cash_causes/
Also, Covance had a major expansion project in the area a few years ago (in 2004): http://www.covance.com/investors/financial-info/press-releases/press-release.php?reqtype=releasetxt&reqid=784770
I request that Covance be added back to the wiki page.
Uma Manian (talk) 19:32, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- It appears that an IP editor already added it back, and you subsequently removed it. So I'm not sure what the issue is here. If you want to add it back that's fine, but it would be best if you cited sources that demonstrate the company is major employer. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 20:15, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Ya that IP address was me..(I added it back as I did not know why it was deleted..and then I saw your comment in the 'View History' section..so deleted it!). I am pretty new to editting and stuff. I'll add it to Madison's talk page. Thanks for your suggestion :) Uma Manian (talk) 20:24, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- My guess is that Covance is a big enough company to be listed there. Including an independent source with the entry will help ensure it stays. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 20:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
ok. I'll add it in along with an independent source then. Thanks! Uma Manian (talk) 20:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 February 2011
- News and notes: Foundation report; gender statistics; DMCA takedowns; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia wrongly blamed for Super Bowl gaffe; "digital natives" naive about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Articles for Creation
- Features and admins: RFAs and active admins—concerns expressed over the continuing drought
- Arbitration report: Proposed decisions in Shakespeare and Longevity; two new cases; motions passed, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 21 February 2011
- News and notes: Gender gap and sexual images; India consultant; brief news
- In the news: Egyptian revolution and Wikimania 2008; Jimmy Wales' move to the UK, Africa and systemic bias; brief news
- WikiProject report: More than numbers: WikiProject Mathematics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Longevity and Shakespeare cases close; what do these decisions tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Grand Valley State
Please consider finishing the clean up and resubmitting the article for a GA review. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 23:57, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- Probably in the next couple weeks I can tackle that project. Off-wiki activities have consumed much of my writing energies as of late. Keep pestering me if I don't get on it soon! Thanks, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 00:45, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 February 2011
- News and notes: Newbies vs. patrollers; Indian statistics; brief news
- Arbitration statistics: Arbitration Committee hearing fewer cases; longer decision times
- WikiProject report: In Tune with WikiProject Classical Music
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC applications open; interim desysopping; two pending cases
- Technology report: HTML5 adopted but soon reverted; brief news
Hi Mr Cook-re Nobility in Sicily
Thanks so much for you assistance. I am relatively new to Wikipedia however I felt that my research might be of use to your community. Im not teaching tomorrow so apart from grading a few papers i will have time to dedicate to the article. I see there's quite a bit of info on the site so i will get moving quickly. I will be sure to write if i have further questions. thanks again and wish me luck! Sven — Preceding unsigned comment added by Italian-royalty (talk • contribs) 23:43, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
McGill Lead re Public/Private Character
We who oppose the duplication of the lead and info box do not wish to engage in an edit war. That is precisely why we are trying to establish or propose a consensus: put it either in lead or info box but not both, and let the author Elkevo choose. But she keeps editing it. Jenilyn834 (talk) 06:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- The fact is that you are edit warring. You have violated Wikipedia policy and you could be blocked right now. Your opinion appears not to be based on policy or tradition, but rather some personal desire. The next step is dispute resolution, so I hope you'll just let this one go and realize that it is perfectly appropriate to include public in both the infobox and lead. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 06:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
My page was deleted
Hi Mr. pdcook, I was very pleased when i saw how youd linked my page to other relevant pages however i noticed another moderator erased it soon after. I was warned by colleagues of mine who dont use the service how this happens more often than not. I am not sure exactly why i was unable to finish the page. Much of the information is new and from my personal research of source materials in Sicily, Argentina and Switzerland. Do you have any ideas how i can get this information out there? What i can do, within reason, to the information to have it up on wikipedia? I am slightly disappointed as so much of wat i had written is new. The fact that there was a different page on sicilian nobility simply listing individual families from the 14th century (theres been 700 year history since then ;-) seeems to be the reason why it was deleted. Any ideas would help. Thanks very much for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Italian-royalty (talk • contribs) 10:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not really sure that I understand what the issue is here. Did you have another page besides User:Italian-royalty/Nobility in sicily? P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
McGill RfC
Thanks for starting an RfC! That was to be my next step, too, but you beat me to it. ElKevbo (talk) 20:07, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! P. D. Cook Talk to me! 22:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Mr Cook-re Nobility in Sicily
Sorry for bothering you but it appears that the page has been deleted again. I dont really understand why as the majority of the text is unique, its all verifiable and it seems to be set up correctly. Can you assist? it seems that theres someone who ive not spoken with about the article, possibly another moderator that is deleting it. I worked really hard on it, feel that so much of the information is worthwhile to people studying this part of Italian history that its a true loss. Can u assist and tell me whats happening?
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Italian-royalty (talk • contribs) 23:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Not sure if my page was deleted-maybe its st
Hi,I just sent you a message informing you that my page had been deleted. it appears that it has not been deleted and i was reading an earlier message. I am entirely new to wikipedia and i feel quite foolish. sorry
I have finished the article however and feel that its ready to be posted. there still might be some errors with my refereces/bibliography-im not entirely sure.
I was also unable to link some to other wiki pages for some odd reason nor post the photos i wanted to upload. neither have any bearing on the article however. Still any assistance would be helpful. If you see any issues with my article please let me know so i can make the necessary adjustments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Italian-royalty (talk • contribs) 23:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- It can take quite some time to learn how Wikipedia works. What is important is that you are willing to communicate with other editors - that is critical.
- It appears that your User:Italian-royalty/Nobility in sicily article cites sources, but it could use inline citations. You can use Reftools or this wizards to generate the full reference tag. This helps the article meet the requirements of verifiability. As I am not remotely an expert in the areas of Sicily or nobility, I would recommend getting input from other editors who are. You can drop a note at WikiProject Sicily, Wikiproject Italy and/or WikiProject Royalty and Nobility. If I find a few minor fixes I can make to your article, I'll go ahead and do it. I hope this helps. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:08, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- I cleaned up a few minor Manual of Style things and added a (poor) lead section. Feel free to rewrite the lead, but every article needs to have one. Another thing that is important is to provide wikilinks to the people mentioned in the article. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:22, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks I appreciate it. The lead paragraph looks fine-i might adjust it a tad however thanks for the info and assisting me with it.
continuation-
Some of the people i mentioned in the article are already in the Wiki database with specific pages dedicated to them (G. Tomasi the Prince of Lampedusa) however most are not. Are you saying that i need to create links myself or that i need to link the names to an existing articles? I was going to write a second article on the Catalog of Barons as i noticed that theres not one in English. two of the names i mentioned are in the Catalog, and i thought would really work.Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Italian-royalty (talk • contribs) 18:29, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- If there are existing articles for people you mention in the article you are writing, link to them. Best, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 18:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I think the article is ready to go. Whats the next step? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Italian-royalty (talk • contribs) 19:39, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Some of the people i mentioned in the article are already in the Wiki database with specific pages dedicated to them (G. Tomasi the Prince of Lampedusa) however most are not. Are you saying that i need to create links myself or that i need to link the names to an existing articles? I was going to write a second article on the Catalog of Barons as i noticed that theres not one in English. two of the names i mentioned are in the Catalog, and i thought would really work.Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Italian-royalty (talk • contribs) 19:49, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 March 2011
- News and notes: Foundation looking for "storyteller" and research fellows; new GLAM newsletter; brief news
- Deletion controversy: Deletion of article about website angers gaming community
- WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Feminism
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case opened after interim desysop last week; three pending cases
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
didnt mean to duplicate what id already written-sorry. Im still learning....I meant to add I have a paper i wrote on the catalog of the Barons that i will link to this and other pages dealing with this period. Seems as though theres a page in Italian but nothing in English so it might prove useful. i will submit that shortly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Italian-royalty (talk • contribs) 19:53, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
had a hard time editng that last talk page
I figured I would start a new talk page. I am still pretty pathetic with the technical side of wikipedia and it appears i have duplicated something id writte earlier, instead of addressing the issues i wanted to. i really have n idea why....
I wanted to say that I have finished the article following the advice youd given. I was going to link my page on nobility in Sicily with a wikipage on the catalog of Barons however i noticed that it was only in italian and the Italian wiki site. i have a paper on the subject and will post that once this article is up and running. Can you tell what I need to do next?
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Italian-royalty (talk • contribs) 22:17, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- No worries. It can take a while to learn the ins and outs of Wikipedia. I left a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sicily for folks who know something about this topic to take a look at your article. It still would be best if you used inline citations. This is the best way to meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and it helps to ensure that the work contains no original research and does not violate any copyrights. Hopefully some folks from the Wikiprojects will take an interest. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 22:51, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thanks. i noted that you communicated with a few other people interested in this area. i think thats a good idea-if they can assist getting this onto the main page. I dont know what their qualifications are in this area-hopefully they are lecturers on the subject as well so they can add something useful to my article.
but Can you tell me exactly what you need me to cite? When i wrote a paper for a university project a few yrs back,most of the text i am using is based on the paper, i merely gave my sources, neve cited actual paragraphs etc. If you can tell me exactly what i need to cite/confirm i will do that. I have checked a few other articles and will try and make the necessary adjustments however i really on understand what needs to be done. I just want to get this page up and running so i can add the catalog of barons article.
I also noted that the other person you wrote to dealing with this subject is looking for someone to assist with sicily as he doesnt have time. I will write to him and see if i can be of assistance> Ive written for journals, local papers as well as lectured on southern italy in my native sweden as well as abroad. all of the text in the article is that of my own- the info itself comes from verifiable sources, some from personal research ive performed etc, all of which ive cited in the reference section. As i dont usually cite individual paragraphs and page numbers in my articles i really dont know how best to do so.
i am actually from sweden and my interest in the Normans has taken me to the mezzogiorno a few times. I just want to get some of what ive learned out there.
Lastly, if we dont get a response from other editors, what do i need to do to get this up and running? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Italian-royalty (talk • contribs) 18:23, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- I went ahead and formatted most of the references. I also put the Telegraph article inline as an example. So if you could do the same for the other references, I think the article would be ready for the mainspace. Just copy the <ref name="X">...</ref> tags at the bottom of the article to the end of whichever statement or paragraph they need to go. If you wish to reference a work multiple times, you can simply type <ref name="X"/> and it will add citation X again. Let me know if you have anymore questions. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 15:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
I think Ive fathomed it out. I inserted the refs and it looks like, with the exception of a few symbols that appear in front of the sources I linked, that the paragraphs are linked to their respected sources. Do you think you can take a look and see what i did wrong so i know for next time... im considering posting an article on the Catalog and if I get assigned a different editor who isnt has helpful, this will give me a leg up-not sure exactly how your org works.... Either way ill just be happy to see this article in the "mainspace". its been hard as i have very little knowledge on programming. The hardest part has certainly been the setup and format preparation. Thanks for all of your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Italian-royalty (talk • contribs) 14:51, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 March 2011
- News and notes: Foundation reports editor trends, technology plans and communication changes; brief news
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case on AE sanction handling; AUSC candidates; proposed decision in Kehrli 2 and Monty Hall problem
- Technology report: Left-aligned edit links and bugfixes abound; brief news
Nomination of James Lighthill House for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Lighthill House is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Lighthill House until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mtking (talk) 23:45, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Commented there; thanks. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:22, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Italian royalty
I think Ive fathomed it out. I inserted the -refs and it looks like, with the exception of a few symbols that appear in front of the sources I linked, that the paragraphs are linked to their respected sources. Do you think you can take a look and see what i did wrong so i know for next time... im considering posting an article on the Catalog and if I get assigned a different editor who isnt has helpful, this will give me a leg up-not sure exactly how your org works.... Either way ill just be happy to see this article in the "mainspace". its been hard as i have very little knowledge on programming. The hardest part has certainly been the setup and format preparation. Thanks for all of your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Italian-royalty (talk • contribs) 14:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- The referencing looks decent enough now for the mainspace, so I moved it there and changed the name to Sicilian nobility for consistency with other similar articles. You might consider mentioning some of the people listed in Category:Sicilian_noble_families.
- Oh, and you're not "assigned" and editor - I just happened to come across your work and I am happy to keep helping you. I would still recommend creating a userspace draft of a new article first. Kind regards and let me know if you need anymore help. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 17:24, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks so much for your help. I doubt i would have been able to produce anything worthy of being in the database without it. Getting an article ready for the mainspace has been more technical that i anticipated. I am a novice when it comes to computers-tasks as simple as "linking" terms/names etc to other pages were entirely new to me. I should have been better prepared and had a finished piece ready before uploading it last month. i will be more prepared next time.
Thats a great idea regarding the individual families. I am carrying on with my research on a daily basis and might have enough information on several families to start individual pages by late Spring. I will be taking a trip to Palermo and meeting with several local historians and journalists. Hopefully i can compile enough information to write individual articles. In the meantime I will work on the catalog af the Barons. I am surprised theres nothing in the Wiki database on it other than what i found in Italian as it is such an important document. I will work on what i have already written up.
Certainly its a good idea to create a user draft first and i will defintiely do that. When i get to that point i will let you know via your talk page. i am sure i will have formatting issues so...thanks for you offer of assistance. Thanks again for all of your help . It has been greatly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Italian-royalty (talk • contribs) 13:03, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Happy to help. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 22:25, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 March 2011
- WikiProject report: Medicpedia — WikiProject Medicine
- Features and admins: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: One closed case, one suspended case, and two other cases
- Technology report: What is: localisation?; the proposed "personal image filter" explained; and more in brief
The Signpost: 28 March 2011
- News and notes: Berlin conference highlights relation between chapters and Foundation; annual report; brief news
- In the news: Sue Gardner interviewed; Imperial College student society launched; Indian languages; brief news
- WikiProject report: Linking with WikiProject Wikify
- Features and admins: Featured list milestone
- Arbitration report: New case opens; Monty Hall problem case closes – what does the decision tell us?
The Signpost: 4 April 2011
- News and notes: 1 April activities; RIAA takedown notice; brief news
- Editor retention: Fighting the decline by restricting article creation?
- WikiProject report: Out of this world — WikiProject Solar System
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments, new case, proposed decision for Coanda case, and motion regarding CU/OS
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
GVSU
The GA Review that we did together has become the subject of a Request for Comment. I would appreciate you sharing your views at: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Racepacket 2. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 01:29, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Commented there. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 16:46, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Kansas cities and mayors of 100,000 population requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hang on}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Mateinsixtynine (talk) 21:47, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Differences between templates
Besides the names of the templates (which appeared at the tops of each template, like "State of Kansas" does at the top of {{Kansas}}), the only differences are stylistic: for example, the old template had a colwidth of 20%, and the new one of 25%. The entire text of the old one was as follows:
1. Carl Brewer 2. Carl R. Gerlach 3. Joe Reardon 4. Bill Bunten 5. Michael Copeland (Wichita) (Overland Park) (Kansas City) (Topeka) (Olathe)
and the only differences between that and the new one was the presence on the new one of "D" and "R" to indicate party affiliation. I suspect that the "two links" bit referred to redlinks: we don't have any articles on Reardon or Copeland, and Gerlach was created after the TFD. Did I address all your concerns, or did I miss something? Nyttend (talk) 11:58, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- I understand that the content of the template is basically the same. I figured that the addition of the Gerlach article made the previous deletion reason no longer strictly true, as the nominator pointed out that "currently only two mayors even have links to an article." Now there are three. It seems to me that TFD is a better route here, but I'm not going to get all worked up over a minor template. Thanks, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 13:46, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- No, sorry: the only thing that matters is the content of the template itself. If you'd like to expand the template in some way, just let me know and I'll restore it in your userspace for you to work on it. Nyttend (talk) 13:59, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- Can you provide for me the proper interpretation of "this excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies..." (emphasis mine) under G4 at WP:CSD? Perhaps I am not understanding it correctly. Thanks, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:34, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- The point of the bit that you italicised is that we don't delete pages that are not substantially identical because the reason for the deletion generally doesn't apply. Nyttend (talk) 14:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- OK. I learn something new every day. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:57, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- The point of the bit that you italicised is that we don't delete pages that are not substantially identical because the reason for the deletion generally doesn't apply. Nyttend (talk) 14:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- Can you provide for me the proper interpretation of "this excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies..." (emphasis mine) under G4 at WP:CSD? Perhaps I am not understanding it correctly. Thanks, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:34, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- No, sorry: the only thing that matters is the content of the template itself. If you'd like to expand the template in some way, just let me know and I'll restore it in your userspace for you to work on it. Nyttend (talk) 13:59, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
CharmColor01
Hi, its me CharmColor01 my thing is that i am a very big fan of Eddsworld but I got everything right on the page i got the infobox and everything but it did not come up.... Talk to me! — Preceding unsigned comment added by CharmColor01 (talk • contribs)
- You removed an Articles for Deletion notice, on which it clearly states not to remove the notice. You are certainly free to re-add the infobox, but be sure you fix the errors. There were redlinks and other problems that need to be cleaned up. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:39, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 April 2011
- Recent research: Research literature surveys; drug reliability; editor roles; BLPs; Muhammad debate analyzed
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases closed – what does the Coanda decision tell us?
- Technology report: The Toolserver explained; brief news
Mayfield Middle School
You should not have redirected the page because I was still editing it with more information.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ClickmeHARDER (talk • contribs)
- You are more than welcome to continue working on it. Perhaps it would be better to work on a userspace draft. I made one here for you: User:ClickmeHARDER/Mayfield Middle School, Ryde. Feel free to edit that and if it meets WP:V and WP:N, it can go back out into the article space. Let me know if you need help. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 13:08, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 April 2011
- News and notes: Commons milestone; newbie contributions assessed; German community to decide on €200,000 budget; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia accurate on US politics, plagiarized in court, and compared to Glass Bead Game; brief news
- WikiProject report: An audience with the WikiProject Council
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Case comes to a close after 3 weeks - what does the decision tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Don't censor me brah, people just go with the "just another kinase" thing cuz it's PC...look up the real history...you are educated stupid...japanese anus kinase is real name —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.1.255.119 (talk) 21:56, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- I checked the references given in the article and I can't find "Japanes anus kinase" in them. Furthermore a Google search of "Japanes anus kinase" turns up nothing. Nice try. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 22:00, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 April 2011
- News and notes: Survey of French Wikipedians; first Wikipedian-in-Residence at Smithsonian; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Somerset
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Request to amend prior case; further voting in AEsh case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
help with wikification
Hello. In this edit of yours from 4 February 2010 you placed a {{wikify}} tag on the Antonino Isordia article. I became aware of the article only recently when it was put up for AFD. I suspected that the subject was notable enough to keep the article and that seems to be the consensus reached in the discussion. In trying to improve the article I have added an infobox, added several categories, added a separate section for "Works" and for "References", and I have added several internal wikilinks to the article. In the latter task I now find myself refraining from adding more links and removing some (such as the one to Spain) so as to avoid the practices discouraged at WP:OVERLINK. I was wondering if you might be able to help spot any further wikification that the article now needs. If so could you please post some hints at Talk:Antonino Isordia, and if not would you be willing to remove the tag? Thanks very much for your help in improving that article. 69.126.127.193 (talk) 02:56, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- I think it looks fine now and have removed the wikify and orphan tags. Good job! Let me know if I can be of further assistance. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 13:57, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the removal of the tags and the stub template as well as the promotion from stub to start class. I hope to find sources to fill out more biographical detail in the article, but that may take some time. I do appreciate your efforts and assistance. 69.126.127.193 (talk) 22:45, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- Happy to help. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 23:51, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the removal of the tags and the stub template as well as the promotion from stub to start class. I hope to find sources to fill out more biographical detail in the article, but that may take some time. I do appreciate your efforts and assistance. 69.126.127.193 (talk) 22:45, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 May 2011
- News and notes: Picture of the Year voting begins; Internet culture covered in Sweden and consulted in Russia; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Physics of a WikiProject: WikiProject Physics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two new cases open – including Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Call for RTL developers, varied sign-up pages and news in brief
The way Things work tv
Hi, I got all my information from IMDb, Millimages.com, various sites with epsidoe information, watching episodes, and the back of the DVD box Rutabagafacefool (talk) 19:15, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- OK. Well, it might be worth your while reviewing WP:V and WP:RS. All content on Wikipedia needs to be verifiable. IMDb and Millages.com are probably OK as reliable sources, but watching episodes might be considered original research, which is not verifiable and thus not appropriate for Wikipedia. The DVD box certainly is a reliable source and should be included in the references section. What other "various sites with episode information" did you find? Those should be cited as well. Thanks for creating this article and let me know if you need any help! Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 20:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
OK, here are the links to the "various sites" you asked for:
http://www.abc.net.au/abckids/shows/prog324.htm
http://tv.msn.com/tv/episode/the-way-things-work/take-it-to-the-bridge/ (just click an episode, this is where I got my airing information.)
Also, if you'd like to add any additional information to the article regarding the actual series, you're more than welcome to do so. Here's a link so you can see the episodes and decide for yourself if it needs anything edited. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QIShi2ERwY&playnext=1&list=PLF35403B475D10E86 (they're on a playlist) Thanks again for all your support on this article, you're being a great help! Many thanks and kind regards, Rutabagafacefool (talk) 07:49, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- OK, I'll take a look through these. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 17:24, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Want to change the username
Hi,thanks for helping. Need another help. I want to change my user name to "D!p.wikistudy". I have send a request to Wikipedia:Changing username/Simple but it doesn't change. Will it take long time? please help.Dip.wikistudy (talk) 07:34, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delayed response, but it appears this issue has been sorted out. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 17:23, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 May 2011
- In the news: Billionaire trying to sue Wikipedians; "Critical Point of View" book published; World Bank contest; brief news
- WikiProject report: Game Night at WikiProject Board and Table Games
- Features and admins: Featured articles bounce back
- Arbitration report: AEsh case comes to a close - what does the decision tell us?
Just a few points
Thanx for your guidance, its well recieved and appreciated .I am new to wiki, so it may be a while I understand all stuff .I do not add the {{stub}} only template everywhere.Its only when I don't understand which exact stub category to put it in. So I think ,making it stub ,is important ,so other exp. editors know it and can change category.
As far as that Hinrich Braren article was concerned ,Sorry. I wanted to put that inline reason i.e. nofootnotes ,but probably forgot. Sorry for that again. Sau6402 (talk) 03:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. Let me know if you have any questions or need help. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 11:43, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi there!
You are indeed correct, I need to find some better sources... I'm afraid I have some exams coming up, but I will hunt through some of the University archives to find some independent and reliable sources. Also, with regards to its notability, it is a prominent society at that University and has helped shape the careers of various politicians, as well as the dynamics of the Mile End area of London. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia and am still getting used to it. Thanks for helping! ChaucerGeoffrey (talk) 16:10, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Quite often clubs such as this fail to meet Wikipedia's notability guideline, but I thought this one might be notable due to its age and influence. The best way to demonstrate this is to find independent sources that not just mention the club, but are actually about the club. Let me know if you need help. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 18:18, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 May 2011
- WikiProject report: Back to Life: Reviving WikiProjects
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motions - hyphens and dashes dispute
- Technology report: Berlin Hackathon; April Engineering Report; brief news
DYK for Booker T. Washington High School (Memphis, Tennessee)
On 24 May 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Booker T. Washington High School (Memphis, Tennessee), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that U.S. President Barack Obama delivered the 2011 commencement speech at Booker T. Washington High School in Memphis, Tennessee? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 May 2011
- News and notes: GLAM workshop; legal policies; brief news
- In the news: Death of the expert?; superinjunctions saga continues; World Heritage status petitioned and debated; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Formula One
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Injunction – preliminary protection levels for BLP articles when removing PC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 30 May 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom referendum goes live; US National Archives residency; financial planning; brief news
- In the news: Collaboration with academia; world heritage; xkcd; eG8 summit; ISP subpoena; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Royal Railway
- Featured content: Whipping fantasies, American–British naval rivalry, and a medieval mix of purity and eroticism
- Arbitration report: Update – injunction from last week has expired
- Technology report: Wikimedia down for an hour; What is: Wikipedia Offline?
Tunisia's Ben Ali
Hi
a few years back you used to revert amy changes I made to the Zine Abidine Ben Ali page suggesting he was a dictator. Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.94.190 (talk) 14:52, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- I assume you're referring to this edit. I reverted your changes because they appeared to violate Wikipedia's policies of keeping a neutral point of view and verifiability. Given the events in Tunisia in the past year, I'm sure the article has since been extensively edited by multiple authors, so I bet the article is in fine shape now. In the future, if you're going to make such extensive changes, it might be best to discuss them on an article's talk page first. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 01:47, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 June 2011
- Board elections: Time to vote
- News and notes: Board resolution on controversial content; WMF Summer of Research; indigenous workshop; brief news
- Recent research: Various metrics of quality and trust; leadership; nerd stereotypes
- WikiProject report: Make your own book with Wikiproject Wikipedia-Books
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases pending resolution; temporary desysop; dashes/hyphens update
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Proposed Image Deletion
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 June 2011
- News and notes: Wikipedians 90% male and largely altruist; 800 public policy students add 8.8 million bytes; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Aircraft
- Featured content: Featured lists hit the main page
- Arbitration report: More workshop proposals in Tree shaping case; further votes in PD of other case
- Technology report: 1.18 extension bundling; mobile testers needed; brief news
The Signpost: 20 June 2011
- News and notes: WMF Board election results; Indian campus ambassadors gear up; Wikimedia UK plans; Malayalam Wikisource CD; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Elemental WikiProject
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: One case comes to a close; initiator of a new case blocked as sockpuppet
The Signpost: 27 June 2011
- WikiProject report: The Continuous Convention: WikiProject Comics
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision for Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
A cup of coffee for you!
To a former laker working hard to make GVSU a good article MOLEY (talk) 22:21, 3 July 2011 (UTC) |
- Thanks! I only wish I had more time to work on the article. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 July 2011
- News and notes: Picture of the Year 2010; data challenge; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Star-Spangled WikiProject
- Featured content: Two newly promoted portals
- Arbitration report: Arb resigns while mailing list leaks continue; Motion re: admin
Twinkle
Are you having trouble with twinkle too? Puffin Let's talk! 15:22, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, there must be a server problem. I've been doing things manually. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 15:23, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
- It seems that everything has cleared up. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 15:37, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 July 2011
- From the editor: Stepping down
- Higher education summit: Wikipedia in Higher Education Summit recap
- In the news: Britannica and Wikipedia compared; Putin award criticized; possible journalistic sockpuppeting
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Albums
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tree shaping case comes to a close
- Technology report: WMF works on its release strategy; secure server problems
The Signpost: 18 July 2011
- In the news: Fine art; surreptitious sanitation; the politics of kyriarchic marginalization; brief news
- WikiProject report: Earn $$$ free pharm4cy WORK FROM HOME replica watches ViAgRa!!!
- Featured content: Historic last launch of the Space Shuttle Endeavour; Teddy Roosevelt's threat to behead official; 18th-century London sex manual
- Arbitration report: Motion passed to amend 2008 case: topic ban and reminder
- Technology report: Code Review backlog almost zero; What is: Subversion?; brief news
The Signpost: 25 July 2011
- Wikimedian in Residence interview: Wikimedian in Residence on Open Science: an interview with Daniel Mietchen
- Recent research: Talk page interactions; Wikipedia at the Open Knowledge Conference; Summer of Research
- WikiProject report: Musing with WikiProject Philosophy
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case opened; hyphens and dashes update; motion
- Technology report: Protocol-relative URLs; GSoC updates; bad news for SMW fans; brief news
The Signpost: 01 August 2011
- In the news: Consensus of Wikipedia authors questioned about Shakespeare authorship; 10 biggest edit wars on Wikipedia; brief news
- Research interview: The Huggle Experiment: interview with the research team
- WikiProject report: Little Project, Big Heart — WikiProject Croatia
- Featured content: Featured pictures is back in town
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision submitted for one case
- Technology report: Developers descend on Haifa; wikitech-l discussions; brief news
Help!
Can you tell me how to add to a businesses page without having it appear to be promotional? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boston20112 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- It's tricky. You should first review WP:COI and WP:NPOV. Those pages will help you identify any conflict of interest you have and how to avoid sounding biased and promotional. If you are affiliated with the company you are writing about, you're on shaky ground. I would also suggest you read WP:FIRST for advice on how to write a new page. Feel free to start a user space draft; I'd be happy to review it for you. Let me know if you have specific questions. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 17:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the error on this page; it's amazing how long it persisted there unnoticed! Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 00:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I very much appreciate your having taken time to extend the courtesy of thanking me. Drphilharmonic (talk) 20:44, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 August 2011
- News and notes: Wikimania a success; board letter controversial; and evidence showing bitten newbies don't stay
- In the news: Israeli news focuses on Wikimania; worldwide coverage of contributor decline and gender gap; brief news
- WikiProject report: Shooting the breeze with WikiProject Firearms
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Manipulation of BLPs case opened; one case comes to a close
- Technology report: Wikimania technology roundup; brief news
The Signpost: 15 August 2011
- Women and Wikipedia: New Research, WikiChix
- WikiProject report: The Oregonians
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case opened, two more still in progress
- Technology report: Forks, upload slowness and mobile redirection
The Signpost: 22 August 2011
- News and notes: Girl Geeks edit while they dine, candidates needed for forthcoming steward elections, image referendum opens
- WikiProject report: Images in Motion – WikiProject Animation
- Featured content: JJ Harrison on avian photography
- Arbitration report: After eleven moves, name for islands now under arbitration
- Technology report: Engineering report, sprint, and more testers needed
The Signpost: 29 August 2011
- News and notes: Abuse filter on all Wikimedia sites; Foundation's report for July; editor survey results
- Recent research: Article promotion by collaboration; deleted revisions; Wikipedia's use of open access; readers unimpressed by FAs; swine flu anxiety
- Opinion essay: How an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tennis
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four existing cases
- Technology report: The bugosphere, new mobile site and MediaWiki 1.18 close in on deployment
Hello Pdcook!
You have marked this scientist as US-citizen. Writing the german-language article on him I couldn't find any hints on his nationality (except tons of Wikipedia mirrors and clones). Do you remember where you've found his US-citizenship?
Kindest regards, --Drahreg01 (talk) 04:39, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hello. He's been a scholar in the US for 60 years, so I think it's safe to assume he's a US citizen. His lab webpage shows him as an emeritus professor at UW-Madison, and it also shows the years he earned his degrees. I hope you find that sufficient. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 12:24, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
I am sorry Mr Cook but i do not know how to contact you. My colleague Sven at the university in Palermo, who is on sabbatical until December, set up the Sicily nobility page in English several months ago.I accessed this morning for my lesson in Sundsvall, Sweden and see that some of the information, which sven and I painstakingly researched ourselves for our thesis has been erased by a nameless person.Can you please tell me what happened? I dont understand how to use wikipedia. I have changed it to the manner it was before but am fearful that the same person will simply come in here without any credentials and erase the hard work we put in. My colleage tells me he worked with you for weeks on this page and doesnt understand. He has asked me to speak with you so we can sort it out without his help. Sincerely, Fabrizio — Preceding unsigned comment added by FabrizioParisi (talk • contribs) 08:32, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Sicilian Nobility
I am quite dismayed. I start teaching a class on sicilian aristocracy on the 11th, taking over for my colleague Sven. I noticed his wikipedia page has been edited in a heavy handed manner. Someone erased three paragraphs as well as his citations. Sven and I spent more than 14 months in Sicily meeting with & interviewing private families for a thesis we ahve written at the university of Catania and university of Solleftea. I dont know how to use wikipedia but would like you to make sure the paragraphs on Baron serramarrocco and the Vallon Ventimiglia family, which have been on the page since June, remain as they were.Is there a way i can be otified if this gentleman erases them again? I was able to add the text but have no idea how to link them to the citations. Can you please assist me?
Thanks for your time. Best regards, Fabrizio Parisi
Professore di Storia e Filosofia Catania e Univ di Solleftea — Preceding unsigned comment added by FabrizioParisi (talk • contribs) 09:24, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Sicilian Nobility
I was told to write to you. I am forwarding a letter i left for Cinda muse.
This is the first time I have used Wikipedia so please excuse my efforts. Can you please explain why three paragraphs from my colleagues wikipedia page on Sicilian Nobility, along with pertinent citations have been deleted? The paragraphs on "Barone Serramarrocco" and the Famiglia Ventimiglia Vallon were deleted entirely. The user that deleted them may not see their importance however for those of us in southern Italy that monitor and write about the lives and habits of contemporary aristocracy this act is criminal. Our island has been stripped of its tradition since the second world war. Academics at the University of Catania are trying to restore the respect our island warrants. Contemporary aristocracy is of the utmost importance to our island and sense of self. To delete all traces of what remains of our fragmented aristocracy, as this user who I am certain is NOT A SICLILIAN, has done so insensitively, reeks of censorship. It is a blatant attack on our culture and deliberate revision of our history. Not only were citations specific to the deleted paragraphs erased by this user but sources used in the writing of paragraphs he decided to leave were as well. I tried to restore the references but believe i did so incorrectly and you reversed them.This user also added some information to the text without citing his source material. I have no issues leaving some of the information he added re Infante Carlos as this is not our area of expertise and any additional information is helpful, but to erase information drawn from months of painstaking research and primary source material my students and i have spent so much time digging through is criminal. I am sorry if i am overreacting however this is my passion and to see our work destroyed and my culture trampled on through cultural imperialism pains me. Please let me know what we can do to block this individual from deleting portions of our work. Either way we want to share our research on the the contemporary aristocracy with the wikipedia community. If not I would like to file a formal complaint. Sincerely,
Fabrizio Parisi
Professore di Storia e Filosofia
I wanted to add that this FactStraight appears to be menacing many other contributors as well. He has been blocked on countless occasions and has all but ruined our article. please can you assist? As i stated earlier I dont know how to use wikipedia and am getting quite frustrated. I will ask Sven if he can write to you as well. he tells me that you and he worked o the article together 3 months ago. Any assistance with this FactStraight will help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FabrizioParisi (talk • contribs) 14:08, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- I suppose now you've learned that you do not own the article that contains your contributions. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, and others are able to change what is written. It is best if folks discuss such changes on the talk page of the respect article. Hopefully in the past week or so you've learned a little more about how Wikipedia functions. Let me know if you need additional help. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 11:20, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 September 2011
- News and notes: 24,000 votes later and community position on image filter still unclear; first index of editor satisfaction appears positive
- WikiProject report: Riding with WikiProject London Transport
- Sister projects: Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Opinion essay: The copyright crisis, and why we should care
- Arbitration report: BLP case closed; Cirt-Jayen466 nearly there; AUSC reshuffle
The Signpost: 12 September 2011
- News and notes: Foundation reports on research, Kenya trip, Mumbai Wikiconference; Canada, Hungary and Estonia; English Wikinews forked
- WikiProject report: Politics in the Pacific: WikiProject Australian Politics
- Featured content: Wikipedians explain two new featured pictures
- Arbitration report: Ohconfucius sanctions removed, Cirt desysopped 6:5 and a call for CU/OS applications
- Technology report: What is: agile development? and new mobile site goes live
- Opinion essay: The Walrus and the Carpenter
The Signpost: 19 September 2011
- From the editor: Changes to The Signpost
- News and notes: Ushahidi research tool announced, Citizendium five years on: success or failure?, and Wikimedia DC officially recognised
- Sister projects: On the Wikinews fork
- WikiProject report: Back to school
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom narrowly rejects application to open new case
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.18 deployment begins, the alleged "injustice" of WMF engineering policy, and Wikimedians warned of imminent fix to magic word
- Popular pages: Article stats for the English Wikipedia in the last year
The Signpost: 26 September 2011
- Recent research: Top female Wikipedians, reverted newbies, link spam, social influence on admin votes, Wikipedians' weekends, WikiSym previews
- News and notes: WMF strikes down enwiki consensus, academic journal partnerships, and eyebrows raised over minors editing porn-related content
- In the news: Sockpuppeting journalist recants, search dominance threatened, new novels replete with Wikipedia references
- WikiProject report: A project in overdrive: WikiProject Automobiles
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 3 October 2011
- News and notes: Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy
- In the news: QRpedia launches to acclaim, Jimbo talks social media, Wikipedia attracts fungi, terriers and Greeks bearing gifts
- WikiProject report: Kia ora WikiProject New Zealand
- Featured content: Reviewers praise new featured topic: National treasures of Japan
- Arbitration report: Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 10 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians
- News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised
- In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist
- WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People
- Featured content: The weird and the disgusting
The Signpost: 17 October 2011
- News and notes: Arabic Wikipedia gets video intros, Smithsonian gifts images, and WikiProject Conservatism scrutinized
- In the news: Why Wikipedia survives while others haven't; Wikipedia as an emerging social model; Jimbo speaks out
- WikiProject report: History in your neighborhood: WikiProject NRHP
- Featured content: Brazil's boom-time dreams of naval power: The ed17 explains the background to a new featured topic
The Signpost: 24 October 2011
- From the editors: A call for contributors
- Opinion essay: There is a deadline
- Interview: Contracting for the Foundation
- WikiProject report: Great WikiProject Logos
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion; request for amendment on Climate Change case
- Technology report: WMF launches coding challenge, WMDE starts hiring for major new project
New Page Patrol survey
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Pdcook! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
- Done. Golly I hope I made a difference. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 23:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Happy Halloween
Puffin has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween! |
Puffin Let's talk! 18:28, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The monster under the rug
- Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified
- News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest
- Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful
- WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined
- Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked
A cookie for you!
Hello Pdcook! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 00:14, 2 November 2011 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 7 November2011
- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
The Signpost: 14 November 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released
- WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India
- Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding
The Signpost: 21 November 2011
- Discussion report: Much ado about censorship
- WikiProject report: Working on a term paper with WikiProject Academic Journals
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: End in sight for Abortion case, nominations in 2011 elections
- Technology report: Mumbai and Brighton hacked; horizontal lists have got class
Vandalism on WBBB page
I've noticed your edits on WBBB, and just want to inform you that there has been more vandalism on the page since your edit was made. Keep an eye out for these guys. Thanks! --Radiokid1010 (talk) 02:51, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 November 2011
- News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar
- In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars
- Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle
- Featured content: The best of the week
Question
Why did you revert my changes on Yoram Bauman?
Thanks
StandupComedyCenter (talk) 21:05, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
- Because it appears you have a conflict of interest. You added a link to a blog with which you are associated. Let me know if you have anymore questions. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 16:17, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 December 2011
- News and notes: Amsterdam gets the GLAM treatment, fundraising marches on, and a flourish of new admins
- In the news: A Wikistream of real time edits, a call for COI reform, and cracks in the ivory tower of knowledge
- Discussion report: Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship
- WikiProject report: This article is about WikiProject Disambiguation. For other uses...
- Featured content: This week's Signpost is for the birds!
Summit Series Conference / Summit Series (conference)
Hi there, Pdcook. Way back in 2009 you left a comment on the Talk page for Summit Series Conference suggesting the article be moved. I agree, and have in fact proposed a much-improved new draft. However, because I've engaged the article at Summit Series' request, I'm wary of making non-trivial edits without clear consensus. Would you be interested in looking at my suggested replacement version and, if you agree it's appropriate to move into place, saying so on that discussion page? Alternatively, if you have any questions or suggestions for improvement, I'm open to that as well. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 21:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 December 2011
- Opinion essay: Wikipedia in Academe – and vice versa
- News and notes: Research project banner ads run afoul of community
- In the news: Bell Pottinger investigation, Gardner on gender gap, and another plagiarist caught red-handed
- WikiProject report: Spanning Nine Time Zones with WikiProject Russia
- Featured content: Wehwalt gives his fifty cents; spies, ambushes, sieges, and Entombment
The Signpost: 19 December 2011
- News and notes: Anti-piracy act has Wikimedians on the defensive, WMF annual report released, and Indic language dynamics
- In the news: To save the wiki: strike first, then makeover?
- Discussion report: Polls, templates, and other December discussions
- WikiProject report: A dalliance with the dismal scientists of WikiProject Economics
- Featured content: Panoramas with Farwestern and a good week for featured content
- Arbitration report: The community elects eight arbitrators
The Signpost: 26 December 2011
- Recent research: Psychiatrists: Wikipedia better than Britannica; spell-checking Wikipedia; Wikipedians smart but fun; structured biological data
- News and notes: Fundraiser passes 2010 watermark, brief news
- WikiProject report: The Tree of Life
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, one set for acceptance, arbitrators formally appointed by Jimmy Wales
- Technology report: Wikimedia in Go Daddy boycott, and why you should 'Join the Swarm'
The Signpost: 02 January 2012
- Interview: The Gardner interview
- News and notes: Things bubbling along as Wikimedians enjoy their holidays
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Part III
- Featured content: Ghosts of featured content past, present, and future
- Arbitration report: New case accepted, four open cases, terms begin for new arbitrators
The Signpost: 09 January 2012
- Technological roadmap: 2011's technological achievements in review, and what 2012 may hold
- News and notes: Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang
- WikiProject report: From Traditional to Experimental: WikiProject Jazz
- Featured content: Contentious FAC debate: a week in review
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Betacommand 3
The Signpost: 16 January 2012
- Special report: English Wikipedia to go dark on January 18
- Sister projects: What are our sisters up to now?
- News and notes: WMF on the looming SOPA blackout, Wikipedia turns 11, and Commons passes 12 million files
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Beer
- Featured content: Lecen on systemic bias in featured content
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, Betacommand case deadlocked, Muhammad images close near
City mayors by state templates
I see you have created several of these (CT, IA, MN, OK, OR, UT, WI). The first deletion discussion is occurring at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2012_January_24#Template:New_York_cities_and_mayors_of_100.2C000_population.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:46, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification! P. D. Cook Talk to me! 13:40, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 January 2012
- News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership
- WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto
- Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications
- Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues
A request for comments has been opened on administrator User:Fæ. You are being notified due to your prior participation in ANI, RfA, or RfC discussions regarding this user. Thank you, MadmanBot (talk) 19:54, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 January 2012
- In the news: Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation über alles, editor engagement and the innovation plateau
- Recent research: Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Wikipedia compared to commercial databases
- WikiProject report: Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology
- Featured content: Featured content soaring this week
- Arbitration report: Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases
- Technology report: Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19
The Signpost: 06 February 2012
- News and notes: The Foundation visits Tunisia, analyzes donors
- In the news: Leading scholar hails Wikipedia, historians urged to contribute while PR pros remain shunned
- Discussion report: Discussion swarms around Templates for deletion and returning editors of colourful pasts
- WikiProject report: The Eye of the Storm: WikiProject Tropical Cyclones
- Featured content: Talking architecture with MrPanyGoff
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, final decision in Muhammad images, Betacommand 3 near closure
The Signpost: 13 February 2012
- Special report: Fundraising proposals spark a furore among the chapters
- News and notes: Foundation launches Legal and Community Advocacy department
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Stub Sorting
- Featured content: The best of the week
The article Moulshree Sachdeva has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ukexpat (talk) 16:12, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification. I added an external link, but it's weak. My heart won't be broken if the article is deleted. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 00:32, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 February 2012
- Special report: The plight of the new page patrollers
- News and notes: Fundraiser row continues, new director of engineering
- Discussion report: Discussion on copyrighted files from non-US relation states
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Poland
- Featured content: The best of the week
DRV notice
You participated in the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 January 24#Template:New York cities and mayors of 100.2C000 population. Be advised that I have opened Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 February 27#User:TonyTheTiger/New York cities and mayors of 100,000 population.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification. I would comment, but it's already been overturned. Thanks. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 13:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 February 2012
- News and notes: Finance meeting fallout, Gardner recommendations forthcoming
- Recent research: Gender gap and conflict aversion; collaboration on breaking news; effects of leadership on participation; legacy of Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Focus on admin conduct and editor retention
- WikiProject report: Just don't call it "sci-fi": WikiProject Science Fiction
- Arbitration report: Final decision in TimidGuy ban appeal, one case remains open
- Technology report: 1.19 deployment stress, Meta debates whether to enforce SUL
The Signpost: 05 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapter-selected Board seats, an invite to the Teahouse, patrol becomes triage, and this week in history
- In the news: Heights reached in search rankings, privacy and mental health info; clouds remain over content policing
- Discussion report: COI and NOTCENSORED: policies under discussion
- WikiProject report: We don't bite: WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
- Featured content: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments announced, one case remains open
The Signpost: 12 March 2012
- Interview: Liaising with the Education Program
- Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters
- Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators
- Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History
- Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case
- Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
The Signpost: 19 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts
- Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again
- WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas
- Featured content: Featured content on the upswing!
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting
The Signpost: 26 March 2012
- News and notes: Controversial content saga continues, while the Foundation tries to engage editors with merchandising and restructuring
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Rock Music
- Featured content: Malfunctioning sharks, toothcombs and a famous mother: featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review at evidence, article titles closed
- Recent research: Predicting admin elections; studying flagged revision debates; classifying editor interactions; and collecting the Wikipedia literature
- Education report: Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.
The Signpost: 02 April 2012
- Interview: An introduction to movement roles
- Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal
- News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Wikipedia's day of mischief
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
- Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case
The Signpost: 09 April 2012
- News and notes: Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee
- WikiProject report: The Land of Steady Habits: WikiProject Connecticut
- Featured content: Assassination, genocide, internment, murder, and crucifixion: the bloodiest of the week
- Arbitration report: Arbitration evidence-limit motions, two open cases
The Signpost: 16 April 2012
- Arbitration analysis: Inside the Arbitration Committee Mailing List
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren
- Discussion report: The future of pending changes
- WikiProject report: The Butterflies and Moths of WikiProject Lepidoptera
- Featured content: A few good sports: association football, rugby league, and the Olympics vie for medals
The Signpost: 23 April 2012
- Investigative report: Spin doctors spin Jimmy's "bright line"
- WikiProject report: Skeptics and Believers: WikiProject The X-Files
- Featured content: A mirror (or seventeen) on this week's featured content
- Arbitration report: Evidence submissions close in Rich Farmbrough case, vote on proposed decision in R&I Review
- Technology report: Wikimedia Labs: soon to be at the cutting edge of MediaWiki development?
The Signpost: 30 April 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth
- Discussion report: 'ReferenceTooltips' by default
- WikiProject report: The Cartographers of WikiProject Maps
- Featured content: Featured content spreads its wings
- Arbitration report: R&I Review remains in voting, two open cases
My RFA
Hi, I just wanted to leave a note saying thank you for partcipating in my RFA, and your comments will be taken on board and acted upon. Hopfully, I will be of a level you can support in a future RFA. MrLittleIrish (talk) © 13:12, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- Best of luck to you in all your future endeavors. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 15:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 May 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes
- News and notes: Hong Kong to host Wikimania 2013
- WikiProject report: Say What?: WikiProject Languages
- Featured content: This week at featured content: How much wood would a Wood Duck chuck if a Wood Duck could chuck wood?
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in Rich Farmbrough, two open cases
- Technology report: Search gets faster, GSoC gets more detail and 1.20wmf2 gets deployed
The Signpost: 14 May 2012
- WikiProject report: Welcome to Wikipedia with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse
- Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week
- Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure
A barnstar for you!
The Special Barnstar | |
Thanks for your contributions, Pdcook. SwisterTwister talk 00:29, 20 May 2012 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 21 May 2012
- From the editor: New editor-in-chief
- WikiProject report: Trouble in a Galaxy Far, Far Away....
- Featured content: Lemurbaby moves it with Madagascar: Featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: No open arbitration cases pending
- Technology report: On the indestructibility of Wikimedia content
The Signpost: 28 May 2012
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation endorses open-access petition to the White House; pending changes RfC ends
- Recent research: Supporting interlanguage collaboration; detecting reverts; Wikipedia's discourse, semantic and leadership networks, and Google's Knowledge Graph
- WikiProject report: Experts and enthusiasts at WikiProject Geology
- Featured content: Featured content cuts the cheese
- Arbitration report: Fæ and GoodDay requests for arbitration, changes to evidence word limits
- Technology report: Developer divide wrangles; plus Wikimedia Zero, MediaWiki 1.20wmf4, and IPv6
Thanks for !voting
at my successful RFA | |
Thank you, Pdcook, for !voting at my successful RFA; I am humbled that you put your trust in me. I grant you this flower, which, if tended to properly, will grow to be the fruit of Wikipedia's labours. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:33, 3 June 2012 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 04 June 2012
- Special report: WikiWomenCamp: From women, for women
- Discussion report: Watching Wikipedia change
- WikiProject report: Views of WikiProject Visual Arts
- Featured content: On the lochs
- Arbitration report: Two motions for procedural reform, three open cases, Rich Farmbrough risks block and ban
- Technology report: Report from the Berlin Hackathon
The Signpost: 11 June 2012
- News and notes: Foundation finance reformers wrestle with CoI
- WikiProject report: Counter-Vandalism Unit
- Featured content: The cake is a pi
- Arbitration report: Procedural reform enacted, Rich Farmbrough blocked, three open cases
The Signpost: 18 June 2012
- Investigative report: Is the requests for adminship process 'broken'?
- News and notes: Ground shifts while chapters dither over new Association
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: The Punks of Wikipedia
- Featured content: Taken with a pinch of "salt"
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, GoodDay case closed
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 25 June 2012
- WikiProject report: Summer Sports Series: WikiProject Athletics
- Featured content: A good week for the Williams
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Second Visual Editor prototype launches
The Signpost: 02 July 2012
- Analysis: Uncovering scientific plagiarism
- News and notes: RfC on joining lobby group; JSTOR accounts for Wikipedians and the article feedback tool
- In the news: Public relations on Wikipedia: friend or foe?
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: Burning rubber with WikiProject Motorsport
- Featured content: Heads up
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, motion for the removal of Carnildo's administrative tools
- Technology report: Initialisms abound: QA and HTML5
The Signpost: 09 July 2012
- Special report: Reforming the education programs: lessons from Cairo
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Football
- Featured content: Keeps on chuggin'
- Arbitration report: Three requests for arbitration
The Signpost: 16 July 2012
- Special report: Chapters Association mired in controversy over new chair
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: French WikiProject Cycling
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- Featured content: Taking flight
- Technology report: Tech talks at Wikimania amid news of a mixed June
- Arbitration report: Fæ faces site-ban, proposed decisions posted
messaging
I got a message saying that an edit of mine had been been refused - I don't know who edited what but it wasn't me. I have never submitted an edit at all. Gjthomas (talk) 13:48, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- I'll need some context here. I checked your contributions, and there's nothing there. Did you create a page and it was later deleted? Did you edit using a different account? P. D. Cook Talk to me! 13:51, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 July 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia pay? The skeptic: Orange Mike
- From the editor: Signpost developments
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Olympics
- Arbitration report: Fæ and Michaeldsuarez banned; Kwamikagami desysopped; Falun Gong closes with mandated external reviews and topic bans
- Featured content: When is an island not an island?
- Technology report: Translating SVGs and making history bugs history
The Signpost: 30 July 2012
- News and notes: Wikimedians and London 2012; WMF budget – staffing, engineering, editor retention effort, and the global South; Telegraph's cheap shot at WP
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Horse Racing
- Featured content: One of a kind
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
The Signpost: 06 August 2012
- News and notes: FDC portal launched
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
- Featured content: Casliber's words take root
- Technology report: Wikidata nears first deployment but wikis go down in fibre cut calamity
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Martial Arts
The Signpost: 13 August 2012
- Op-ed: Small Wikipedias' burden
- Arbitration report: You really can request for arbitration
- Featured content: On the road again
- Technology report: "Phabricating" a serious alternative to Gerrit
- WikiProject report: Dispute Resolution
- Discussion report: Image placeholders, machine translations, Mediation Committee, de-adminship
Nomination of Nang Jang for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nang Jang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nang Jang until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
Notifying you as a past editor as a courtesy. --KGF0 ( T | C ) 02:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 August 2012
- In the news: American judges on citing Wikipedia
- Featured content: Enough for a week – but I'm damned if I see how the helican.
- Technology report: Lua onto test2wiki and news of a convention-al extension
- WikiProject report: Land of Calm and Contrast: Korea
The Signpost: 27 August 2012
- News and notes: Tough journey for new travel guide
- Technology report: Just how bad is the code review backlog?
- Featured content: Wikipedia rivals The New Yorker: Mark Arsten
- WikiProject report: From sonic screwdrivers to jelly babies: Doctor Who
The Signpost: 03 September 2012
- Technology report: Time for a MediaWiki Foundation?
- Featured content: Wikipedia's Seven Days of Terror
The Signpost: 10 September 2012
- From the editor: Signpost adapts as news consumption changes
- Featured content: Not a "Gangsta's Paradise", but still rappin'
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Fungi
- Special report: Two Wikipedians set to face jury trial
- Technology report: Mmmm, milkshake...
- Discussion report: Closing Wikiquette; Image Filter; Education Program and Momento extensions
The Signpost: 17 September 2012
- From the editor: Signpost expands to Facebook
- WikiProject report: Action! — The Indian Cinema Task Force
- Featured content: Go into the light
- Technology report: Future-proofing: HTML5 and IPv6
The Signpost: 24 September 2012
- In the media: Editor's response to Roth draws internet attention
- Recent research: "Rise and decline" of Wikipedia participation, new literature overviews, a look back at WikiSym 2012
- WikiProject report: 01010010 01101111 01100010 01101111 01110100 01101001 01100011 01110011
- News and notes: UK chapter rocked by Gibraltar scandal
- Technology report: Signpost investigation: code review times
- Featured content: Dead as...
- Discussion report: Image filter; HotCat; Syntax highlighting; and more
The Signpost: 01 October 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Founder: Jimmy Wales
- News and notes: Independent review of UK chapter governance; editor files motion against Wikitravel owners
- Featured content: Mooned
- Technology report: WMF and the German chapter face up to Toolserver uncertainty
- WikiProject report: The Name's Bond... WikiProject James Bond
The Signpost: 08 October 2012
- News and notes: Education Program faces community resistance
- WikiProject report: Ten years and one million articles: WikiProject Biography
- Featured content: A dash of Arsenikk
- Discussion report: Closing RfAs: Stewards or Bureaucrats?; Redesign of Help:Contents
The Signpost: 15 October 2012
- In the media: Wikipedia's language nerds hit the front page
- Featured content: Second star to the left
- News and notes: Chapters ask for big bucks
- Technology report: Wikidata is a go: well, almost
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemicals
The article Bhojpur, Bihar needs improvement
Your article is well-written but most of it's data is not sourced and unreferenced. Please verify and improve and add citation to support your word. Or else it will be published for deletion as a stub. adnan.jsr (talk · contribs)MAShaikh 11:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 October 2012
- Special report: Examining adminship from the German perspective
- Arbitration report: Malleus Fatuorum accused of circumventing topic ban; motion to change "net four votes" rule
- Technology report: Wikivoyage migration: technical strategy announced
- Discussion report: Good articles on the main page?; reforming dispute resolution
- News and notes: Wikimedians get serious about women in science
- WikiProject report: Where in the world is Wikipedia?
- Featured content: Is RfA Kafkaesque?
The Signpost: 29 October 2012
- News and notes: First chickens come home to roost for FDC funding applicants; WMF board discusses governance issues and scope of programs
- WikiProject report: In recognition of... WikiProject Military History
- Technology report: Improved video support imminent and Wikidata.org live
- Featured content: On the road again
The Signpost: 05 November 2012
- Op-ed: 2012 WikiCup comes to an end
- News and notes: Wikimedian photographic talent on display in national submissions to Wiki Loves Monuments
- In the media: Was climate change a factor in Hurricane Sandy?
- Discussion report: Protected Page Editor right; Gibraltar hooks
- Featured content: Jack-O'-Lanterns and Toads
- Technology report: Hue, Sqoop, Oozie, Zookeeper, Hive, Pig and Kafka
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Songs
The Signpost: 12 November 2012
- News and notes: Court ruling complicates the paid-editing debate
- Featured content: The table has turned
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.20 and the prospects for getting 1.21 code reviewed promptly
- WikiProject report: Land of parrots, palm trees, and the Holy Cross: WikiProject Brazil
The Signpost: 19 November 2012
- News and notes: FDC's financial muscle kicks in
- WikiProject report: No teenagers, mutants, or ninjas: WikiProject Turtles
- Technology report: Structural reorganisation "not a done deal"
- Featured content: Wikipedia hit by the Streisand effect
- Discussion report: GOOG, MSFT, WMT: the ticker symbol placement question
The Signpost: 26 November 2012
- News and notes: Toolserver finance remains uncertain
- Recent research: Movie success predictions, readability, credentials and authority, geographical comparisons
- Featured content: Panoramic views, history, and a celestial constellation
- Technology report: Wikidata reaches 100,000 entries
- WikiProject report: Directing Discussion: WikiProject Deletion Sorting
The Signpost: 03 December 2012
- News and notes: Wiki Loves Monuments announces 2012 winner
- Featured content: The play's the thing
- Discussion report: Concise Wikipedia; standardize version history tables
- Technology report: MediaWiki problems but good news for Toolserver stability
- WikiProject report: The White Rose: WikiProject Yorkshire
The Signpost: 10 December 2012
- News and notes: Wobbly start to ArbCom election, but turnout beats last year's
- Featured content: Wikipedia goes to Hell
- Technology report: The new Visual Editor gets a bit more visual
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Human Rights
The Signpost: 17 December 2012
- News and notes: Arbitrator election: stewards release the results
- WikiProject report: WikiProjekt Computerspiel: Covering Computer Games in Germany
- Discussion report: Concise Wikipedia; section headings for navboxes
- Op-ed: Finding truth in Sandy Hook
- Featured content: Wikipedia's cute ass
- Technology report: MediaWiki groups and why you might want to start snuggling newbie editors
Invitation to WikiProject Brands
Hello, Pdcook.
You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics. |
---|
The Signpost: 24 December 2012
- WikiProject report: A Song of Ice and Fire
- Featured content: Battlecruiser operational
- Technology report: Efforts to "normalise" Toolserver relations stepped up
Medical English class
Hi! I'm a Wikipedian and English teacher in Mexico. I'll be teaching a class in medical English using Wikipedia starting in January. If you'd like to help us out, that would be great!!!!!--Thelmadatter (talk) 23:10, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
- I'd love to, but I'm way too busy with my own classes!P. D. Cook Talk to me! 16:07, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 December 2012
- From the editor: Wikipedia, our Colosseum
- In the media: Is the Wikimedia movement too 'cash rich'?
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser a success; Czech parliament releases photographs to chapter
- Technology report: Looking back on a year of incremental changes
- Discussion report: Image policy and guidelines; resysopping policy
- Featured content: Whoa Nelly! Featured content in review
- WikiProject report: New Year, New York
- Recent research: Wikipedia and Sandy Hook; SOPA blackout reexamined
The Signpost: 07 January 2013
- WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Episode IV: A New Year
- News and notes: 2012—the big year
- Featured content: Featured content in review
- Technology report: Looking ahead to 2013
The Signpost: 14 January 2013
- Investigative report: Ship ahoy! New travel site finally afloat
- News and notes: Launch of annual picture competition, new grant scheme
- WikiProject report: Reach for the Stars: WikiProject Astronomy
- Discussion report: Flag Manual of Style; accessibility and equality
- Special report: Loss of an Internet genius
- Featured content: Featured articles: Quality of reviews, quality of writing in 2012
- Arbitration report: First arbitration case in almost six months
- Technology report: Intermittent outages planned, first Wikidata client deployment