User talk:Parmin khosravi

December 2022

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Halva—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

مشکل از کجاست ؟! Parmin khosravi (talk) 12:35, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

sorry, But where does the problem come from? Parmin khosravi (talk) 12:35, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

I apologize, but your information was wrong. In Iran, halva is served both hot and cold, and between cold and hot temperatures Parmin khosravi (talk) 12:38, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Halva. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:00, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Your information is wrong or insufficient and it causes the reader to mislead and get wrong information, what is your purpose of giving insufficient information, you are a robot?! I don't think you can recover your data. Parmin khosravi (talk) 22:30, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

It does not matter what we know, we must cite reliable references together with our additions to Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 23:37, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

But when it comes to culture, you have to find information about that country, which may not be on all sites. I only improved the information about my country because I only had information about it. You used very bad pictures that lack Iranian culture and reality. . Parmin khosravi (talk) 23:46, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

I don't think calling that edit vandalism was correct because the information you changed and removed did not have any WP:SOURCES. However I agree that you should learn WP:RS. Invasive Spices (talk) 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Materialscientist/DYKs

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, User talk:Materialscientist/DYKs, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 23:29, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

why? for what?! Parmin khosravi (talk) 23:59, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

CS1 error on Sardis

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sardis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Sardis

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sardis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:23, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Parmin khosravi! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! LouisAragon (talk) 17:38, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

Hello, I'm LouisAragon. An edit that you recently made to Sardis seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. - LouisAragon (talk) 17:38, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Hello, I'm Semsûrî. I noticed that you recently removed content from Karim Khan Zand without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Semsûrî (talk) 14:54, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Vandalism-only account/ WP:CIR problems with User:Parmin_khosravi. Thank you.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 16:21, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, you're ruffling a lot of feathers here. I appreciate your efforts to improve our Iranian articles and I want you to be successful. Please take a look at this summary of the 5 pillars our project is built on:

• Wikipedia:Five pillars

I suggest you slow down and discuss your proposed changes on the article talk pages first before making them. I think this will make things easier for you.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 17:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Take a look at these links:

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Intertranswiki/Persian
  • Your language skills may be useful

There are special instructions to follow at:

• • • Help:Translation
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Iran - you can ask for help with Iranian topics at:
  • Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Iran
• Category:User fa - other Farsi speakers on en.wikipedia]]

Thanks for your interest in improving our coverage of Iran-related topics. Don't forget to use those article talk pages!

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 01:11, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Hello, I'm Mako001. An edit you recently made to Ardaseer Cursetjee seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 11:28, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Jasmine etymology

On my talk page, you said: "About the contents of Jasmin flower, what are you manipulating for?! Subversive manipulation. In the mentioned sources, the wrong thing that you, for example, corrected, was never mentioned. And from the scientific point of view, this word entered Turkish through the Persian language, not Arabic."

The description of the word origin in the article is cited and almost verbatim from the sources, Merriam-Webster and OED: "from Arabic yas(a)min, from Persian yasmin". There is no source for the statement, "entered Turkish through the Persian language, not Arabic." If you have a WP:RS source for that content, you should add it. Zefr (talk) 03:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

First of all, such a thing is not mentioned in the mentioned source and I did not find it, secondly, your argument is that this is something that is not proven by the photo, so it is definitely true and you allow yourself to include such a thing on the Wikipedia site, that too from a source. which is a site, not historical and scientific evidence of a word.Your manipulation is destructive and with a specific purpose. Parmin khosravi (talk) 11:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

And your explanation about this word in Arabic and Farsi is completely wrong, The word Yasmin entered Arabic in the same Persian form, the only difference is that they say Yasmin in the pronunciation form "Yasmein" یاسمِین or یاسمینة I recommend to do at least a simple search in Arabic translations and Arabic names Parmin khosravi (talk) 12:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Jasmine) for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit _(blether) 12:42, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

You have been edit warring at that article, where you have been reverted by two separate experienced users. You know that your edits are contested - the onus is on you to make your argument at its talk page, rather than reinstating your preferred version. This is a short, partial block - be advised that repeated instances of edit warring will likely result in longer, site-wide blocks. Girth Summit _(blether) 12:44, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

First of all, I stated my argument completely logically and with documents, while the verified user, the manipulator, without any logic, started to delete and post false content without documents and evidence, and started writing and editing as they wished, even when historical and scientific documents They were saying something else, he started to remove the scientific material, apart from the false material he had included. And you approved the false and baseless editing of this user because it should be discussed?! I think the only thing that is being discussed is the question of who approved these users who do any destructive manipulation and get a seal of approval from another user... Parmin khosravi (talk) 13:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

I find it difficult to make sense of what you're saying here, but from what I can see on your talk page contributions, I don't see any references to sources at all, and I see a lot of accusations about others. I have no view on who is right or wrong about the content, and I don't 'approve' anything - I'm here because of your conduct. You can't accuse people of manipulation like that, it is not civil, and you cannot reinstate your preferred version without gaining consensus after being reverted. Girth Summit _(blether) 13:18, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit _(blether) 13:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Since you have gone on to disparage another user who reverted your edits, I have changed your block to a site-wide one. You need to assume good faith of other contributors - assume that they're acting to preserve the quality of the encyclopedia, even if you think they are mistaken in their edits. If you believe that your edits to that page are correct, and you can point to some reliable sources that support your view, you are welcome to go to the article's talk page and make your case after your block expires. Be careful to ensure that any arguments you make are based on sources, and avoid commenting on other editors' motivations: comment on content, not contributor. If you continue accusing others of bad faith actions like manipulating the article, you'll end up indefinitely blocked. Girth Summit _(blether) 13:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

There is definitely a reason to accuse a person of bad intentions, someone who does not accept logic and questions the truth to write the content as he wants. And then they start deleting real content and yes, it is definitely with good intentions.When a subversive work is approved by a user who does not accept logic and documentation and only wants to write what he wants, oh, you are right, we should definitely not say anything to the editor and the Wikipedia policy that approves such users, we must repeat the sentences. Which the manipulative editor doesn't see because he definitely has good intentions. Parmin khosravi (talk) 14:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

The sarcastic responses are not helping your cause here - is it really with throwing around such accusations over the etymological history of a simple word? I am quite sure that the other editors are just attempting to faithfully reflect what the relevant sources say, and I haven't seen you make a coherent explanation anywhere of why those sources are wrong. I'm not the one to discuss that with however, you need to do that on the article talkpage when the block expires. As an aside, was the IP editor who just tried to reinstate your edit you? Girth Summit _(blether) 14:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

I referred the person to the sources he specified and the sources mentioned in them and said that there is nothing about this there, and this person said that if he did not violate it, then the opposite is definitely true, this person's argument was not Violation of their own hypothesis caused editing and subversive manipulation of the material and replacing Arabic instead of Persian, he wanted to put it under him. And later, he started to delete other contents, including how to transfer this name from Persian to Arabic, from Persian to Turkish and French, and... and the Arabs attacked a country called Iran. Even though his sources were a site and not a solid and real source. In spite of what I said many times, this person constantly manipulated the contents without paying attention to the truth. Then you are here for my behavior?! It sounds like you are here for your own behavior. Let's say you were here for my behavior, then you, a verified user, supported subversive manipulation and allowed the deletion and insertion of lies because of another person's behavior?! He definitely behaved for a reason. Such as false insertions, malicious manipulation. Parmin khosravi (talk) 14:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

I'm trying to help you here, but you're not making it easy. There are some rules here about editing. First: you don't insult people by accusing them of malice or manipulation. That is covered by WP:NPA, and if you do it again I will make the block indefinite and walk away; consider that a final warning. Second: if your edit is reverted, you don't reinstate it, you go to the article's talk page and discuss the change. If you can't convince others that your change is an improvement, then you don't reinstate the change. That is covered by WP:EW. Third: when your account is blocked, you may not make edits through an IP. That is called block evasion. You haven't answered my question about whether it was you editing the page through an IP recently. Girth Summit _(blether) 14:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Oh, I don't think you intend to help because your behavior showed that, instead of responding to a behavior, you question the truth and allow subversive manipulation and insertion of false content and target real content. That is against the behavior that was approved by a user in response to these destructive manipulations. You block a person for something, while you approve of the destructive manipulations and insertion of the desired content of a verified user. Do you think you really want to help?! Yes, the rules are more against a destructive manipulation than against a behavior.

I understand your question now, no. Parmin khosravi (talk) 14:58, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

I didn't make any sarcasm, I told the truth about people like you who support such users or stamp approval on subversive manipulation and inserting false content and deleting real content and writing as they please under the pretext that it is because of ethics. And when you wrote it yourself, oh my goodness, he looked at the good intention and definitely the verified user or your friend intended to improve the article by removing the real content and sabotage manipulation, while you yourself questioned the truth for "ethics". . In the meantime, I referred that person to the mentioned sources that they claimed with, and to the sources mentioned in the same sources and wrote "nothing there said such a thing", while your verified user wrote the opposite, so He definitely allowed himself to write false content based on his own assumptions that his verified sources did not refute. And you put a stamp of approval on such content, all Wikipedia content is written like this?! Parmin khosravi (talk) 14:42, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

I did not understand your last question. Parmin khosravi (talk) 14:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit _(blether) 14:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

I don't know what sort of online forums you're used to using, but I don't think you're temperamentally suited to this environment. You're turning a disagreement about the etymology of the name of a plant into an excuse to insult everyone you come into contact with. If you want to contribute here, you're going to need to convince another administrator that you can do so in a civil, collegiate manner. Best wishes. Girth Summit _(blether) 14:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Oh, I didn't insult you. You insulted yourself by supporting destructive manipulation and removing the truth, and the discussion is not about the plant at all. What is written here about the plant does not tell all the facts. It is about your behavior and supporting destructive manipulation. You didn't look because of, for example, the insults. You only saw the insults because the response to an insult that comes from your behavior in this environment where the inclusion of, for example, the truth is important to you is more important than responding to a destructive manipulation of a verified user and posting It is his choice. Parmin khosravi (talk) 15:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)