Jump to content

User talk:Osvaldo2007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Osvaldo2007, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 20:38, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Osvaldo2007, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Osvaldo2007! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bsoyka (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Thomas Adams (chewing gum maker) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:03, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guerreros Unidos Cartel moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Guerreros Unidos Cartel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 19:49, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agencia de Investigación Criminal moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Agencia de Investigación Criminal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. nearlyevil665 19:17, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agencia de Investigación Criminal (June 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mexican Criminal Investigation Agency (June 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:36, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mexican Criminal Investigation Agency has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mexican Criminal Investigation Agency. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:37, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Safe Veracruz moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Operation Safe Veracruz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 20:29, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oyindamola Adejumo Ayibiowu (June 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.
You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Tol | talk | contribs 21:33, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mexican Criminal Investigation Agency (June 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 00:01, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Safe Veracruz moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Operation Safe Veracruz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz Read! Talk! 01:56, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Osvaldo2007,
Once your articles have been moved to Draft space, you should submit them for AFC approval. Do not keep moving them back to main space as it is disruptive editing on your part and could lead to a loss of editing privileges. These AFC messages you have posted yourself to your talk page are not fooling anyone, you need your articles reviewed by an AFC reviewer. Liz Read! Talk! 02:02, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Osvaldo, as a further suggestion, you should avoid attempting to approve your own articles, as you not only lack permission to approve articles, but you engender extreme suspicion on the part of your fellow Wikipedia editors in doing so. This sort of behavior can lead to a sudden curtailment of your editing privileges.--Quisqualis (talk) 15:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. When an item you have created is declined you cannot simply move it to mainspace; it is declined so improvements can be made. Neither of the articles recently moved to mainspace are of sufficiebt standard to be accepted into the encyclopedia and to persistently return them to mainspace after draftification is disruptive and considered edit-warring and as noted above (by an administrator) could lead to the loss of editibg privileges. If an article is declined and then moved to mainspace (even if only once) it will often be proposed for deletion. You also seem to have sent yourself an acceptance notice which rates the item as 'yes-class' which is a non-excistent category. I would strongly suggest that you carefully study all the links you have been provided with in the welcome message; that way you will avoid the type of problem you are now encountering. Would also recommend a review of the guide to article creation and the manual of style. The tutorial may also assist you in the future. Eagleash (talk) 06:34, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dirección de Investigación y Seguridad Nacional moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Dirección de Investigación y Seguridad Nacional, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 03:12, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dirección de Investigación y Seguridad Nacional

[edit]
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Yes-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

1983kid (talk) 14:37, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dirección de Investigación y Seguridad Nacional moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Dirección de Investigación y Seguridad Nacional, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 16:55, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dirección de Investigación y Seguridad Nacional (June 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 16:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dirección de Investigación y Seguridad Nacional (June 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:36, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/1983kid, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:56, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dirección de Investigación y Seguridad Nacional (June 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hatchens were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hatchens (talk) 16:11, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia appeal key: e0db1aade4585799848fc1d32e528667

UTRS 44571

[edit]

UTRS appeal #44571 is now closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 45285

[edit]

UTRS appeal #45285 has been closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinación de Métodos de Investigación moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Coordinación de Métodos de Investigación, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 22:44, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dirección de Investigación y Seguridad Nacional

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Osvaldo2007. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dirección de Investigación y Seguridad Nacional, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Operation Safe Veracruz

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Osvaldo2007. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Operation Safe Veracruz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dirección de Investigación y Seguridad Nacional

[edit]

Hello, Osvaldo2007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dirección de Investigación y Seguridad Nacional".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:30, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Operation Safe Veracruz

[edit]

Hello, Osvaldo2007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Operation Safe Veracruz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:16, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Coordinación de Métodos de Investigación

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Osvaldo2007. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Coordinación de Métodos de Investigación, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mexican Criminal Investigation Agency

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Osvaldo2007. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mexican Criminal Investigation Agency, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Coordinación de Métodos de Investigación

[edit]

Hello, Osvaldo2007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Coordinación de Métodos de Investigación".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mexican Criminal Investigation Agency

[edit]

Hello, Osvaldo2007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mexican Criminal Investigation Agency".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:New Blood Zeta

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Osvaldo2007. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:New Blood Zeta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:New Blood Zeta

[edit]

Hello, Osvaldo2007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "New Blood Zeta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Osvaldo2007&oldid=1248739360"